WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Threshold templating for digital AGC    
United States Patent5658317   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5658317.html
Inventor(s)Haefner; Paul A. (Crystal, MN); Stockburger; Mark A. (Inver Grove Heights, MN)
AbstractA system and method automatically adjusts a sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator which receives electrical activity of the heart and delivers shock pulses in response thereto. An amplifier amplifies the electrical activity. A detection circuit detects depolarizations in the amplified electrical activity and provides a detect signal representing a cardiac event indicative of a depolarization when the amplified electrical activity exceeds a variable sensing threshold. Digital template generation circuitry responds quickly to track amplitudes of the electrical activity and to set the variable sensing threshold to a level proportional to a peak value of the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity and then decreases the variable sensing threshold from the level in discrete steps until the variable sensing threshold is at a low threshold value. The discrete steps are grouped into step groups. Each step group decreases the variable sensing threshold by a defined percentage.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 5658317
Threshold templating for digital AGC - US Patent 5658317 Drawing
Threshold templating for digital AGC
Inventor     Haefner; Paul A. (Crystal, MN); Stockburger; Mark A. (Inver Grove Heights, MN)
Owner/Assignee     Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (St. Paul, MN)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     August 19, 1997
Application Number     08/514,929
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     August 14, 1995
US Classification     607/5 128/901
Int'l Classification     A61N 001/39
Examiner     Kamm; William E.
Assistant Examiner     Jastrzab; Jeffrey R.
Attorney/Law Firm     Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A.
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     607/5 607/4 607/9 128/696 128/697 128/704 128/708 128/901
Patent Tags     threshold templating digital agc
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5513644
McClure
600/521
May,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5470342
Mann
607/5
Nov,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5458621
White

Oct,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5374282
Nichols
607/18
Dec,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5370124
Dissing
600/508
Dec,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5354316
Keimel
607/15
Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5339820
Henry
600/508
Aug,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5330508
Gunderson
607/14
Jul,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5269300
Kelly
607/4
Dec,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5117824
Keimel
607/4
Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5103819
Baker

Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5065766
Sasaki

Nov,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5050599
Hoegnelid
607/17
Sep,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5014704
Alt
607/19
May,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5010887
Thornander
600/509
Apr,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4972835
Carroll
607/5
Nov,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4967747
Carroll
607/5
Nov,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4966146
Webb
607/19
Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4940054
Grevis
607/4
Jul,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4934376
Armington
600/509
Jun,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4903699
Baker, Jr.
607/9
Feb,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4880004
Baker, Jr.
607/4
Nov,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4827934
Ekwall
607/9
May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4819643
Menken
607/4
Apr,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4779617
Whigham
607/9
Oct,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4768511
DeCote, Jr.
607/9
Sep,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4766902
Schroeppel
607/9
Aug,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4722351
Phillipps

Feb,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4708144
Hamilton
607/9
Nov,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4665919
Mensink
607/25
May,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4617938
Shimoni
600/521
Oct,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4325384
Blaser
600/509
Apr,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4250883
Thompson
607/9
Feb,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4240442
Andresen
600/521
Dec,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4226245
Bennett, Jr.
607/27
Oct,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
3999556
Alferness
607/9
Dec,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3986496
Brastad
600/510
Oct,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3939824
Arneson
600/485
Feb,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3927677
Gobeli
607/9
Dec,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3878833
Arneson
600/485
Apr,1975

[0 after 0 votes]
3590811
Harris
128/892
Jul,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What we claim is:

1. A method for automatically adjusting a sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator, which receives electrical activity of the heart and provides shock pulses in response thereto, the method comprising the steps of:

amplifying the electrical activity of the heart;

detecting cardiac events representing depolarizations in the electrical activity which exceed a variable sensing threshold;

tracking amplitudes of the amplified electrical activity;

adjusting the variable sensing threshold to a level proportional to the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of a current detected cardiac event; and

decreasing the variable sensing threshold from said level in discrete steps until the variable sensing threshold is at a low threshold value, wherein said discrete steps are grouped into step groups, wherein each step group decreases the variable sensing threshold by a defined percentage, and wherein each step group comprises multiple discrete steps.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the adjusting and decreasing steps achieve a piecewise linear approximation of a geometric progression.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the geometric progression is an exponential decay curve.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said level is a percentage of a peak value of the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of the current detected cardiac event.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the percentage of the peak value is approximately 75%.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of adjusting the variable sensing threshold to said level occurs prior to the end of a new sensed refractory period caused by a cardiac event.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the method automatically adjusts the sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator having pacing capability, and wherein the step of adjusting the variable sensing threshold to said level occurs at the end of a paced/shock refractory period resulting from a pace or shock pulse.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the defined percentage is approximately 50%.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein each step group includes at least 4 discrete steps.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the decreasing step uses integer math to calculate an amount of drop for a discrete step.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of varying a time width of each discrete step based on operating conditions of the cardioverter/defibrillator to control the decay rate of the variable sensing threshold.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the method automatically adjusts the sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator having pacing capability, and wherein the step of varying the time width of each discrete step includes the steps of varying time widths based on bradycardia pacing, tachyarrhythmia sensing, and normal sinus sensing to control the decay rate of the variable sensing threshold.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the varying step varies the time width as a function of a bradycardia pacing rate when the cardioverter/defibrillator is operating under the bradycardia pacing conditions.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the method automatically adjusts the sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator having pacing capability, and wherein the method further comprises the steps of:

setting the variable sensing threshold after a pace or a shock pulse to a selected relatively high threshold value; and

holding the variable sensing threshold at the selected relatively high threshold value through a paced/shock refractory period resulting from the pace or shock pulse.

15. A system for automatically adjusting a sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator, which receives electrical activity of the heart and provides shock pulses in response thereto, the system comprising:

an amplifier for amplifying the electrical activity of the heart;

a cardiac depolarization detector for detecting depolarizations in the amplified electrical activity of the heart and providing a detect signal representing a cardiac event indicative of a depolarization when the amplified electrical activity exceeds a variable sensing threshold; and

threshold controller for tracking amplitudes of the amplified electrical activity and for adjusting the variable sensing threshold to a level proportional to the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of a current detected cardiac event and for decreasing the variable sensing threshold from said level in discrete steps until the variable sensing threshold is at a low threshold value, wherein said discrete steps are grouped into step groups, wherein each step group decreases the variable sensing threshold by a defined percentage, and wherein each step group comprises multiple discrete steps.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the threshold controller adjusts the variable sensing threshold to achieve a piecewise linear approximation of a geometric progression.

17. The system of claim 16 wherein the geometric progression is an exponential decay curve.

18. The system of claim 15 wherein said level is a percentage of a peak value of the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of the current detected cardiac event.

19. The system of claim 18 wherein the percentage of the peak value is approximately 75%.

20. The system of claim 15 wherein the threshold controller adjusts the variable sensing threshold to said level prior to the end of a new sensed refractory period caused by a cardiac event.

21. The system of claim 15 wherein the cardioverter/defibrillator, in which the system of claim 15 automatically adjusts the sensing threshold, has pacing capability, and wherein the system further comprises means for detecting the end of a paced/shock refractory period resulting from a pace or shock pulse from the cardioverter/defibrillator and, and wherein the threshold controller includes means for adjusting the variable sensing threshold to said level at the detected end of a paced/shock refractory period.

22. The system of claim 15 wherein the defined percentage is approximately 50%.

23. The system of claim 15 wherein each step group includes at least 4 discrete steps.

24. The system of claim 15 wherein the threshold controller calculates an amount of drop for a discrete step using integer math.

25. The system of claim 15 further comprising a decay rate controller for varying a time width of each discrete step based on operating conditions of the cardioverter/defibrillator to control the decay rate of the variable sensing threshold.

26. The system of claim 25 wherein the cardioverter/defibrillator, in which the system of claim 25 automatically adjusts the sensing threshold, has pacing capability, and wherein the decay rate controller varies the time widths of each step based on bradycardia pacing, tachyarrhythmia sensing, and normal sinus sensing.

27. The system of claim 26 wherein the decay rate controller varies the time width as a function of a bradycardia pacing rate when the cardioverter/defibrillator is operating under the bradycardia pacing conditions.

28. The system of claim 15 wherein the system automatically adjusts the sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator having pacing capability, and wherein the system further comprises:

means for setting the variable sensing threshold after a pace or a shock pulse to a selected relatively high threshold value and for holding the variable sensing threshold at the selected relatively high threshold value through a paced/shock refractory period resulting from the pace or shock pulse.

29. A method for automatically controlling a decay rate of a sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator with pacing capability, which receives electrical activity of the heart and provides shock pulses and pacing pulses in response thereto, the method comprising the steps of:

amplifying the electrical activity of the heart;

detecting cardiac events representing depolarizations in the electrical activity which exceed a variable sensing threshold;

tracking amplitudes of the amplified electrical activity;

adjusting the variable sensing threshold to a level proportional to the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of a current detected cardiac event;

decreasing the variable sensing threshold from said level in discrete steps until the variable sensing threshold is at a low threshold value; and

controlling the decay rate of the variable sensing threshold by varying a time width of each discrete step based on operating conditions of the cardioverter/defibrillator including bradycardia pacing, tachyarrhythmia sensing, and normal sinus sensing.

30. The method of claim 29 wherein the controlling step varies the time width as a function of a bradycardia pacing rate when the cardioverter/defibrillator is operating under bradycardia pacing conditions.

31. The method of claim 30 wherein the controlling step varies the time width under bradycardia pacing conditions based on the time between each pacing pulse, a programmed paced refractory period, and the number of discrete steps to go from said level to the low threshold level.

32. The method of claim 29 wherein the controlling step varies the time width to produce a relatively fast decay rate when the cardioverter/defibrillator is operating under tachyarrhythmia sensing conditions.

33. A system for automatically controlling a decay rate of a sensing threshold in a cardioverter/defibrillator with pacing capability, which receives electrical activity of the heart and provides shock pulses and pacing pulses in response thereto, the system comprising:

an amplifier for amplifying the electrical activity of the heart;

a cardiac depolarization detector for detecting depolarizations in the amplified electrical activity of the heart and providing a detect signal representing a cardiac event indicative of a depolarization when the amplified electrical activity exceeds a variable sensing threshold;

threshold controller for tracking amplitudes of the amplified electrical activity and for adjusting the variable sensing threshold to a level proportional to the amplitude of the amplified electrical activity of a current detected cardiac event and for decreasing the variable sensing threshold from said level in discrete steps until the variable sensing threshold is at a low threshold value; and

decay rate controller for controlling the decay rate of the variable sensing threshold by varying a time width of each discrete step based on operating conditions of the cardioverter/defibrillator including bradycardia pacing, tachyarrhythmia sensing, and normal sinus sensing.

34. The system of claim 33 wherein the decay rate controller varies the time width as a function of a bradycardia pacing rate when the cardioverter/defibrillator is operating under bradycardia pacing conditions.

35. The system of claim 34 wherein the decay rate controller varies the time width under bradycardia pacing conditions based on the time between each pacing pulse, a programmed paced refractory period, and the number of discrete steps to go from