|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5634086 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5634086.html |
| Inventor(s) | Rtischev; Dimitry (Menlo Park, CA);
Bernstein; Jared C. (Palo Alto, CA);
Chen; George T. (Menlo Park, CA);
Butzberger; John W. (Foster City, CA) |
| Abstract | Spoken-language instruction method and apparatus employ context-based
speech recognition for instruction and evaluation, particularly language
instruction and language fluency evaluation. A system can administer a
lesson, and particularly a language lesson, and evaluate performance in a
natural interactive manner while tolerating strong foreign accents, and
produce as an output a reading quality score. A finite state grammar set
corresponding to the range of word sequence patterns in the lesson is
employed as a constraint on a hidden Markov model (HMM) search apparatus
in an HMM speech recognizer which includes a set of hidden Markov models
of target-language narrations produced by native speakers of the target
language. The invention is preferably based on use of a linguistic
context-sensitive speech recognizer. The invention includes a system with
an interactive decision mechanism which employs at least three levels of
error tolerance to simulate a natural level of patience in human-based
interactive instruction. A system for a reading phase is implemented
through a finite state machine having at least four states which
recognizes reading error at any position in a script and which employs a
first set of actions. A related system for an interactive question phase
is implemented through a finite state machine, but which recognizes
reading errors as well as incorrect answers while invoking a second set of
actions. A linguistically-sensitive utterance endpoint detector is
provided for judging termination of a spoken utterance to simulate human
turn-taking in conversational speech. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5634086 |
|
|
Method and apparatus for voice-interactive language instruction |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
May 27, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
September 18, 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/032,850, filed Mar. 12,
1993, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5333275 Wheatley 704/243 Jul,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5329609 Sanada
Jul,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5329608 Bocchieri
Jul,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5307444 Tsuboka 706/20 Apr,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5268990 Cohen 704/200 Dec,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5199077 Wilcox 704/256 Mar,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5148489 Erell 704/226 Sep,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5075896 Wilcox
Dec,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5027406 Roberts 704/244 Jun,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4969194 Ezawa 704/276 Nov,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4887212 Zamora 704/8 Dec,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4862408 Zamora 707/102 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4860360 Boggs 704/233 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4852180 Levinson 704/256.4 Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4783803 Baker 704/252 Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4641343 Holland 704/276 Feb,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4380438 Okamoto 434/157 Apr,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4276445 Harbeson 704/207 Jun,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A language instruction and evaluation method using an automatic speech
recognizer which generates word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from input speech and a grammar model, wherein the input speech
is speech spoken by the speaker in response to a prompting of the speaker
to recite a preselected script, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a grammar model from the preselected script;
imbedding alt elements in the grammar model between words and sentences of
the preselected script thereby forming an altered grammar model, the alt
elements representing potential nonscripted speech and pauses;
generating an input hypothesis from the input speech using the automatic
speech recognizer with the altered grammar model, wherein the input
hypothesis comprises a subset of sequences of words and alts allowed by
the altered grammar model;
parsing the input hypothesis into sequences identified as one of words
found in the preselected script, nonscripted speech and silence, wherein
alts in the input hypotheses are associated with the nonscripted speech
and the silence;
evaluating the accuracy of the input speech based on a distribution of alts
in the input hypothesis, the accuracy being a measure of how well the
input speech corresponds with preselected script which the Speaker of the
input speech was prompted to recite; and
outputting an indication of the accuracy of the input speech to the
speaker, thereby informing the speaker of how well the speaker has recited
the preselected script.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
digitizing the input speech and storing digitized input speech in a digital
memory;
storing the grammar model and the altered grammar model in the digital
memory; and
using a digital computer to compare the input speech with the stored
grammar models.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of, in response to the
input speech, prompting the speaker to re-recite the preselected script
with phonetic and semantic accuracy, according to at least three levels of
patience.
4. A language instruction and evaluation method using an automatic speech
recognizer which generates word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from input speech and a grammar model, wherein the input speech
is speech spoken by the speaker in response to a prompting of the speaker
to recite a preselected script, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a grammar model from the preselected script;
imbedding alt elements in the grammar model between words and sentences of
the preselected script thereby forming an altered grammar model, the alt
elements representing potential nonscripted speech and pauses;
generating an input hypothesis from the input speech using the automatic
speech recognizer with the altered grammar model, wherein the input
hypothesis comprises a subset of sequences of words and alts allowed by
the altered grammar model;
parsing the input hypothesis into sequences identified as one of words
found in the preselected script, nonscripted speech and silence, wherein
alts in the input hypotheses are associated with the nonscripted speech
and the silence;
evaluating the accuracy of the input speech based on a distribution of alts
in the input hypothesis; and
outputting an indication of the accuracy of the input speech to the
speaker,
wherein the preselected script includes alternative texts, the method
further comprising a step of generating an interactive conversation
grammar model for the alternative texts, the interactive conversation
grammar model comprising a first common alt element disposed before a
selection of alternative phrases and a second common alt element disposed
after the selection of an alternative phrase, thereby permitting
alternative responses having phonetic accuracy and semantic inaccuracy.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising a step of structuring an alt
element as a plurality of transition arcs for events, including prolonged
silence, prolonged out-of-script speech, speech alternating between
periods of silence and periods of out-of-script speech, and speech without
pauses or out-of-script speech.
6. A language instruction and evaluation method using an automatic speech
recognizer which generates word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from input speech and a grammar model, wherein the input speech
is speech spoken by the speaker in response to a prompting of the speaker
to recite a preselected script, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a grammar model from the preselected script;
imbedding alt elements in the grammar model between words and sentences of
the preselected script thereby forming an altered grammar model, the alt
elements representing potential nonscripted speech and pauses;
generating an input hypothesis from the input speech using the automatic
speech recognizer with the altered grammar model, wherein the input
hypothesis comprises a subset of sequences of words and alts allowed by
the altered grammar model;
parsing the input hypothesis into sequences identified as one of words
found in the preselected script, nonscripted speech and silence, wherein
alts in the input hypotheses are associated with the nonscripted speech
and the silence, the step of parsing comprising the steps of:
a) recurrently examining a current segment output by the speech recognizer
for scripted words, pause phones and reject phones;
b) determining reject density for the current segment; and
c) denoting the current segment as out-of-script speech if the reject
density exceeds a reject density threshold;
evaluating the accuracy of the input speech based on a distribution of alts
in the input hypothesis; and
outputting an indication of the accuracy of the input speech to the
speaker.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining the reject
density for the current segment comprises the step of dividing a reject
phone count returned by the speech recognizer for a preselected number of
consecutive scripted words by a sum of the reject phone count and a count
of the preselected number of consecutive scripted words.
8. A language instruction and evaluation method using an automatic speech
recognizer which generates word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from input speech and a grammar model, wherein the input speech
is speech spoken by the speaker in response to a prompting of the speaker
to recite a preselected script, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a grammar model from the preselected script;
imbedding alt elements in the grammar model between words and sentences of
the preselected script thereby forming an altered grammar model, the alt
elements representing potential nonscripted speech and pauses;
generating an input hypothesis from the input speech using the automatic
speech recognizer with the altered grammar model, wherein the input
hypothesis comprises a subset of sequences of words and alts allowed by
the altered grammar model;
parsing the input hypothesis into sequences identified as one of words
found in the preselected script, nonscripted speech and silence, wherein
alts in the input hypotheses are associated with the nonscripted speech
and the silence, the step of parsing comprising the steps of:
a) recurrently examining a current segment output by the speech recognizer
for-scripted words, pause phones and reject phones;
b) determining reject indicator for the current segment; and
c) denoting the current segment as out-of-script speech if the reject
indicator exceeds a reject density threshold;
evaluating the accuracy of the input speech based on a distribution of alts
in the input hypothesis; and
outputting an indication of the accuracy of the input speech to the
speaker, thereby informing the speaker of how well the speaker has recited
the preselected script.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of determining the reject
indicator for the current segment comprises the step of summing a reject
phone count returned by the speech recognizer for a preselected number of
consecutive scripted words.
10. A language instruction and evaluation method using an automatic speech
recognizer which generates word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from input speech and a grammar model, wherein the input speech
is speech spoken by the speaker in response to a prompting of the speaker
to recite a preselected script, the method comprising the steps of:
generating a grammar model from the preselected script;
imbedding alt elements in the grammar model between words and sentences of
the preselected script thereby forming an altered grammar model, the alt
elements representing potential nonscripted speech and pauses;
generating an input hypothesis from the input speech using the automatic
speech recognizer with the altered grammar model, wherein the input
hypothesis comprises a subset of sequences of words and alts allowed by
the altered grammar model;
parsing the input hypothesis into sequences identified as one of words
found in the preselected script, nonscripted speech and silence, wherein
alts in the input hypotheses are associated with the nonscripted speech
and the silence, the step of parsing comprising the steps of:
a) recurrently examining a current segment output by the speech recognizer
for scripted words, pause phones and reject phones;
b) determining a pause indicator for the current segment; and
c) denoting the current segment as an actionable pause if the pause
indicator exceeds a pause indicator threshold, the actionable pause
representing a turn-taking point in interaction between the automatic
speech recognizer and the speaker;
evaluating the accuracy of the input speech based on a distribution of alts
in the input hypothesis; and
outputting an indication of the accuracy of the input speech to the
speaker, thereby informing the speaker of how well the speaker has recited
the preselected script.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising a step of generating the
pause indicator threshold as a threshold dependent upon linguistic context
of the current segment and position of the current segment in the
preselected script, the pause indicator threshold being smaller at ends of
sentences and major clauses than elsewhere among words of sentences of the
preselected script.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the pause indicator determining step
comprises a step of summing pause phones returned by the speech recognizer
out of a preselected number of consecutive words of the preselected
script.
13. A system for tracking speech of a speaker using an automatic speech
recognizer producing word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from a grammar model and input speech spoken by a speaker
prompted to recite a preselected script, the system comprising:
presentation means for presenting information to the speaker about a
subject and the preselected script and for prompting the speaker to recite
the preselected script;
means for electronically capturing the input speech spoken in response to
prompts of the presentation means, wherein captured input speech is stored
in a computer memory;
means for analyzing the captured input speech to determine a sequence of
words and alts corresponding to the captured input speech, wherein a word
is identified as being part of the preselected speech and alts represent
nonscripted speech and pauses;
assessing means coupled to the analyzing means for assessing completeness
of an utterance to determine accuracy of the recitation of the preselected
script, the accuracy being a measure of how well the input speech
corresponds with preselected script which the speaker of the input speech
was prompted to recite; and
producing means coupled to the assessing means for producing a response, if
the recitation is not accurate, instructing the speaker to correctly
recite the preselected script.
14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the system for tracking is
used for instruction in a language foreign to the speaker and wherein the
producing means includes means for generating an audible response as an
example of native pronunciation and rendition of speech in the language.
15. The system according to claim 13, further comprising means for
measuring recitation speed comprising:
means for counting words recited to determine a recited word count;
means for measuring time duration of a recitation of scripted words; and
means for dividing the recited word count by the measured time elapsed.
16. The system according to claim 13, further comprising means (192) for
measuring recitation quality, thereby obtaining a recitation quality score
(230), the means for measuring recitation quality comprising:
means (194) for counting words (195) in the preselected script to determine
a preselected script word count;
means (196) for determining an optimum recitation time (197;
means (198) for counting reject phones (199) to determine a reject phone
count;
means (200) for measuring a total time (201) elapsed during recitation of
the preselected script;
means (202) for measuring good time (203) elapsed during recitation of
phrases deemed acceptable by the analyzing means;
means (204) for dividing the good time (203) by the total time (201) to
obtain a first quotient (205);
means (210) for outputting a preferred maximum value (211) which is a
maximum of the optimum recitation time (197) and the good time (203);
means (212) for dividing the optimum recitation time (197) by the preferred
maximum value (211) to obtain a second quotient (213);
means (218) for summing the reject phone count (199) and the preselected
script word count (195) to obtain a quality value (219);
means (220) for dividing the preselected script word count (195) by the
quality value (219) to obtain a third quotient (221); and
means for calculating the recitation quality score (230) as a weighted sum
of the first quotient (208), the second score quotient (216) and the third
score quotient (224).
17. A system for tracking speech of a speaker using an automatic speech
recognizer producing word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence
hypotheses from a grammar model and input speech spoken by a speaker
prompted to recite a preselected script, the system comprising:
presentation means for presenting information to the speaker about a
subject and the preselected script and for prompting the speaker to recite
the preselected script;
means for electronically capturing the input speech spoken in response to
prompts of the presentation means, wherein captured input speech is stored
in a computer memory;
means for analyzing the captured input speech to determine a sequence of
words and alts corresponding to the captured input speech, wherein a word
is identified as being part of the preselected speech and alts represent
nonscripted speech and pauses;
assessing means coupled to the analyzing means for assessing completeness
of an utterance to determine accuracy of the recitation of the preselected
script;
producing means coupled to the assessing means for producing a response, if
the recitation is not accurate, instructing the speaker to correctly
recite the preselected script;
means (192) for measuring recitation quality, thereby obtaining a
recitation quality score (230), the means for measuring recitation quality
comprising:
a) means (194) for counting words (195) in the preselected script to
determine a preselected script word count;
b) means (196) for determining an optimum recitation time (197);
c) means (198) for counting reject phones (199) to determine a reject phone
count;
d) means (200) for measuring a total time (201) elapsed during recitation
of the preselected script;
e) means (202) for measuring good time (203) elapsed during recitation of
phrases deemed acceptable by the analyzing means;
f) means (204) for dividing the good time (203) by the total time (201) to
obtain a first quotient (205);
g) means (210) for outputting a preferred maximum value (211) which is a
maximum of the optimum recitation time (197) and the good time (203);
h) means (212) for dividing the optimum recitation time (197) by the
preferred maximum value (211) to obtain a second quotient (213);
i) means (218) for summing the reject phone count (199) and the preselected
script word count (195) to obtain a quality value (219);
j) means (220) for dividing the preselected script word count (195) by the
quality value (219) to obtain a third quotient (221); and
k) means for calculating the recitation quality score (230) as a weighted
sum of the first quotient (208), the second score quotient (216) and the
third score quotient (224), the means for calculating further comprising:
1) means (206) for weighting the first quotient (205) by a first weighting
parameter (a) to obtain a first score component (208);
2) means (214) for weighting the second quotient (213) by a second
weighting parameter (b) to obtain a second score component (216);
3) means (222) for weighting the third quotient (221) by a third weighting
parameter (c) to obtain a third score component (224);
4) means (226) for summing the first score component (208), the second
score component (216) and the third score component (224) to produce a
score sum (227); and
5) means for weighting the score sum (227) by a scale factor (228) to
obtain the recitation quality score (230).
18. A system for tracking speech and interacting with a speaker using
spoken and graphic outputs and an automatic speech recognizer producing
word sequence hypotheses and phone sequence hypotheses from input speech
spoken by the speaker after being prompted to recite from a preselected
script which includes a plurality of preselected script alternatives and
from a grammar model, the system comprising:
presentation means for presenting information to the speaker about a
subject and prompting the speaker to recite one of the plurality of
preselected script alternatives;
sensing means for electronically capturing the input speech, wherein the
captured input speech is stored in a computer memory;
analyzing means for analyzing the captured input speech to determine an
input hypothesis corresponding to the input speech spoken by the speaker;
identifying means, coupled to the analyzing means, for identifying which
preselected script alternative from the plurality of preselected script
alternatives best corresponds to the input hypothesis;
assessing means, coupled to the identifying means, for assessing
completeness of an utterance to determine accuracy of recitation of the
identified preselected script alternative, the accuracy being a measure of
how well the input speech corresponds with preselected script which the
speaker of the input speech was prompted to recite;
output means, coupled to the assessing means, for outputting a response
upon the completion of the utterance, the response indicating to the
speaker the accuracy of the recitation of the identified preselected
script alternative and the semantic appropriateness of the identified
preselected script alternative.
19. The system according to claim 18, wherein the interacting system is for
instruction in a language foreign to the speaker and wherein the producing
means includes means for generating an audible response as an example of
native pronunciation and rendition.
20. The language instruction and evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the
step of outputting an indication is a step of indirectly outputting an
indication and comprises the steps of:
inputting the indication to a lesson program; and indicating, using the
lesson program, to the speaker the accuracy of the speaker's recitation by
taking an action consistent with the accuracy input to the lesson program. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which
is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection
to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the
patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent
file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
MICROFICHE APPENDIX
This application has been filed with a microfiche appendix of 47 frames in
length containing source code listings of elements of one embodiment of
the present invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to speech recognition and more particularly to the
types of such systems based on a hidden Markov models (HMM) for use in
language or speech instruction.
By way of background, an instructive tutorial on hidden Markov modeling
processes is found in a 1986 paper by Rabiner et al., "An Introduction to
Hidden Markov Models," IEEE ASSP Magazine, Jan. 1986, pp. 4-16.
Various hidden-Markov-model-based speech recognition systems are known and
need not be detailed herein. Such systems typically use realizations of
phonemes which are statistical models of phonetic segments (including
allophones or, more generically, phones) having parameters that are
estimated from a set of training examples.
Models of words are made by making a network from appropriate phone models,
a phone being an acoustic realization of a phoneme, a phoneme being the
minimum unit of speech capable of use in distinguishing words. Recognition
consists of finding the most-likely path through the set of word models
for the input speech signal.
Known hidden Markov model speech recognition systems are based on a model
of speech production known as a Markov source. The speech units being
modeled are represented by finite state machines. Probability
distributions are associated with the transitions leaving each node
(state), specifying the probability of taking each transition when
visiting the node. A probability distribution over output symbols is
associated with each node. The transition probability distributions
implicitly model duration. The output symbol distributions are typically
used to model speech signal characteristics such as spectra.
The probability distributions for transitions and output symbols are
estimated using labeled examples of speech. Recognition consists of
determining the path through the Markov network that has the highest
probability of generating the observed sequence. For continuous speech,
this path will correspond to a sequence of word models.
Models are known for accounting for out-of-vocabulary speech, herein called
reject phone models but sometimes called "filler" models. Such models are
described in Rose et al., "A Hidden Markov Model Based Keyword Recognition
System," Proceedings of IEEE ICASSP, 1990.
The specific hidden Markov model recognition system employed in conjunction
with the present invention is the Decipher speech recognizer, which is
available from SRI International of Menlo Park, Calif. The Decipher system
incorporates probabilistic phonological information, a trainer capable of
training phonetic models with different levels of context dependence,
multiple pronunciations for words, and a recognizer. The co-inventors have
published with others papers and reports on instructional development
peripherally related to this invention. Each mentions early versions of
question and answer techniques. See, for example, "Automatic Evaluation
and Training in English Pronunciation," Proc. ICSLP 90, Nov. 1990, Kobe,
Japan. "Toward Commercial Applications of Speaker-Independent Continuous
Speech Recognition," Proceedings of Speech Tech 91, (Apr. 23, 1991) New
York, N.Y. "A Voice Interactive Language Instruction System," Proceedings
of Eurospeech 91, Genoa, Italy Sep. 25, 1991. These papers described only
what an observer of a demonstration might experience.
Other language training technologies are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No.
4,969,194 to Ezawa et al. discloses a system for simple drilling of a user
in pronunciation in a language. The system has no speech recognition
capabilities, but it appears to have a signal-based feedback mechanism
using a comparator which compares a few acoustic characteristics of speech
and the fundamental frequency of the speech with a reference set.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,380,438 to Okamoto discloses a digital controller of an
analog tape recorder used for recording and playing back a user's own
speech. There are no recognition capabilities.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,860,360 to Boggs is a system for evaluating speech in which
distortion in a communication channel is analyzed. There is no alignment
or recognition of the speech signal against any known vocabulary, as the
disclosure relates only to signal analysis and distortion measure
computation.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,276,445 to Harbeson describes a speech analysis system
which produces little more than an analog pitch display. It is not
believed to be relevant to the subject invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,641,343 to Holland et al. describes an analog system which
extracts formant frequencies which are fed to a microprocessor for
ultimate display to a user. The only feedback is a graphic presentation of
a signature which is directly computable from the input signal. There is
no element of speech recognition or of any other high-level processing.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,783,803 to Baker et al. discloses a speech recognition
apparatus and technique which includes means for determining where among
frames to look for the start of speech. The disclosure contains a
description of a low-level acoustically-based endpoint detector which
processes only acoustic parameters, but it does not include higher level,
context-sensitive end-point detection capability.
What is needed is a recognition and feedback system which can interact with
a user in a linguistic context-sensitive manner to provide tracking of
user-reading of a script in a quasi-conversational manner for instructing
a user in properly-rendered, native-sounding speech.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, an instruction system is provided which employs
linguistic context-sensitive speech recognition for instruction and
evaluation, particularly language instruction and language fluency
evaluation. The system can administer a lesson, and particularly a
language lesson, and evaluate performance in a natural voice-interactive
manner while tolerating strong foreign accents from a non-native user. The
lesson material and instructions may be presented to the learner in a
variety of ways, including, but not limited to, video, audio or printed
visual text. As an example, in one language-instruction-specific
application, an entire conversation and interaction may be carried out in
a target language, i.e., the language of instruction, while certain
instructions may be in a language familiar to the user.
In connection with preselected visual information, the system may present
aural information to a trainee. The system prompts the trainee-user to
read text aloud during a reading phase while monitoring selected
parameters of speech based on comparison with a script stored in the
system. The system then asks the user certain questions, presenting a list
of possible responses. The user is then expected to respond by reciting
the appropriate response in the target language. The system is able to
recognize and respond accurately and | | |