WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Microfluidic devices and systems    
United States Patent5876675   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/5876675.html
Inventor(s)Kennedy; Colin B. (Mill Valley, CA)
AbstractMicrofluidic devices and systems, and particularly, microfluidic devices that are easier to handle by the operator, without damaging, contaminating or otherwise fouling, as a result of manual contact with the device. These microfluidic devices and systems include manual handling structures, to allow handling of the small scale devices with minimal potential for fouling as a result of manual contact with the device.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Kennedy; Colin B. (Mill Valley, CA)
Owner/Assignee     Caliper Technologies Corp. (Palo Alto, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     March 2, 1999
Application Number     08/906,441
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     August 5, 1997
US Classification     422/99 73/864.91 204/451 204/452 204/601 204/603 206/261 206/263 215/395 220/755 220/771 356/244 356/246 422/55 422/58 422/68.1 422/82.05 422/100 422/104 422/108
Int'l Classification     B01L 003/00
Examiner     Soderquist; Arlen
Assistant Examiner     Carrillo; S.
Attorney/Law Firm     Murphy; Matthew B.
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     422/55 422/68.1 422/58 422/82.05 422/99 422/104 422/100 422/108 204/297 R 204/601 204/603 204/451 204/452 73/864.91 356/244 356/246 220/755 220/771 220/345 215/395 206/261 206/263
Patent Tags     microfluidic devices
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5726026
Wilding

Mar,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5637469
Wilding
435/7.21
Jun,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5635403
Bailey
436/66
Jun,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5635358
Wilding
435/7.2
Jun,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5603351
Cherukuri
137/597
Feb,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5599432
Manz
204/451
Feb,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5593838
Zanzucchi
435/6
Jan,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5585069
Zanzucchi

Dec,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5571410
Swedberg
210/198.2
Nov,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5498392
Wilding
422/68.1
Mar,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5486335
Wilding
422/55
Jan,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5484731
Stevens

Jan,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5370078
Kou
117/209
Dec,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5304487
Wilding
435/29
Apr,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5296375
Kricka

Mar,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5296114
Manz

Mar,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5279791
Aldrich
422/58
Jan,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5180480
Manz
204/644
Jan,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5160704
Schluter

Nov,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5156285
Zogg
215/384
Oct,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5126022
Soane
204/458
Jun,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5107987
Palazzolo

Apr,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5100627
Buican
422/108
Mar,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
4952373
Sugarman
422/99
Aug,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4908112
Pace
210/198.2
Mar,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4390403
Batchelder
204/547
Jun,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4252132
Kuntz
600/574
Feb,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4038149
Liner
435/305.3
Jul,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3939623
Shine
53/440
Feb,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A microfluidic apparatus, comprising:

a microfluidic device comprising a planar substrate having a first surface and at least two edges, at least two intersecting channels disposed in the substrate, a detection window in the first surface which permits transmission of an optical signal from at least one of the at least two intersecting channels;

a holder assembly having a second surface and a cavity disposed therein, the cavity being configured to fixedly receive the microfluidic device; and

a manual handling structure integrated with the holder assembly, wherein the manual handling structure is selected from the group consisting of raised ridges disposed on said second surface of the holder assembly and beveled edges positioned on said holder assembly and adjacent to said at least two edges of said substrate of said microfluidic device for gripping said holder assembly without contacting said microfluidic device.

2. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first surface of the microfluidic device comprises a plurality of wells disposed therein, wherein said wells are in fluid communication with at least one of said at least two intersecting channels.

3. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first surface of the microfluidic device is hydrophobic.

4. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the holder assembly comprises a polymeric material.

5. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 2, wherein the plurality of wells are each configured to receive an electrode, wherein said electrode is positioned to be in electrical contact with a fluid disposed in said wells.

6. A microfluidic apparatus, comprising:

a microfluidic device comprising a substrate having a first surface and at least two edges, at least two intersecting microscale channels disposed in the substrate, a detection window in the first surface which permits transmission of an optical signal from at least one of the at least two intersecting microscale channels;

a holder assembly attached to the substrate, the holder assembly having a second surface and a cavity disposed therein, the cavity being configured to fixedly receive the microfluidic device; and

a manual handling structure integrated with the holder assembly, wherein the manual handling structure comprises beveled edges positioned on said holder assembly and adjacent to said at least two edges of said substrate of said microfluidic device for gripping said holder assembly without contacting said microfluidic device.

7. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 6, wherein the first surface of the microfluidic device comprises a plurality of wells disposed therein, wherein said wells are in fluid communication with at least one of said at least two intersecting channels.

8. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 6, wherein the first surface of the microfluidic device is hydrophobic.

9. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 6, wherein the holder assembly comprises a polymeric material.

10. The microfluidic apparatus of claim 7, wherein the plurality of wells are each configured to receive an electrode, wherein said electrode is positioned to be in electrical contact with a fluid disposed in said wells .
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


Microfluidic systems have been previously described for carrying out a number of operations, including, e.g., capillary electrophoresis (Manz et al., J. Chromatog. 593:253-258 (1992)), gas chromatography (Manz et al., Adv. In Chromatog. 33:1-66 (1993)), cell separations (U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,358) and the like. Generally, such devices have been described in the context of proof-of-concept experiments, where they have been used in operations primarily performed by highly skilled technicians. Despite the advancements made with respect to these devices, however, such devices have not been adapted for use by less sophisticated operators.

In particular, the microfluidic devices and systems for controlling and monitoring the devices described to date, have generally included bulky, complex and expensive prototypical systems whose use requires complex series of operations and or a high level of skill on the part of the operator. Further, such systems are generally fabricated in the lab, where time and funding can be at a premium, resulting in little or no attention being given to features of the device that are not specifically directed to the fluidic elements. As such, these devices tend to be extremely sensitive to operator handling, and by implication, operator error. It would therefor be desirable to provide microfluidic devices and/or systems which are more "user friendly," i.e., more resistant to operator error, and particularly, operator handling error. The present invention meets these and other needs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally provides improved microfluidic devices, apparatus and systems which reduce the potential for errors which arise from operator mishandling of such devices. In particular, the present invention provides microfluidic devices which comprises a substrate having a first surface and at least one edge, at least two intersecting microscale channels disposed in the substrate, and a detection window in the first surface which permits transmission of an optical signal from at least one of the at least two intersecting channels. These devices also comprise a manual handling structure attached to the substrate for handling the microfluidic device substantially without contacting the first surface of the substrate. Also provided are apparatus for utilizing these devices, which apparatus include electrical control systems for applying an electric field across each of the at least first and second intersecting channels within the device, as well as optical detectors disposed adjacent to the detection window within the device for receiving the optical signal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a microfluidic device incorporating a manual handling structure.

FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an alternate embodiment of a microfluidic device incorporating a manual handling structure.

FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C schematically illustrates a further embodiment of a microfluidic device incorporating a manual handling structure from perspective, top, and bottom views, respectively.

FIG. 4 illustrates an ornamental design for a microfluidic device, which also incorporates a manual handling structure.

FIG. 5 shows a voltage controller coupled to a microfluidic device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to improved microfluidic devices and systems, and particularly, microfluidic devices that are easier to handle by the operator, without damaging, contaminating or otherwise fouling, as a result of manual contact with the device. Specifically, the present invention provides microfluidic devices and systems which include manual handling structures, for allowing easy handling of the small scale devices with minimal potential for fouling as a result of manual contact with the device. As noted above, previously, microfluidic devices have been used mainly in "proof of concept" applications, by highly skilled researchers for extremely low throughput applications, e.g., single sample separations etc. Because of the nature of this use, it has been largely unnecessary to provide microfluidic devices with elements to reduce or prevent operator error or mishandling. Specifically, because such devices were used by highly skilled researchers, the chances of their becoming damaged by operator error or mishandling were reduced. Similarly, because these devices had been used primarily in such "proof-of-concept" research, e.g., involving low throughput or single sample assays, they were generally considered disposable, somewhat obviating the need for significant barriers to mishandling and the like.

The microfluidic devices according to the present invention, on the other hand, are generally intended to be used by the ordinary research and development consumer, e.g., laboratory technicians, physicians in point of care diagnostic applications, in home testing, and the like. As such, the devices must generally be designed to withstand or prevent a certain level of consumer mishandling. Of particular relevance is mishandling due to excessive contact with the microfluidic device by the operator. For example, because microfluidic devices include channels having extremely small cross-sectional dimensions, e.g., regularly in the range of from 1 to 15 .mu.m, these devices are extremely vulnerable to fouling as a result of dirt, dust or other particulate matter which can be deposited in the reservoirs of the device and potentially block one or more of the channels of the device.

Further, in addition to fouling the interior portions of these devices, direct contact by a user with the surface of the microfluidic device can have a number of additional adverse effects. For example, the devices of the present invention typically include a detection window for observing or optically detecting the results of the operation of the device, e.g., assay results. Often such optical detection methods rely upon highly sensitive instruments, detectors and the like. Accordingly, any interference resulting from the collection of dirt or oils on this detection window can adversely effect the amount or quality of the signal that is transmitted by the window and detected by the detector.

Similarly, collection of dirt and oils on the surface of the microfluidic devices can provide surface locations at which moisture may condense during the operation of the device. Such moisture and condensation can provide an avenue for the contamination of the device, or cross contamination among the various fluid access ports or wells of the device. Further, and perhaps more critically, the formation of this condensation on the surface of an microfluidic device which employs an electrokinetic-based material transport and direction system can also lead to electrical shorting between adjacent reservoirs/electrodes used in these systems, e.g., as used in preferred aspects of the present invention. Such shorting can significantly reduce and even destroy the efficacy of these material direction and transport systems.

The problems associated with handling the microfluidic devices are compounded by the small size of these devices. In particular, because the microfluidic devices described herein have relatively small external dimensions, it is substantially more difficult to handle such devices without contacting large portions of the surface of the device. Further, improvements in fluid direction systems, e.g., electroosmotic systems, have permitted a substantial reduction n the size of microfluidic devices. As these devices shrink in size, it becomes more and more difficult to handle them, without contacting a substantial portion of their surfaces, potentially leading to the problems described.

By providing a means of manually handling or holding the device without contacting the surface of the device in which the reservoirs are disposed, one can substantially reduce the probability that dirt or dust might find its way into the reservoirs and channels of the device. Such dust and dirt can readily foul microfluidic channels which typically include at least one cross sectional dimension as small as 0.1 to 10 .mu.m, and typically in the range from about 5 .mu.m to about 100 .mu.m. Further, these manual handling structures, prevent contact by the user or operator with the relevant surfaces of the device, and thereby significantly reduce the probability that any surface contamination of the device will occur, which contamination could potentially lead to shorting and/or interference with the detection window.

As used herein, the term "microfluidic," or the term "microscale" when used to describe a fluidic element, such as a passage, chamber or conduit, generally refers to one or more fluid passages, chambers or conduits which have at least one internal cross-sectional dimension, e.g., depth or width, of between about 0.1 .mu.m and 500 .mu.m. In the devices of the present invention, the microscale channels preferably have at least one cross-sectional dimension between about 0.1 .mu.m and 200 .mu.m, more preferably between about 0.1 .mu.m and 100 .mu.m, and often between about 0.1 .mu.m and 20 .mu.m. Accordingly, the microfluidic devices or systems of the present invention typically include at least one microscale channel, and preferably at least two intersecting microscale channels disposed within a single body structure.

The body structure typically comprises an aggregation of separate parts, e.g., capillaries, joints, chambers, layers, etc., which when appropriately mated or joined together, form the microfluidic device of the invention, e.g., containing the channels and/or chambers described herein. Typically, the microfluidic devices described herein will comprise a top portion, a bottom portion, and an interior portion, wherein the interior portion substantially defines the channels and chambers of the device. In preferred aspects, the bottom portion will comprise a solid substrate that is substantially planar in structure, and which has at least one substantially flat upper surface. A variety of substrate materials may be employed as the bottom portion. Typically, because the devices are microfabricated, substrate materials will generally be selected based upon their compatibility with known microfabrication techniques, e.g., photolithography, wet chemical etching, laser ablation, air abrasion techniques, injection molding, embossing, and other techniques. The substrate materials are also generally selected for their compatibility with the full range of conditions to which the microfluidic devices may be exposed, including extremes of pH, temperature, salt concentration, and application of electric fields. Accordingly, in some preferred aspects, the substrate material may include materials normally associated with the semiconductor industry in which such microfabrication techniques are regularly employed, including, e.g., silica based substrates such as glass, quartz, silicon or polysilicon, as well as other substrate materials, such as gallium arsenide and the like. In the case of semiconductive materials, it will often be desirable to provide an insulating coating or layer, e.g., silicon oxide, over the substrate material, particularly where electric fields are to be applied.

In additional preferred aspects, the substrate materials will comprise polymeric materials, e.g., plastics, such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polycarbonate, polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON.TM.), polyvinylchloride (PVC), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polysulfone, and the like. Such substrates are readily manufactured from microfabricated masters, using well known molding techniques, such as injection molding, embossing or stamping, or by polymerizing the polymeric precursor material within the mold. Such polymeric substrate materials are preferred for their ease of manufacture, low cost and disposability, as well as their general inertness to most extreme reaction conditions. Again, these polymeric materials may include treated surfaces, e.g., derivatized or coated surfaces, to enhance their utility in the microfluidic system, e.g., provide enhanced fluid direction, e.g., as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/843,212 filed Apr. 14, 1997, and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

The channels and/or chambers of the microfluidic devices are typically fabricated into the upper surface of the substrate, or bottom portion, using the above described microfabrication techniques, as microscale grooves or indentations. The lower surface of the top portion of the microfluidic device, which top portion typically comprises a second planar substrate, is then overlaid upon and bonded to the surface of the bottom substrate, sealing the channels and/or chambers (the interior portion) of the device at the interface of these two components. Bonding of the top portion to the bottom portion may be carried out using a variety of known methods, depending upon the nature of the substrate material. For example, in the case of glass substrates, thermal bonding techniques may be used which employ elevated temperatures and pressure to bond the top portion of the device to the bottom portion. Polymeric substrates may be bonded using similar techniques, except that the temperatures used are generally lower to prevent excessive melting of the substrate material. Alternative methods may also be used to bond polymeric parts of the device together, including acoustic welding techniques, or the use of adhesives, e.g., UV curable adhesives, and the like.

In accordance with the present invention, the microfluidic devices and/or systems include a manual handling structure. By "manual handling structure" is meant a structural element that is attached to or an integral part of the microfluidic device or system, which facilitates the manual handling of the device or system, and prevents excess contact between the handler and the microfluidic device, per se. The holding structures may be fabricated as an integrated portion of the microfluidic device, e.g., as an extension of the device's body structure, or alternatively may comprise a separately fabricated structure that is attached to the microfluidic device, either permanently or removably. In the latter instance, the handling structure may be fabricated as a portion of a separate holder assembly, into which the microfluidic device is permanently or removably inserted. In either event, the microfluidic device is securely inserted into the holder assembly. Typically, such holding structures will be fabricated from a polymeric materital, e.g., polystyrene, polypropylene, or the other polymeric materials described herein. These materials are selected, again for their inertness to the various reagents, temperatures or other conditions to which the overall device might be subjected.

By reducing or preventing contact with the device, the manual handling structures described herein, serve to prevent fouling of the device resulting from excess handling of the device. For example, in a first aspect, the manual handling structures prevent the deposition of debris, e.g., dirt, dust or other detritus, on the surface of the device resulting from manual contact with that surface. Such debris can be deposited within the wells or reservoirs of the device, and can potentially clog or otherwise interfere with flow within the channels of the device. This is a particular hazard for devices which include large numbers of ports or reservoirs, providing greater opportunity for debris to find is way into the channel elements. These include those devices intended for the analysis of multiple samples, which devices can include upwards of 8, 12, 16 and even 18 or more reservoirs or ports.

As noted previously, the manual handling structures, as described in terms of the present invention, provide the most significant advantage in microfluidic devices which utilize either or both of electrical material direction/transport systems, and optical detection methods and systems.

In preferred aspects, the devices, methods and systems described herein, employ electrokinetic material transport systems, and preferably, controlled electrokinetic material transport systems. As used herein, "electrokinetic material transport systems" include systems which transport and direct materials within an interconnected channel and/or