|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5481647 Brody 706/11 Jan,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5284947 Kadam 544/245 Feb,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5257185 Farley 707/100 Oct,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5228116 Harris 706/50 Jul,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5193143 Kaemmerer
Mar,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5191638 Wakami 706/10 Mar,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5179632 Masui 706/47 Jan,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5167012 Hayes
Nov,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5164912 Osborne 713/300 Nov,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5159669 Trigg 715/814 Oct,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5131087 Warr 711/113 Jul,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5121496 Harper 707/200 Jun,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5103498 Lanier 706/58 Apr,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5043915 Suwa 706/47 Aug,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5034898 Lu 706/62 Jul,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5006992 Skeirik 706/58 Apr,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4970657 Wolf 706/52 Nov,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4949278 Davies 706/10 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4930071 Tou 707/4 May,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4928236 Tanaka 706/59 May,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4920499 Skeirik 706/11 Apr,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4891766 Derr 706/60 Jan,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4884218 Agnew 706/50 Nov,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4866635 Kahn 706/46 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4866634 Reboh 706/60 Sep,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4847784 Clancey 706/50 Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4754409 Ashford 706/10 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4658370 Erman 706/60 Apr,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5025392 Singh 706/50 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed:
1. An apparatus for providing an expert systems toolkit, comprising:
a memory for storing data;
a computer coupled to said memory and having a video display and an input
device;
a program in execution by said computer for controlling operations thereof
for receiving user input defining one or more analysis rules to be applied
to user specified data from said memory, each said analysis rule being a
user defined arithmetic and/or logic test to be applied to user specified
items of said data and for controlling said computer to receive and store
user entered data defining the alphanumeric text of a diagnostic statement
associated with each true result of each said analysis rule, each said
diagnostic statement comprised of a user defined alphanumeric text string
which the user can program to define the significance of the true result,
its relevance or any other expression which provides meaning to the user
of the true result of the analysis rule, and for controlling said computer
to receive user input controlling which of said analysis rules are to be
applied to said data, and for applying said analysis rules so designated
to the data designated by said user and returning a true or false result
for each analysis rule so applied depending upon the state of the data to
which each analysis rule was applied, and for each true result returned by
an analysis rule, controlling said computer to store in a file in said
memory the user programmed text of a diagnostic statement associated with
each true result as a diagnostic in a diagnostic database, and for
controlling said computer to receive and store in said memory user input
defining one or more expert tests, each expert test comprising a user
defined arithmetic and/or logic statement to be applied to one or more
diagnostics selected by user input from the diagnostics stored in said
diagnostic database, said arithmetic and/or logic statement comprised of
mathematical operators and/or logical operators from any logic set such as
predicate logic or Boolean logic including at least the AND, OR and NOT
functions, each said expert test returning either a true or false result,
and for controlling said computer to receive user input defining the text
of a super diagnostic statement in the form of an alphanumeric string
associated with each true result of one of said expert tests, each said
superdiagnostic being an alphanumeric string which the user can program to
define the significance of the true result of the expert rule, its
relevance or any other expression which provides meaning to the user of
the true result of the expert rule, and for controlling said computer to
receive user input defining which of said expert tests to execute on user
specified diagnostics in said diagnostic database, and for controlling the
computer to execute the expert tests so designated, and for controlling
said computer to store as a super diagnostic in a super diagnostic file in
said memory the super diagnostic statement associated with any true result
returned by any said expert test.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said program also controls said
computer to accept user input entered through said input device which
defines bidirectional pointer data which associates each said diagnostic
statement defined by user input for an analysis rule with one or more user
defined items of data to which said analysis rule is to be applied, and
for controlling said computer such that when an analysis rule returns a
true result, the corresponding one or more items of user defined data
mapped to said true result are stored along with the corresponding
bidirectional pointer data.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said diagnostics, the underlying data
from which said diagnostics were generated by said analysis rules, and the
super diagnostics generated by said expert tests are each stored in a
separate table of a relational database, and wherein said program also
controls said computer to accept user input entered through said input
device which defines bidirectional pointer data which associates each said
diagnostic statement defined by user input for an analysis rule with one
or more user defined items of data to which said analysis rule is to be
applied, and for controlling said computer such that when an analysis rule
returns a true result, the corresponding one or more items of user defined
data mapped to said true result are stored along with the corresponding
bidirectional pointer data, and wherein said program also controls said
computer to accept user input entered through said input device which
defines bidirectional pointer data which associates each said
superdiagnostic statement defined by user input for an expert rule with
one or more user defined diagnostics to which said expert rule is to be
applied, and for controlling said computer such that when an expert rule
returns a true result, the corresponding one or more diagnostics mapped to
said true result are stored along with the corresponding bidirectional
pointer data.
4. An apparatus for providing an expert systems toolkit implementing
diagnostic weighting, comprising:
a memory for storing data;
a computer coupled to said memory and having a video display and an input
device;
a program in execution by said computer for controlling operations thereof
for receiving user input defining one or more analysis rules to be applied
to user specified data from said memory, and for controlling said computer
to receive and store user data defining a unique diagnostic statement
associated with each true result of each said analysis rule, each said
diagnostic statement comprised of a user defined alphanumeric text string,
and for controlling said computer to receive user input defining a
subjective mathematical statement associated with each said analysis rule,
each said subjective mathematical statement being comprised of a user
programmable combination of mathematical functions, and each said
mathematical statement to be executed only when said associated analysis
rule returns a true result, said subjective mathematical statement
operating on user specified data from said memory and outputting a numeric
result in the form of a weighting number, and for controlling said
computer to receive user input controlling which of said analysis rules is
to be applied to said data, and for applying said analysis rules so
designated to the data in said memory designated by said user and
returning a true or false result depending upon the state of the data to
which the analysis rule was applied, and for each true result returned by
an analysis rule, controlling said computer to store in a file in said
memory the diagnostic statement associated with each true result as a
diagnostic in a diagnostic database and the corresponding weighting number
from the corresponding mathematical statement, and for controlling said
computer to receive and store in said memory user input defining one or
more expert tests, each expert test comprising a user defined logic
statement to be applied to one or more diagnostics selected by user input
from the diagnostics stored in said diagnostic database, each said expert
test also including an associated user programmable subjective weighting
mathematical statement, each said subjective weighting mathematical
statement being comprised of a user programmable combination of
mathematical functions to be applied to the weighting numbers associated
with the diagnostics combined by the logic statement of said expert test,
at least one said mathematical function designed to select the maximum of
all the weighting numbers associated with diagnostics combined by the
corresponding expert test logic statement, and at least one said
mathematical function designed to select the minimum of all the weighting
numbers associated with the diagnostics combined by the associated expert
test logic statement, said logic statement of each said expert test
comprised of logical operators from any logic set such as predicate logic
or Boolean logic including at least the AND, OR and NOT functions, each
said expert test returning either a true or false result, and for
controlling said computer to receive user input defining a super
diagnostic statement in the form of an alphanumeric string associated with
each true result of one of said expert tests, and for controlling said
computer to receive user input defining which of said expert tests to
execute and for executing the expert tests so designated, and for
controlling said computer to store as a super diagnostic in a super
diagnostic file in said memory the super diagnostic statement associated
with any true result returned by any said expert test in addition to the
numeric result of the associated weighting mathematical statement.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said subjective weighting mathematical
statements associated with each said analysis rule and each said expert
test are user defined.
6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein each said mathematical function forming
part of any said subjective mathematical statement has a predetermined
rule of operation for operating on the weighting numbers associated with
the data or diagnostics operated on by said analysis rules or said expert
tests, respectively, said rule of operation not being definable by the
user.
7. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said numeric result of each said
subjective weighting mathematical statement defines the degree, expressed
as a percentage, to which said user believes the diagnostic associated
width said true result is or is not included in a subjective class of
diagnostics believed by the user to share a similar property or meaning,
and wherein the rule of operation for each said mathematical function
forming a part of any said mathematical statement associated with any said
expert test is predefined, and wherein all logical AND operators forming
part of any user defined logic statement of any expert test are assigned
the mathematical minima rule of operation which selects the minima of the
weighting numbers associated with the diagnostics being combined by the
logic statement of the expert test, and wherein all logical OR operators
forming part of any user defined logic statement forming part of an expert
test is assigned the mathematical maxima rule of operation which selects
the maxima of the weighting numbers associated with the diagnostics being
combined by the logic statement of the expert test, and wherein all NOT
logical operators forming part of any user defined logic statement of any
expert test are assigned thereto a 1-x mathematical operator where x is
the weighting number of the diagnostic which is negated by the NOT logical
operator, such that a logical expression of A AND NOT(B), where A had a
weighting number of 40% and B had a weighting number of 70% would result
in a weighting number of minima{40%:(1-70%)}=30%.
8. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said program also controls said
computer to accept user input entered through said input device which
defines bi-directional pointer data which associates each said diagnostic
statement defined by user input for an analysis rule with any user defined
data in said memory, and for controlling said computer such that when an
analysis rule returns a true result, the corresponding diagnostic mapped
to said true result is stored along with the corresponding bi-directional
pointer data.
9. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said diagnostics and the associated
weighting numbers, the underlying data from which said diagnostics were
generated by said analysis rules, and the super diagnostics generated by
said expert tests and the associated weighting numbers derived by said
mathematical statement associated with each said expert test are each
stored in a separate table of a relational database.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein said program controls said computer to
receive user input that defines first and second sets of analysis rules,
said first set of analysis rules for acting upon user designated data from
a first data file and said second set of analysis rules for acting upon
user designated data from a second data file, and for controlling said
computer to receive user input data that defines diagnostic statements and
mathematical statements relating subjective weighting numbers, each of
said diagnostic statements and mathematical statements associated with
true results from each said analysis rule in said first and second set of
analysis rules, and for controlling said computer to store diagnostics
generated by said first set of analysis rules in a first diagnostic
database and to store diagnostics generated by said second set of analysis
rules in a second diagnostic database, and for controlling said computer
such that said logical statements and subjective, user defined
mathematical statement associated with each said expert test may be
applied to user designated combinations of diagnostics from either or both
of said first and second diagnostic databases.
11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein said program controls said computer to
receive user input that defines first and second sets of analysis rules,
said first set of analysis rules for acting up on user designated data
from a first data file and said second set of analysis rules for acting
upon user designated data from a second data file, and for controlling
said computer to receive user input data that defines diagnostic
statements and mathematical statements relating subjective weighting
numbers, each of said diagnostic statements and mathematical statements
associated with true results from each said analysis rule in said first
and second set of analysis rules, and for controlling said computer to
store diagnostics generated by either said first or second set of analysis
rules in a single diagnostic database.
12. An apparatus for providing an expert systems toolkit, comprising:
a memory for storing data including at least first and second database
files;
a computer coupled to said memory and having a video display and an input
device;
a program in execution by said computer for controlling operations thereof
for receiving user input defining a first set of one or more analysis
rules to be applied to user specified data from said first database file,
and for controlling said computer for receiving user input defining a
second set of one or more analysis rules to be applied to user specified
data from said second database file, each said analysis rule in said first
and second set of analysis rules returning either true or false results
depending upon the state of the data to which the analysis rule was
applied, and for controlling said computer to receive and store user data
defining a unique diagnostic statement associated with each true result of
each said analysis rule in said first and second set of analysis rules,
each said diagnostic statement comprised of a user defined alphanumeric
text string which the user can program to define the significance of the
true result, its relevance or any other expression which provides meaning
to the user of the true result of the analysis rule, and for controlling
said computer to receive user input controlling which of said analysis
rules in each of said first and second sets of analysis rules are to be
applied to said data of said first and second database files and for
applying the analysis rules so designated from said first and second sets
of analysis rules, and for applying said analysis rules so designated to
the data designated by said user and returning a true or false result for
each analysis rule so applied, and for each true result returned by an
analysis rule in said first set of analysis rules, controlling said
computer to store in said memory the diagnostic statement associated with
each true result as a diagnostic in a first diagnostic database, and for
each true result returned by an analysis rule in said second set of
analysis rules, controlling said computer to store in said memory the
diagnostic statement associated with each true result as a diagnostic in a
second diagnostic database, and for controlling said computer to receive
and store in said memory user input defining one or more expert tests,
each expert test comprising a user defined logic statement to be applied
to one or more diagnostics selected by user input from the diagnostics
stored in either or both of said first and second diagnostic databases,
said logic statement comprised of logical operators from any logic set
such as predicate logic or Boolean logic including at least the AND, OR
and NOT functions, each said expert test returning either a true or false
result, and for controlling said computer to receive user input defining a
superdiagnostic in the form of an alphanumeric string associated with each
true result of one of said expert tests each said superdiagnostic being an
alphanumeric string which the user can program to define the significance
of the true result of the expert rule, its relevance or any other
expression which provides meaning to the user of the true result of the
expert rule, and for controlling said computer to receive user input
defining which of said expert tests to execute and for executing the
expert tests so designated, and for controlling said computer to store as
a superdiagnostic in a superdiagnostic file in said memory the
superdiagnostic statement associated with any true result returned by any
said expert test. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention as a whole relates to the fields of artificial intelligence,
decision-support software and expert systems.
More specifically, the invention relates to computer software based on
artificial intelligence and rule-based systems for the development of an
executive information system.
The invention can perform information analysis via captured expertise and
the generation of diagnostics using a combination of artificial
intelligence techniques such as expert systems, neural nets, fuzzy logic
and others.
Current software implementations do not address directly the need for a
system integrating (a) report analysis via an EIS system incorporating the
generation of diagnostics using a combination of artificial intelligence
techniques, (b) storage of said diagnostics in a database related to the
original information in the reports, and (c) a query system, empowering
the user to search for any information in both reports and diagnostics in
a coordinated manner.
Heretofore, no instruments have been involved in a similar idea as that
dealt with in the invention. However, its individual elements respond to
prior art in the following areas: decision-support software and executive
information systems, expert systems and expert system building tools,
fuzzy systems, weighting schemes in expert systems, neural networks, tools
integrating expert systems and neural networks, genetic algorithms and
classifier systems, tools integrating expert systems and databases,
intelligent databases and object-oriented databases, intelligent user
interfaces, and knowledge acqui | | |