WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Method for processing silver halide color photographic elements using processors having low volume thin tank designs    
United States Patent5573896   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5573896.html
Inventor(s)Carli; Jerel R. (Penfield, NY); Foster; David G. (West Henrietta, NY); Gates; Edgar P. (Honeoye, NY); Patton; David L. (Webster, NY); Rosenburgh; John H. (Hilton, NY); Vincent; Sheridan E. (Rochester, NY)
AbstractA method of processing an imagewise exposed silver halide photographic element comprising developing and desilvering the photographic element in a low volume thin tank processor wherein the processor operates at 15% or less of maximum production capacity.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Carli; Jerel R. (Penfield, NY); Foster; David G. (West Henrietta, NY); Gates; Edgar P. (Honeoye, NY); Patton; David L. (Webster, NY); Rosenburgh; John H. (Hilton, NY); Vincent; Sheridan E. (Rochester, NY)
Owner/Assignee     Eastman Kodak Company (Rochester, NY)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     November 12, 1996
Application Number     08/390,594
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     April 3, 1995
US Classification     430/399 396/622 396/626 396/627 396/636 396/641 430/30 430/398 430/400 430/401 430/403 430/450 430/963
Int'l Classification     G03C 005/18 G03C 005/26 G03C 005/00 G03D 003/02
Examiner     Caldarola; Glenn A.
Assistant Examiner     Pasterczyk; J.
Attorney/Law Firm     Tucker; J. Lanny Roberts; Sarah , Meeks
Address
Parent Case     This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 221,711, filed 31 Mar. 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,436,118.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     430/30 430/398 430/399 430/400 430/401 430/403 430/450 430/963 354/322 354/324 354/325 354/331 354/336
Patent Tags     processing silver halide color photographic elements using processors low volume thin tank designs
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2401185



[0 after 0 votes]
2993427



[0 after 0 votes]
5400107
Rosenburgh
396/632
Mar,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5400106
Rosenburgh
396/632
Mar,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5361114
Earle
396/617
Nov,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5357307
Glanville
396/626
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5355190
Rosenburgh
347/108
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5353086
Piccinino, Jr.
396/571
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5353088
Rosenburgh
396/571
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5353087
Rosenburgh
396/632
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5353083
Rosenburgh
396/620
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5347337
Patton
396/622
Sep,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5311235
Piccinino, Jr.
396/618
May,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5302996
Hall
396/626
Apr,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5294956
Earle

Mar,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5270762
Rosenburgh
396/632
Dec,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5252439
Nakamura
430/399
Oct,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5243373
Glover
396/615
Sep,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5179404
Bartell
396/617
Jan,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5077180
Yoshida

Dec,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5043756
Takabayashi
396/616
Aug,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5024924
Naruse
430/376
Jun,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5004676
Meckl
430/398
Apr,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4997749
Wernicke
430/464
Mar,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4977067
Yoshikawa
430/398
Dec,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4797351
Ishikawa
430/387
Jan,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4791048
Hirai
430/372
Dec,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4786584
Endo
430/434
Nov,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4613562
Kuse
430/450
Sep,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4328306
Idota
430/393
May,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4245034
Libicky
430/399
Jan,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method of processing an imagewise exposed color silver halide photographic element comprising developing and desilvering said photographic element in a processor having either a rack and tank or automatic tray design, said processor comprising a narrow processing channel wherein said processor operates at 15% or less of maximum production capacity,

said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being processed,

the total amount of a processing solution used in said narrow processing channel being at least 40% of the total volume of said processing solution in said processor, and

said processing solution being delivered to said narrow processing channel via a nozzle according to the following formula:

1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40

wherein F is the flow rate of said processing solution through said nozzle in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in square inches.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said processor operates at 10% or less of maximum production capacity.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element has a silver halide emulsion wherein greater than 90 mole % of the silver halide is silver chloride.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element is a color photographic paper.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element is a color photographic film.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said photographic element is a silver bromoiodide photographic film.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element comprises a tabular grain silver halide emulsion.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein said photographic element comprises less than 0.8 g silver per m.sup.2.

9. The method of claim 1 for the processing of color photographic paper, wherein said narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less than 50 times the thickness of said color photographic paper being processed.

10. The method of claim 1 for the processing of color photographic film, wherein said narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less than 18 times the thickness of said color photographic film being processed.

11. A method of processing an imagewise exposed color silver halide photographic element comprising developing said photographic element in a developing solution, in a processor having either a rack and tank or automatic tray design, said processor comprising a narrow processing channel, wherein said developing solution is replenished by direct replenishment,

said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being processed,

the total amount of said developing solution used in said narrow processing channel being at least 40% of the total volume of the processing solution in said processor, and

said developing solution being delivered to said narrow processing channel via a nozzle according to the following formula:

1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40

wherein F is the flow rate of said developing solution through said nozzle in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in square inches.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein said developing solution is replenished at the rate of 10 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein said developing solution is replenished at the rate of 6 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein said developing solution is replenished at the rate of 20 ml or less per roll of 35mm-24 exposure film having a surface area of 0.42 ft.sup.2.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said developing solution is replenished at the rate of 15 ml or less per roll of 35mm-24 exposure film having a surface area of 0.42 ft.sup.2.

16. A method of processing an imagewise exposed and developed color silver halide photographic element comprising desilvering said photographic element in a bleach-fixing processing solution or in a bleaching processing solution and a separate fixing processing solution, in a processor having either a rack and tank or automatic tray design, said processor comprising a narrow processing channel, wherein said bleach-fixing processing solution or bleaching processing solution and fixing processing solution are replenished by direct replenishment,

said photographic element being processed in said narrow processing channel of said processor, which narrow processing channel has a thickness equal to or less than 100 times the thickness of said photographic element being processed,

the total amount of each of said processing solutions used in said narrow processing channel being at least 40% of the total volume of each of said processing solutions in said processor, and

each of said processing solutions being delivered to said processing channel via a nozzle according to the following formula:

1.ltoreq.F/A.ltoreq.40

wherein F is the flow rate of said processing solution through said nozzle in gallons per minute, and A is the cross-sectional area of said nozzle in square inches.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein said bleach-fixing processing solution or said bleaching processing solution and said fixing processing solution are replenished at the rate of 10 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein said bleach-fixing processing solution or said bleaching processing solution and said fixing processing solution are replenished at the rate of 5 ml or less per ft.sup.2 of photographic element.

19. The method of claim 16 wherein said photographic element has a silver halide emulsion wherein greater than 90 mole % of the silver halide is silver chloride.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the level of silver in said element is less than or equal to 0.8 g/m.sup.2.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the processing of silver halide photographic materials. It more specifically relates to the processing of such materials using a Low Volume Thin Tank processing system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Photographic processing equipment and processing chemicals have evolved dramatically over the last decade to meet the increasing demand for convenient, low cost, and environmentally friendly photoprocessing. Some of the changes have included improved processing chemicals which provide faster processing for both film and paper; and smaller, more streamlined equipment which requires a reduced amount of photochemicals. One of the most popular systems is the minilab which is small enough to allow any corner drugstore to offer photoprocessing and which can process a roll of film and provide prints in less than one hour.

However, even the advent of the minilab has not addressed all the needs and problems of modern photoprocessing. Two areas which particularly need addressing are 1) the increasing demand for photoprocessing capabilities in non-traditional photoprocessing environments and 2) the need to reduce the amount of replenishment necessary to keep a photoprocess system stable, both to decrease cost and to reduce the amount of effluent from processing machines. These two areas are often interrelated. In addition there is the never-ending desire to reduce processing time and/or the amount of chemicals needed to fully process various photographic materials.

The demand for non-traditional photoprocessing environments is being fueled by the increase of digital image processing. As digital image processing becomes more prevalent, there is a growing need for color hard copy from digital sources. Silver halide photographic hard copy can give the highest quality images, but is often found to be less convenient than electrophotographic or thermal technologies. Since the photographic processing of digital images would often be done in an office, home, or other non-traditional photoprocessing environments, the convenience of processing is of upmost importance.

Currently available processors can be inconvenient for home or office processing or for other small operations for the following reasons. First, the volume of the tank solutions that need to be prepared to fill a processor are still somewhat large for small-scale operations. Typical processor tank volumes of 10 to 25 liters for processor tanks require relatively large volumes of solutions to be handled.

Secondly, for low utilized systems, the processing solutions remain in the tank for a long residence time. The lack of `tank-turnovers` with fresh replenisher causes the solutions to evaporate and the components to oxidize, causing the chemical concentrations of the components to change. This leads to process control variability and precipitate formation, both of which can affect sensitometry. Such low utilization problems are one of the largest obstacles for small-scale operations when using traditional processing equipment.

Lastly, the relatively high silver coverages of current films and papers require higher chemical concentrations in the processing solutions, which contributes to the cost of the chemicals. It further results in a concentration of chemicals in the waste from the processor which may make disposal of the waste difficult for a home, office, or other small-scale operations.

The need to reduce the-amount of replenishment is driven by both cost and environmental concerns and is shared by large and small processors. Photographic processors are equipped with replenisher solutions designed to maintain process activity at a steady-state, as sensitized goods are processed. The replenishers contain the necessary components to replace chemicals consumed or lost through oxidation or carryover in developing, bleaching, fixing and washing and/or stabilization of sensitized materials.

In automated systems, as sensitized materials are processed, a signal is relayed to turn on the replenisher pumps, so that fresh solution is added to the process tanks. The rates that the solutions are added to the process are dependent on the concentration of components which can be attained in the replenisher solutions.

The replenishment rate in a processing system is set at the lowest rate possible. This reduces the effluent from the process, lowers handling of chemicals, reduces the amount of chemicals used, and reduces the energy needed to maintain operating temperatures. However, the amount replenishment can be reduced is dependent on the following factors.

1. Replenisher Stability--Once all components are combined into a single solution, the components begin reacting with each other and with oxygen, limiting the usefulness of the solution to the stability of the components. The usefulness of a mixed replenisher is normally 4-8 weeks, but may be as short as a few days. Solution stability may be enhanced by the use of covers which sit on top of the solution, eliminating air space which allows oxidation and evaporation.

2. Concentrate Stability--Because of the reactivity of the various components with each other and with oxygen, it is necessary to separate the replenisher concentrates into two or more parts until they are to be used. Concentrates are normally stable for several years if properly stored.

3. Productivity--The quantity of sensitized material processed daily is of concern, since low replenishment rates cause the tank solutions to be resident in the tanks for longer periods of time, subjecting them to oxidation, evaporation and interaction degradation.

4. Carryover--Carryover is the solution carried over from one tank into the next with the sensitized materials. The lower the carryover, the more stable the solutions. When very little or no solution is carried over into the next tank, less dilution occurs and less replenisher is needed in the next tank and less chemical interaction takes place. If the carryover is high, more solution is carried over and more replenisher is needed to compensate for dilution and chemical interactions. If the carryover out of the tank is greater than the replenishment rate, the tank volume will decrease. This results in a shift in the process activity due to the resulting volume loss. This loss reduces the time the sensitized material is in the solution and could lead to processor malfunction. If tank volume is lost, processing solution must be added to maintain solution level.

5. Evaporation-Oxidation--Evaporation and oxidation take place constantly with all processors. To control them, the area of solution exposed to the air needs be kept to a minimum. A surface which results in considerable evaporation and oxidation is the surface of rollers which are used to transport the sensitized material from one tank to another. Some processors have rollers which are partially submerged in the process solutions. The continual wetting and drying of these rollers increases evaporation and oxidation of the processing solutions. It is advantageous to have rollers either completely submerged or completely out of solution. Another way to reduce evaporation and oxidation is to reduce the flow of air over the solutions.

6. Tank turnover--Tank turnover (TTO) is the time required to replace the process tank solution with fresh replenisher solution. Reducing the replenishment rate of solutions extends the residence time of the solutions in the processor, increasing the time per tank turnover. To reduce the time per TTO and replenishment rate, it is necessary to reduce the volume of the processor tanks or increase the utilization (productivity) of the processor. Reducing the volume of the tanks or increasing the utilization of the processor, will decrease the time per tank turnover and reduce the residence time of the solutions.

7. Precipitation/Crystallization--Components which are present in the tank solutions may increase in concentration due to seasoning (processing of sensitized materials) or because of evaporation. Because of their solubility, the components may precipitate or crystallize from solution. The increase of the level of certain components may cause the precipitation or crystallization of other components by reducing their solubility. The lower the replenishment rate, the more likely that this will occur.

8. Process by-product buildup--Materials washing out of the sensitized product, such as, sensitizing dyes, halides, calcium, silver, which accumulate in the solutions as they season out of the sensitized materials, or as they are formed from reactions during photoprocessing, may also precipitate or crystallize.

9. Pump accuracy--As the replenishment rates are reduced, the need for high accuracy, low-volume pumps becomes imperative.

In particular, the amount of replenishment necessary is dependent on the level of utilization of the processor. When a traditional processing system has low utilization it cannot be operated using a low replenishment regime because the system is not stable.

The industry has attempted to compensate for low utilization problems and disposal problems by adjusting processing chemistry. For example, minilab film and paper processors run through a wide range of utilizations. One unit may experience a wide change of utilizations depending on the time of the year and picture taking opportunities. A variety of developer solutions have been made available to accommodate most situations. EKTACOLOR RA Developer Replenisher was formulated to accommodate the widest range of utilizations or tank turnovers within a given period of time. EKTACOLOR RA Developer Replenisher or EKTACOLOR PRIME Developer Replenisher will perform as designed, if the process maintains one tank turnover every 2 to 4 weeks or less. This product will perform equally as well if the process is run at higher utilizations, but may begin to fail if the developer tank is turned over less frequently than every 4 weeks. In this case, EKTACOLOR