WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Method of bumping substrates by contained paste deposition    
United States Patent5539153   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5539153.html
Inventor(s)Schwiebert; Matthew K. (Palo Alto, CA); Campbell; Donald T. (Campbell, CA); Heydinger; Matthew (Mountain View, CA); Kraft; Robert E. (Santa Clara, CA); Vander Plas; Hubert A. (Palo Alto, CA)
AbstractA solder bump is stenciled into a substrate, providing bumped substrate at pitches below 400 microns. The solder is applied through stencil/mask and paste method; the mask, however, remains attached to the substrate during reflow. Pitches of greater than 400 microns may also be obtained through the invention. The invention further provides for generation of uniform, controllable volume metal balls
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Schwiebert; Matthew K. (Palo Alto, CA); Campbell; Donald T. (Campbell, CA); Heydinger; Matthew (Mountain View, CA); Kraft; Robert E. (Santa Clara, CA); Vander Plas; Hubert A. (Palo Alto, CA)
Owner/Assignee     Hewlett-Packard Company (Palo Alto, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     July 23, 1996
Application Number     08/287,453
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     August 8, 1994
US Classification     174/260 29/832 174/259 228/180.1 257/E21.503 257/E21.508 257/E23.021 257/E23.069
Int'l Classification     H05K 001/18
Examiner     Thomas; Laura
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm    
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     174/250 174/260 174/256 174/257 174/258 228/179 228/180.1 228/180.2 29/832 29/842 29/846
Patent Tags     bumping substrates contained paste deposition
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
1067415



[0 after 0 votes]
3002847



[0 after 0 votes]
3458925



[0 after 0 votes]
3569607



[0 after 0 votes]
3719981



[0 after 0 votes]
5346118
Degani
228/180.22
Sep,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5323947
Juskey
228/56.3
Jun,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5317438
Suzuki
349/192
May,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5307983
Dudderar
228/180.22
May,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5271548
Maiwald
228/175
Dec,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5261593
Casson
228/180.22
Nov,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5219117
Lin
228/253
Jun,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5217597
Moore
205/123
Jun,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5162257
Yung
438/613
Nov,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5139610
Dunaway
438/674
Aug,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5133495
Angulas
228/180.1
Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5118027
Braun
228/180.22
Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5118029
Fuse
228/198
Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5108027
Warner

Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5105537
Datta
205/667
Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5046161
Takada
257/778
Sep,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5024372
Altman
228/180.22
Jun,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5022580
Pedder
228/56.3
Jun,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4906823
Kushima
228/245
Mar,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4898320
Dunaway
228/245
Feb,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4832255
Bickford
228/254
May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4759490
Ochiai
228/124.1
Jul,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4545610
Lakritz
438/125
Oct,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4489923
Barresi
269/8
Dec,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4369376
Ertl
307/99
Jan,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


I claim:

1. A method for forming solder bumps directly on a substrate having a plurality of wettable pads comprising the steps of:

positioning a non-wettable metal mask on the substrate such that a plurality of apertures in the mask align with the pads;

applying solder paste to the metal mask such that the solder paste loads the mask apertures;

reflowing the solder paste to form solder bumps on the pads; and

removing the metal mask after formation of the solder bumps.

2. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of cleaning the metal mask after removal.

3. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of inspecting the substrate/paste/mask assembly prior to reflow.

4. A method as in claim 3 further comprising the step of adding additional paste to untilled mask apertures after inspection.

5. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of inspecting the substrate/solder bump assembly after mask removal.

6. A method as in claim 5 further comprising the step of replacing missing bumps on the substrate/solder bump assembly after inspection.

7. A method as in claim 5 further comprising the step of repairing damaged bumps on the substrate/solder bump assembly after inspection.

8. A method as in claim 1 wherein the solder paste contains metal powder in a flux vehicle.

9. A method as in claim 1 wherein the solder paste contains an alloy of at least one metal that can be made into a powder and a flux vehicle for said powder.

10. A method as in claim 1 wherein the solder paste contains an 63 Sn 37 Pb alloy.

11. A method as in claim 1, wherein the coefficient of thermal expansion of the mask is substantially similar to the coefficient of thermal expansion of the substrate.

12. A method as in claim 1 wherein the mask is attached to the substrate in a manner that allows lateral excursion of the mask and substrate during reflow such that alignment of the mask apertures and the pads is maintained.

13. A method as in claim 1 wherein the substrate has a first surface and a second surface, the second surface being opposite to the first surface, and the step of positioning the metal mask on the substrate includes situating the mask on the first surface of the substrate and situating magnets on the second surface of the surface.

14. A method as in claim 13 wherein the magnets are capable of withstanding the heat from the reflow step.

15. A method as in claim 13 wherein the magnets contain AlNiCo.

16. A method as in claim 1 wherein the bumps have pitches in the range of 150 to 350 microns.

17. A method as in claim 1 wherein the apertures are cylindrical such that V.sub.paste =(.pi.L.sup.2 t)/4 where V.sub.paste is the required aperture volume, L is aperture size and t is mask thickness.

18. A method as in claim 1 wherein the metal mask is composed of 75-100 micron thick tension-leveled and sheeted alloy.

19. A method for electrically connecting a first substrate having a plurality of wettable pads to a second substrate having a plurality of wettable pads comprising the steps of:

forming solder bumps on the first substrate by a method comprising the steps of:

attaching a non-wettable metal stencil mask having a plurality of apertures on the substrate such that the mask apertures are in alignment with the pads;

applying solder paste to the metal mask such that the solder paste loads the mask apertures;

reflowing the solder paste to form solder bumps on the pads; and

removing the metal mask after forming the solder bumps;

positioning the solder bumps formed on the first substrate in registry with the wettable pads of the second substrate; and

reflowing the solder bumps to form an electrical connection between the first substrate and the second substrate.

20. A method as in claim 19 further comprising the step of cleaning the metal mask after removal.

21. A method as in claim 19 further comprising the step of inspecting the substrate/paste/mask assembly prior to reflow.

22. A method as in claim 21 further comprising the step of adding additional paste to unfilled mask apertures after inspection.

23. A method as in claim 19 further comprising the step of inspecting the substrate/solder bump assembly after mask removal.

24. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the step of replacing missing bumps on the substrate/solder bump assembly after inspection.

25. A method as in claim 23 further comprising the step of repairing damaged bumps on the substrate/solder bump assembly after inspection.

26. A method as in claim 19 further comprising the step of adding bumps after metal mask removal through positioning one or more bumps on a carrier medium near the wettable pads of the first substrate such that the bump is attracted to and moves onto the wettable pad, detaching from the carrier medium.

27. A method as in claim 19 wherein the bumps have pitches in the range of 150 to 350 microns.

28. A method as in claim 19 wherein the apertures are cylindrical such that V.sub.paste =(.pi.L.sup.2 t)/4 where V.sub.paste is the required aperture volume, L is aperture size and t is mask thickness.

29. A method as in claim 19 wherein the metal mask is composed of 75-100 micron thick tension-leveled and sheeted alloy.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method and process for attaching an electrically conductive substance onto substrates and, in particular, a process that provides attachment of solder bumps onto substrates, with particular advantages in applications in which a pitch of less than 400 microns is required.

BACKGROUND

Enormous research and development resources are spent the world over in the perennial search for low cost, high volume methods of producing and assembling integrated circuits or "chips". An integral piece of chip assembly is making electrical interconnections. Solder bumped flip chip technology has become extremely popular because it provides a tiny semiconductor die with terminations all on one side (in the form of solder pads or bumps); after the chip surface has been treated, it can be flipped over and attached to a matching substrate. To make the connection, flip chip technology includes techniques for affixing bumps of electrically conductive material onto substrates, including boards, packages and chips. Flip chip bumping techniques have also proven useful in tape automated bonding (TAB). Other applications for solder bumps have included opto-electronics and silicon-on-silicon interconnects.

Flip chip technology presents a number of advantages that make it a preferred form of electronic interconnect. Flip chip provides improved electrical performance. Flip chip interconnections are the most efficient electrical interconnections for high frequency applications such as main frames and computer workstations. In addition to efficiency in function, the flip chip is efficient in form because of its small size. As devices of ever greater power are reduced in size, flip chip provides the smallest interconnect option. Other advantages include easier thermal management and reduced EMI emmissions and reduced RFI susceptibility.

Solder bump flip chip assembly can be made compatible with well-established Surface Mount Technology (SMT). (For a thorough introduction to SMT, please refer to the Handbook of Surface Mount Technology, Stephen W. Hinch, Longman Scientific & Technical, UK, 1988.) With the appropriate choice of solder bump metallurgy, an SMT assembly line can simultaneously assemble both flip chip and surface mount packages on a product passing through the line. This compatibility provides the utilization of an installed base of SMT assembly lines as well as the flexibility of designing packages incorporating flip chip into larger SMT packages. Perhaps the most telling advantage of flip chip over other packaging technologies is its lower cost. Flip chip eliminates an entire level of interconnect--the package level (see Steps B through E in FIG. 2). By eliminating the package level, system cost is significantly reduced. In the IC business generally, the potential cost savings justify investments in multi-million dollar flip chip technology research.

The primary way of making flip chip interconnects is with solder bumps. Solder bumps have been applied by evaporation, electroplating, stencil printing and serial methods. However, each of these methods has particular limitations and much research has been and is being performed to overcome the limitations of each of these methods.

For the past three decades, companies such as IBM have used evaporation to form high lead (Pb) bumps for flip chip applications. One major disadvantage of evaporation is the high cost: at least ten million dollars worth of capital equipment is required. Processing costs are also high due to tooling and mask costs, process delays, low throughput, low yields, and necessarily frequent manual removal of hazardous lead waste. Finally, alloy compositions are limited because many metals are not suitable for evaporation. Especially limiting is the fact that the deposition rate of tin (Sn) is such that it cannot readily be evaporated. A high tin alloy (63Sn-37Pb, that is "eutectic") is highly desirable as a bumping material, because the melting point of eutectic tin (T.sub.m =183 degrees C.) is compatible with existing SMT materials and processes (usually performed at 200-210 degrees C.). By contrast, the melting point of lead is 327 degrees C., a temperature that would melt many of the organic materials used in SMT (e.g. epoxy circuit beards, whose maximum temperature is 230 degrees C., and other components).

There is no shortage of patents that have issued covering improvements in the evaporation process. Because the evaporation process involves vaporizing lead and allowing the lead to deposit on all surfaces, both masked and unmasked, the cleaning of the metal shadow mask is messy and hazardous. The metal mask can only be reused three or four times before it is no longer cleanable and must be discarded. The waste lead, including the lead-encrusted metal mask, poses environmental and worker safety problems as well as escalates manufacturing expense. A recent patent, U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,878, addressed the problem of mask cleaning and presented some labor saving cleaning techniques. However, although improvements may speed bumping and reduce labor costs to a certain degree, the equipment required for evaporation remains costly, and the hazards of the waste lead are ever-present.

Whereas the evaporation technique is fraught with the hazards of vaporizing lead, electroplating is a wet technique using chemical baths as the medium in which to deposit bumps. The chemical baths contain lead and other hazardous materials that pose a handling and disposal problem. Moreover, electroplating is limited in efficiency because it is a batch process. Thus, volume production faces the attendant challenges of an equipment intense serial process and, as IC manufacturers are all too keenly aware, cost is governed by the production volume or capacity limits. Other disadvantages of electroplating include difficulty in alloy composition control, problems in consistently achieving acceptable bump height at small bump pitches, and difficulty in the elimination of surface impurities.

Stencil printing (also known as screen printing), depicted in FIG. 2A, is by far the simplest approach, at least conceptually, but has posed seemingly insurmountable limitations on bump size and pitch. (See, generally, Handbook of Surface Mount Technology, ibid, pp 245-260).

As depicted in FIG. 2A, stencil printing involves placing a mask 10 or screen on a substrate 12, slathering on a solder paste on top of the mask, using a squeegee 16 to squeegee the paste, which serves to force paste into all the apertures in the mask and to scrape off the excess paste, and removing the mask prior to re-flowing the solder paste. Re-flow is essentially controlled melting in order that the small spheres of metal that compose the solder paste coalesce to form the electronic interconnect.

Packing more interconnects on smaller chip has created a need for smaller bumps with smaller pitch (pitch being the distance between the centers of two adjacent bumps). Conventional stencil printing methods have had a lower pitch limit of 400 microns, primarily due to the limitations on well-established stencil aspect ratio (about 2.5:1) of aperture width relative to mask thickness. This limit is the result of the interplay of the spacing of holes in and thickness of the stencil and the physical and chemical characteristics of the solder paste. The well-known pitch limitation convinced IC manufacturers that stencil printing had no future in the majority of flip chip bumping applications since a pitch of less than 400 microns is required.

AT&T has used stencil printing to produce silicon-on-silicon assemblies. The process involves mounting the mask, joining the silicon to silicon with stenciled paste between the silicon components, and reflowing, thereby producing a silicon-on-silicon attach. The mask apertures are limited by the aspect ratio.

Serial methods have been proposed, and while attractive in theory, none has been commercialized. Proposed methods have included "stud-bumping" with wirebonding equipment (also known as "wirebond bumps"), decal processing, and solder jet processes. Methods proposed to simplify serial processes still require multiple steps. U.S. Pat. No. 5,156,997 issued to Kumar et al. describes a simplified process consisting of depositing a barrier and diffusion layer, forming a bump from a metal using a focused liquid metal ion source, and removing the exposed barrier/adhesion layer by etching. The process takes over 13 hours to bump a 200 die wafer. Thus, even simplified serial processing has associated processing disadvantages such as slow throughput.

A dramatic and significant improvement would be a simple, low cost, high volume, environmentally friendly (or environmentally neutral), non-hazardous process for applying bumps of various alloys to substrate where the bumps are uniform in height and the pitch small, and, ideally, such a method would provide bump alloys that are compatible with existing surface mount technology assembly lines.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a non-hazardous, environmentally neutral process for bumping substrates (including silicon wafers) for electronic interconnects. The inventive process provides for Contained Paste Deposition (CPD) on masked substrate with mask attached during reflow. The process provides for bumps that are suitable for flip chip application with pitches of less than 400 microns. Process cost is further lowered by inventive aspects including a reusable metal mask in one embodiment, and a photoimageable polymer coating, removable or not, in other embodiments.

Further, this method uses manufacturing technology that is well-characterized and suitable for volume production.

CPD separates the composition control of the bump from the volume control of the bump. For example, in evaporation and plating, the volume and composition are determined simultaneously in a single process step. With CPD, the composition of the metal is determined during the paste manufacture; while the process of forming the bumps determines the volume of the metal bump.

Virtually any alloy composition can be used to bump wafers according to the present invention. The limitations of evaporation methods are completely overcome because CPD allows the selection of any alloy, whereas many alloys cannot be effectively evaporated. When compatibility with SMT is desirable, melting point characteristics are essentially the only limitation in alloy selection. The inventive method provides more precise control of the alloy composition than currently achievable in alloy and elemental plating methods. The present method provides solutions to environmental and worker safety issues associated with current methods of applying lead (Pb) via evaporation or the chemical waste produced by plating baths. Consistent bump height, volume, and spacing can be accomplished.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1, 1A and 1B inclusive, depicts cross-sections of the mask/paste/substrate and mask/bump/substrate assembly according to the invention.

FIG. 2, 2A through 2I inclusive, represents conventional stencil method, conventional SMT packaging, and conventional stencil method as used in the SMT assembly process.

FIG. 3, 3A through 3H, represents flip chip bump formation and flip chip assembly according to the invention.

FIG. 4 as a flow chart of the bump formation method according to the present invention.

FIG. 5 illustrates the assembling of mask upon the substrate in the preferred embodiment.

FIG. 6, 6A through 6C inclusive, represents the invention providing attached stand-off bumps.

FIG. 7 represents CPD providing controlled-volume ball production.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As outlined in FIG. 4, the inventive method generally includes the steps of selecting 410 a substrate, mask and paste; assembling 412 the substrate and mask; aligning 414 the substrate-mask, depositing 416 the paste; reflowing 422 the substrate-mask-paste, removing 424 the mask; cleaning 430 the mask; reusing the mask in another repetition of the process. Other embodiments eliminate the step of mask removal 424; still others include intermediate inspection 418, 426 and touch-up 420, 428 steps to ensure the uniform thickness of solder paste deposition and ball placement. If a nonwettable substrate is used, then rather than a bumped substrate, the method generates solder ball of controlled volume.

FIG. 3, A through H inclusive, illustrates the inventive process. FIG. 3A through 3E illustrates flip chip bump formation and FIG. 3F through 3H illustrates flip chip assembly. The selected substrate 320 having a surface 321 or active side selected for the formation of electrical interconnections to which wettable or solderable regions 322 or solderable bump limiting metal (BLM) regions have been attached. In the preferred embodiment, the substrate chosen is a silicon wafer with a BLM that is wettable by the alloy to be deposited. Silicon wafer with zincated pads (Al pads treated with electro-less Zn, Ni, then Au plated), and passivated with SiN (silicon nitride) is the substrate/BL,M combination of the preferred embodiment. It is simple and effective to prepare a wafer with solderable (or wettable) BLMs on a pitch of 400 microns or less. The center-to-center distance between each wettable BLM corresponds to the pitch of the bumps; the preferred embodiment provides for pitches in the range of 150 to 350 microns. This minimum pitch limitation is currently a function of mask technology, and even smaller pitches are achievable with the present invention with improvements in mask fabrication technology.

The remaining regions of the substrate surface 321 must be non-wettable regions 324 (for example, regions of the substrate covered by non-wettable materials, such as polyimide, silicon nitride, or, silicon dioxide). In the preferred embodiment for 63Sn-37Pb bumps, the silicon wafer has wettable regions of Ni-Au and nonwettable regions of silicon nitride.

A pair of cross-sections of the mask/substrate/paste and mask/substrate bump assem