Planar lower cost multilayer dual-band microstrip antenna

Description Submit all comments and votes

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of antennas.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Many military and commercial communication systems need compact low cost antennas such as aircraft and global positioning systems.

Microstrip antennas have been widely used instead of conventional antennas because they are relatively light in weight, low in cost, and have a low profile. Unfortunately, however, their bandwidth is too narrow for many applications, but there are some applications such as global positioning systems that require only a few distinct frequency bands rather than a continuous spectrum. The generally planar dual band antennas presently known have features perpendicular to the main plane of the antenna that are expensive to manufacture. These antennas have a ground plane on one side of a dielectric layer and patches of conductive material on the other.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with this invention, a dual band antenna is comprised of a conductive sheet having a first dielectric layer between it and a second dielectric layer, parallel spaced conductive strips on the side of said second dielectric layer that is remote from said conductive sheet, a third dielectric layer covering said second dielectric layer and said conductive strips and a conductive patch on the side of third dielectric layer that is remote from said second dielectric layer. A layer of bonding film is on either side of the second dielectric layer. Excitation is achieved by extending the central conductor of an SMA probe through the conductive sheet and all of the dielectric layers up to the conductive patch at a point between the conductive strips and connecting the shield of the probe to the conductive sheet.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross section of the dual band antenna of this invention taken in a plane perpendicular to the conductive strips; and

FIG. 2 is a top view of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the impedance response of an antenna of the invention having particular parameters.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference is made to the cross sectional view of the antenna shown in FIG. 1. A sheet 2 is conductive and covers the entire bottom plane of the antenna. A first dielectric layer 4 is located between the conductive sheet 2 and a second dielectric layer 6. Usually, bonding films 8 and 10 are on either side of the dielectric layer 6. As will be seen in FIG. 2, conductive strips 12 and 14 that are on the second dielectric layer 6, are parallel. A third dielectric layer 16 lies between the second dielectric layer 6 the strips 12 and 14 and a conductive patch 18. Thus, the dielectric layers 4, 6 and 16 form a striated structure having two external surfaces with the sheet 2 on one surface and the patch 18 on the other.

Excitation of the antenna is achieved by extending the central conductor 20 of an SMA probe 22 through the conductive sheet 2 and the dielectric layers 4, 6 and 16 to the conductive patch 18 at a point midway between the conductive strips 12 and 14, and, as can be seen in FIG. 2 at a distance S from their ends. In the lateral direction, the conductive patch 18 extends beyond the outer or remote edges of the conductive strips 12 and 14. In the direction parallel to the strips, the width of the conductive patch typically will be equal to the length of the strips. The dielectric layer 6 is the thinnest and the dielectric layer 4 is preferably thicker than the dielectric layer 16. The total thickness of all the layers is much smaller than any radiated wavelength.

FIG. 2 is a top view of FIG. 1 showing the width of the conductive strips 12 and 14 and other dimensions by lower case letters. The frequencies of the upper and lower band are determined by the dimension d of the conductive patch and by the dielectric constants of the three dielectric layers. While the dielectric constant of layers 4 and 16 in effect determine the frequency of the upper band, the dielectric constant of layer 6, which is assumed to be larger than that of the two other layers, has a determining influence on the frequency of the lower band. The central conductor 20 is connected at a distance s along this dimension at which the impedance of the antenna at the higher frequency matches the impedance of the probe 22, and the separation c between the conductive strips 12 and 14 is such as to provide an impedance match at the lower frequency as well. The difference between the upper and lower frequencies is determined by the thickness of the dielectric layers and their respective dielectric constants. It is important, however, that the dielectric constant of the, second dielectric layer 6 be different from the dielectric constant of the first dielectric layer 2 and the dielectric constant of the third dielectric layer 16.

Those skilled in the art know that for typical multi-layer dual-band antennas, the layer thicknesses are assumed to be much smaller than the wavelength and a cavity model is used for analyzing the antenna characteristics. For this analysis, the antenna structure is considered to be a leaky resonating cavity where the open-ended edges are considered to be blocked by a perfect magnetic conductor. In conventional antennas, therefore, there are multiple resonant frequencies that are regularly separated. However, with the structure of the present invention, these resonant frequencies can be altered by varying patch sizes, layer thicknesses and the dielectric constants of the substrate. The unique feature of the present invention is the strip patches that are placed on the interface of the two different dielectric materials. These patches divide the cavity roughly into two regions. As stated earlier, the feed is located such that the radiating edges are perpendicular to the inner strips and, therefore, two types of resonance result. Each resonance indicates a high field excitation in the corresponding region. The dielectric constant in each region critically determines its corresponding resonant frequency. Accordingly, in one embodiment of the invention, two different dielectric materials are mixed in the bottom layer to give an effective dielectric constant between those of homogeneous mediums. As those skilled in the art readily know, commercially available dielectric substrates are only available in a limited number of dielectric constants and therefore, the mixing of two different substrate materials will achieve the desired results.

With such a configuration, the present invention provides an antenna which is easy to fabricate and can be easily mass produced by using printed-circuit technology. The two resonant frequencies can be placed as closely as desired and the relative bandwidths at those two frequencies can be adjusted. Further, the radiation patterns at each resonant frequency will not be degraded by the dual-frequency operation.

For purpose of analysis, the resonating cavity of the present invention is divided into seven subregions. In each subregion, fields may be expressed in terms of the modal fields that satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions. The resonant frequencies and field distributions are derived by using mode-matching techniques at the interfaces between the subregions. Since the problem is symmetric, only a half of the structure should be considered assuming a perfect magnetic conductor at a the symmetry plane. Given this type of analysis, those skilled in the art will be able to arrive at number of specific application configurations for the present invention.

The impedance matching at both resonant frequencies is achieved by moving the middle layer strips. Shifting the strips under the radiation patch does not change the resonant frequencies much but increases the resonant resistance at one frequency while decreasing that at the other frequency. The bandwidth at the higher resonant frequency is larger than that at the lower frequency when the layer thicknesses above and below the middle strips are the same. Therefore, to compensate for such a difference, the layer below the middle strips should be thicker than the upper layer.

By way of example, an antenna constructed with the dimensions a=0.7 cm, b=1.0 cm, c=0.6 cm, d=2.5 cm, s=0.65 cm, the thickness of the dielectric layers 4, 6, 16 being respectively 31 mils, 10 mils, and 20 mils, the relative dielectric constants of these layers being 2.2, 6.2 and 2.2 and the thicknesses of the bonding films 8 and 10 being 1.5 mils radiates frequencies of 3.52 GHz and 3.9 GHz as shown in FIG. 3 which is a plot of return loss vs frequency.

Although the present invention has only been described in terms of one embodiment, those skilled in the art will be able to devise specific applications for the present invention. Therefore, the inventors herein do not wish to be limited by the present disclosure, but only by the following claims.

* * * * *