|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 5673325 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5673325.html |
| Inventor(s) | Andrea; Douglas (Old Brookville, NY);
Topf; Martin (Brooklyn, NY) |
| Abstract | Apparatus for reducing acoustic background noise for use with a telephone
handset or a boom microphone device or a boom headset or the like. The
apparatus includes first and second microphones which are arranged such
that the first microphone receives a desired speech input and the
background noise present in the vicinity of the speech, and the second
microphone receives substantially only the background noise. The
background noise from the second microphone is converted into a
corresponding electrical signal and subtracted from a signal corresponding
to the speech and background noise obtained from the first microphone so
as to produce a signal representing substantially the speech. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
*
September 30, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
November 14, 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation-in-part of allowed application Ser. No.
07/968,180, filed Oct. 29, 1992 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,473, incorporated
herein by reference. Reference is also made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,251,263,
issued Oct. 5, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 2379514
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2972018
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3098121
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3394226
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5471538 Sasaki 381/92 Nov,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5448637 Yamaguchi 379/430 Sep,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5402497 Nishimoto 381/95 Mar,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5381473 Andrea 379/388.03 Jan,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5327506 Stites, III 381/355 Jul,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5276740 Inanaga 381/382 Jan,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5260997 Gattey 379/430 Nov,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5226087 Ono 381/92 Jul,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5138664 Kimura 381/71.6 Aug,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5138663 Moseley 381/71.6 Aug,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5134659 Moseley 381/72 Jul,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5125032 Meister 381/72 Jun,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5121426 Baumhauer, Jr. 379/420.03 Jun,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5117461 Moseley 381/72 May,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5091954 Sasaki 381/72 Feb,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5001763 Moseley 381/71.6 Mar,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4985925 Langberg 381/71.6 Jan,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4833719 Carme 381/72 May,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4783817 Hamada 381/71.5 Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4752961 Kahn 381/92 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4672674 Clough 381/94.7 Jun,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4589137 Miller 381/94.2 May,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4463222 Poradowski 381/357 Jul,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4334740 Wray 352/11 Jun,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3890474 Glicksberg 381/72 Jun,1975 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3889059 Thompson 379/388.05 Jun,1975 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3830988 Mol 379/419 Aug,1974 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5414769 Gattey 379/430 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. Noise reduction apparatus comprising: a housing having first
omnidirectional microphone means for receiving a first acoustic sound
composed of speech originating from an operator operating said apparatus
and background noise, and for converting said first acoustic sound to a
first signal, and second omnidirectional microphone means arranged in
close proximity up to about 0.5 inches to thereby act as a dipole at a
predetermined angle .phi. with respect to said first omnidirectional
microphone means for receiving a second acoustic sound composed of
substantially said background noise and for converting said second
acoustic sound to a second signal whereas the first omnidirectional
microphone means and the second omnidirectional microphone means are
directly connected without any intermediate circuitry to a means for
subtracting; and
the means for subtracting said second signal from said first signal so as
to obtain a signal representing substantially said speech.
2. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 1, wherein at least one
of said first and second microphone means includes a plurality of
omnidirectional microphones.
3. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first
and/or second omnidirectional microphone means comprises a plurality of
noise canceling microphones and outputs from the first and/or second
omnidirectional microphone means comprises a weighted sum of several
microphone output voltages which are weighted according to a desired
function.
4. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the desired
function is a gradient search algorithm.
5. A microphone apparatus for reducing background noise, said apparatus
comprising:
a housing;
a first omnidirectional microphone having a first pressure sensitive
surface and arranged within said housing so as to receive a first acoustic
sound composed of speech originating from an operator operating said
apparatus and said background noise, said first omnidirectional microphone
for converting said first acoustic sound to a first signal;
a second omnidirectional microphone having a second pressure sensitive
surface and arranged within said housing so as to receive a second
acoustic sound composed of substantially said background noise, said
second omnidirectional microphone converting said second acoustic sound to
a second signal, said second pressure sensitive surface being arranged in
close proximity up to about 0.5 inches at a predetermined angle with
respect to said first pressure sensitive surface whereas the first
omnidirectional microphone means and the second omnidirectional microphone
means are directly connected without any intermediate circuitry to a means
for subtracting;
the means for subtracting said second signal from said first signal so as
to obtain a signal representing substantially said speech; and
wherein the first and second microphones are in close proximity to each
other to thereby act as a dipole.
6. A microphone apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said predetermined
angle is substantially 180 degrees.
7. A microphone apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said first and
second sensitive surfaces are located less than a predetermined amount
from each other.
8. A microphone apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said predetermined
amount is approximately 0.25 of an inch.
9. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said
predetermined angle .phi. lies within a range from approximately 30
degrees to approximately 60 degrees.
10. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said first
omnidirectional microphone means is arranged in said housing such that an
angle .theta. formed between a plane passing through a portion of said
first omnidirectional microphone means which receives said first acoustic
sound and an input direction of said speech is less than approximately 35
degrees.
11. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said
second omnidirectional microphone means is arranged in said housing such
that an angle .beta. formed between an axis normal to the receiving
portion of said second omnidirectional microphone means and said input
direction of said speech is approximately equal to ›(90-.theta.)+.phi.!
degrees.
12. The noise reduction apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first
and second omnidirectional microphone means are electret microphones
having matching frequency, phase and gain characteristics.
13. The microphone apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said
predetermined amount is in a range of 0.10 to 0.50 inches. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a noise cancellation apparatus and, more
particularly, to an apparatus for canceling or reducing background
acoustic noise for use with a telephone handset or a boom microphone
device or boom headset or the like.
2. Description of the Prior Art
As is to be appreciated, in numerous situations, the presence of background
acoustic noise is undesirable. As an example, consider the situation in
which an operator is attempting to conduct a telephone conversation from a
telephone or such similar device located in a noisy area. In this
situation, loud acoustic background noise is received by a microphone in
the handset of the telephone and converted to an electrical signal which
is supplied to the telephone(s) of the person(s) having the conversation
with the operator and is converted thereat to an acoustic signal. As a
result, the person to whom the operator is communicating constantly hears
the loud background noise. Further, when the person is speaking, such
speech is combined with the background noise and, as such, may be
difficult for the other person(s) to understand. As a result, the operator
may have to shout into the microphone of the telephone. Furthermore, the
signal representing the background noise is also supplied from the
microphone in the operator's handset to the speaker in the operator's
handset. Thus, the operator also constantly hears the background noise
from the speaker in the operator's handset and, when the other person is
speaking, may impair the understanding thereof.
As another example, consider the situation in which a pilot who is
operating a helicopter or the like wishes to communicate with another
person by way of radio frequency (RF) communication. In this situation,
the pilot typically speaks into a so-called boom microphone or boom
headset which is coupled to a radio transmitting/receiving device
whereupon the speech is converted into RF signals which are transmitted to
a second receiving/transmitting device and converted therein to speech so
as to be heard by the other person(s). As with the above situation of a
telephone located in a noisy area, the loud background noise from the
helicopter is received and converted into an electrical signal by the boom
microphone or headset device and thereafter supplied to the receiving
device. As a result, the person(s) communicating with the pilot hears the
loud background noise. This may be particularly annoying when the pilot
leaves the radio transmitting/receiving device in the "ON" position while
operating the helicopter.
As yet another example, consider voice verification and/or recognition
systems into which an operator must speak for access, for instance to a
physical facility or, to operate a computer or automatic teller machine.
Background noise can prevent access (no recognition or verification due to
background noise) or can provide false access by false verification.
In an attempt to reduce background noise so as to improve performance of a
telephone or a boom microphone or headset or the like located in a noisy
environment or the like, pressure gradient microphones may be utilized.
Basically, a pressure gradient microphone responds to the difference in
pressure at two closely spaced points. When used in an environment where
the pressure gradient of the background noise is isotropic, the electrical
signal produced by the pressure-gradient microphone due to such background
noise is effectively zero. However, in most actual situations, the
pressure gradient of the background noise is not isotropic and, as a
result, in these situations, the performance of the pressure-gradient
microphone is adversely affected. Additionally, since voice or speech
propagates in more than one direction, the electrical signal produced by
the microphone which corresponds thereto is often degraded. Thus, even if
a pressure gradient microphone is utilized in either a telephone handset
or a boom microphone, the desired amount of background noise cancellation
may not be sufficient and the performance may not be adequate.
Furthermore, since two opposite sides of a pressure-gradient microphone
respond to acoustic pressure, as previously mentioned, the handset of an
existing telephone would have to be substantially modified so as to enable
these two sides of the microphone to respond to the acoustic pressure.
Moreover, as a result of using such a microphone in a telephone handset,
the electrical signals produced therefrom should be amplified. Thus, to
replace the conventional microphone in a telephone handset of an existing
telephone with a pressure-gradient microphone would typically necessitate
replacing the handset with a new handset and, as such, would be relatively
expensive.
As an alternative to using pressure-gradient microphones, an acoustic
feed-back type system may be utilized. Such a system normally includes
compensation filters which are used to equalize the transfer function of
the speakers. Since the characteristics of the speakers are tightly
controlled by these filters, the cost of the filters is relatively high.
As a result, such acoustic feed-back systems are typically relatively
expensive.
Thus, the prior art has failed to provide a relatively low-cost means for
reducing background noise to an acceptable level for use with telephones
and/or boom microphone devices or the like, and a cost-effective means for
enabling existing telephones to reduce background noise to an acceptable
level.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide noise reduction apparatus
which overcomes the problems associated with the prior art.
More specifically, it is an object of the present invention to provide
noise reduction apparatus which reduces background noise to an acceptable
level.
Another object of the present invention is to provide noise reduction
apparatus as aforementioned for use with a telephone or boom microphone or
headset device or to provide a noise reduction microphone device or the
like.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide noise
reduction apparatus as aforementioned which is relatively inexpensive.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a relatively
low-cost noise reduction apparatus for use with telephones which is
operable with standard available on-line power.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a relatively
low-cost noise reduction apparatus which is readily adaptable to handsets
of existing telephones and which is operable with standard available
on-line power.
A yet further object of the present invention is to provide a relatively
low-cost noise reduction apparatus for use with telephones or which may be
readily adaptable to handsets of existing telephones which enables an
operator to selectively amplify a received signal or, which may be used in
a boom microphone or headset or, which may be used as a noise canceling
microphone.
In accordance with an aspect of this invention, a telephone handset
apparatus for use with a telephone operable by standard power supplied to
the telephone handset for transmitting and receiving signals representing
speech between two or more operators is provided. The apparatus includes a
housing having a first microphone means for receiving a first acoustic
signal composed of speech from the operator using the apparatus and
background noise in the vicinity of the speech and for converting the
first acoustic sound to a first signal, and a second microphone means
arranged at a predetermined angle with respect to the first microphone
means for receiving a second acoustic sound composed of substantially the
background noise and for converting the second acoustic sound to a second
signal; and a device for subtracting the second signal from the first
signal so as to obtain a signal representing substantially the speech.
In another aspect the invention provides a boom microphone or headset
device for transmitting and receiving signals representing speech by at
least one, preferably two or more operators. The device includes housing
having a first microphone means for receiving a first acoustic signal
composed of speech from the operator using the device and background noise
in the vicinity of the speech and for converting the first acoustic sound
to a first signal and a second microphone means arranged at a
predetermined angle and/or distance with respect to the first microphone
means for receiving a second acoustic signal composed substantially of
background noise and for converting the second acoustic sound to a second
signal; and an apparatus for subtracting the second signal from the first
signal so as to obtain a signal representing substantially speech.
The boom microphone or headset can be used in flight (e.g., helicopter or
airplane) or in other settings such as telephones, or voice recognition
and/or verification systems for instance, for access to a physical
facility or to a computer (either via direct or indirect interface or via
telephone lines) or to an automatic teller machine or, in other
recognition and/or verification systems. The first and second microphones
arranged at a predetermined angle and/or distance with subtraction
apparatus disclosed herein can also be used in the area of ambient noise
cancellation for microphones in acoustic surveillance or telemetry or even
directional microphones such as directional microphones with sidelobes.
Other objects, features and advantages according to the present invention
will become apparent from the following detailed description of the
illustrated embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings in which corresponding components are identified by the same
reference numerals.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates a telephone having a noise reduction apparatus according
to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the noise reduction apparatus used in the
telephone of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3A is a front plan view of the receiver portion of the telephone of
FIG. 1;
FIG. 3B is a side elevational view of the receiver portion of the telephone
of FIG. 1 with the top removed;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the block diagram of FIG. 2;
FIG. 5 is another schematic diagram of the noise reduction apparatus
illustrated in FIG. 2; and
FIG. 6 illustrates a boom microphone device utilizing a noise reduction
apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is schematic diagrams to which reference will be made in explaining
the operation of the present invention;
FIG. 8 illustrates of a noise reduction apparatus according to the present
invention;
FIG. 9 illustrates boom microphone and headset embodiments of the invention
(FIGS. 9A and 9B each showing an embodiment having particular placement of
the microphone; FIG. 9C showing an overview of the headset and FIGS. 9D
and 9E showing side views of the boom microphone);
FIG. 10 is schematic diagrams of the noise reduction apparatus of FIG. 8;
FIG. 11 illustrates a phase reversing circuit;
FIG. 12 illustrates an oppositely charged microphone circuit | | |