|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5594638 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5594638.html |
| Inventor(s) | Iliff; Edwin C. (La Jolla, CA) |
| Abstract | A system and method for providing computerized, knowledge-based medical
diagnostic and treatment advice. The medical advice is provided to the
general public over a telephone network. Two new authoring languages,
interactive voice response and speech recognition are used to enable
expert and general practitioner knowledge to be encoded for access by the
public. "Meta" functions for time-density analysis of a number of factors
regarding the number of medical complaints per unit of time are an
integral part of the system. A semantic discrepancy evaluator routine
along with a mental status examination are used to detect the
consciousness level of a user of the system. A re-enter feature monitors
the user's changing condition over time. A symptom severity analysis helps
to respond to the changing conditions. System sensitivity factors may be
changed at a global level or other levels to adjust the system advice as
necessary. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5594638 |
|
|
Computerized medical diagnostic system including re-enter function and
sensitivity factors |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
January 14, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
December 29, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5193541 Hatsuwi
Mar,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5113869 Nappholz 600/508 May,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5099424 Schneiderman 705/3 Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5054493 Cohn 600/485 Oct,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5030948 Rush 340/7.46 Jul,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5023785 Adrion 600/300 Jun,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5012411 Policastro 600/485 Apr,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4975840 DeTore 705/4 Dec,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4974607 Miwa 600/483 Dec,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4962491 Schaeffer 368/21 Oct,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4945476 Bodick 600/301 Jul,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4868763 Masui 706/10 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4839822 Dormond
Jun,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4838275 Lee
Jun,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4825869 Sasmor 607/27 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4712562 Ohayon 600/485 Dec,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4606352 Geddes 600/515 Aug,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4531527 Reinhold, Jr. 600/509 Jul,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4465077 Schneider 600/551 Aug,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4458693 Badzinski 600/528 Jul,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4428381 Hepp 600/528 Jan,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4337377 Van Riper 379/106.02 Jun,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4315309 Coli 705/3 Feb,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4220160 Kimball 600/528 Sep,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. In an automated medical advice system including a computer, and input
and output devices, a method of re-entering a diagnosis of a patient's
medical problem, comprising the steps of:
performing an initial diagnostic consultation with the patient, thereby
collecting patient information;
identifying a situation wherein the patient is to consult the system again
wherein an indicator associated with programmed re-enter criteria is set
in the computer;
automatically instructing the patient to consult the system at a
predetermined time in the future based upon the identified situation;
performing one or more additional diagnostic consultations with the
patient, thereby collecting and storing additional patient information,
wherein the execution path of the additional diagnostic consultation is
responsive to the stored patient information and the indicator of
satisified re-enter criteria; and
formulating a diagnosis from said collected patient information during a
one of the diagnostic consultations.
2. The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step for identifying the
situation provides for monitoring the symptoms of the patient over time.
3. The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step for identifying the
situation makes an identification when the system fails to make a
diagnosis based on the available patient information.
4. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
assessing the severity of the problem during at least one of the
consultations.
5. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
identifying a person consulting the system after the initial consultation
as a re-enter patient.
6. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
determining that the initial consultation and each additional diagnostic
consultation provides patient information for only one medical problem.
7. The method defined in claim 1, wherein the step of performing additional
consultations results in adding the additional information to a medical
record of the patient.
8. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
identifying a patient needing immediate medical attention during any one
of the additional diagnostic consultations.
9. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
confirming a diagnosis made during one of the consultations based on the
additional patient information.
10. The method defined in claim 9, additionally comprising the step of
informing the patient when a change in treatment is available for the
confirmed diagnosis.
11. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
referring the patient to a physician if a diagnosis made during one of the
consultations cannot be confirmed based upon any one succeeding
consultation.
12. The method defined in claim 1, additionally comprising the step of
automatically contacting the patient at preselected times so as to monitor
the condition of the patient.
13. In an automated medical advice system including a computer, and input
and output devices, a method of symptom severity analysis, comprising the
steps of:
performing a first diagnostic consultation with a patient for a problem by
a diagnostic process, thereby collecting patient information;
quantizing a severity of a symptom of the patient based upon the first
consultation;
identifying a situation wherein the patient is to consult the system again
wherein, if a programmed re-enter criteria is satisified, an indicator
associated with the programmed re-enter criteria is set in the computer;
automatically instructing the patient to consult the system at a
predetermined time in the future based upon the identified situation;
performing a second diagnostic consultation with the patient for the
problem by the diagnostic process;
quantizing the severity of the symptom of the patient based upon the second
consultation;
analyzing changes in a level of severity and rate of change of severity
over time based upon the quantized severities and
providing instructions to the patient based on the analysis of changes in a
level of severity and rate of change of severity over time.
14. The method defined in claim 13, additionally comprising the step of
providing selected medical advice if the rate of change of severity
exceeds a preselected threshold.
15. The method defined in claim 13, additionally comprising the step of
requesting the patient to consult with the system at a predetermined later
time if the rate of change of severity does not achieve a preselected
threshold.
16. The method defined in claim 13, additionally comprising the steps of:
performing a third diagnostic consultation with the patient for the problem
by the diagnostic process; and
quantizing the severity of the symptom of the patient based upon the third
consultation.
17. The method defined in claim 16, additionally comprising the steps of:
analyzing any change in the rate of change of severity over time; and
providing medical advice if the change of rate of change of severity
exceeds a preselected threshold.
18. In an automated medical advice system including a computer, input and
output devices, and a set of medical algorithms, a method of modifying
sensitivity so as to change the advice of the system, comprising the steps
of:
receiving through at least one of said input devices data indicative of
physical symptoms of a patient;
establishing a sensitivity factor representative of relative importance of
a selective field of interest having a cost/benefit tradeoff recognized by
a healthcare organization in at least one medical algorithm;
changing a threshold value in at least one of the medical algorithms by use
of the sensitivity factor, wherein the new threshold value affects a
branching decision in the medical algorithm and wherein the medical
algorithm uses physical symptoms of the patient to generate a diagnosis;
communicating the diagnosis through the output device; and
changing the sensitivity factor over time to affect the sensitivity of the
system thereby improving the advice given by the system.
19. The method defined in claim 18, wherein the sensitivity factor
comprises a system-wide sensitivity factor affecting all threshold
calculations throughout the system.
20. The method defined in claim 18, additionally comprising the steps of:
establishing a problem sensitivity factor; and
changing threshold calculations in a selected one of the medical algorithms
by use of the problem sensitivity factor.
21. The method defined in claim 18, wherein the sensitivity factor is
selected from the following sensitivity factors: system-wide, anatomic
system, cause, problem, question, organization, or patient, or
combinations thereof.
22. The method defined in claim 21, wherein the step of changing the
sensitivity factor over time includes changing any combination of the
sensitivity factors.
23. The method defined in claim 18, wherein the value of the sensitivity
factor is initially set to one.
24. The method defined in claim 18, wherein the changing threshold
calculations step includes a multiplication of the sensitivity factor
times a threshold value.
25. In an automated medical advice system including a computer, and input
and output devices, a method of re-entering a diagnosis of a patient's
medical problem, comprising the steps of:
performing an initial diagnostic consultation with the patient, thereby
collecting patient information;
identifying a situation wherein the patient is to consult the system again,
wherein, if a programmed re-enter criteria is satisfied, an indicator
associated with the programmed re-enter criteria is set in the computer;
automatically instructing the patient to consult the system at a
predetermined time in the future based upon the identified situation;
performing one or more additional diagnostic consultations in response to
the indicator of satisfied re-enter criteria such that additional
information collected from the patient is associated with one medical
problem; and
formulating a diagnosis from said collected patient information during a
one of the diagnostic consultations. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
MICROFICHE APPENDIX
A Microfiche Appendix containing computer source code is attached. The
Microfiche Appendix comprises 9 sheets of microfiche having 454 frames,
including one title frame.
The Microfiche Appendix contains material which is subject to copyright
protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the reproduction of
such material, as it appears in the files of the Patent and Trademark
Office, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to medical knowledge systems and, more
particularly, to systems for giving medical advice to the general public
over a telephone network.
2. Description of the Related Technology
Health care costs currently represent 14% of the United States Gross
National Product and are rising faster than any other component of the
Consumer Price Index. Moreover, usually because of an inability to pay for
medical services, many people are deprived of access to even the most
basic medical care and information.
Many people delay in obtaining, or are prevented from seeking, medical
attention because of cost, time constraints, or inconvenience. If the
public had universal, unrestricted and easy access to medical information,
many diseases could be prevented. Likewise, the early detection and
treatment of numerous diseases could keep many patients from reaching the
advanced stages of illness, the treatment of which is a significant part
of the financial burden attributed to our nation's health care system. It
is obvious that the United States is facing health-related issues of
enormous proportions and that present solutions are not robust.
One prior attempt at a solution to the health care problem is called
Ask-A-Nurse, wherein a group of nurses provide health information by
telephone around-the-clock. A person with a medical problem calls an 800
number and describes the problem to the nurse. The nurse uses a computer
for general or diagnostic information on the ailment or complaint
mentioned by the caller. The nurse may then refer the caller to a doctor
from a computerized referral list for a contracting hospital or group of
hospitals. Client hospitals contract with Ask-A-Nurse to provide patient
referrals. A managed care option called Personal Health Advisor is similar
and adds the capability for the caller to hear prerecorded messages on
health topics 24 hours a day. Several problems exist with these prior
medical advice systems. First, these systems have high costs associated
with having a nurse answer each telephone call. Second, the caller may
have to belong to a participating health plan to utilize the service.
Third, if for some reason all nurses on a particular shift happen to be
busy and the caller has an emergency condition (that is not known by the
caller to be an emergency), precious time in getting emergency services
may be lost during the delay.
Another prior health system was developed by InterPractice Systems which
provides a computerized service that answers health care questions and
advises people in their homes. A health maintenance organization (HMO) may
provide this service to its members in a particular geographic area. To
get advice at home, an HMO member connects a toaster-sized box to a
telephone and calls a toll-free 800 number. Using a keyboard that is part
of the box, the user answers questions displayed on a screen of the box
relating to the user's symptoms. Depending on the answers, the user might
be told to try a home remedy, be called by a nurse or doctor, or be given
an appointment to be examined. A limitation of this system is the
additional expense of the electronics box, which could either be purchased
by the user for approximately $300 or purchased by the health organization
with the expense to be passed on to the users. Another limitation is that
this service is directed to members of a particular contracting health
organization, such as an HMO. What is desired is a system that does not
require additional hardware for the basic service, but that utilizes the
existing communication network. The desired system should be available for
use by any person, not just members of a certain organization.
A prior attempt at a health care solution for a limited set of conditions
is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,712,562. A patient's blood pressure and
heart rate are measured and the measurements are sent via telephone to a
remote central computer for storage and analysis. Reports are generated
for submission to a physician or the patient. U.S. Pat. No. 4,531,527
describes a similar system, wherein the receiving office unit
automatically communicates with the physician under predetermined
emergency circumstances.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,275 discloses a device for a patient to lay on or sit
in having electronics to measure multiple parameters related to a
patient's health. These parameters are electronically transmitted to a
central surveillance and control office where a highly trained observer
interacts with the patient. The observer conducts routine diagnostic
sessions except when an emergency is noted or from a patient-initiated
communication. The observer determines if a nonroutine therapeutic
response is required, and if so facilitates such a response. As previously
mentioned, highly trained people are needed by this system along with the
special measurement apparatus (embedded in a bed or chair).
Other prior attempts at a health care solution are typified by U.S. Pat.
No. 5,012,411 which describes a portable self-contained apparatus for
measuring, storing and transmitting detected physiological information to
a remote location over a communication system. The information is
evaluated by a physician or other health professional. As before, highly
trained people are necessary to utilize such an apparatus.
Several services to provide medical or pharmaceutical advice are now
available via "1-900" telephone numbers, e.g., "Doctors by Phone." These
services are available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. A group of
doctors, including some specialties, is available to answer questions
about health care or medical conditions for people anywhere in the United
States who call the "1-900" telephone of one of the services. A group of
registered pharmacists answers questions about medications for the "1-900"
pharmaceutical service.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present solution to the health care problem is a computerized medical
diagnostic and treatment advice (MDATA) system that is a medical
knowledge-based system designed to give medical advice to the general
public over the telephone network. The goal of the MDATA system is to
provide everyone with equal access to high quality, 100%-consistent
medical advice at a reasonable cost. The MDATA system provides callers
with extremely fast and virtually unlimited access to health care
information, twenty-four hours a day, from any location around the world.
Health care advice is made available to an entire spectrum of users, from
elderly patients confined to their homes to travelers in a foreign country
with telephones in their cars.
The central ideas leading to the development of the MDATA system are based
on the following assumptions:
Nearly 90% of all patient complaints are confined to approximately 100
medical problems.
Almost all primary care decisions involved in these 100 problems can be
made based upon information learned solely by obtaining a detailed medical
history. The results of the physical examination, laboratory, and imaging
studies only tend to confirm a diagnosis.
The minimal amount of information that many doctors believe can only be
obtained from the physical examination can actually be directly acquired
from the patient when given appropriate instructions.
In most cases, a face-to-face interaction between the doctor and patient is
not necessary. A detailed and well-constructed history, along with
physical findings elicited from the patient, can be obtained over the
telephone.
Medicine is basically diagnosis and treatment. Although treatment
recommendations change frequently, the fundamental principles of making
the diagnosis do not.
There is a significant delay between the time a new therapy is recognized
as safe and effective and the time physicians are able to provide it to
their patients.
These central ideas are utilized in the implementation of the MDATA system.
A goal of the MDATA system is to give better medical advice than a family
practitioner who is unfamiliar with a patient, e.g., an on-call physician.
A person seeking medical advice frequently will not be able to see or
speak with his or her personal physician in a timely manner. The MDATA
system provides medical advice whenever desired by the caller--seven days
a week/24 hours a day.
All previous medical algorithms, including those used in the military, are
designed for face-to-face interactions. Self-help books generally do not
consider age and sex in their algorithms. Furthermore, a book cannot take
into account how many times a person has consulted the same algorithm
within a short period of time for the same problem. The medical algorithms
used by the MDATA system are designed for use in a telecommunications
setting and overcome the deficiencies of self-help books.
Previous medical advice systems do not do a time-density analysis for a
number of factors with regard to the number of complaints per unit of
time. The MDATA system uses "meta" functions to perform these analyses.
Previous medical advice algorithms do not have a way of detecting the
consciousness level of the person seeking consultation. The MDATA system
invokes a "mental status examination" whenever a complaint or problem has
the possibility of an altered level of consciousness. In addition, the
MDATA system uses "semantic discrepancy evaluator loops" which allow the
system to invoke the mental status exam if there are differences in
answers to the parallel threads of thought that are woven or embedded into
the system.
Other medical advice systems do not have a "re-enter" feature to monitor a
patient's progress or worsening over time. The MDATA system checks for and
responds to changing conditions over time.
Prior medical advice systems suffer from the inability to be nearly
instantly up-dated as new medical information is made available. The MDATA
system regularly and frequently updates the treatment aspect of the
system.
The computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice (MDATA) system is
a medical knowledge-based system designed to give medical advice to the
general public over the telephone network. Using a new authoring language,
interactive voice response and speech recognition technology, the MDATA
system encodes a highly useful core of expert and general practitioner
diagnostic and treatment knowledge into a computerized system for access
by non-medically trained personnel.
The MDATA system does not provide advice for every medical problem, nor
does it make an exhaustive study of one vertical cross-section of
medicine. Instead, the MDATA system provides up-to-date medical advice for
approximately one hundred of the most commonly encountered problems in
general practice and emergency medicine. It also provides valuable
information to the public on any number of other medical topics.
As another embodiment of the MDATA system, a person desiring medical advice
and having access to a personal computer (PC) loads a program into the PC
to produce a stand-alone medical diagnostic and treatment advice
(SA-MDATA) system. Rather than listening to questions and responding via
touch tone keypresses or via voice, the user responds to questions and
directions displayed on the computer screen via a computer input device,
such as a keyboard or mouse. The diagnosis and/or treatment
recommendations provided by the MDATA system are the same as that provided
by the SA-MDATA system. The user of the SA-MDATA system can procure
updates by contacting the MDATA system sponsor/administrator to obtain the
most current treatment table information for a particular diagnosis.
One aspect of the present invention includes, in an automated medical
advice system including a computer, and input and output devices, a method
of re-entering a diagnosis of a patient's medical problem, comprising the
steps of: performing an initial diagnostic consultation with the patient,
thereby collecting patient information, identifying a situation wherein
the patient is to consult the system again, instructing the patient to
consult the system at a predetermined time in the future, and performing
one or more additional diagnostic consultations with the patient, thereby
collecting additional patient information.
Another aspect of the | | |