WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Method and apparatus for conditionally generating a microinstruction that selects one of two values based upon control states of a microprocessor    

Get related patents on CD
United States Patent5537560   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5537560.html
Inventor(s)Boggs; Darrell D. (Aloha, OR); Kyker; Alan B. (Portland, OR); Rodgers; Scott D. (Hillsboro, OR)
AbstractThe present invention provides a microinstruction for conditionally selecting one of two data values based upon control states of a processor. The microinstruction is preferably utilized in an out-of-order processor, although it may be used in conventional processors, to perform state dependent operations, including but not limited to privilege or mode sensitive instruction checking, privilege or mode sensitive algorithm execution and processor state updating. This is accomplished through the issuance from microcode to an execution unit upon decoding of a state dependent instruction a conditional move operation that takes advantage of condition resolving circuitry implemented within the execution unit. The execution unit's circuitry makes available processor state information in the form of result values that can be immediately used by the microinstruction upon its execution to resolve the conditions which it specifies. Upon immediate resolution of a specified condition, one of two values (or microcode temporary registers having values therein) is selected in order to properly complete the state dependent operation or to take other appropriate action such as posting a fault.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History Custom Search
Drawing from US Patent 5537560
Method and apparatus for conditionally generating a microinstruction

     that selects one of two values based upon control states of a

     microprocessor - US Patent 5537560 Drawing
Method and apparatus for conditionally generating a microinstruction that selects one of two values based upon control states of a microprocessor
Inventor     Boggs; Darrell D. (Aloha, OR); Kyker; Alan B. (Portland, OR); Rodgers; Scott D. (Hillsboro, OR)
Owner/Assignee     Intel Corporation (Santa Clara, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     July 16, 1996
Application Number     08/203,783
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     March 1, 1994
US Classification     712/245 712/23
Int'l Classification     G06F 009/30
Examiner     An; Meng-Ai
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     395/800 395/375 364/DIG. 1 364/DIG. 2
Patent Tags     conditionally generating microinstruction selects one two values based upon control states a microprocessor
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5353421
Emma
712/240
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5226130
Favor
712/238
Jul,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5193158
Kinney

Mar,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5191649
Cadambi
709/225
Mar,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5095527
Uramoto
712/14
Mar,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
4881194
Sprague
712/233
Nov,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4675843
Vautier
712/208
Jun,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4459666
Kruger
712/248
Jul,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
5134561
Liptay
711/164
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. In a processor having a decoder and an execution unit for executing microinstructions a method is provided for selecting one of two data values based upon control states of the processor, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a microinstruction indicating actions to be taken by the execution unit in resolving a specified condition, with resolution of the specified condition being contingent upon the control states of the processor;

providing a first data value as a first source input to the microinstruction;

providing a second data value as a second source input to the microinstruction; and

issuing the microinstruction to the execution unit for execution, wherein during execution of the microinstruction, the first source input value is selected when the specified condition is determined to be true and the second source input value is selected when the specified condition is determined to be false.

2. In a processor having an execution unit for executing microinstructions and for providing a resolution to a specified condition and a decoder, a method is provided for selecting one of two data values based upon a specified condition, resolution of the specified condition being contingent on predetermined processor state values, the state values being selected from a group consisting of processor operating mode values and processor privilege values, the method comprising the steps of:

providing the predetermined processor state values to hardware circuitry of the execution unit;

providing a microinstruction indicating actions to be taken by the execution unit in resolving the specified condition;

providing a first data value as a first source input to the microinstruction;

providing a second data value as a second source input to the microinstruction;

issuing the microinstruction to the execution unit for execution;

reading the predetermined processor state values provided to the execution unit;

resolving the specified condition in the execution unit;

selecting the first source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is true;

selecting the second source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is false; and

allocating a storage location to which the selected source input value will be written, the storage location being preselected from a group consisting of a processor register, a memory location within the processor and a memory location external to the processor.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

writing the selected source input value to the storage location, the storage location comprising the processor register having an associated flag;

setting the associated flag when the selected source input value written to the processor register comprises a binary zero;

clearing the associated flag when the selected source input value written to the processor register does not comprise a binary zero; and

writing the flag to the storage location allocated.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the first data value and the second data value provided to the microinstruction comprise values selected from the group consisting of register values, immediate values, constant values and memory values.

5. The method according to claim 2, wherein the processor operating mode values and processor privilege values represent Intel Processor Architecture operating modes and privilege states.

6. In an out-of-order processor having a decoder, at least one execution unit for executing microinstructions out-of-order and a reorder buffer having storage locations provided for buffering execution results of corresponding microinstructions, a method is provided for selecting one of two data values based upon control states of the processor, the method comprising the steps of:

providing a microinstruction indicating actions to be taken by the execution unit in resolving a specified condition;

providing a first data value as a first source input to the microinstruction;

providing a second data value as a second source input to the microinstruction;

issuing the microinstruction to the execution unit for execution;

determining the control states of the processor;

resolving the specified condition in the execution unit;

selecting the first source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is true; and

selecting the second source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is false.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the step of determining the control states of the processor is performed by the steps of:

providing predetermined values to hardware circuitry of the execution unit, the predetermined values comprising processor control state values selected from the group consisting of processor operating mode values and processor privilege values; and

reading the predetermined values provided to the execution unit.

8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the method further comprises the step of allocating a storage location to which the selected source input value will be written, the storage location comprising one of a processor register, a memory location within the processor and a memory location external to the processor.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

writing the selected source input value to the storage location, the storage location comprising the processor register, the processor register having an associated flag;

setting the associated flag when the selected source input value written to the processor register comprises a binary zero;

clearing the associated flag when the selected source input value written to the processor register does not comprise a binary zero; and

writing the flag to the storage location allocated.

10. The method according to claim 6, wherein the processor further comprises a dispatch buffer for temporarily storing the microinstruction until the execution unit is available, an instruction decoder having microcode read only memory for decoding instructions into the microinstruction and an allocator for assigning the microinstruction storage location in each of the dispatch buffer and the reorder buffer, and wherein the step of issuing the microinstruction to the execution unit for execution is performed by issuing the microinstruction from the microcode read only memory of the instruction decoder upon detection of an instruction the execution of which depends upon the control states of the processor.

11. The method according to claim 6, wherein the first data value and the second data value to the microinstruction comprise values selected from the group consisting of register values, immediate values, constant values and memory values.

12. The method according to claim 6, wherein the processor control states comprises states selected from the group consisting of processor operating mode states and processor privilege states.

13. An apparatus provided in a processor having a decoder, the apparatus for selecting one of two data values based upon control states of the processor, the apparatus comprising:

a decoder for providing a sequence of microinstructions, each microinstruction having an opcode indicating actions to be taken by the processor in resolving a specified condition, a first source input value and a second source input value;

an execution unit for executing microinstructions, the execution unit having hardware circuitry for collecting predetermined control state values to be used in resolving the specified condition, the predetermined state values being selected from a group consisting of processor operating mode values and processor privilege values, the execution unit executing each microinstruction to produce as output the first source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is true and the second source input value of the microinstruction when the specified condition is false.

14. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the execution unit in execution of the microinstruction further writes the selected source input value to a storage location, the storage location being selected from the group consisting of a processor register, a memory location within the processor and a memory location external to the processor.

15. The apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the processor comprises an out-of-order processor in which the execution unit of the processor executes microinstructions out-of-order, the storage location including a location within a reorder buffer, the reorder buffer buffering execution results and data after execution of corresponding microinstructions.

16. The apparatus according to claim 15, wherein the processor further comprises a dispatch buffer for temporarily storing microinstructions until the execution unit is available, an instruction decoder having microcode read only memory for decoding instructions into microinstructions and an allocator for assigning microinstructions storage locations in the dispatch buffer and the reorder buffer, and wherein each microinstruction is issued from the microcode read only memory of the instruction decoder upon detection of the instruction the execution of which depends upon the control states of the processor.

17. The apparatus according to claim 14, wherein the storage location comprises a processor register having an associated flag and the selected source input value written to the processor register causes the associated flag to be set when the selected source input value comprises a binary zero, the selected source input value written to the processor register further causing the associated flag to be cleared when the selected source input value does not comprises a binary zero.

18. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the first source input value and the second source input value of the microinstruction comprise values selected from the group consisting of register values, immediate values, constant values and memory values.

19. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the predetermined control state values comprise values selected from the group consisting of processor operating mode values and processor privilege values.

20. The apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the processor operating mode values and processor privilege values comprise values corresponding to operating modes and privileges defined by the Intel Architecture.

21. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the processor is implemented in a computer system comprising an input/output means for providing a communications interface and a memory means coupled to the input/output means for providing input data and output data to interface with a computer user.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to programming operations in a microprocessor, and more specifically, to the use of a conditional move microinstruction for implementing processor state dependent operations. The invention is particularly pertinent to speculative, out-of-order processors which predict program flow and execute instructions out-of-order, but may also be used in conventional pipelined and non-pipelined processors.

2. Art Background

I. State Dependent Operations in Pipelined, In-Order Microprocessors

Simple microprocessors generally process instructions one at a time. Each instruction can be considered as being processed in five sequential stages: instruction fetch, instruction decode, operand fetch, execute and writeback. During instruction fetch, an instruction pointer from a program counter is sent to an instruction memory, such as an instruction cache, to retrieve a macroinstruction. The macroinstruction is decoded into microinstructions or micro-operations (uops) which specify an opcode in addition to source and destination register addresses. During operand fetch, a register file is addressed with the source register addresses to return the source operand values. In the execution stage, the uop and the source operand values are sent to an execution unit for execution. During writeback, the result value of the microinstruction execution is written to the register file at the destination register address encoded in the microinstruction.

Within simple microprocessors, different dedicated logic blocks perform each processing stage. Each logic block waits until all the previous logic blocks complete operations before beginning its operation. Without pipelining, the microprocessor processes the uops sequentially one after another. However, to improve microprocessor efficiency, microprocessor architectures are now designed with overlapped pipeline stages so that the microprocessor can operate on several uops simultaneously.

In the processing of state dependent instructions, the results derived from execution of these instructions depend upon the current state of the microprocessor. But since the state of the processor may be changed by certain control instructions which may be fetched and decoded but not executed before the fetching of the state dependent instructions, it is possible that some state dependent instructions will be erroneously fetched. This is because the fetching of a state dependent instruction is based upon a processor state that may subsequently be modified by a previously fetched control instruction. In this case, the processor would have to detect the change in state and the fact that a particular state dependent instruction was erroneously fetched so as to stop the execution of the state dependent instruction and cause a fault to occur indicating that the state dependent instruction should not be executed and that another flow of uops should be fetched.

In order to prevent such a situation from occurring, conventional pipelined processors are designed to detect the existence of a control instruction at the decode stage and stall the pipeline by issuing fake uops (no-ops) to the execution unit until the result of the control instruction (i.e. a possible change in state) is determined during its execution. Once the control instruction reaches the execution unit and its execution is complete, the decoder is informed of any change in state and can resume the normal fetching of instructions. Obviously, processors which utilize this method incur a performance penalty due to the number of clock cycles that are wasted during the pipeline stall.

Additionally, in the execution of state dependent instructions, many clock cycles are required to access the state information needed and to resolve their dependencies. For example, in execution of a privileged instruction, the processor would have to read the proper control registers, place the information in the proper format, compare the proper values and perform a select (i.e. a conditional move operation) based upon the comparison. For example, consider the relatively complex pseudo-instruction shown below:

IF [(CPL=0) & (IOPL=3) & (VME)], THEN SELECT A (INSTRUCTION EXECUTION), OR ELSE B (FAULT)

In order to resolve the above condition, the following pseudo-uops would be required:

A: T0:=compare (CPL,0)

T1:=select.sub.-- Equal(A,B)

B: T0:=compare (IOPL,3)

T1:=select.sub.-- Equal(T1,B)

C: T0:=compare (VME, TRUE)

T1:=select.sub.-- Equal(T1,B)

The value within register T1 can then be checked by microcode to determine whether execution of the instruction can proceed (T1=A) or whether a fault must be posted (T1=B). In calculation of these operations, however, the processor would require many clock cycles (i.e. approximately 5) in order to (A) read the CPL control register, do a mask to get the lower 2 bits of the CPL register, and compare CPL to 0; (B) read the IOPL value, mask and shift the value, and compare IOPL to 3; and (C) read the processor mode, mask the mode value, and check to see if the mode is enabled. Nonetheless, even after all this has been done, the result of these calculations may indicate that sufficient privilege does not exist, thereby requiring microcode to signal a fault to the writeback logic of the execution unit so that a fault can be posted instead of executing the privileged instruction.

Furthermore, the performance of privilege or mode sensitive algorithms and updates based on processor state (i.e. instructions that modify the control flags based upon processor mode) also give rise to a similar performance penalties. In the case where instructions which modify the control are executed, for example STI, CLI and IRET in the Intel architecture, the execution unit will take several cycles to determine the current processor mode. Thereafter, based on the current mode, a jump (or branch) will or will not be taken to an algorithm or routine which determines whether a particular control flag will be modified. Yet, for processors which predict the flow of instructions instead stalling the pipeline, if the branch is conditionally taken and later found to be mispredicted, more cycles will be lost due to the instructions that were speculatively fetched which must now be canceled or flushed from the pipeline.

Hence, the performance of the above state dependent operations in conventional in-order, pipelined processors significantly reduces the efficiency of the processor due to the wasted cycles needed to stall the processor upon detection of control instructions and those required to resolve the conditions of state dependent instructions or recover from mispredicted branches.

II. Speculative, Out-of-Order Processors

For pipelined microprocessors to operate more efficiently, an instruction fetch unit at the head of the pipeline must continually provide the pipeline with a stream of instructions. However, conditional branch instructions within an instruction stream prevent the instruction fetch unit from fetching subsequent instructions that are known to be correct since the conditions for such instructions are not resolved until execution.

To alleviate this problem, some newer pipelined microprocessors use branch prediction mechanisms that predict the outcome of branches, and then fetch subsequent instructions according to the branch prediction. Branch prediction is achieved using a branch target buffer to store the history of a branch instruction based only upon the instruction pointer or address of that instruction. Every time a branch instruction is fetched, the branch target buffer predicts the target address of the branch using the branch history. For a more detailed discussion of branch prediction, please refer to Tse Yu Yeh and Yale N. Patt, Two-Level Adaptive Branch Prediction, the 24th ACM/IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on MicroArchitecture, November 1991, and Tse Yu Yeh and Yale N. Patt, Alternative Implementations of Two-Level Adaptive Branch Prediction, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Symposium on Computer Architecture, May 1992.

In combination with speculative execution, out-of-order dispatch of instructions to the execution units results in a substantial increase in instruction throughput. With out-of-order completion, any number of instructions are allowed to be in execution in the execution units, up to the total number of pipeline stages in all the functional units. Instructions may complete out of order because instruction dispatch is not stalled when a functional unit takes more than one cycle to compute a result. Consequently, a functional unit may complete an instruction after subsequent instructions have already completed. For a detailed explanation of speculative out-of-order execution, please refer to M. Johnson, Superscalar Microprocessor Design, Prentice Hall, 1991, Chapters 2,3,4, and 7.

In a processor using out-of-order execution, instruction dispatch is stalled when there is a conflict for a functional unit or when an issued instruction depends on a result that is not yet computed. In order to prevent or mitigate stalls in decoding, the prior art provides for a temporary storage buffer (referred to herein as a dispatch buffer) between the decode and execute stages. The processor decodes instructions and places (or "issues") them into the dispatch buffer as long as there is room in the buffer, and at the same time, examines instructions in the dispatch buffer to find those that can be dispatched to the execution units (i.e. those instructions for which all source operands and the appropriate execution units are available).

Instructions are dispatched from the dispatch buffer to the execution units with little regard for their original program order. However, the capability to issue instructions out-of-order introduces a constraint on register usage. To understand this problem, consider the following pseudo-microcode sequence:

1. t.rarw.load (memory)

2. eax.rarw.add (eax,t)

3. ebx.rarw.add (ebx,eax)

4. eax.rarw.mov (2)

5. edx.rarw.add (eax,3)

The micro-instructions and registers shown above are generic and will be recognized by those familiar with the art as those of the well known Intel microprocessor architecture.

In an out-of-order machine executing these instructions, it is likely that the machine would complete execution of the fourth instruction before the second instruction, because the third ADD instruction may require only one clock cycle, while the load instruction and the immediately following ADD instruction may require a total of four clock cycles, for example. However, if the fourth instruction is executed before the second instruction, then the fourth instruction would probably incorrectly overwrite the first operand of the second instruction, leading to an incorrect result. Instead of the second instruction producing a value that the third instruction would use, the fourth instruction produces a value that would destroy a value that the second one uses.

This type of dependency is called a storage conflict, because the reuse of storage locations (including registers) causes instructions to interfere with one another, even though the conflicting instructions are otherwise independent. Such storage conflicts constrain instruction dispatch and reduce performance.

It is known in the art that storage conflicts can be avoided by using register renaming where additional registers are used to reestablish the correspondence between registers and values. Using register renaming, the additional "physical" registers are associated with the original "logical" registers and values needed by the program. To implement this technique, the processor typically allocates a new register for every new value produced (i.e., for every instruction that writes a register). An instruction identifying the original logical register for the purpose of reading its value obtains instead the value in the newly allocated register. Thus, the hardware renames the original register identifier in the instruction to identify the new register and the correct value. The same register identifier in several different instructions may access different hardware registers depending on the locations of register references with respect to the register assignments.

With renaming, the example instruction sequence depicted above becomes:

1. t.sub.a .rarw.load (mem)

2. eax.sub.b .rarw.add (eax.sub.a,t.sub.a)

3. ebx.sub.b .rarw.add (ebx.sub.a,eax.sub.b)

4. eax.sub.c .rarw.mov (2)

5. edx.sub.a .rarw.add (eax.sub.c,3)

In this sequence, each assignment to a register creates a new instance of the register, denoted by an alphabetic subscript. The creation of a renamed register for eax in the fourth instruction avoids the resource dependency on the second and third instructions, and does not interfere with correctly supplying an operand to the fifth instruction. Renaming allows the fourth instruction to be dispatched immediately, whereas, without renaming, the instruction must be delayed until execution of the second and third instructions. When an instruction is decoded, its result value is assigned a location in a functional storage unit (referred to herein as a reorder buffer), and its destination register number is associated with this location. This renames the destination register to the reorder buffer location. When a subsequent instruction refers to the renamed destination register, in order to obtain the value considered to be stored in the register, the instruction may instead obtain the value stored in the reorder buffer if that value has already been computed.

The use of register renaming in the reorder buffer not only avoids register resource dependencies to permit out-of-order execution, but also plays a key role in speculative execution. If the instruction sequence given above is considered to be part of a predicted branch, then one can see that execution of those instructions using the renamed registers in the reorder buffer has no effect on the actual registers denoted by instruction. Thus, if it is determined that the branch was mispredicted, the results calculated and stored in the reorder buffer may be erased and the pipeline flushed without affecting the actual registers found in the processor's register file. If the predicted branch affected the values in the register file, then it would be difficult to recover from branch misprediction because it would be difficult to determine the values stored in the registers before the predicted branch was taken without the use of redundant registers in the reorder buffer.

When a result is output from an execution unit, it is written back to the reorder buffer. The result may also provide an input operand to one or more waiting instructions buffered in the dispatch buffer, indicating that the source operand is ready for dispatch to one or more execution units along with the instructions using the operand. After the value is written into the reorder buffer, subsequent instructions continue to fetch the value from the reorder buffer, unless the entry is superseded by a new register assignment and until the value is retired by writing it to the register file.

After the processor determines that the predicted instruction flow is correct, the processor commits the speculative results of those instructions that were stored in the reorder buffer to an architectural state by writing those results to the register file. This process is known as retirement wherein the instructions are architecturally committed or retired according to their original program order (i.e. the original instruction sequence).

III. State Dependent Operations in Out-of-Order Processors

In out-of-order microprocessors, the processor state needed for execution of state dependent instructions is located either in the register file or in microcode control registers distributed throughout the processor's architecture. However, due to the speculative, out-of-order nature of the processor, the problems involved with processing state dependent operations, such as checking privileged instructions, executing privilege or mode sensitive algorithms and updating processor state, become much worse.

One problem is in the out-of-order nature of execution which gives rise to significantly greater performance penalties. The number of pipestages for an out-of-order processor between the decode stage and the retirement stage (where the register file is updated) is increased by approximately 10 stages over that for an in-order processor. Hence, a pipeline stall at the decode stage caused by a control instruction requesting a change of state would waste many more cycles in an out-of-order processor, thereby increasing the performance penalty to an unacceptable value. However, out-of-order does not, in and of itself, increase the length of the pipeline. In one embodiment of the present invention, the microprocessor uses superpipelining, a technique which increases the number of stages in each pipe while shortening each stage. This is done so that pipe stages which require short periods of time to execute are not penalized due to longer periods required by preceding or subsequent pipe stages. This technique is what increases the number of pipe stages in the present invention over past implementations. The primary affect of out-of-order execution is the increase in the number of microinstructions which may be outstanding in the portion of the pipeline which supports out-of-order execution. Also, note that out-of-order execution allows operations which come after a given operation to contend for execution unit resources in some cases. This can further lengthen the pipeline for a microinstruction in the pipeline.

Similarly, the pipeline length in addition to the size of the reorder buffer determine the number of speculative uops that are in the pipeline at any one time, this number ranging between approximately 30-50 uops. Therefore, the cost of taking a speculative branch (i.e. by predicting the result of a conditional move or jump instruction) later found to be mispredicted (at the execute stage) would give rise to another unacceptable performance penalty due to the large number of speculative uops that would have to be flushed in addition to the lost opportunity costs in terms of the clock cycles wasted by the flushed uops.

Furthermore, with regard to microcode determining processor state at the decode stage, such as with privileged instruction checking, the disjunction between the instruction decoder, the execution units and the retirement logic in an out-of-order processor would also require a substantial investment in hardware and microcode to enable state updates to occur at the various functional units throughout the processor. Since the back-end, out-of-order functional units have little control over the front-end, in-order functional units, a substantial amount of communications or signaling hardware would have to be implemented between the decoder and the updated processor state kept in the real register file and in microcode registers throughout the processor. Even so, the broadcasting of state updates would cause more penalties due to the multiple state updates required for each state change.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus in a microprocessor for conditionally selecting one of two data values based upon control states of a processor via a microinstruction.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for performing processor state dependent operations in an out-of-order processor through the use of microcode while minimizing performance penalties caused by pipestailing, conditional moves and conditional jumps.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for performing privileged instruction checking, privilege or mode sensitive algorithm execution and privileged updating in an out-of-order processor through the use of a microinstruction that avoids the complexity and expense of dedicated hardware that would otherwise have to be implemented between the front-end and back-end of the processor.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a microinstruction for conditionally selecting one of two data values based upon control states of a processor. The microinstruction is preferably utilized in an out-of-order processor, although it may be used in conventional processors, to perform state dependent operations, including but not limited to privilege or mode sensitive instruction checking, privilege or mode sensitive algorithm execution and processor state updating. This is accomplished through the issuance from microcode to an execution unit upon decoding of a state dependent instruction a conditional move operation that takes advantage of condition resolving circuitry implemented within the execution unit. The execution unit's circuitry makes available state information in the form of result values that can be immediately used by the microinstruction upon its execution to resolve the conditions which it specifies. Upon immediate resolution of a specified condition, one of two values (or microcode temporary registers having values therein) is selected in order to properly complete the state dependent operation or to take other appropriate action such as posting a fault.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is generalized block diagram of one embodiment of the microprocessor in which the present invention is utilized.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the microprocessor shown in FIG. 1 in which the pertinent in-order, front-end functional units and out-of-order, back-end functional units are shown.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a computer system in which the out-of-order microprocessor of the present invention may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for performing processor state dependent operations in a microprocessor through the use of a microinstruction that selects one of two data values based upon control states of a processor. For purposes of explanation, specific embodiments are set forth in detail to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced with other embodiments and without all the specific details set forth. In other instances, well known elements, devices, circuits, process steps and the like are not set forth in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.

I. System Block Diagram

FIG. 1 is a generalized block diagram of one embodiment of a speculative, out-of-order processor according to the present invention. This particular embodiment includes a variety of functional units grouped together in clusters forming a bus cluster, an instruction fetch cluster, an issue cluster, an out-of-order cluster, an execution cluster and a memory cluster. In particular, these clusters can be further categorized into an in-order section comprising the bus cluster, the instruction fetch cluster and the issue cluster, and an out-of-order section comprising the out-of-order cluster, the execution cluster and the memory cluster.

The functional units and corresponding interconnections pertinent to the description of the present invention are shown in more detail in FIG. 2. With reference to FIG. 2, the in-order section (or front-end) of the microprocessor is denoted as 120, while the out-of-order section (or back-end) is denoted as 130. The in-order section 120 includes an instruction fetch unit (IFU) 102 having an instruction cache (ICACHE) and an instruction translation lookaside buffer (ITLB) (neither being shown), a branch target buffer (BTB) 104, and instruction decoder (ID) 106, a microinstruction sequencer (MS) 107, an allocator (ALLOC) 112 and a register alias table (RAT) 114. The out-of-order section 130 includes a reservation station (RS) 118, a number of execution units (EUs) 116 (i.e. an instruction execution unit (IEU) and a memory execution unit (MEU)), a retire control circuit