WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Process for forming a raised portion on a projecting contact for electrical testing of a semiconductor    
United States Patent5585282   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5585282.html
Inventor(s)Wood; Alan G. (Boise, ID); Doan; Trung T. (Boise, ID); Farnworth; Warren M. (Nampa, ID); Corbett; Tim J. (Boise, ID)
AbstractA process for forming die contacting substrate for establishing ohmic contact with the die is formed with raised portions on contact members. The raised portions are dimensioned so that a compression force applied to the die against the substrate results in a limited penetration of the contact member into the bondpads. In the preferred embodiment, the substrate is formed of semiconductor material, with the raised portions being formed by etching. The arrangement may be used for establishing temporary electrical contact with a burn-in oven and with a discrete die tester. This permits the die to be characterized prior to assembly, so that the die may then be transferred in an unpackaged form. A Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material may be interposed between the die attachment surface and the die.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5585282
Process for forming a raised portion on a projecting contact for

     electrical testing of a semiconductor - US Patent 5585282 Drawing
Process for forming a raised portion on a projecting contact for electrical testing of a semiconductor
Inventor     Wood; Alan G. (Boise, ID); Doan; Trung T. (Boise, ID); Farnworth; Warren M. (Nampa, ID); Corbett; Tim J. (Boise, ID)
Owner/Assignee     Micron Technology, Inc. (Boise, ID)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     December 17, 1996
Application Number     08/406,637
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     March 20, 1995
US Classification     438/613 216/11 257/E21.512 257/E21.525 257/E23.004 257/E23.069 257/E23.07 438/17
Int'l Classification     H01L 021/28 H01L 021/308 H01L 021/66
Examiner     Niebling; John
Assistant Examiner     Graybill; David E.
Attorney/Law Firm     Gratton; Stephen A.
Address
Parent Case     CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/137,675 filed Oct. 14, 1993, abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 7/709,858, filed Jun. 4, 1991, abandoned; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 7/788,065, filed Nov. 5, 1991, U.S. Pat. No. 5,440,240; and U.S. patent application No. 7/981,956, filed Nov. 24, 1992. U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,324.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     437/8 437/183 437/216 437/222 437/977 257/739 257/785 228/180.22
Patent Tags     forming raised portion projecting contact for electrical testing semiconductor
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
3581151



[0 after 0 votes]
5326428
Farnworth
324/724
Jul,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5323035
Leedy
257/248
Jun,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5262718
Svendsen
324/754
Nov,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5225037
Elder
216/18
Jul,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5177439
Liu
324/754
Jan,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5177438
Littlebury
324/754
Jan,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5123850
Elder
439/67
Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5103557
Leedy

Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5088190
Malhi

Feb,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5073117
Malhi

Dec,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5072116
Kawade

Dec,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5070297
Kwon

Dec,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5059898
Barsotti
324/762
Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5045780
Swart
324/754
Sep,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5014161
Lee
361/709
May,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4963225
Lehman-Lamer
216/18
Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4952272
Okino
216/11
Aug,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4937653
Blonder
257/739
Jun,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4929999
Hoeberechts
257/782
May,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4924589
Leedy
438/6
May,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4881118
Niwayama
257/179
Nov,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4585991
Reid
324/757
Apr,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4189825
Robillard
438/4
Feb,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4063271
Bean
257/272
Dec,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
4312117
Robillard
438/107
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method for forming a contact member for establishing electrical contact with a contact location on a discrete, unpackaged semiconductor die, said contact location formed as a metal pad, said method comprising:

forming a substrate;

forming a contact on the substrate, said contact projecting from a surface of the substrate by a distance of from 20 .mu.m to 75 .mu.m to provide a clearance between the die and substrate;

forming a raised portion on the contact, said raised portion shaped as an elongated ridge projecting from a surface of the contact with a height of from 2 .ANG.to 1.5 .mu.m, for penetrating the contact location to a penetration depth that is less than a thickness of the contact location while the surface of the contact limits the penetration depth into the contact location; and

forming a conductive trace on the substrate for transmitting signals to and from said contact to the contact location.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 and wherein a plurality of raised portions shaped as elongated ridges are formed on the contact.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 and wherein the elongated ridges are formed in a concentric pattern.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 and wherein said raised portion is formed by etching the substrate.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 and wherein said contact is formed as a plateau by etching the substrate around the raised portion.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 and wherein said contact is formed by forming a mask on the substrate, etching the substrate around the raised portion to form the plateau and then removing the mask.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 and wherein the raised portion is etched at an etch angle of approximately 55.degree..

8. The method as claimed in claim 7 and wherein the raised portion is formed by wet etching.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 and wherein the substrate is formed of a material selected from the group consisting of silicon, germanium and silicon on sapphire.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 and wherein the raised portion is formed as a pointed elongated ridge.

11. A method for forming a contact member for establishing electrical contact with a pattern of contact locations on a discrete, unpackaged semiconductor die, said contact location formed as a metal pad, said method comprising:

forming a substrate;

forming a first mask on the substrate;

etching the substrate around the mask to form a plurality of elongated ridges with each ridge projecting from the substrate with a height of from 2 .ANG. to 1.5 .mu.m for penetrating the contact location to a penetration depth that is less than a thickness of the contact locations;

forming a second mask on the substrate;

etching the substrate around each ridge to form a plurality of raised contacts in a pattern matching the pattern of contact locations, each contact projecting from a surface of the substrate by a distance of from 20 .mu.m to 75 .mu.m to provide a clearance between the die and substrate; and

forming a conductive trace on the substrate for transmitting signals to and from said contact to the contact location.

12. The method as claimed in claim 11 and wherein each elongated ridge includes sloped sidewalls.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 and wherein each contact includes a plurality of elongated ridges arranged in a concentric pattern.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 and wherein the ridges are etched at an angle of approximately 55.degree. using an isotropic wet etch process.

15. The method as claimed in claim 14 and wherein each contact is formed as a raised plateau with the ridges formed on a flat top surface of the plateau.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15 and wherein the conductive traces are formed using a metallization process.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16 and wherein the conductive traces are formed using a conductive doping process.

18. A method for forming a contact member for establishing electrical contact with a contact location on a discrete, unpackaged semiconductor die, said contact location formed as a metal pad, said method comprising:

forming a substrate;

forming a raised contact on the substrate for contacting the contact location, said raised contact formed with a height to provide a clearance between the substrate and the contact location of at least 20 .mu.m;

forming a conductive trace on the substrate for transmitting signals to and from said contact to the contact location; and

forming a raised portion on the contact, said raised portion shaped as an elongated ridge projecting from a surface of the contact with a height of from 2 .ANG. to 1.5 .mu.m, for penetrating the contact location to a penetration depth that is less than a thickness of the contact location while the surface of the contact limits the penetration depth into the contact location.

19. The method as claimed in claim 18 and wherein said raised portion is formed by etching the substrate.

20. The method as claimed in claim 19 and wherein said contact is formed as a plateau with a flat top surface by etching the substrate around the raised portion.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to packaging for semiconductor devices. More specifically, the invention relates to a bondpad contact which is self-limiting in its penetration into bondpads or other contact points on a semiconductor die.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Semiconductor devices are subjected to a series of test procedures in order to assure quality and reliability. This testing procedure conventionally includes "probe testing ", in which individual dies, while still on a wafer, are initially tested to determine functionality and speed. Probe cards are used to electrically test die at that level. The electrical connection interfaces with only a single die at a time in the wafer; not discrete die.

If the wafer has a yield of functional dies which indicates that quality of the functional dies is likely to be good, each individual die is assembled in a package to form a semiconductor device. Conventionally, the packaging includes a lead frame and a plastic or ceramic housing.

The packaged devices are then subjected to another series of tests, which include burn-in and discrete testing. Discrete testing permits the devices to be tested for speed and for errors which may occur after assembly and after burn-in. Burn-in accelerates failure mechanisms by electrically exercising the devices (DUT) at elevated temperatures, thus eliminating potential failures which would not otherwise be apparent at nominal test conditions.

Variations on these procedures permit devices assembled onto circuit arrangements, such as memory boards, to be burned-in, along with the memory board in order to assure reliability of the circuit, as populated with devices. This closed assembly testing assumes that the devices are discretely packaged in order that it can then be performed more readily.

If the wafer has a yield of grossly functional die, it indicates that a good quantity of die from the wafer are likely to be fully operative. The die are separated with a die saw, and the nonfunctional die are scrapped, while the rest are individually encapsulated in plastic packages or mounted in ceramic packages with one die in each package. After the die are packaged they are rigorously electrically tested. Components which turn out to be nonfunctional, or which operate at questionable specifications, are scrapped or devoted to special uses.

Packaging unusable die, only to scrap them after testing, is a waste of time and materials, and is therefore costly. Given the relatively low profit margins of commodity semiconductor components such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs) and static random access memories (SRAMs), this practice is uneconomical. However, no thorough and cost effective method of testing an unpackaged die is available which would prevent this unnecessary packaging of nonfunctional and marginally functional die. Secondly, the packaging may have other limitations which are aggravated by burn-in stress conditions, so that the packaging becomes a limitation for burn-in testing.

It is proposed that multiple integrated circuit devices be packaged as a single unit, known as a multi chip module (MCM). This can be accomplished with or without conventional lead frames. This creates two problems when using conventional test methods. Firstly, discrete testing is more difficult because a conventional lead frame package is not used. Furthermore, when multiple devices are assembled into a single package, the performance of the package is reduced to that of the die with the lowest performance. Therefore, such dies are tested on an individual basis at probe, using ambient and "hot chuck" test techniques, while still in wafer form. In other words, the ability to presort the individual dice is limited to that obtained through probe testing.

In addition, there is an increased interest in providing parts which are fully characterized prior to packaging. This is desired not only because of the cost of the package, but also because there is demand for multi-chip modules (MCMs), in which multiple parts in die form are tested and assembled into a single unit. While there are various techniques proposed for testing, burning in and characterizing a singulated die, it would be advantageous to be able to "wafer map" the die prior to assembly with as many performance characteristics as possible. Ideally, one would want to be able to map the wafer with full device characterization.

MCMs create a particular need for testing prior to assembly, as contrasted to the economics of testing parts which are discretely packaged as singulated parts. For discretely packaged parts, if the product yield of good parts from preliminary testing to final shipment (probe-to-ship) is, for example, 95%, one would not be particularly concerned with packaging costs for the failed parts, if packaging costs are 10% of the product manufacturing costs. Even where packaging costs are considerably higher, as in ceramic encapsulated parts, testing unpackaged die is economical for discretely packaged parts when the added costs approximates that of cost of packaging divided by yield: ##EQU1## where C=cost

C.sub.DIE =manufacturing cost of functional die

C.sub.ADDL. KGD =additional cost of testing unpackaged die in order to produce known good die (KGD)

Note that in the case of discretely packaged parts, the cost of the die (C.sub.DIE) is essentially not a factor. This changes in the case of MCMs: ##EQU2## Note that again C.sub.DIE is not a factor in modules having identical part types; however, the equation must be modified to account for varied costs and yields of die in modules with mixed part types.

With MCMs, the cost of packaging a failed part is proportional to the number of die in the module. In the case of a .times.16 memory array module, where probe-to-ship yield of the die is 95%, the costs are: ##EQU3## so the additional costs of testing for known good die (KGD) may be 16 times the cost of testing an unrepairable module and still be economical. This, of course, is modified by the ability to repair failed modules.

Testing of unpackaged die before packaging into multichip modules would be desirable as it would result in reduced material waste, increased profits, and increased throughput. Using only known good die in MCMs would increase MCM yields significantly.

Testing unpackaged die requires a significant amount of handling. Since the test package must be separated from the die, the temporary packaging may be more complicated than either standard discrete packaging or multichip module (MCM) packaging. The package must be compatible with test and burn-in procedures, while securing the die without damaging the die at the bondpads or elsewhere during the process.

In U.S. Pat. No. 4,899,107, commonly assigned, a reusable burn-in/test fixture for discrete TAB die is taught. The fixture consists of two halves, one of which is a die cavity plate for receiving semiconductor dies as the units under test (UUT); and the other half establishes electrical contact with the dies and with a burn-in oven.

The first half of the test fixture contains cavities in which die are inserted circuit side up. The die will rest on a floating platform. The second half has a rigid high temperature rated substrate, on which are mounted probes for each corresponding die pad. Each of a plurality of probes is connected to an electrical trace on the substrate (similar to a P.C. board) so that each die pad of each die is electrically isolated from one another for high speed functional testing purposes. The probe tips are arranged in an array to accommodate eight or sixteen dies.

The two halves of the test fixture are joined so that each pad on each die aligns with a corresponding probe tip. The test fixture is configured to house groups of 8 or 16 die for maximum efficiency of the functional testers.

There are some testing and related procedures when the parts are singulated. For this reason, it is inconvenient to retain multiple die in a single test fixture.

Various forms of connections are used to connect the die to a package or, in the case of a multichip module (MCM), to other connections. These include wirebonding, TAB connections, bump bonding directly to substrate, and conductive adhesives.

The bondpads are conductive areas on the face of the die which are used as an interconnect for connecting the circuitry on the die to the outside world. Normally, conductors are bonded to the bondpads, but it is possible to establish electrical contact through the bondpads by biasing conductors against the bondpads without actual bonding.

One of the problems encountered with burn in and full characterization testing of unpackaged die is the physical stress caused by connection of the bondpads to an external connection circuitry. This problem is complicated by the fact that in many die configurations, the bondpads are recessed below the surface level of a passivation layer. The passivation layer is a layer of low eutectic glass, such as BPSG, which is applied to the die in order to protect circuitry on the die. (The term "eutectic" does not, strictly speaking, apply to glass, which is an amorphous fluid; however, the term is used to describe the characteristic of some glasses wherein, as a result of their formulation, they readily flow at a given temperature.)

The ohmic contact between bondpads or test points on a die and a known good die test carrier package has been a matter of interest. It is difficult to achieve and maintain consistent ohmic contact without damaging the bondpads and passivation layer on the die. The design criteria of such contacts is somewhat different from the design criteria of the carrier package.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, probe tips are formed with projections which extend upward from a base. The probe tips establish electrical contact with bondpads or other contact locations on a surface such as a semiconductor die. In the case of bondpads on a semiconductor integrated circuit, the contact permits electrical communication between integrated circuit and external circuitry. The arrangement is suitable for flat bond pads or raised bump contacts.

In the preferred embodiments, the probe tips are formed on a substrate, and the substrate is formed from a material similar to that of the semiconductor integrated circuit die or wafer. In the case of silicon wafers, the substrate is formed from silicon material, thereby providing a coefficient of thermal expansion which matches that of the wafer. In one embodiment, the substrate is silicon, with one or more electrically isolating layers formed on the substrate. A plurality of raised conductors extend from the isolating layers and contact bondpads on the wafer. The conductive traces are in communication with the raised conductors in order to establish signal connections to perform the testing.

The intermediate substrate is preferably formed of a semiconductor material, and includes circuitry which is used to conduct signals between bondpad locations and external connector leads on the fixture. The substrate with circuitry is able to establish contact with the external connector leads, or with other leads on the fixture which are in communication with the external connector leads. In the preferred embodiment, the substrate is formed from silicon, although other semiconductor materials may be used. Examples of alternative materials include germanium and silicon on sapphire (SOS).

The substrate is formed with portions having increased height, such as bumps. These bumps, in turn, are formed with raised portions or points, so that the raised portion may penetrate the bondpad, while the remainder of the bump functions to limit penetration depth of the raised portion. This permits the penetration depth of the bump to be controlled by the physical dimensions of the raised portion. This results in the bumps being self-limiting in their penetration of the bondpads.

In a modification of the invention, a Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material is provided as an interface between the substrate and the die. The Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material is used to establish ohmic contact with bondpads or the equivalent attach points on the semiconductor die. The Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material is able to conform to the shape of the die at the bondpad sufficiently to establish the ohmic contact without substantially damaging the bondpad. Since contact is able to be established by biasing force, it is possible to perform burn in and test of the die without resorting to bonding a conductor to the bondpad.

The Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material is a metal filled polymer composite which is able to function as a compliant interconnection material for connector and testing applications. This material is in a group of materials which are referred to as elastomeric conductive polymer interconnect (ECPI) materials. These are available from AT&T Bell Laboratories, of Allentown, Pa., or Shin Etsu Polymer America Inc., of Union City, Calif., 3M Company of Minneapolis, Minn., at their Austin, Tex. plant or Nitto Denko America, Inc., San Jose, Calif. (a subsidiary of Nitto Denko Corporation of Japan).

The contact between the bondpads and the external connector leads is therefore established by utilizing the Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material and substrate with circuitry. Conductors on the Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material and substrate with circuitry extend from the bondpads to connection points, and the connection points conduct to contacts, which are in turn in communication with the external connector leads. The self-limiting nature of the bump is transferred through the Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material so that the potential damage to the bondpad by force exerted through the Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material is limited.

The various embodiments permit a substrate to be connected, through the contacts, to bondpads or testpoints on the die and conductors on the substrate. The connection may be permanent, or may be temporary. In the case of temporary connections, the contacts establish electrical contact with a wafer or a single die and with a burn-in oven, as well as permitting testing of dies in discretely packaged form. The contacts are thereby suitable for burn-in and testing of unpackaged die. In that application, after burn-in stress and electrical test, the wafer is removed from a test fixture and may be assembled in a conventional manner.

Connections of the substrate to the die may be effected through temporary carriers, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 8/073,003, filed Jun. 7, 1993, to Wood, Hembree, Doan and Farnworth, entitled, BONDPAD ATTACHMENTS USED TO TEMPORARILY CONNECT SEMICONDUCTOR DIE, and as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/046,675, filed Apr. 4, 1993, to Wood and Farnworth, entitled, CLAMPED CARRIER FOR TESTING 0F SEMICONDUCTOR DIES. These patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

The Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material may be placed in a wafer or die receiving carrier between the die and the contacts so that the ohmic contact with the bondpads or testpoints on the die may be established through the Z-axis anisotropic conductive interconnect material, through the substrate, to communicate with external connections.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a configuration in which a substrate has contact points for engaging bondpads on a semiconductor die;

FIG. 2 shows details of a raised portion of a bump, wherein the bump may be self-limiting in its penetration of the bondpads;

FIG. 3 i