|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5573896 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5573896.html |
| Inventor(s) | Carli; Jerel R. (Penfield, NY);
Foster; David G. (West Henrietta, NY);
Gates; Edgar P. (Honeoye, NY);
Patton; David L. (Webster, NY);
Rosenburgh; John H. (Hilton, NY);
Vincent; Sheridan E. (Rochester, NY) |
| Abstract | A method of processing an imagewise exposed silver halide photographic
element comprising developing and desilvering the photographic element in
a low volume thin tank processor wherein the processor operates at 15% or
less of maximum production capacity. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
November 12, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
April 3, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 221,711, filed 31 Mar. 1994,
now U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,118. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 2401185
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2993427
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5400107 Rosenburgh 396/632 Mar,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5400106 Rosenburgh 396/632 Mar,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5361114 Earle 396/617 Nov,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5357307 Glanville 396/626 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5355190 Rosenburgh 347/108 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5353086 Piccinino, Jr. 396/571 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5353088 Rosenburgh 396/571 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5353087 Rosenburgh 396/632 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5353083 Rosenburgh 396/620 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5347337 Patton 396/622 Sep,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5311235 Piccinino, Jr. 396/618 May,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5302996 Hall 396/626 Apr,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5294956 Earle
Mar,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5270762 Rosenburgh 396/632 Dec,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5252439 Nakamura 430/399 Oct,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5243373 Glover 396/615 Sep,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5179404 Bartell 396/617 Jan,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5077180 Yoshida
Dec,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5043756 Takabayashi 396/616 Aug,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5024924 Naruse 430/376 Jun,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5004676 Meckl 430/398 Apr,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4997749 Wernicke 430/464 Mar,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4977067 Yoshikawa 430/398 Dec,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4797351 Ishikawa 430/387 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4791048 Hirai 430/372 Dec,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4786584 Endo 430/434 Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4613562 Kuse 430/450 Sep,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4328306 Idota 430/393 May,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4245034 Libicky 430/399 Jan,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A method of processing an imagewise exposed color silver halide
photographic element comprising developing and desilvering said
photographic element in a processor having either a rack and tank or
automatic tray design, said processor comprising a narrow processing
channel wherein said processor operates at 15% or less of maximum
production capacity,
said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel
of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal
to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being
processed,
the total amount of a processing solution used in said narrow processing
channel being at least 40% of the total volume of said processing solution
in said processor, and
said processing solution being delivered to said narrow processing channel
via a nozzle according to the following formula:
1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40
wherein F is the flow rate of said processing solution through said nozzle
in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in
square inches.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said processor operates at 10% or less of
maximum production capacity.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element has a silver
halide emulsion wherein greater than 90 mole % of the silver halide is
silver chloride.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element is a color
photographic paper.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element is a color
photographic film.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said photographic element is a silver
bromoiodide photographic film.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element comprises a
tabular grain silver halide emulsion.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element comprises less
than 0.8 g silver per m.sup.2.
9. The method of claim 1 for the processing of color photographic paper,
wherein said narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less
than 50 times the thickness of said color photographic paper being
processed.
10. The method of claim 1 for the processing of color photographic film,
wherein said narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less
than 18 times the thickness of said color photographic film being
processed.
11. A method of processing an imagewise exposed color silver halide
photographic element comprising developing said photographic element in a
developing solution, in a processor having either a rack and tank or
automatic tray design, said processor comprising a narrow processing
channel, wherein said developing solution is replenished by direct
replenishment,
said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel
of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal
to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being
processed,
the total amount of said developing solution used in said narrow processing
channel being at least 40% of the total volume of the processing solution
in said processor, and
said developing solution being delivered to said narrow processing channel
via a nozzle according to the following formula:
1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40
wherein F is the flow rate of said developing solution through said nozzle
in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in
square inches.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein said developing solution is replenished
at the rate of 10 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein said developing solution is replenished
at the rate of 6 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein said developing solution is replenished
at the rate of 20 ml or less per roll of 35mm-24 exposure film having a
surface area of 0.42 ft.sup.2.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said developing solution is replenished
at the rate of 15 ml or less per roll of 35mm-24 exposure film having a
surface area of 0.42 ft.sup.2.
16. A method of processing an imagewise exposed and developed color silver
halide photographic element comprising desilvering said photographic
element in a bleach-fixing processing solution or in a bleaching
processing solution and a separate fixing processing solution, in a
processor having either a rack and tank or automatic tray design, said
processor comprising a narrow processing channel, wherein said
bleach-fixing processing solution or bleaching processing solution and
fixing processing solution are replenished by direct replenishment,
said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel
of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal
to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being
processed,
the total amount of each of said processing solutions used in said narrow
processing channel being at least 40% of the total volume of each of said
processing solutions in said processor, and
each of said processing solutions being delivered to said processing
channel via a nozzle according to the following formula:
1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40
wherein F is the flow rate of said processing solution through said nozzle
in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in
square inches.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein said bleach-fixing processing solution
or said bleaching processing solution and said fixing processing solution
are replenished at the rate of 10 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic
element.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein said bleach-fixing processing solution
or said bleaching processing solution and said fixing processing solution
are replenished at the rate of 5 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic
element.
19. The method of claim 16 wherein said photographic element has a silver
halide emulsion wherein greater than 90 mole % of the silver halide is
silver chloride.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein the level of silver in said element is
less than or equal to 0.8 g/m.sup.2. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the processing of silver halide photographic
materials. It more specifically relates to the processing of such
materials using a Low Volume Thin Tank processing system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Photographic processing equipment and processing chemicals have evolved
dramatically over the last decade to meet the increasing demand for
convenient, low cost, and environmentally friendly photoprocessing. Some
of the changes have included improved processing chemicals which provide
faster processing for both film and paper; and smaller, more streamlined
equipment which requires a reduced amount of photochemicals. One of the
most popular systems is the minilab which is small enough to allow any
corner drugstore to offer photoprocessing and which can process a roll of
film and provide prints in less than one hour.
However, even the advent of the minilab has not addressed all the needs and
problems of modern photoprocessing. Two areas which particularly need
addressing are 1) the increasing demand for photoprocessing capabilities
in non-traditional photoprocessing environments and 2) the need to reduce
the amount of replenishment necessary to keep a photoprocess system
stable, both to decrease cost and to reduce the amount of effluent from
processing machines. These two areas are often interrelated. In addition
there is the never-ending desire to reduce processing time and/or the
amount of chemicals needed to fully process various photographic
materials.
The demand for non-traditional photoprocessing environments is being fueled
by the increase of digital image processing. As digital image processing
becomes more prevalent, there is a growing need for color hard copy from
digital sources. Silver halide photographic hard copy can give the highest
quality images, but is often found to be less convenient than
electrophotographic or thermal technologies. Since the photographic
processing of digital images would often be done in an office, home, or
other non-traditional photoprocessing environments, the convenience of
processing is of upmost importance.
Currently available processors can be inconvenient for home or office
processing or for other small operations for the following reasons. First,
the volume of the tank solutions that need to be prepared to fill a
processor are still somewhat large for small-scale operations. Typical
processor tank volumes of 10 to 25 liters for processor tanks require
relatively large volumes of solutions to be handled.
Secondly, for low utilized systems, the processing solutions remain in the
tank for a long residence time. The lack of `tank-turnovers` with fresh
replenisher causes the solutions to evaporate and the components to
oxidize, causing the chemical concentrations of the components to change.
This leads to process control variability and precipitate formation, both
of which can affect sensitometry. Such low utilization problems are one of
the largest obstacles for small-scale operations when using traditional
processing equipment.
Lastly, the relatively high silver coverages of current films and papers
require higher chemical concentrations in the processing solutions, which
contributes to the cost of the chemicals. It further results in a
concentration of chemicals in the waste from the processor which may make
disposal of the waste difficult for a home, office, or other small-scale
operations.
The need to reduce the-amount of replenishment is driven by both cost and
environmental concerns and is shared by large and small processors.
Photographic processors are equipped with replenisher solutions designed
to maintain process activity at a steady-state, as sensitized goods are
processed. The replenishers contain the necessary components to replace
chemicals consumed or lost through oxidation or carryover in developing,
bleaching, fixing and washing and/or stabilization of sensitized
materials.
In automated systems, as sensitized materials are processed, a signal is
relayed to turn on the replenisher pumps, so that fresh solution is added
to the process tanks. The rates that the solutions are added to the
process are dependent on the concentration of components which can be
attained in the replenisher solutions.
The replenishment rate in a processing system is set at the lowest rate
possible. This reduces the effluent from the process, lowers handling of
chemicals, reduces the amount of chemicals used, and reduces the energy
needed to maintain operating temperatures. However, the amount
replenishment can be reduced is dependent on the following factors.
1. Replenisher Stability--Once all components are combined into a single
solution, the components begin reacting with each other and with oxygen,
limiting the usefulness of the solution to the stability of the
components. The usefulness of a mixed replenisher is normally 4-8 weeks,
but may be as short as a few days. Solution stability may be enhanced by
the use of covers which sit on top of the solution, eliminating air space
which allows oxidation and evaporation.
2. Concentrate Stability--Because of the reactivity of the various
components with each other and with oxygen, it is necessary to separate
the replenisher concentrates into two or more parts until they are to be
used. Concentrates are normally stable for several years if properly
stored.
3. Productivity--The quantity of sensitized material processed daily is of
concern, since low replenishment rates cause the tank solutions to be
resident in the tanks for longer periods of time, subjecting them to
oxidation, evaporation and interaction degradation.
4. Carryover--Carryover is the solution carried over from one tank into the
next with the sensitized materials. The lower the carryover, the more
stable the solutions. When very little or no solution is carried over into
the next tank, less dilution occurs and less replenisher is needed in the
next tank and less chemical interaction takes place. If the carryover is
high, more solution is carried over and more replenisher is needed to
compensate for dilution and chemical interactions. If the carryover out of
the tank is greater than the replenishment rate, the tank volume will
decrease. This results in a shift in the process activity due to the
resulting volume loss. This loss reduces the time the sensitized material
is in the solution and could lead to processor malfunction. If tank volume
is lost, processing solution must be added to maintain solution level.
5. Evaporation-Oxidation--Evaporation and oxidation take place constantly
with all processors. To control them, the area of solution exposed to the
air needs be kept to a minimum. A surface which results in considerable
evaporation and oxidation is the surface of rollers which are used to
transport the sensitized material from one tank to another. Some
processors have rollers which are partially submerged in the process
solutions. The continual wetting and drying of these rollers increases
evaporation and oxidation of the processing solutions. It is advantageous
to have rollers either completely submerged or completely out of solution.
Another way to reduce evaporation and oxidation is to reduce the flow of
air over the solutions.
6. Tank turnover--Tank turnover (TTO) is the time required to replace the
process tank solution with fresh replenisher solution. Reducing the
replenishment rate of solutions extends the residence time of the
solutions in the processor, increasing the time per tank turnover. To
reduce the time per TTO and replenishment rate, it is necessary to reduce
the volume of the processor tanks or increase the utilization
(productivity) of the processor. Reducing the volume of the tanks or
increasing the utilization of the processor, will decrease the time per
tank turnover and reduce the residence time of the solutions.
7. Precipitation/Crystallization--Components which are present in the tank
solutions may increase in concentration due to seasoning (processing of
sensitized materials) or because of evaporation. Because of their
solubility, the components may precipitate or crystallize from solution.
The increase of the level of certain components may cause the
precipitation or crystallization of other components by reducing their
solubility. The lower the replenishment rate, the more likely that this
will occur.
8. Process by-product buildup--Materials washing out of the sensitized
product, such as, sensitizing dyes, halides, calcium, silver, which
accumulate in the solutions as they season out of the sensitized
materials, or as they are formed from reactions during photoprocessing,
may also precipitate or crystallize.
9. Pump accuracy--As the replenishment rates are reduced, the need for high
accuracy, low-volume pumps becomes imperative.
In particular, the amount of replenishment necessary is dependent on the
level of utilization of the processor. When a traditional processing
system has low utilization it cannot be operated using a low replenishment
regime because the system is not stable.
The industry has attempted to compensate for low utilization problems and
disposal problems by adjusting processing chemistry. For example, minilab
film and paper processors run through a wide range of utilizations. One
unit may experience a wide change of utilizations depending on the time of
the year and picture taking opportunities. A variety of developer
solutions have been made available to accommodate most situations.
EKTACOLOR RA Developer Replenisher was formulated to accommodate the
widest range of utilizations or tank turnovers within a given period of
time. EKTACOLOR RA Developer Replenisher or EKTACOLOR PRIME Developer
Replenisher will perform as designed, if the process maintains one tank
turnover every 2 to 4 weeks or less. This product will perform equally as
well if the process is run at higher utilizations, but may begin to fail
if the developer tank is turned over less frequently than every 4 weeks.
In this case, EKTACOLOR | | |