WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Integrated circuit testing apparatus and method    
United States Patent5502397   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5502397.html
Inventor(s)Buchanan; James M. (Austin, TX)
AbstractDisclosed is a method and apparatus for the testing of an integrated circuit which is packaged in a housing with leads projecting from the housing and contact elements disposed along one or more of the surfaces of the housing. In the apparatus a plurality of electrical or electronic devices may be temporarily connected to the contact elements during testing of the integrated circuit at an automatic handler test station.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5502397
Integrated circuit testing apparatus and method - US Patent 5502397 Drawing
Integrated circuit testing apparatus and method
Inventor     Buchanan; James M. (Austin, TX)
Owner/Assignee     Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     March 26, 1996
Application Number     07/975,475
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     November 12, 1992
US Classification     324/754 324/755
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Nguyen; Vinh P.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Jenkins & Gilchrist
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     324/158F 324/158P 324/750 324/754 324/725 324/73.1 324/761 324/762 324/158.1 324/765 324/755 439/68 439/69 439/70 439/482
Patent Tags     integrated circuit testing
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5347217
Armstrong et al.

Sep,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5208529
Tsurishima et al.

May,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5202622
Cole et al.

Apr,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5175491
Ewers

Dec,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5156649
Compton et al.

Oct,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5130644
Ott

Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5132613
Papae et al.

Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5126657
Nelson

Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5109596
Driller et al.

May,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5092774
Milan

Mar,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5049813
Van Loan et al.

Sep,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4747784
Cedrone

May,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4734819
Hernandez et al.

Mar,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4689556
Cedrone

Aug,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. An automatic handler test station for testing an integrated circuit packaged in a housing having a plurality of leads projecting from said housing and a plurality of contact elements disposed along at least one surface of the housing, said handler test station comprising:

a test circuit board;

a contactor electrically connected to said test circuit board;

a plurality of electronic circuit components located externally of said integrated circuit and said housing;

a movable platform having a portion thereof disposed adjacent the housing of said integrated circuit and adapted to move the leads of said integrated circuit into temporary electrical contact with said contactor and the contact elements disposed on said housing of the integrated circuit into temporary electrical contact with said electronic circuit components located externally of said integrated circuit and said housing;

a printed circuit board disposed between said movable platform and said housing and having said electronic circuit components mounted thereon; and,

a plurality of pogo pins mounted to said printed circuit board and electrically connected to said electronic circuit components mounted on the printed circuit board, said pogo pins being configured for conductive engagement with said contact elements disposed along at least one surface of the housing of said integrated circuit when said leads are moved into electrical contact with said contactor during the testing of said integrated circuit at said handler test station.

2. The handler test station of claim 1 wherein said leads comprise a pin grid array, said contact elements include power pads and said electronic components include at least one power supply.

3. The handler test station of claim 1 wherein said leads comprise a pin grid array, said contact elements include capacitor pads and said electronic components include at least one decoupling capacitor.

4. The handler test station of claim 3 wherein said printed circuit board comprises a single layer of insulating substrate having a conducting surface which is divided into a plurality of conductive regions of positive potential and a plurality of conductive regions of negative potential, and wherein said electronic circuit components are connected between one of said plurality of positive regions and one of said plurality of negative regions.

5. The handler test station of claim 4 wherein said capacitor pads are located on the top surface of said housing, said printed circuit board is positioned above said housing and said pogo pins extend perpendicularly downward from said printed circuit board.

6. An integrated circuit testing apparatus including a handler test station used for the testing of an integrated circuit which is packaged in a housing with a plurality of leads along a bottom of the housing and a plurality of contact elements along a top surface of the housing, said handler test station comprising:

a movable plunger having a cup-shaped end disposed above the top surface of said housing;

a printed circuit board disposed within said cup-shaped end of said plunger and adapted for mounting a plurality of electronic circuit components thereon;

connectors extending downwardly from said member and arranged for engagement with said contact elements when said plunger is moved downwardly toward said housing during the testing of said integrated circuit,

a test circuit board disposed below said housing; and

a contactor disposed between said housing and said test circuit board for establishing electrical contact with said leads during the testing of said integrated circuit.

7. The handler test station of claim 6 wherein said connectors are pogo pins mounted to said printed circuit board.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to an improvement to the testing of integrated circuits ("ICs"), and more particularly, to an improved IC testing apparatus and method operating within an automated handler environment.

2. History of the Prior Art

Commercially-available ICs, i.e., semiconductor devices, are normally contained or packaged in a molded plastic housing having a generally rectangular, planar, box-like configuration. A typical IC package, commonly known as a "chip," includes one or more rows of evenly-spaced pins or leads extending perpendicularly from one face of the body and disposed along opposite and parallel sides of the body or, alternatively, along each side of the body. The semiconductor device may be a surface mounted device ("SMD") designed to be mounted directly on the surface of a circuit board or within a suitable receiving socket, or a dual-in-line packaged ("DIP") device intended for mounting with leads passing through the circuit board or within a suitable socket rather than for surface mounting.

Regardless of the nature of the semiconductor device or the specific manner of mounting, the reliability and functionality of the IC embodied in the device are important considerations for both manufacturers and users alike. A manufacturer, for example, may wish to inspect a production run or lot of semiconductor devices and discard those found to be defective. Additionally, the manufacturer would like to obtain a true and correct assessment of the capabilities of the device such as, for example, the maximum operating speed, which are directly related to the price the manufacturer can charge for the device. A customer, on the other hand, seeks an assurance that the device purchased from the manufacturer will perform according to manufacturer's specifications under real operating conditions.

A variety of manual and automatic apparatuses have been developed for testing the performance of a semiconductor device. In a manual testing apparatus, the operator manually places each device into a socket mounted on a test circuit board, conducts the test and then removes the device from the socket. By contrast, an automatic testing apparatus, commonly known as a "handler," includes a mechanism for automatically moving a plurality of devices, in sequence (one after the other) or in parallel (two or more together), into electrical contact with the testing board and for separating the defective devices from the fully functional devices in accordance with the test results.

The choice between a manual and an automatic testing apparatus has several implications. On the one hand, a manual testing apparatus using a socket mounted directly to the test circuit board offers an electromagnetic environment which approaches actual use. However, a manual test is both slow and time-consuming and requires frequent replacement of the sockets which tend to wear out rapidly. On the other hand, handlers have gained wide acceptance in the industry precisely because of their speed. Unfortunately, a handler tests the semiconductor device at a relatively remote location from the test circuit and/or the test measurement instrumentation and, therefore, in a suspect environment. To illustrate the importance of proximity of the semiconductor device to the test circuit, it is known, for example, that merely changing the lead length in a test situation by as little as a quarter inch from the actual use situation may lead to significant changes in the electrical response of the device under test.

In a typical handler, the device is momentarily brought to rest at a test station where a set of contacts are flexed or compressed by push bar action into electrical contact with the pins of the device. The contacts are usually a part of a probe or contactor assembly having an insulating base member on which the contacts are mounted. The contactor, therefore, establishes a signal path or link between the device and the testing apparatus. To determine whether a device is defective or functional, a series of test signals having a known response is generated by the testing apparatus and delivered by the contactor to the device. The response at some or all of the pins is then measured and compared to the expected response. If the results of the test do not match the predetermined responses, the device is considered to be defective or of an inferior performance grade, and may then be disposed of as appropriate. As explained below, however, this testing arrangement is plagued by a host of problems which undermine the integrity of the test itself.

One such problem arises from the inherent inductance of the contacts of the contactor. During a test, the test signal travelling through the contactor encounters an inductive reactance which is a function, in part, of the frequency of the test signal being applied. The test signal is usually "fast-rising," i.e, characterized by a very steep, step-like increase in voltage level of five (5) volts per nanosecond, for example. With the aid of Fourier analysis, such a test signal may be represented as a series of superimposed sine waves having frequencies which lie within a wide range or bandwidth, e.g. 0-300 MHz, and including very high frequency components. Since the inductive reactance of the contactor is proportional to the frequency of the test signal, a high test signal frequency implies a high inductive reactance. As is well known in the art, a high reactance produces distortions and reflections which degrade the quality and accuracy of the test. A description of various contactors directed to overcoming this problem may be seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,689,556 and 4,747,784, both to Cedrone, which disclose improved characteristic impedance or generally frequency insensitive contactor assemblies for testing semiconductor devices with fast rising signals.

A related problem to inductive reactance is the presence of ground or power supply noise, i.e., changes in the reference voltage caused by current surges during the test procedure. It is well known in the field of microelectronics that high frequency operation, particularly the switching of integrated circuits, can result in transient energy being coupled into the power supply circuit of a device under test. To illustrate, a change in the state of a device, e.g., conducting to non-conducting, during a test may produce a transient current surge in the range of 20 milli-amperes per nanosecond. Such a surge may, in turn, cause the ground reference voltage of the device to change by one volt or more thereby distorting test measurements referenced to ground and leading to the false rejection of devices which are not defective and which would otherwise be considered acceptable or, alternatively, to the false acceptance of actually defective devices.

Heretofore, in the use but not the testing of semiconductor devices, the decoupling of undesired high frequency noise or interference from the power supply has been accomplished by connecting one or more decoupling capacitors between the power and ground leads of a semiconductor device. Various connection schemes have been devised for this purpose. According to one such scheme, a capacitor is mounted on a multilayer printed circuit board ("PCB") having plated-through holes which are used to connect the capacitor to the internal power and ground planes which are, in turn, connected to the power and ground leads of the semiconductor device. In another scheme, which suffers from the disadvantage of higher inductance, the decoupling capacitor interconnects to the power and ground leads of the semiconductor device via traces on either a multilayer or double-sided PCB. The advantages and disadvantages of the foregoing and other decoupling techniques are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,819 to Hernandez et al. which generally discloses the use of a decoupling capacitor specifically sized and configured for mounting directly over a "leadless" surface mount semiconductor device, or under a "leaded" surface mount semiconductor device, and between the downwardly extending pins.

The use of decoupling capacitors in the testing of semiconductor devices has been far less effective than in actual operation where the decoupling capacitor may be positioned immediately adjacent to the semiconductor device on the PCB. Because of physical constraints in the testing environment, particularly the construction of the contactor, a decoupling capacitor could not be located sufficiently close to the semiconductor device undergoing testing to be equally effective in reducing noise. Specifically, it is known that a decoupling capacitor is not effective if located at a distance greater than a quarter inch from the device being tested. The configurations of prior art contactors have, however, precluded the location of decoupling capacitors within that critical distance. Furthermore, the construction of many prior contactors rendered the decoupling capacitors difficult to reach and sometimes completely inaccessible for repair or replacement. An attempt at overcoming some of these difficulties may be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,668,041 to La Komski et al. which discloses the use of pogo pins as contactors in a series of plates which together act as a decoupling capacitor.

Notwithstanding the improvements and solutions proposed in the prior art, the gap between the semiconductor device test environment and actual operating conditions continues to widen. While, as mentioned above, contactors have been developed with a view to minimizing the uncertainties introduced at the handler test station, the need for bridging the gap persists. Similarly, as the use of new and improved decoupling capacitors increases in actual operation, the need to duplicate their effectiveness during testing becomes more pronounced. While some have proposed the inclusion of decoupling capacitors inside a packaged semiconductor device, the scarcity of "real estate" or space, i.e., the packaging density, within the device and the diverging needs of customers militate against such a solution. In particular, even if the internal layout of the device permits the addition of decoupling capacitors to meet the requirements of a customer for whom high speed is the primary consideration, other, more cost-sensitive customers may not be willing or able to pay the higher price likely to be charged for such a package.

The present invention has been developed with the above and other engineering and economic considerations in mind. In general terms, the present invention provides a necessary tool designed to enhance the integrity and increase the accuracy of conventional IC testing apparatuses. More specifically, the present invention is particularly suited for the testing of semiconductor devices equipped with external contacts in addition to pins such as, for example, the decoupling "capacitor pads" described immediately below.

To facilitate the direct connection of decoupling capacitors to packaged semiconductor devices or chips for purposes of actual use, many manufacturers have recently begun to provide metallic capacitor pads across the top surface of the semiconductor device packages they manufacture. A typical capacitor pad consists of a pair of rectangular-shaped gold foils, one of which connects to the power plane and the other to the ground plane inside the semiconductor device package. A small surface mount capacitor, commonly known as a "chip capacitor," may be easily connected to the semiconductor device by, for example, soldering the capacitor to one of the capacitor pad pairs or by using conductive adhesives.

The availability of chip capacitor pads which can readily accommodate decoupling capacitors promotes a reduction in the length of the signal path and the value of the impedance which would otherwise be encountered were the signal or transient noise to travel from the semiconductor device through the PCB and to the decoupling capacitor as generally required in conventional or prior art decoupling arrangements. Manufacturers of semiconductor devices, however, are reluctant to indiscriminately impose on all their customers the additional costs associated with connecting decoupling capacitors to their chip capacitor pads. Such connection, therefore, is usually left to the individual customer who intends, for example, to use the semiconductor device in a system which has a low tolerance for noise or otherwise requires superior performance, and is not made, as a matter of course, at the factory.

Hence, while the customer may use a semiconductor device with decoupling capacitors directly connected to the capacitor pads, the manufacturer tests the same semiconductor device without the benefit of such decoupling capacitors and, thus, in a testing environment which is significantly different than the operating environment. As previously mentioned, the physical constraints of a conventional handler environment, including a conventional contactor, prevent the placement of a decoupling capacitor within an effective distance from the semiconductor device being tested. Consequently, a mechanism is needed to temporarily connect decoupling capacitors to the chip capacitor pads during testing so as to closely replicate actual operating conditions and fairly evaluate the expected performance of the semiconductor device when used in a customer's circuit.

It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide an improved testing apparatus and method within a handler environment which includes a mechanism for converging the measurements taken at the test station with the responses observed in actual operation.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a controlled electromagnetic testing environment which closely simulates actual use conditions.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a testing apparatus and method which allow for the convenient connection and disconnection of electrical or electronic components to a semiconductor device under test.

A further object of the present invention is to provide a testing environment which may be readily adapted to the requirements of the test.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method and an apparatus for the testing of an integrated circuit which is packaged in a housing having a plurality of leads and a plurality of contact elements. For purposes of the present invention, the term "leads," when used in connection with a packaged semiconductor device, includes generally cylindrical metallic pins, generally flat metallic leads and any other analogous or equivalent means for electrically connecting the integrated circuit inside the housing to circuits or components outside the housing. Similarly, the term "contact elements" includes generally flat metallic pads and any other analogous or equivalent means, other than the leads, for electrically connecting the integrated circuit inside the housing to circuits or components outside the housing.

In one aspect of the present invention, a method for the testing of an integrated circuit, which is packaged in a housing with a plurality of leads on one side of the housing and a plurality of contact elements on at least one other side of the housing, includes the steps of connecting the leads to a first test circuit and connecting the contact elements to a second test circuit. The first and second circuits may be mounted on first and second boards, respectively, in an automatic handler test station.

In another aspect of the present invention, an improved automatic handler test station which is used for the testing of an integrated circuit packaged in a housing with a plurality of leads projecting from the housing and a plurality of contact elements disposed along at least one surface of the housing, and which includes means for moving the leads into electrical contact with a contactor connected to a test circuit board, further includes means for temporarily connecting one or more electronic circuit components to the surface contact elements during the testing of the integrated circuit. The moving means may include, for example, a movable platform disposed adjacent to the housing of the integrated circuit. The connecting means may include, for example, a member disposed between the platform and the housing and adapted for mounting the electronic circuit components thereon. The connecting means may also include connectors electrically connected to the electronic circuit components and configured for conductive engagement with the surface contact elements when the leads are moved into electrical contact with the contactor during the testing of the integrated circuit at the handler test station.

In yet another aspect of the present invention, an improved method for testing an integrated circuit which is packaged in a housing with a plurality of leads projecting from the housing and a plurality of contact elements disposed along at least one surface of the housing, includes the steps of providing, in an automatic handler test station having a contactor connected to a test circuit board, a movable member to which one or more electronic circuit components may be connected; moving the leads into electrical contact with the contactor; and moving the member into electrical contact with the surface contact elements during the testing of the integrated circuit at the handler test station.

According to these and other aspects of the present invention, any of several desired values of an electrical or electronic variable, such as capacitance or power, may be provided for the integrated circuit being tested at the handler test station. The testing of the integrated circuit can thus be made to replicate the conditions of actual usage of the integrated circuit.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be better understood and its numerous objects and advantages will become apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the following drawings in which like numerals or numbers designate like objects:

FIG. 1 is a top planar view of a conventional packaged semiconductor device having a plurality of surface mount capacitor pads;

FIG. 2 is a side elevation view of the semiconductor device shown in FIG. 1 with decoupling capacitors connected to the capacitor pads for purposes of actual use;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional elevation view of an illustrative handler test station constructed in accordance with the present invention and including a decoupling printed circuit board for use in testing the semiconductor device shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a top planar view of one embodiment of the decoupling printed circuit board shown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a bottom planar view of the decoupling printed circuit board shown in FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 6--6 through the decoupling printed circuit board shown in FIGS. 4-5; and

FIG. 7 is a partially enlarged fragmentary cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the decoupling printed circuit board taken along a line similar to line 6--6 in FIGS. 4-5.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring first to FIG. 1, a top planar view of a conventional packaged semiconductor device having a plurality of surface mount capacitor pads may now be seen. The construction of the semiconductor device 10 is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and generally includes an integrated circuit (not shown) enclosed (packaged) within a dielectric housing 15 made, for example, of plastic or ceramic. A plurality of capacitor pads 20, each represented by a pair of rectangles marked with either a positive or a negative electrical sign (plus or minus), may be seen to form a cross-like pattern on the top surface of the housing 15. The plus-marked capacitor pads 20 are connected to the power plane, while the minus-marked capacitor pads 20 are connected to the ground plane, inside the housing 15. It should be clearly understood, however, that the size, shape or location of the capacitor pads 20 relative to the housing 15 are not material aspects of the present invention, and the specific arrangement actually shown on the top surface of the housing 15 in FIG. 1 is for illustration purposes only and is not intended as a limitation on the possible size, shape or location of the capacitor pads 20.

Referring next to FIG. 2, a side elevation view of the semiconductor device 10 shown in FIG. 1 may now be seen. In FIG. 2, a plurality of decoupling capacitors 25 are connected to the capacitor pads 20 (not shown in FIG. 2) for purposes of actual use in a circuit constructed on a printed circuit board (PCB) (also not shown in FIG. 2). The reasons for the use of the decoupling capacitors 25 have heretofore been discussed in detail and reference is hereby made to the Background of the Invention section set forth above as may be necessary for a complete understanding of the function of the decoupling capacitors 25. As will be readily recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art, the semiconductor device 10 includes a plurality of pins configured, for example, as a conventional pin grid array (PGA) 30 which can be used to connect the semiconductor device 10 to the PCB.

Referring now to FIG. 3, a cross-sectional elevation view of an illustrative handler test station constructed in accordance with the present invention may now be seen. It will be appreciated from the succeeding discussion that a variety of handlers may be used in implementing the concept of the present invention and, further, that the present invention may be adapted to a myriad of handler designs without compromising the teachings of the present invention. The illustrative handler test station 100 shown in FIG. 3 is part of an automatic handler which is sold under the brand name "Aetrium" and may be seen to include a plunger 35, a carrier 40, a contactor 45 and a test circuit board or motherboard 50. The plunger 35 of the Aetrium handler test station 100 has a cup-shaped lower end 55 which is generally referred to in the art as a "plunger cup." It should be noted that the lower ends of the plungers of other handlers may be flat-shaped or otherwise different from the plunger cup 55. However, in the prior art testing of a semiconductor device at the handler test station 100, the particular shape of the plunger cup 55 shown in FIG. 3 was found to provide the necessary "clearance" for any heat sinks residing on the top of the semiconductor device being tested.

While not all commercially available handlers include or require carriers, the Aetrium handler 100 uses the carrier 40 for the dual purposes of protecting the body and facilitating the movement of a certain semiconductor device to be tested, such as, for example, the semiconductor device 10 of FIGS. 1-2. The carrier 40 is fitted around the semiconductor device 10 at the entrance to the Aetrium handler and may be removed after the semiconductor device 10 has been tested at the test station 100. The contactor 45 may be any conventional contactor capable of establishing a connection between the semiconductor device 10 and the motherboard 50. Extending from the upper and lower sides of the contactor 45 in FIG. 3 are arrows 60, 65, respectively, which point in opposite directions. The upwardly pointing arrows 60 symbolize the contacts, e.g., spring-loaded pogo pins, which electrically link the contactor 45 with the semiconductor device 10 during testing at the handler station 100. The downwardly pointing arrows 65, on the other hand, symbolize any one of several conventional connection means between the contactor 45 and the motherboard 50.

At the start of a test session in which one or more semiconductor devices will be tested, i.e., during equipment set-up, the contactor 45 is connected to, or mated with, the motherboard 50. To perform a test on a particular semiconductor device, e.g., the semiconductor device 10 in FIG. 3, the semiconductor device 10, supported by the carrier 40, is momentarily brought to rest at the test station 100 and positioned between the plunger 35 and the contactor 45 such that the pogo pins 60 are in axial alignment with the pin grid array 30. The semiconductor device 10 is then pressed downward against the contactor 45 by the mechanical action of the plunger cup 55 which matingly engages the carrier 40 in a downward motion to the point of establishing electrical contact between the pin grid array 30 and the pogo pins 60. After a test signal has been applied to the semiconductor device 10 and the response measured, the mechanical force on the carrier 40 is released springing the pogo pins 60 back to their unbiased state and breaking the electrical connection between the semiconductor device 10 and the motherboard 50. The contactor 45 remains in continuous electrical contact with the motherboard 50 for the duration of the test session, i.e., until all other semiconductor devices have been similarly tested.

As described earlier, particularly in the Background of the Invention section hereof, testing a semiconductor device in the manner illustrated thus far suffers from certain shortcomings which have not heretofore been adequately addressed by the testing apparatuses of the prior art. To alleviate some of these concerns, the prior art has proposed, for example, the incorporation of a decoupling circuit 70 of the kind discussed above in the background of the invention within the contactor 45. While such an addition marks an improvement over other contactor assemblies, its effectiveness in simulating actual operating conditions is limited by, for example, the distance between the decoupling circuit 70 and the semiconductor device 10 during testing. The present invention achieves, among others, the goal of creating a test environment which closely approximates the real operating environment by providing a more effective mechanism for selectively influencing the operation of the semiconductor device 10 under test conditions.

Referring again to FIG. 3, an illustrative embodiment of the improvement which is the subject of the present invention may now be seen. In FIG. 3, a printed circuit board (PCB) 75 is seen disposed within the plunger cup 55 and above the semiconductor device 10 to be tested. A plurality of decoupling capacitors 80 are mounted on the PCB 75 and electrically connected to a plurality of low profile pogo pins 85 extending perpendicularly downward through the PCB 75. The decoupling capacitors 80 may be surface-mount, radial lead or axial lead capacitors.

As described above, during the testing of the semiconductor device 10, the plunger 35 pushes downward against the carrier 40 which supports the semiconductor device 10. In accordance with the present invention, as the plunger cup 55 descends upon the carrier 40 during testing of the semiconductor device 10, the pogo pins 85 move into contact with the corresponding capacitor pads 20 and connect the decoupling capacitors 80 to the integrated circuit within the semiconductor device 10. In this manner, the decoupling capacitors 80 may simulate for the duration of the test the operation of, for example, the decoupling capacitors 25 which are connected to the semiconductor device 10 in actual use. Once the test is completed, the downward force on the plunger cup 55 is released and the pogo pins 85 move up and away from the capacitor pads 20 disconnecting the decoupling capacitors 80 from the semiconductor device 10.

As well known in the art, the PCB 75 may be manufactured from one or more layers (laminate) of an insulating (dielectric) substrate having the desired thermoelectric or material properties for a particular application. Typical laminate materials in wide use today include FR4, plastic and polyimide. Each laminate is coated with a conducting metal sheet, e.g., copper foil, either on one side only or on both sides (top and bottom sides). The copper foil, without more, may act as a power or ground plane, i.e., may be connected to a power supply or ground (or some reference voltage) when in use. Alternatively, the copper foil may be chemically treated to provide point-to-point electrical connections for a printed circuit or for separately manufactured component parts. For this purpose, a resist is deposited on the copper foil in a predetermined pattern and exposed to light, if the resist is a photoresist which is photosensitive, or otherwise exposed through silkscreen printing. The exposed copper surfaces are then etched in a chemical bath which leaves a conductive pattern on the surface of the laminate.

As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, any one of a number of alternative embodiments of the PCB 75 may be used in the present invention depending on the needs of a particular application, the preferences of a particular user or the availability of constituent materials in stock at a particular moment in time. For example, the PCB 75 may be constructed from either a single layer or a plurality of layers of dielectric laminate. Furthermore, each dielectric laminate may have a copper foil only on one side or on both sides. In addition, each copper foil may be finished into a conductive pattern as described above. For clarity and convenience, the term "basic laminate" shall be used hereinafter to designate an insulating laminate having a metal, e.g., copper, foil layer on both the upper and lower sides, the term "single-sided laminate" shall be used hereinafter to designate a basic laminate having an etched conducting pattern on one side (upper or lower side), and the term "double-sided laminate" shall be used hereinafter to designate a basic laminate having an etched conducting pattern on each of its upper and lower sides.

Referring next to FIGS. 4-6, one embodiment of the PCB 75 may now be seen. FIG. 4 shows a top planar view while FIG. 5 shows a bottom planar view of the exemplary embodiment of the PCB 75. FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view taken along line 6--6 through the PCB 75 shown in FIGS. 4-5. For purposes of illustration, the PCB 75 in FIGS. 4-6 is shown to include only one double-sided laminate, i.e., one layer of insulating substrate having a conducting pattern on each of its upper and lower surfaces. Moreover, the conducting patterns on the single-layer PCB 75 shown in FIGS. 4-6 are exemplary only and represent but one of many possible layouts or decoupling schemes which may be used in accordance with the present invention.

With continuing reference to FIGS. 4-6, the upper surface (FIG. 4) and the lower surface (FIG. 5) of the PCB 75 include conductive regions of positive potential designated by a "+" (plus) sign and the alphanumeric characters 90a-j, and conductive regions of negative or ground potential designated by a "-" (minus) sign and the alphanumeric characters 95a-j. Each of the regions 90a-j and 95a-j is electrically connected, either directly or indirectly, to at least one of the pogo pins 85 which are positioned in holes drilled in the PCB 75 (FIG. 6). The pogo pins 85 extend perpendicularly downward through the plane of the PCB 75 with one end projecting from the upper surface and the other end projecting from the lower surface of the PCB 75. The holes for the pogo pins 85 may be plated-through (not shown) for mechanical strength and electrical conductivity.

The connection of the regions 90a-j and 95a-j to the pogo pins 85 may be made in any of several ways which are well known in the art. In the exemplary embodiment shown in FIGS. 4-6, each of the regions 90a-d and 95a-d on the upper surface of the PCB 75 (FIG. 4) is directly penetrated by a pair of pogo pins 85. The pairs of pogo pins 85 which penetrate regions 90b-c and 95b-c on the upper surface of the PCB 75 also penetrate regions 90i-j and 95i-j, respectively, on the lower surface of the PCB 75 (FIG. 5). Each of the pogo pins 85 is electrically connected to the corresponding region on the upper or lower surface of the PCB 75 by, for example, depositing a solder fillet (not shown) on the regional area immediately adjacent to the sides of the pogo pin. Connection of the remaining regions, 90e-h and 95e-h on the upper surface of the PCB 75 (FIG. 4), to the pogo pins 85 is made indirectly using through-hole "vias" (conductive connectors) 96 to the regions 90i-j and 95i-j on the lower surface of the PCB 75 (FIG. 5). The leftmost vias 96 in each of the regions 90i-j and 95i-j connect the pair of pogo pins 85 in that region to one of the regions 90e-f and 95e-f, respectively. Similarly, the rightmost vias 96 in each of the regions 90i-j and 95i-j connect the pair of pogo pins 85 in that region to one of the regions 90g-h and 95g-h, respectively.

Each of the decoupling capacitors 80 may be soldered to or otherwise connected between one of the positive regions 90a-j and one of the negative regions 95a-j in any conventional manner. FIG. 6 shows the connection of each of the decoupling capacitors 80 between one of the positive regions 90d, f, h and an adjacent one of the negative regions 95d, f, h on the upper surface of the PCB 75. During testing of the semiconductor device 10, the decoupling capacitors 80 will be connected to the semiconductor device when the pogo pins 85 come into contact with the chip capacitor pads 20.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 4-6, the pogo pins 85 are arranged in pairs in order to introduce redundancy in their alignment registration with the chip capacitor pads 20 so that at least one of the pogo pins 85 makes accurate and reliable contact with the corresponding one of the chip capacitor pads 20. Providing multiple connections to the capacitor pads 20 has the additional advantage of reducing electrical impedance and, hence, improving the performance of the decoupling circuit on the PCB 75. It will also be appreciated from the depiction in FIGS. 4-6 that many decoupling capacitors may be connected to the PCB 75 and prioritized such that capacitors with fast time constants are positioned close to the pogo pins 85 and those with slower time constants are positioned further away.
<