|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5619539 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5619539.html |
| Inventor(s) | Coker; Jonathan D. (Rochester, MN);
Dolivo; Francois B. (Wadenswil, CH);
Galbraith; Richard L. (Rochester, MN);
Hermann; Reto J. (Buttikon, CH);
Hirt; Walter (Zurich, CH);
Vannorsdel; Kevin (San Jose, CA) |
| Abstract | A method and apparatus are provided for maximum-likelihood data detection
in a partial-response (PR) data channel including a head and disk assembly
providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to digital converter (ADC)
providing digital samples. A plurality of digital samples are received
from the ADC. The received digital samples are applied to a selected first
filter and a selected second filter. The first filtered digital samples
are applied to a first data detector, and the second filtered digital
samples are applied to a second data detector. A predetermined parameter
is identified, and at least one of the first and second data detectors is
selected responsive to the identified predetermined parameter. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5619539 |
|
|
Data detection methods and apparatus for a direct access storage device |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
April 8, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
February 28, 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5521945 Knudson 375/341 May,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5488633 Laroia 375/262 Jan,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5434886 Kazawa
Jul,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5416806 Coker 375/354 May,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5287385 Sugawara 375/341 Feb,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5276709 Kazawa 375/242 Jan,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5214641 Chen 370/484 May,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5196849 Galbraith 341/59 Mar,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5119402 Ginzburg 375/288 Jun,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5095484 Karabed 714/746 Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5031195 Chevillat 375/234 Jul,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4970609 Cunningham 360/51 Nov,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4964107 Galbraith 368/120 Oct,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4945538 Patel 714/786 Jul,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4931250 Greszczuk 375/222 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4888779 Karabed 714/792 Dec,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4888775 Karabed 714/755 Dec,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4881241 Pommier 375/260 Nov,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4800577 Tachita 375/340 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4786890 Marcus 341/81 Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4750059 Syracuse 360/48 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4707681 Eggenberger 341/59 Nov,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4609907 Adler 341/59 Sep,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. A method for maximum-likelihood data detection in a direct access
storage device including a partial-response (PR) data channel including a
head and disk assembly providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to
digital converter (ADC) providing digital samples, said method comprising
the steps of:
receiving a plurality of digital samples from the ADC;
applying the received digital samples to a first digital filter for
providing class-IV partial response (PR4) samples;
applying the filtered PR4 digital samples to a second digital 1+D filter
for providing extended Class IV partial response (EPR4) samples;
applying the filtered PR4 digital samples to a first data detector;
applying the filtered EPR4 digital samples to a second data detector;
identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received digital
samples; and
selecting at least one of the first and second data detectors responsive to
the identified predetermined parameter.
2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of applying the filtered
PR4 digital samples to the first data detector includes the step of
applying the filtered PR4 digital samples to a PR4 Viterbi detector.
3. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of applying the filtered
EPR4 digital samples to the second data detector includes the step of
applying the filtered EPR4 digital samples to an EPR4 Viterbi detector.
4. A method for maximum-likelihood data detection in a direct access
storage device including a partial-response (PR) data channel including a
head and disk assembly providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to
digital converter (ADC) providing digital samples, said method comprising
the steps of:
receiving a plurality of digital samples from the ADC;
applying the received digital samples to a partial response (PR) shaping
filter for providing PR digital samples;
applying the received digital samples to a selected second filter;
applying the filtered PR digital samples to a first data detector;
applying the second filtered digital samples to a second data detector;
identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received digital
samples; and
selecting at least one of the first and second data detectors responsive to
the identified predetermined parameter.
5. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein the step of applying the filtered
PR digital samples to the first data detector includes the step of
applying the filtered PR digital samples to a PR Viterbi detector.
6. A method for maximum-likelihood data detection in a direct access
storage device including a partial-response (PR) data channel including a
head and disk assembly providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to
digital converter (ADC) providing digital samples, said method comprising
the steps of:
receiving a plurality of digital samples from the ADC;
applying the received digital samples to a noise whitening filter for
providing noise whitening digital samples;
applying the received digital samples to a selected second filter;
applying the filtered noise whitening digital samples to a first data
detector;
applying the second filtered digital samples to a second data detector;
identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received digital
samples; and
selecting at least one of the first and second data detectors responsive to
the identified predetermined parameter.
7. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein the step of applying the filtered
noise whitening digital samples to the first data detector includes the
step of applying the filtered noise whitening digital samples to a
full-state Viterbi detector.
8. A method as recited in claim 6 wherein the step of applying the filtered
noise whitening digital samples to the first data detector includes the
step of applying the filtered noise whitening digital samples to a reduced
state Viterbi detector.
9. A method for maximum-likelihood data detection in a direct access
storage device including a partial-response (PR) data channel including a
head and disk assembly providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to
digital converter (ADC) providing digital samples, said method comprising
the steps of:
receiving a plurality of digital samples from the ADC;
applying the received digital samples to a pre-processing filter for
providing pre-processing digital samples;
applying the received digital samples to a selected second filter;
applying the filtered pre-processing digital samples to a first data
detector;
applying the second filtered digital samples to a second data detector;
identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received digital
samples; and
selecting at least one of the first and second data detectors responsive to
the identified predetermined parameter.
10. A method as recited in claim 9 wherein the step of applying the
filtered pre-processing digital samples to said first data detector
includes the step of applying the filtered preprocessing digital samples
to an adaptive Viterbi detector.
11. A method for maximum-likelihood data detection in a direct access
storage device including a partial-response (PR) data channel including a
head and disk assembly providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to
digital converter (ADC) providing digital samples, said method comprising
the steps of:
receiving a plurality of digital samples from the ADC;
applying the received digital samples to a selected first filter;
applying the received digital samples to a selected second filter;
applying the first filtered digital samples to a first data detector;
applying the second filtered digital samples to a second data detector;
wherein said first data detector and said second data detector include an
extended partial-response maximum-likelihood (EPRML) data detector and a
partial response maximum-likelihood (PRML) data detector;
identifying a predetermined parameter; the identified predetermined
parameter including at least a zone of a disk and a head and radius
combination; and
selecting at least one of said extended partial response maximum-likelihood
(EPRML) data detector and said partial response maximum-likelihood (PRML)
data detector responsive to each identified head and radius combination.
12. A method as recited in claim 11 wherein the step of identifying the
predetermined parameter includes the step of identifying a signal
resolution.
13. Apparatus for data detection in a direct access storage device
including a digital data channel including a head and disk assembly
providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to digital converter (ADC)
providing digital samples, said apparatus comprising:
a first filter coupled to the ADC for receiving and filtering a plurality
of digital samples from the ADC;
a second filter coupled to the ADC for receiving and filtering a plurality
of digital samples from the ADC;
an extended class-IV partial response (EPR4) Viterbi detector coupled to
the first filter for receiving the first filtered samples;
a data detector coupled to the second filter for receiving the second
filtered samples;
means for identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received
digital samples; and
means for selecting at least one of the EPR4 Viterbi detector and the data
detector responsive to the identified predetermined parameter.
14. Apparatus for data detection in a direct access storage device
including a digital data channel including a head and disk assembly
providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to digital converter (ADC)
providing digital samples, said apparatus comprising:
a first filter coupled to the ADC for receiving and filtering a plurality
of digital samples from the ADC;
a second filter coupled to the first filter for receiving and filtering a
plurality of digital samples from the first filter;
a partial response class-IV (PR4) Viterbi detector coupled to the first
filter for receiving the first filtered samples;
a data detector coupled to the second filter for receiving the second
filtered samples;
means for identifying a predetermined parameter responsive to the received
digital samples from the ADC; and
means for selecting at least one of the PR4 Viterbi detector and the data
detector responsive to the identified predetermined parameter.
15. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes an
extended class-IV partial response (EPR4) Viterbi detector.
16. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes a
partial response Viterbi detector.
17. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes an
adaptive Viterbi detector.
18. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes a
full-state Viterbi detector.
19. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes a
reduced-state Viterbi detector.
20. Apparatus as recited in claim 14 wherein the data detector includes an
extended class-IV partial response (EPR4) Viterbi detector implementation
of a modified metric function J* is represented by
##EQU3##
where .delta..sub.k ({a'.sub.k })=A(-2x'k({a'k}) (y.sub.k.sup.EPR4
+C)+(x'.sub.k ({a'.sub.k }))2); and where A is a scaling factor and
where the y.sub.k.sup.EPR 4 are extended class IV partial response (EPR4)
samples corrupted with additive noise, C is a real constant and x'.sub.k
({a'.sub.k }) are the hypothesized, noise-free channel output samples
given by
x'.sub.k ({a'.sub.k })=a'.sub.k +a'.sub.k-1 -a'.sub.k-2 -a'.sub.k-3,
a'.sub.i .epsilon.{-1,+1 }.
21. Apparatus as recited in claim 20 wherein branch metrics Z.sub.k and
Q.sub.k are represented in terms of received class IV partial response
(PR4) samples as
Z.sub.k =y.sub.k+1.sup.PR4 +2y.sub.k.sup.PR4 +Y.sub.k-1.sup.PR4
and
Q.sub.k =-Z.sub.k +(4-.alpha.),
where 0.ltoreq..alpha.<1, C=-1 and y.sub.k.sup.EPR4 y.sub.k.sup.PR4
+y.sub.k-1.sup.PR4. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to data detection methods and apparatus,
and more particularly to methods and apparatus for partial-response
maximum-likelihood (PRML), extended partial-response maximum-likelihood
(EPRML), and Viterbi data detection in a direct access storage device
(DASD).
2. Description of the Prior Art
Partial-response signaling with maximum-likelihood sequence detection
techniques are known for digital data communication and recording
applications. Achievement of high-data density and high-data rates has
resulted in the use of a PPML channel for writing and reading digital data
on the disks.
Known commercial disk drives which include a PRML channel benefit from the
fact that, with proper choice of the data rate, binary partial-response
class-4 (PR4) signaling with maximum-likelihood sequence detection (MLSD)
or PRML provides nearly optimal performance at the presently used linear
recording densities. Typically magnetic recording channels operate with
0.8T/R<p.sub.w50 <1.6T/R where T is the channel encoded bit period, R is
the code rate and p.sub.w50 is the width at the 50%-level of the channel's
step response. For example, p.sub.w50 =(.beta..sub.user /(.pi.R))T where
.beta. user represents normalized user data rate and R is the code rate
specific to each scheme, for example, such as, PRML advantageously uses
R=8/9.
The performance loss of PRML with digital filter equalization caused by
noise enhancement due to the equalizing filter becomes increasingly
significant when the channel operates at linear recording densities such
as p.sub.w50 >1.6T/R. As a consequence, PMRL may fail to meet product
specifications at greater linear recording densities.
To increase area storage density, mainly by means of increasing the linear
density, requires that the PRML channel be replaced or complemented with a
more powerful scheme in order to meet competitive product specifications.
However, development and implementation of an entirely new channel
architecture is a complex and costly task whose scope contradicts today's
requirement for cost-effective and quick-to-market solutions.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,890 discloses a class-IV PRML channel using a
run-length limited (RLL) code. The disclosed class-IV partial response
channel polynomial equals (1-D.sup.2), where D is a one-bit interval delay
operator and D.sup.2 is a delay of two-bit interval delay operator and the
channel response output waveform is described by taking the input waveform
and subtracting from it the same waveform delayed by a two-bit interval. A
(0,k=3/k1=5) PRML modulation code is utilized to encode 8 bit binary data
into codewords comprised of 9 bit code sequences, where the maximum number
k of consecutive zeroes allowed within a code sequence is 3 and the
maximum number k1 of consecutive zeroes in the all-even or all-odd
sequences is 5.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,196,849 discloses rate 8/9 block codes having maximum ones
and run length constraints for use in a class-IV PRML channel.
Trellis coding techniques are used to provide a coding gain required in
noisy or otherwise degraded channels. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,888,775 and
4,888,779 describe trellis codes for PRML channels which provide
significantly improved coding gains for transmission of digital data over
PRML channels.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,609,907 discloses a method for bandwidth compression using
partial response and run length limited coding. A first 1-D.sup.2 channel
is used for detection of data with a 1+D channel for clocking.
A conventional EPRML channel design including extended (EPR4) equalization,
timing and gain control represents a large jump in complexity as compared
to a PRML channel. By conventional implementation methods, PRML and EPRML
share very few common functional blocks. The conventional approach is
considered unacceptable from a size, power and speed viewpoint. For EPRML,
the calculations required for the 5-level gain and timing loops are more
complex and slower. Also, the 5-level timing gradient calculation is
considered to be less robust than the 3-level calculation for PRML. EPRML
requires an 8-state non-interleaved Viterbi detector which by conventional
implementation methods is not acceptable from a size, power and speed
viewpoint. It is desirable to provide an EPRML implementation that allows
for an acceptable size, cost and power to be achieved.
With a goal of increased linear density, it is desirable to implement an
EPRML/PRML combination system to provide optimal performance over the
entire disk radius.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide data detection
methods and apparatus for detecting data that overcomes many of the
disadvantages of prior art arrangements.
In brief, the objects and advantages of the present invention are achieved
by a method and apparatus for maximum-likelihood data detection in a
partial-response (PR) data channel including a head and disk assembly
providing an analog signal coupled to an analog to digital converter (ADC)
providing digital samples. A plurality of digital samples are received
from the ADC. The received digital samples are applied to a selected first
filter and a selected second filter. The first filtered digital samples
are applied to a first data detector, and the second filtered digital
samples are applied to a second data detector. A predetermined parameter
is identified, and at least one of the first and second data detectors is
selected responsive to the identified predetermined parameter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention, together with the above and other objects and
advantages, can best be understood from the following detailed description
of the embodiment of the invention illustrated in the drawings, wherein:
FIGS. 1 and 2 are graphs illustrating pulse responses for partial-response
maximum-likelihood (PRML) channels based on partial response class-4 (PR4)
and extended partial response class-4 (EPR4), respectively;
FIGS. 3A and 3B together provide a block diagram representation of a
combination extended partial-response maximum-likelihood (EPRML) and PRML
channel according to the invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram representation of an alternative flexible channel
architecture of the invention;
FIG. 4A is a flow chart illustrating sequential data detection steps in
accordance with a data detection method of the invention;
FIGS. 5A and 5B together form a schematic diagram illustrating a survivor
path memory for an EPR4 Viterbi detector arrangement;
FIG. 6 is an eight state EPR4 trellis transition diagram using modified
metric computation with A=1/4, Y.sub.K =Y.sub.K.sup.EPR4 and C equal to a
real constant;
FIG. 7 is a transformed eight state EPR4 trellis transition diagram using
modified metric computation with A=1/4 and C=-1;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating add, compare and select (ACS)
calculation circuitry for an EPR4 Viterbi detector derived directly from
the trellis of FIG. 7 according to the invention;
FIG. 9 is a second alternative, transformed and expanded EPR4 trellis
transition diagram enabling high-speed implementation; and
FIG. 10 illustrates the EPR4 trellis transition diagram of FIG. 7
transformed as a PR4 detector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2 of the drawing, there are shown graphs
illustrating pulse responses for partial-response maximum-likelihood
(PRML) channels based on partial response class-4 (PR4) and extended
partial response class-4 (EPR4), respectively, assuming plus and minus one
binary inputs. The system polynomial for PR4 is (1-D.sup.2). A natural
extension of the PR4 response is the extended partial-response class-4
(EPR4) response which has a system polynomial of (1-D.sup.2)
(1+D)=(1+D-D.sup.2 -D.sup.3). FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate the equalized
readback waveforms for PR4 and EPR4 due to a 1-length write current pulse.
Equalized EPR4 samples occur at five levels (+4, +2, 0, -2, -4) as
compared to three levels (+2, 0, -2) for PR4. Maximum-likelihood detection
can be applied to either of these partial-response systems.
In accordance with the invention, the correct choice for using EPR4 or PR4
depends on the magnetic design point. Only the detection method is changed
for improved error rate performance. As shown in Table I, either EPR4 or
PR4 is the optimal solution for a range of magnetic design points. This is
illustrated by Table I where T is the channel encoded bit period, R is the
Run-Length-Limited code rate, and p.sub.w50 is the width at the 50%-level
of the channel's step response.
TABLE I
______________________________________
Channel Selection versus Signal Resolution
Best Solution over
Channel Type
Code Rate R
this Range
______________________________________
Peak Detect (1,7)
2/3 P.sub.w50 .ltoreq. 0.8T/R
PR4 (PRML) 8/9 0.8T/R < p.sub.w50 .ltoreq. 1.6T/R
EPR4 (EPRML)
8/9 1.6T/R < p.sub.w50
______________________________________
The EPRML/PRML combination system creates a new approach to maximizing both
capacity and performance. By utilizing a PRML detection system towards the
outer diameter (OD) of the disk and an EPRML system towards the inner
diameter (ID) of the disk and maintaining the channel data rate at the
maximum rate over the entire radius or slight zoned band recording (ZBR),
it is possible to gain a significant capacity increase, for example, such
as, approximately 15% while improving the overall data-rate performance of
the file. This approach works because the detector type is matched to the
channel magnetic design point, and thus the error-rate degrades less as
the linear density is increased.
Preliminary experimental data has shown EPRML data detection to be less
sensitive to ADC saturation, MR asymmetry, and uncompensated nonlinear bit
shift as compared to PRML data detection. A significant
performance/capacity increase is possible with the EPRML/PRML combination
over what known ZBR systems have provided. ZBR provides increased capacity
given the assumption that the channel error-rate always degrades as the
linear density is increased. The capacity gain from ZBR always has the
penalty of poorer sustained data-rate performance towards the ID of the
disk.
Referring now to FIGS. 3A and 3B, there is shown a block diagram of a
combination of a partial-response maximum-likelihood (PRML) and extended
partial-response maximum-likelihood (EPRML) data detection for a
partial-response recording channel 10 in a direct access storage device in
accordance with the invention. Customer data to be written, such as in the
form of a binary symbol string, is applied to an encoder 12. Encoder 12
produces a modulated coded output having pre-defined run length
constraints or codewords which serve as an input to a class-IV
partial-response (PR) channel described by a (1-D.sup.2) operation. As
shown, the present invention provides a novel architecture and
implementation of EPR4 Viterbi detection (EPRML) in a PRML channel for
improved data detection in high-density digital magnetic recording
devices.
Referring also to FIG. 3B, the novel architecture of the invention allows a
combination system of PRML and EPRML to share all functional blocks as
shown in FIG. 3A with either a PR4 Viterbi detector 14 or an EPR4 Viterbi
detector 16. This architecture allows for the addition of EPRML capability
to a PRML channel by the inclusion of only a simple (1+D) digital adder or
filter circuit 18, the EPR4 Viterbi detector 16 and a one-bit multiplexer
20 for selecting the output of the PR4 Viterbi detector 14 or the EPR4
Viterbi detector 16.
A serializer 24 and a precoder 26 follows the encoder 12. Precoder 26 is
described by a 1/(1.sym.D) operation where D is a unit delay operator and
where .sym. means modulo 2 addition. A PRML precomp 28 coupled to the
precoder 26 provides a modulated binary pulse signal applied to a write
trigger circuit 30 that provides the modulated write current for writing
to the disk surface. Write trigger circuit 30 is described by 1/(1.sym.D)
operation. Precoder 26 in combination with write trigger circuit 30
together form a non-standard precoder 1/(1.sym.D.sup.2) for EPRML which
has been proven to reduce the error event lengths and the number of Type I
symbol errors as compared to the standard EPRML precoder.
An analog read signal is obtained at head and disk block 32. The read
signal is applied via an arm electronics block 34 to a variable gain
amplifier (VGA) 36. The amplified read signal is applied to a lowpass
filter 38 that should preferably boost the higher frequencies to avoid
saturation of an analog to digital converter (ADC) 40. The lowpass
filtered read signal is converted to digital form by the ADC 40 that
provides, for example, 64 possible 6-bit sampled values. Raw samples and
noise are provided at a line labelled B at the output of the ADC 40.
The samples of the ADC 40 are applied to a timing recovery and gain control
42 and are applied to a digital filter 44, such as a 10-tap finite impulse
response (FIR) digital filter. The timing recovery and gain control 42
provides a gain control signal to the VGA 36 and provides a timing control
signal to the ADC 40. The EPRML/PRML combination system 10 uses common
3-level gain and timing loops for the PR4 equalized samples and noise
provided at a line labelled A at the out-put of the digital filter 44.
Gain and timing loops based upon the PR4 equalized samples are simpler and
are considered more robust than 5-level loops for EPR4 samples.
PR4 equalized samples are transformed by the digital (1+D) adder or filter
circuit 18 to obtain EPR4 5-level samples applied to the EPR4 Viterbi
detector 16. The filtered signal from the digital filter 44 is applied to
the PR4 Viterbi detector 14 and also is applied to the EPR4 Viterbi
detector 16 via adder circuit 18. PR4 and EPR4 Viterbi detectors 14 and 16
are coupled to a decoder 46 to complete the maximum-likelihood (ML)
detection process for data read back.
A postcoder 50 coupled to | | |