|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5601609 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5601609.html |
| Inventor(s) | Duncan; James L. (Alpharetta, GA) |
| Abstract | An implantable cardioversion shock therapy system is provided which delays
delivery of a cardioversion shock until late in the cardiac cycle to
optimize the chance for the vast majority of ventricular myocardial tissue
to be non-refractory. The system in intended to increase efficacy and
safety by properly synchronizing the cardioversion shock to the
appropriate portion of the cardiac cycle to successfully terminate a
tachycardia episode. The timing of the cardioversion shock is programmable
as either a percentage of measured tachycardia cycle length or fixed delay
in milliseconds. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5601609 |
|
|
Implantable cardiac stimulating device and method for administering
synchronized cardioversion shock therapy to provide preemptive
depolarization |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
February 11, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
March 14, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/123,025 filed on
Sep. 15, 1993, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5184615 Nappholz 607/14 Feb,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5083562 de Coriolis
Jan,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5063928 Grevis
Nov,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4998974 Aker 607/4 Mar,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4989602 Sholder 607/4 Feb,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4895151 Grevis 607/4 Jan,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4869252 Gilli 607/4 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4830006 Haluska 607/4 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4790317 Davies 607/4 Dec,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4788980 Mann 607/14 Dec,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4787389 Tarjan 607/4 Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4662377 Heilman 607/4 May,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4587970 Holley 607/15 May,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4541430 Elmqvist 607/14 Sep,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4427011 Spurrell 607/14 Jan,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4408606 Spurrell 607/14 Oct,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4406287 Nappholz 607/15 Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4398536 Nappholz 607/15 Aug,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4390021 Spurrell 607/14 Jun,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4384585 Zipes 607/5 May,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4312356 Sowton 607/14 Jan,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4280502 Baker, Jr. 607/14 Jul,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4163451 Lesnick 607/14 Aug,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3942534 Allen 607/14 Mar,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4875483 Vollmann 607/15 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. An implantable cardioversion shock therapy system, comprising:
sensing means for sensing intrinsic R-waves;
pulse generating means for generating a cardioversion shock and for
delivering the cardioversion shock to cardiac tissue; and
control means, responsive to the sensing means, for analyzing the R-waves
to confirm a tachycardia episode, and for controlling the pulse generating
means to trigger the cardioversion shock after a predetermined delay
corresponding to a period when the cardiac tissue is repolarized, the
predetermined delay being synchronized from a last R-wave following the
confirmation of the tachycardia episode so that the cardioversion shock
preempts a successive R-wave.
2. The system of claim 1, further comprising:
an external programming means for sending system operating parameters to
and receiving data from the control means;
telemetry means, coupled to the control means, for receiving the system
operating parameters, including the predetermined delay, from the external
programming means.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the control means further comprises:
means for defining the predetermined delay as a predetermined fixed time
interval which is expected to occur when the cardiac tissue is
repolarized.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the predetermined fixed time interval is
at least greater than 300 msec.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein:
the control means further includes means for determining a tachycardia
cycle length; and
the predetermined fixed time interval is a programmable value between 150
ms and the tachycardia cycle length.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the control means further comprises:
means for determining a tachycardia cycle length; and
means for defining the predetermined delay as a predetermined percentage of
the tachycardia cycle length which is expected to occur when the cardiac
tissue is repolarized.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the predetermined percentage of the
tachycardia cycle length is in the range of 30-99% of the tachycardia
cycle length.
8. An implantable system for administering cardioversion shock therapy to
cardiac tissue in accordance with a tachycardia rate of a patient to
preempt an expected tachycardia beat, the system comprising:
sensing means for sensing intrinsic R-waves;
pulse generating means for generating a cardioversion shock and delivering
the cardioversion shock to the cardiac tissue; and
control means, responsive to the sensing means, for analyzing the intrinsic
R-waves to determine a tachycardia cycle length, and for triggering the
pulse generating means to deliver the cardioversion shock after a
predetermined time, determined as a function of the tachycardia cycle
length, has elapsed following a preceding tachycardia beat to elicit a
heartbeat that preempts the expected tachycardia beat.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the function of the tachycardia cycle
length is a predetermined percentage of the tachycardia cycle length.
10. The system of claim 9, further comprising:
an external programming means for sending system operating parameters to
and receiving data from the control means;
telemetry means, coupled to the control means, for receiving the system
operating parameters, including the predetermined percentage, from the
external programming.
11. An implantable cardioversion shock therapy system, comprising:
cardiac sensing means for sensing naturally occurring cardiac
depolarizations in a selected chamber of a patient's heart;
pulse generator means for providing a cardioversion shock of sufficient
energy to terminate a tachycardia episode in the selected chamber of the
heart;
a shocking lead, coupled to the pulse generator means, for delivering the
cardioversion shock to the selected chamber of the heart; and
processing means, coupled to the cardiac sensing means and the pulse
generator means, for confirming a tachycardia episode based on the sensed
cardiac depolarizations and for controlling the pulse generator means to
provide the cardioversion shock after a predetermined time interval
following confirmation of the tachycardia episode to preempt an expected
tachycardia beat.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processing means further comprises:
control means for defining the predetermined time interval as an alert
interval corresponding to an expected alert period of the heart following
the refractory period and prior to the next expected tachycardia beat.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein:
the processing means includes means for determining a tachycardia cycle
length; and
the control means includes means for defining the predetermined time
interval as a predetermined percentage of the tachycardia cycle length
following a preceding tachycardia beat.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the predetermined percentage of the
tachycardia cycle length is in the range of 30-99% of the tachycardia
cycle length.
15. The system of claim 11, wherein the control means further comprises:
means for defining the predetermined time interval as a predetermined fixed
time interval, triggered from a preceding tachycardia beat, which is
expected to occur when the cardiac tissue is repolarized.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein:
the control means further includes means for determining a tachycardia
cycle length; and
the predetermined fixed time interval is a programmable value between 150
ms and the tachycardia cycle length.
17. An implantable cardioversion shock therapy system, comprising:
means for detecting a tachycardia episode;
means for delivering a cardioversion shock to cardiac tissue in response to
the tachycardia episode; and
means for delaying delivery of the cardioversion shock by a predetermined
time interval measured from a preceding tachycardia beat and preemptively
before an expected tachycardia beat.
18. A method of providing cardioversion shock therapy to cardiac tissue,
comprising the steps of:
detecting a tachycardia episode; and
delivering a cardioversion shock after a predetermined delay period
corresponding to a period between a preceding tachycardia beat and an
expected tachycardia beat when the cardiac tissue is non-refractory
following detection of the tachycardia episode.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the delaying step comprises the step
of:
delivering the cardioversion shock after a predetermined fixed time
interval following the preceding tachycardia beat has elapsed.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the delaying step comprises the steps
of:
determining a tachycardia cycle length; and
delivering the cardioversion shock after a length of time corresponding to
a predetermined percentage of the tachycardia cycle length has elapsed
following the preceding tachycardia beat.
21. The method of claim 18, wherein the detecting step comprises the step
of:
detecting a ventricular tachycardia episode.
22. The method of claim 18, wherein the detecting step comprises the step
of:
detecting an atrial tachycardia episode.
23. A method of administering cardioversion shock therapy to cardiac tissue
to preempt an expected tachycardia beat, comprising the steps of:
detecting an occurrence of a tachycardia episode;
determining a tachycardia cycle length of the tachycardia episode; and
delivering a cardioversion shock to the cardiac tissue after a length of
time, determined as a function of preceding tachycardia beat so that the
cardioversion shock is delivered when the cardiac tissue is repolarized.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the function of the tachycardia cycle
length is a predetermined percentage of the tachycardia cycle length.
25. An implantable cardioversion shock therapy system, comprising:
sensing means for sensing intrinsic P-waves;
pulse generating means for generating a cardioversion shock and for
delivering the cardioversion shock to cardiac tissue; and
control means, responsive to the sensing means, for analyzing the P-waves
to confirm an atrial tachycardia episode, and for controlling the pulse
generating means to trigger the cardioversion shock after a predetermined
delay, corresponding to a period when the cardiac tissue is repolarized,
the predetermined delay being synchronized from a last P-wave following
the confirmation of the atrial tachycardia episode so that the
cardioversion shock preempts a successive P-wave.
26. The system of claim 25, further comprising:
an external programming means for sending system operating parameters to
and receiving data from the control means;
telemetry means, coupled to the control means, for receiving the system
operating parameters, including the predetermined delay, from the external
programming means.
27. The system of claim 25, wherein the control means further comprises:
means for defining the predetermined delay as a predetermined fixed time
interval which is expected to occur when the cardiac tissue is
repolarized.
28. The system of claim 27, wherein the predetermined fixed time interval
is at least greater than 300 msec.
29. The system of claim 27, wherein:
the control means further includes means for determining a tachycardia
cycle length; and
the predetermined fixed time interval is a programmable value between 150
ms and the tachycardia cycle length.
30. The system of claim 25, wherein the control means further comprises:
means for determining a tachycardia cycle length; and
means for defining the predetermined delay as a predetermined percentage of
the tachycardia cycle length which is expected to occur when the cardiac
tissue is repolarized.
31. The system of claim 30, wherein the predetermined percentage of the
tachycardia cycle length is in the range of 30-99% of the tachycardia
cycle length. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to implantable cardiac stimulation devices
that provide cardioversion shock therapy for interrupting episodes of
tachycardia. More particularly, the present invention relates to specific
improvements to such devices that (i) reduce the potential for lethal
acceleration, (ii) increase the probability that the treatment will safely
terminate the arrhythmia, and (iii) allow cardioversion therapy to use a
lower energy electrical stimulation pulse, thereby lowering power
consumption of the devices and reducing discomfort to patients.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
One form of cardiac arrhythmia with serious consequences is tachycardia.
Tachycardia is a condition where an abnormally high heart rate severely
affects the ability of the heart to pump blood. The higher the heart rate,
the more dangerous the condition. In ventricular tachycardia (VT), the QRS
complexes defining the heart rate are abnormally broad and occur at a rate
in the range from about 100 to about 250 beats per minute. Sustained
episodes of VT are particularly dangerous because they may deteriorate
into ventricular fibrillation (VF), the most life-threatening cardiac
arrhythmia. VF is the result of disordered, rapid stimulation of
ventricular cardiac tissue, which prevents the ventricles from contracting
in a coordinated fashion. VF may cause a severe drop in cardiac output and
death if not quickly reverted.
Tachycardia is often the result of electrical feedback within the heart--a
natural beat results in the feedback of an electrical stimulus which
prematurely triggers another beat. Tachycardia control is frequently
achieved by applying electrical stimulation to the heart. The application
of electrical stimulation disrupts the stability of the feedback loop,
thereby returning the heart to normal sinus rhythm.
One type of electrical stimulation therapy that is known for interrupting
tachycardia is cardioversion shock therapy. Cardioversion shock therapy is
performed by applying an electrical shock to cardiac tissue in order to
depolarize the ventricular myocardium. This allows the site of fastest
spontaneous discharge, typically the sinus node, to regain pacing control,
thereby terminating the tachycardia episode. In known cardioversion
systems, the cardioversion shock is electronically synchronized to fire at
the R-wave following confirmation of the arrhythmia. Because of electronic
delays which are the result of device switching and charging requirements,
the shock is generally provided shortly after the confirming R-wave.
Nevertheless, the shock is often administered while significant portions
of cardiac tissue are still refractory from the confirming depolarization.
A successful cardioversion shock that is administered while significant
portions of cardiac tissue are refractory may require a higher energy
content than would otherwise be the case. Also, an improperly timed
cardioversion shock can cause an afterdepolarization which can prolong the
arrhythmia and even lead to a lethal acceleration.
Another type of electrical stimulation therapy known for interrupting
tachycardia is antitachycardia pacing. This type of therapy is typically
provided by a pacemaker that delivers antitachycardia pacing pulses to
cardiac tissue in a manner intended to revert the tachycardia episode.
Antitachycardia pacing pulses are of much lower energy than cardioversion
shocks, typically between about 25 .mu.joules and about 30 .mu.joules and
accordingly, and such pacing pulses should be delivered when the heart is
most responsive to external stimulation. More particularly,
antitachycardia pacing pulses should be delivered when the heart is
non-refractory.
Unfortunately, there is usually no way of knowing exactly when the
refractory period associated with the preceding R-wave ends. In recent
years, pacemakers that provide antitachycardia pacing therapy have
employed various techniques in an attempt to deliver antitachycardia
pacing pulses to the portion of the cardiac cycle most likely to lead to
termination of the tachycardia episode. For example, U.S. Pat. No.
4,280,502 (Baker et al.) refers to a pacemaker which, after confirmation
of a tachycardia episode, automatically initiates a search routine
consisting of a sequence of stimulation pulses. The pulses are provided
within a predetermined time interval after a confirmation tachycardia
beat. The refractory period is estimated from the experimental results of
the search routine, and the search is terminated when a normal heartbeat
is detected. If the first search routine is unsuccessful at terminating
the tachycardia episode, a second pulse is then applied following the
previously determined refractory interval by a second interval which is
also experimentally determined by a second search routine.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,390,021 (Spurrell et al.) refers to a pacemaker which
generates a sequence of two electrical stimulation pulses to terminate
tachycardia. The delay of the first stimulation pulse and the coupled
delay between the first and the second pulse are each scanned through 16
discrete steps. Successful time delay parameters are permanently stored,
and on the next confirmed episode of tachycardia, scanning begins with the
most recent successful synchronization parameters.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,587,970 (Holley et al.) refers to a pacemaker which uses
experimental data taken from a general sample population to determine a
function estimating the relationship between refractory period and heart
rate. A sequence of pacing pulses is generated at intervals defined by the
predetermined function in an attempt to synchronize the pacing pulses to a
time shortly after the end of the refractory period. If the tachycardia
episode is not terminated, another sequence of pulses is generated. The
rate of the new sequence is decreased or increased depending upon whether
an unevoked heartbeat was sensed during the preceding sequence.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,398,536 (Nappholz et al.) refers to a programmable
pacemaker which automatically increases the pulse rate. A burst of pulses
is generated after the last heartbeat used to confirm tachycardia. The
initial time interval between the last heartbeat used to confirm
tachycardia and the first pulse in the sequence is equal to a measured
heartbeat cycle less a fixed decrement. If tachycardia persists, another
pulse burst is generated at a higher rate. After exceeding the maximum
rate, the scanning resumes during the next cycle at the minimum rate. The
last burst rate which is successful in terminating tachycardia is stored
in the pacemaker and is used for the first burst generated following the
next tachycardia confirmation.
The features described above have enabled pacemakers capable of providing
antitachycardia pacing therapy to interrupt tachycardia. However, this
technology is not applicable to implantable cardiac stimulating devices
that provide cardioversion shock therapy. Indeed, the aforedescribed
approaches taken with respect to antitachycardia pacing devices would be
inappropriate for cardioversion shock therapy systems, because they
require the generation and delivery of a "sequence" or "burst" of pulses.
A sequence or burst of cardioversion shocks, which are typically several
orders of magnitude greater in energy content than antitachycardia pacing
pulses, would rapidly deplete limited energy reserves, and could possibly
cause great discomfort to the patient.
Prior art cardioversion shock systems either provide no synchronization or
they synchronize the stimulation pulses to fire immediately after an
R-wave (that is, when the tissue is generally refractory), rather than in
the period at which the heart is fully responsive to external stimulation
(i.e., when the heart is in a repolarized state, or non-refractory state).
During the refractory period of the heart, the cardiac muscle is
insensitive to restimulation and cannot respond to a stimulus until after
most of the repolarization process is completed.
Furthermore, the cardioversion shocks provided by some "synchronized"
systems are administered at approximately the same time relative to the
confirming R-wave regardless of the patient's heart rate. Since the timing
of the repolarization period relative to the previous R-wave is a function
of heart rate, these prior art systems that are heart rate independent do
not accurately synchronize delivery of cardioversion shocks to the
repolarization period. Consequently, these systems may administer shocks
while the heart is generally refractory, may require higher than necessary
energy content, and may require additional shocks, thereby increasing the
possibility of discomfort to the patient and reducing the useful life of
the implanted cardioverter.
What is needed, therefore, is an implantable cardiac stimulating device
that attempts to administer a cardioversion shock during the period of the
cardiac cycle when the heart is primarily repolarized, so that a lower
energy cardioversion shock can effectively interrupt a tachycardia episode
because the tissue is responsive to an electrical stimulation pulse. A
cardioversion shock properly administered when the heart is responsive to
an external stimulus, would optimize the chance of eliciting a heartbeat
that preempts the next expected tachycardia beat.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an implantable cardiac stimulating device
and a method for synchronizing cardioversion shocks to the heart during a
predetermined time interval when the heart is expected to be repolarized.
The implantable cardiac stimulating device of the present invention
administers therapy for terminating a tachycardia more effectively and
safely than known "synchronous" cardioversion shock therapy systems, which
simply synchronize the shocks to the refractory period of the previous
R-wave that is used to confirm episodes of tachycardia. In general, the
present invention delays the shocks until late in the cardiac cycle, when
the heart is expected to be repolarized, thereby optimizing the chance for
the vast majority of the ventricular myocardium to be non-refractory.
This invention relates not only to the implantable cardiac stimulating
device itself, including the manner in which cardioversion shocks are
delivered to the heart, but also to a method of synchronizing the
cardioversion shocks to the repolarization period of the cardiac cycle.
More particularly, the present invention is directed to providing
preemptive cardioversion shock therapy shortly before the tachycardia beat
which follows the confirmation so that it falls in the repolarization
period of the cardiac cycle.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a cardioversion shock
is synchronized to be administered during the repolarization period which
follows the refractory period after a confirmation R-wave. While it is
possible to determine the end of the refractory period, it would require
extra stimuli and a delay in the time-to-termination of the arrhythmia.
Instead, the present invention proposes determining a delay period which
has a high probability of falling in the repolarization period of the
cardiac cycle. Typically, the physician will characterize the patient's
various tachycardia rhythms at implant and can easily determine a window
which will preempt the various tachycardias. For example, if the patient
has tachycardias at a multiplicity of rates, the physician may desire a
delay period which also varies as a function of the tachycardia rate,
e.g., using a percentage of the measured tachycardia rate. Alternatively,
it may be desirable to select a fixed delay, say 300 or 400 ms, after the
last R-wave to insure that the cardioversion shock does not occur during a
T-wave and accelerate the arrhythmia.
Such a properly synchronized cardioversion shock has a high probability of
creating an action potential that is conducted through the heart. If
successful in creating an action potential, the cardioversion shock will
elicit a heartbeat that preempts the next anticipated tachycardia beat. In
this way, the tachycardia episode may be efficiently and safely reverted.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a sensor for
monitoring the cardiac signals; an analog-to-digital converter for
converting the analog data from the sensor into conventional digital
signals; a microprocessor for analyzing incoming sensor data, processing a
sequence of stored instructions, and controlling the generation and
delivery of shocks; nonvolatile memory for storing control instructions
and program data; an internal telemetry stage for sending and receiving
data from an external programmer; and a pulse generator for generating
cardioversion shocks under control of the microprocessor. The
cardioversion shocks are delivered to cardiac tissue by a shocking lead,
which may also be used as part of the electrophysiology sensor. Although
the invention is described in the context of an implantable device, the
principles disclosed herein may also be applied to external cardioversion
shock therapy systems.
The present invention provides numerous advantages over prior art
cardioversion systems. Potentially less energy is required to successfully
revert the tachycardia to sinus rhythm if the cardioversion shock is
properly synchronized to the repolarization period of the cardiac cycle.
Also, fewer cardioversion shocks may be necessary. In fact, the preferred
embodiment of this invention uses only a single cardioversion shock to
interrupt a tachycardia episode. The use of fewer, lower amplitude shocks
both reduces the discomfort to the patient and increases the useful life
of the implantable cardiac stimulating device by using less energy.
In the preferred embodiment, the approach to cardioversion therapy
described herein is heart rate dependent. More particularly, the patient's
tachycardia rate is measured and utilized to synchronize the cardioversion
shock to the repolarization period of the cardiac cycle. This is necessary
for proper synchronization, since the timing of the rep | | |