|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5898456 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5898456.html |
| Inventor(s) | Wahl; Stefan (Schwieberdingen, DE) |
| Abstract | A communication system (KS) with a hierarchical server structure is
indicated for a demand service, which makes possible a suitable compliance
with requests for services from users (U1 . . . UN). To that end, the
communication system (KS), as viewed by the respective user (U1 . . . UN),
is divided into a central (I) and a local (II) distance zone. Movies (A1 .
. . A10) frequently requested by the users (U1 . . . UN) are stored in
local servers (SL1 . . . SLN) and seldom requested movies (B1 . . . B100)
are stored in central servers (SM). According to the invention, in case
the local server (SL1) is unable to provide a movie (B2) requested by a
user (U11 . . . U13), the central server SM or another local server (SL2 .
. . SLN) complies with the request through a switched connection between
the requesting user (U11 . . . U13) and the central server (SM), or the
other local server (SL2 . . . SLN). |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
Drawing from US Patent 5898456 |
|
|
Communication system with hierarchical server structure |
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
April 27, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
April 19, 1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Priority Data |
Apr 25, 1995[DE]195 14 616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5749055 Dahlin 455/453 May,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5603058 Belknap 710/35 Feb,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5592626 Papadimitriou 718/102 Jan,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5592470 Rudrapatna 370/320 Jan,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5583994 Rangan 709/219 Dec,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5553005 Voeten 711/112 Sep,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5550577 Verbiest 725/92 Aug,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5528282 Voeten 725/92 Jun,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5341216 Hoffart 725/13 Aug,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5293641 Kallin 455/453 Mar,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5172413 Bradley 725/121 Dec,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4949187 Cohen 386/69 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4670899 Brody 455/453 Jun,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
I claim:
1. A communication system (KS) comprising:
servers (SM, SL1, . . . , SLN) each having a memory (SPM, SPL1, . . . ,
SPLN) for storing services and a control facility (CM, CL1, . . . , CLN);
exchanges (VSTM, VST1, . . . , VSTN) connected to the servers (SM, SL1, . .
. , SLN) and with one another; and
user terminals (U1, . . . UN) connected to the exchanges (VSTM, VST1, . . .
, VSTN),
the servers (SM, SL1, . . . , SLN) being organized in the form of a
hierarchical structure with subordinate servers (SL1, . . . , SLN) and
superordinate servers (SM),
characterized in that if one of the subordinate servers (SL1, . . . , SLN)
signals to a respective superordinate server that the subordinate server
is unable to provide a service requested by one of the user terminals (U1,
. . . , UN), the respective superordinate server (SM) determines whether
said respective superordinate server or another one of the subordinate
servers (SL1, . . . , SLN) is in a position to comply with the request
from the user terminal (U1, . . . , UN) via a switched connection between
the requesting user terminal (U1, . . . , UN) and the respective
superordinate server (SM) or said another one of the subordinate servers
(SL1, . . . , SLN).
2. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, characterized by being
divided into one or more distance zones (I, II) as viewed from one of the
user terminals (U1, . . . , UN), and in that the subordinate servers (SL1,
. . . , SLN) are located in a distance zone (II) close to the user, while
the superordinate servers (SM) are located in a central distance zone (I).
3. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the
control facility (CM, CL1, . . . , CLN) of each server (SM, SL1, . . . ,
SLN) determines a service request value (FAW) for each service stored in
the memory (SPM, SPL1, . . . , SPLN), that the service request value (FAW)
is an indication of a frequency of requests for the service from the user
terminals (U1, . . . , UN), and that the service request value (FAW) is a
criterion for storing of one of the services in one of the subordinate
servers (SL1, . . . , SLN) or in a respective superordinate server (SM).
4. A communication system as claimed in claim 3, characterized in
that a control facility (CL1, . . . , CLN) of each subordinate server (SL1,
. . . , SLN) initiates a transfer of the service request values (FAW) to
the superordinate server (SM),
that a control facility (CM) of the superordinate server (SM) compares the
transferred service request value (FAW) from each subordinate server (SL1,
. . . , SLN) with service request values (FAW) for requests for services
(B2) which are handled by the superordinate server (SM) because of an
inability of a respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) to provide
said services, and
that the control facility (CM) of the superordinate server (SM) causes a
service (B2) to be copied into the memory (SPL1, . . . , SPLN) for storing
services of a respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) whose
service request value (FAW) in the superordinate server (SM) is greater
than a service request value (FAW) for one (A10) of the services of the
respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN).
5. A communication system as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the
service request value specifies a time integral of a function which has a
negative value if no request is present for a particular service in a
respective server (SM, SL1, . . . , SLN), and which, if a number of
requests for the particular service are present simultaneously, has a
positive value which depends on the number of requests that are present
simultaneously.
6. A communication system as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the
control facility (CM) of the respective superordinate server (SM)
increases the service request value (FAW) disproportionately for the
service (B2) for which the request from one of the user terminals (U1, . .
. , UN) is handled by the respective superordinate server (SM) because the
respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) is unable to provide this
service.
7. A communication system as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the
control facility (CL1, . . . , CLN) of each subordinate server (SL1, . . .
, SLN) initiates the transfer of the service request values (FAW) to the
superordinate server (SM) at predetermined time intervals.
8. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that if
the respective superordinate server determines that said another one of
the superordinate servers is in a position to comply with the request, the
respective superordinate server establishes a connection between said one
of the user terminals and said another one of the superordinate servers.
9. A communication system as claimed in claim 8, characterized by being
divided into one or more distance zones (I, II) as viewed from one of the
user terminals (U1, . . . , UN), and in that the subordinate servers (SL1,
. . . , SLN) are located in a distance zone (II) close to the user, while
the superordinate servers (SM) are located in a central distance zone (I).
10. A communication system as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the
control facility (CM, CL1, . . . , CLN) of each server (SM, SL1, . . . ,
SLN) determines a service request value (FAW) for each service stored in
the memory (SPM, SPL1, . . . , SPLN), that the service request value (FAW)
is an indication of a frequency of requests for the service from the user
terminals (U1, . . . , UN), and that the service request value (FAW) is a
criterion for storing of one of the services in one of the subordinate
servers (SL1, . . . , SL1) or in a respective superordinate server (SM).
11. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, characterized in
that a control facility (CL1, . . . , CLN) of each subordinate server (SL1,
. . . , SLN) initiates a transfer of the service request values (FAW) to
the superordinate server (SM),
that a control facility (CM) of the superordinate server (SM) compares the
transferred service request value (FAW) from each subordinate server (SL1,
. . . , SLN) with service request values (FAW) for requests for services
(B2) which are handled by the superordinate server (SM) because of an
inability of a respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) to provide
said services, and
that the control facility (CM) of the superordinate server (SM) causes a
service (B2) to be copied into the memory (SPL1, . . . , SPLN) for storing
services of a respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) whose
service request value (FAW) in the superordinate server (SM) is greater
than a service request value (FAW) for one (A10) of the services of the
respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN).
12. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that
the service request value specifies a time integral of a function which
has a negative value if no request is present for a particular service in
a respective server (SM, SL1 . . . , SLN), and which, if a number of
requests for the particular service are present simultaneously, has a
positive value which depends on the number of requests that are present
simultaneously.
13. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that
the control facility (CM) of the respective superordinate server (SM)
increases the service request value (FAW) disproportionately for the
service (B2) for which the request from one of the user terminals (U1, . .
. , UN) is handled by the respective superordinate server (SM) because the
respective subordinate server (SL1, . . . , SLN) is unable to provide this
service.
14. A communication system as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that
the control facility (CL1, . . . , CLN) of each subordinate server (SL1, .
. . , SLN) initiates the transfer of the service request values (FAW) to
the superordinate server (SM) at predetermined time intervals. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention concerns a communication system with servers for
storing services for user terminals and interconnected via exchanges.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Such a communication system is known from the article "An Open Systems
Approach to Video On Demand" by Y.-H. Chang et al, IEEE Communications
Magazine, May 1994, pages 68 to 80. The communication system is a
Video-On-Demand (VOD) communication system, in which the services are
movies stored in the servers. The article states that three factors
determine the optimum locations of the communication system servers and of
the stored movies. They are: storage costs, transmission costs and the
anticipated number of simultaneous users of each movie. To make
Video-On-Demand attractive to the user, a suitable server structure must
be found in the communication system, whereby the cost of the
Video-On-Demand service, which is generated by hardware investments in the
servers and transmission of the movie data via the public communications
network, can be kept low. A hierarchical server structure is known from
the article, which is predetermined by the rate of movie requests and the
geographical distance of a server from the requesting user. The
communication system is divided into several distance zones. Frequently
requested movies are stored in servers that are close to the user (local),
and less frequently requested movies are stored in central servers
(regional, national servers, archives). The local servers are the
subordinate servers and the central servers are the superordinate servers.
If a user requests a movie, it is transmitted by the server close to the
user (local server). If the local server cannot comply with the user's
request, the local server requests a copy of the requested movie from the
central server, which is stored in the local server via downloading. The
local server has a reserve memory for storing the movie transmitted by the
central server. The requested movie is transmitted at a high bit rate in a
short period of time via the public communications network from the
central server to the local server, where it is stored in the reserve
memory. If the requesting rate for movies frequently requested by the
users and stored in local servers becomes low, the movie is deleted from
the local server and is then only available from the central servers.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
It is the task of this invention to present a communication system with a
hierarchical server structure, which makes possible a suitable, effective
compliance with the requests for services from user terminals.
According to the present invention, a communication system comprising
servers each having a memory for storing services and a control facility,
exchanges connected to the servers and with one another, and user
terminals connected to the exchanges, the servers being organized in the
form of a hierarchical structure with subordinate servers and
superordinate servers, is characterized in that if one of the subordinate
servers is unable to provide a service requested by one of the user
terminals, the respective superordinate server or one of the other
subordinate servers is in a position to comply with the request from the
user terminal via a switched connection between the requesting user
terminal and the respective superordinate server or the other subordinate
server.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention
will become more apparent in light of the detailed description of a best
mode embodiment thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a configuration example of a communication system according to
the invention;
FIG. 2 is a first configuration example of a request for movies by users;
FIG. 3 is a second configuration example of a request for movies by users;
FIG. 4 is a first configuration example of a control table of a central and
a local server according to the second configuration example in FIG. 3;
FIGS. 5A, B is a configuration example of the time process of a movie
request value;
FIG. 6 is a third configuration example of a request for movies by users
after a movie was copied from the central server to the local server;
FIG. 7 is a second configuration example of a control table of the central
and the local server according to the third configuration example in FIG.
6, and
FIG. 8 is a configuration example of the time process of a requesting rate
for a movie.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 depicts the configuration example of a communication system KS
according to the invention for a demand service which in the present
configuration examples is a Video-On-Demand service. However, it could
also be a request for audio, for electronically stored books, or for
another service. The services stored in the configuration examples are
therefore movies, which can be requested by users. The communication
system KS is divided into two distance zones, a central zone I and a local
zone II that is close to the user. These two distance zones I and II
determine a hierarchical server structure of the communication system KS.
It is also possible to establish the hierarchical server structure in
accordance with other criteria. The central zone I includes an exchange
VSTM, to which a central superordinate server SM is connected. The central
server SM has a control facility CM and a memory SPM for storing movies.
Users can be connected to the exchange VSTM however this is not
significant for the description of the invention in the present
configuration example. A number of other exchanges VST1 . . . VSTN (N is a
natural number when N>1) are located in the local zone II, and a
respective local, subordinate server SL1 . . . SLN is connected to each.
Each local server SL1 . . . SLN contains a control facility CL1 . . . CLN
and a memory SPL1 . . . SPLN for storing movies. A number of users are
connected to the exchanges VST1 . . . VSTN of the local zone II,
represented in the configuration example by users U1 . . . UN, who are
connected to the exchange VST1. The exchanges VST1 . . . VSTN of the local
zone II are connected to the exchange VSTM of the central zone I through a
communications network PSTN for switched connections. This communications
network PSTN switches connections between the users and the servers, as
needed.
To simplify the description of the invention, the communication system KS
in the present configuration example has been divided into two distance
zones. However, the invention can also be used in a different
communication system with more than two distance zones and any number of
exchanges, which are interconnected in different ways by any number of
transmission arrangements. Also, one of the exchanges can be connected to
none or to any number of servers, each having a predetermined number of
assigned users.
The communication system KS has the hierarchical server structure
determined by the rate at which the movies are requested and the
geographical distance of the servers from a requesting user. The movies
frequently requested by the users assigned to one of the local servers SL1
. . . SLN are stored in the memories SPL1 . . . SPLN of the local servers
SL1 . . . SLN. Therefore, the movies stored in the memories SPL1 . . .
SPLN can always be different, depending on the rate at which the users
assigned to the respective servers request them. In the following, the
local servers SL1 . . . SLN and their assigned users are represented by
the local server SL1 and by the users U1 . . . UN assigned to this server
SL1. For that reason, the movies A1 . . . A10 most frequently requested by
the users U1 . . . UN are stored in the memory SPL1 of the local server
SL1. The movies B1 . . . B100, which are seldom requested by the users U1
. . . UN, and the frequently requested movies A1 . . . A10, which are
stored in the memory SPL1 of the local server SL1, are stored in the
memory SPM of the central server SM. In addition, the memory SPM also
stores the movies frequently requested by the other users of the local
zone 11, not considered here, and assigned to the servers SL2 . . . SLN,
which are stored in the memories SPL2 . . . SPLN of the respective local
servers SL2 . . . SLN, and do not correspond to the movies A1 . . . A10
stored in the memory SPL1. However, these movies do not figure in the
present configuration example.
FIG. 2 depicts the first configuration example of a request for movies by
the users U1 . . . U6, U10. The frequently requested movies A1 . . . A10
are stored in the memory SPL1 of the local server SL1. Several copies of a
movie could be stored in the memory SPL1, in accordance with an assumed
requesting rate for those movies by the users. In the first configuration
example of FIG. 2, the movie A1 is being transmitted at the moment by the
local server SL1. Thus, in the present configuration example all requests
for movies are complied with by the local server SL1. Other requests for
movies by the users are not illustrated for reasons of clarity, but they
do exist.
FIG. 3 depicts a second configuration example of a request for movies by
the users U1 . . . U6, U10 . . . U13. In this second configuration
example, not all the requests for movies from the users can be complied
with by the local server SL1. As with the first configuration example in
FIG. 2, in the second configuration example in FIG. 3 the local server SL1
transmits the movie A1 to the users U1 . . . U6, while the movie A10 is
transmitted to user U10. In addition, the memory SPM of the central server
SM transmits the movie B2 to the users U11 . . . U13. Since the local
server SL1 was unable to provide the movie B2 to the users U11 . . . U13,
the local server SL1 passed the requests for the movie B2 by the users U11
. . . U13 on to the central server SM, which complies with them. The local
server SL1 is also unable to provide the movie if the number of copies of
one of the frequently requested movies A1 . . . A10 is insufficient in the
memory of the local server SL1 to comply with the requests for this movie
by the users U1 . . . UN. In that case, the surplus of the requests for
this movie is also passed on to the central server SM, which complies with
them.
The local server SL1 has the control facility CL1, and the central server
has the control facility CM, to control the requests for a movie by the
users U1 . . . UN. When one of the users U1 . . . UN requests a movie, the
exchange VST1 establishes a connection to the local server SL1. The
control facility CL1 receives the commands from the respective user and
causes the transmission of the requested movie from the memory SPL1 to the
requesting user. If the local server SL1 is unable to provide the
requested movie, the control facility CL1 passes the request from the
respective user U1 . . . UN on to the central server SM. The control
facility CM of the central server SM receives the commands from the local
server SL1 and establishes a data and control connection to the respective
requesting user U1 . . . UN. This releases the connection between the
requesting user U1 . . . UN and the local server SL1. Subsequently, the
control facility CM causes the transmission of the requested movie from
the memory SPM to the respective requesting user U1 . . . UN.
However, when the local server SL1 is unable to provide the requested
movie, it is also possible to pass the request for this movie on to one of
the other neighboring local servers SL2 . . . SLN, so that the request can
be complied with by this local server SL2 . . . SLN. To that end, the
control facility CM of the central server SM checks whether one of the
other local servers SL2 . . . SLN is able to comply with the request. The
central server SM contains information about which movies and how many
copies of these movies are stored in the respective local servers SL2 . .
. SLN. If the control facility CM determines that one of the other local
servers SL2 . . . SLN is able to comply with the request, it establishes a
connection between the respective requesting user U1 . . . UN and the
other local server SL2 . . . SLN, through which the other local server SL2
. . . SLN can comply with the request from the respective requesting user
U1 . . . UN.
The control facilities CL1 and CM provide a control table for the
respective server SL1 and SM. FIG. 4 depicts the first configuration
example of the control tables of the central server SM and the local
server SL1 according to the second configuration example in FIG. 3. The
control table TABL1 of the local server SL1 is produced by the control
facility CL1 and, for each movie A1 . . . A10 stored in the server SPL1,
contains a movie request value FAW and the identity of the server to which
the users are assigned, who are requesting the respective movie at that
moment. The control table TABM of the central server SM is produced by the
control facility CM. For each movie stored in the server SPM, it also
contains the movie request value FAW and the identity of the server to
which the users are assigned, who are requesting the movie at that moment,
thereby producing the movie request value FAW. The movie request value FAW
provides a time integral for a function, which depends on the simultaneous
requests for the respective movie, which are complied with at that moment
by the respective server. In the case of the central server SM the movie
request value FAW provides a time integral for a function that depends on
the simultaneous requests for the respective movie, which are complied
with at that moment by the central server SM, because the local server SL1
is unable to do so. Without simultaneously present requests, the function
has a negative value, thereby reducing the movie request value FAW until
it reaches the minimum value of zero. With one or more simultaneous
requests, the function has a positive value, which depends on the number
of simultaneous requests and possibly on other factors as well, such as
e.g. storage costs, transmission costs, etc. In that case, it causes the
movie request value FAW to increase; it is however limited upwards, i.e. a
maximum movie request value FAW.sub.max is specified. In the present
configuration examples, the time integral is determined from the time at
which the respective movie is made available in the respective server SM,
SL1 . . . SLN, to the present time, so that the movie request value FAW
also includes the history of the requests for the respective movie.
FIGS. 5 A and B depict a configuration example of the timely process of the
movie request value FAW, as determined from the number of simultaneous
requests. FIG. 5A depicts a coordinate system in which the number of
requests for a movie is plotted with respect to time. At a point in time
t.sub.1, n.sub.1 requests for the movie are present in the respective
server SM, SL1 . . . SLN. At a point in time t.sub.2, the number of
requests increases to n.sub.2, and at a point in time t.sub.3, to n.sub.3
requests. At a point in time t.sub.4, the number of requests decreases to
n.sub.3 -n.sub.1, and at the point in time t.sub.5 to n.sub.3 -n.sub.2. At
a point in time t.sub.6, there are no more requests for the movie in the
server.
FIG. 5B depicts a coordinate system in which the movie request value FAW
for the number of requests according to the configuration example in FIG.
5A is plotted with respect to time. The configuration example of FIGS. 5 A
and B considers the frequency of requests for the movie in the time
represented here, so that the FAW with a value of w.sub.1 is not zero at
the point in time t.sub.1. The FAW now increases in substantially linear
form to a value of w.sub.2 >w.sub.1 at the point in time t.sub.2. The
positive gradient of the curve now increases, since more requests are
present, and reaches a value of w.sub.3 >w.sub.2 at the point in time
t.sub.3. The gradient of the curve increases subsequently again, until it
reaches a value of w.sub.4 >w.sub.3 at the point in time t.sub.4. Since
the number of requests is now decreasing, the positive gradient of the
curve also decreases and reaches a value of w.sub.5 >w.sub.4 at the point
in time t.sub.5. After that the number of requests decreases further, the
gradient of the curve decreases as well and the FAW is w.sub.6 >w.sub.5 at
the point in time t.sub.6. Since there are no further requests for the
movie, the function of determining the FAW, whereby the time integral is
formed, becomes negative. This means that the gradient of the FAW curve
also becomes negative and the FAW decreases.
In the second configuration example of FIG. 3, the local server SL1
provides the movie A1 to the users U1 . . . U6. Therefore, a movie request
value FAW.sub.A1 for the movie A1 and the server SL1 is entered by the
control facility CL1 into the control table TABL1 in FIG. 4, since the
local server SL1 is transmitting the movie A1 to the users U1 . . . U6,
who are assigned to this local server SL1. Accordingly, the control table
TABL1 also contains the movie request value FAW.sub.A10 for the movie A10
and the server SL1, since the local server SL1 is transmitting the movie
A10 to user U10, who is assigned to this local server SL1. According to
FIG. 4, the control table TABM of the central server SM contains the movie
request value FAW.sub.B2 for the movie B2 and the local server SL1 since,
according to the second configuration example in FIG. 3, the central
server SM is transmitting the movie B2 to the users U11 . . . U13, who are
assigned to the local server SL1. For reasons of clarity, no further
entries are listed in the control tables TABL1 and TABM.
The control facility CL1 of the local server SL1 causes the movie request
values FAW to be transmitted to the central server SM. The control
facility CM of the central server SM compares the movie request values FAW
transmitted by the local server SL1, with the movie request values FAW in
its control table TABM, for requests of movies which were complied with by
the central server SM because the local server SL1 was unable to do so. In
the configuration example of FIG. 4, the control facility CL1 of the local
server SL1 causes the transmission of the movie request value FAW.sub.A1
for the movie A1 and the server SL1, and the transmission of the movie
request value FAW.sub.A10 for the movie A10 and the server SL1, via a
connection between the local server SL1 and the central server SM. The
control facility CM of the central server SM receives the transmitted
movie request values and compares them to the movie request value
FAW.sub.B2 in table TABM for the movie B2 and the server SL1. In the
present configuration example, the control facility CM thereby determines
that the movie request value FAW.sub.B2 for the movie B2 and the server
SL1 is greater than the movie request value FAW.sub.A10 for the movie A10
and server SL1, transmitted by the local server SL1. This means that the
integrated requesting rate for the movie B2 by users U11 . . . U13, who
are assigned to the local server SL1, is greater than the integrated
requesting rate for the movie A10 by user U10, who is also assigned to the
local server SL1. However, since the movie B2 must be transmitted over a
geographically longer distance from the central server SM to the
respective users U11 . . . U13, instead of the short distance between the
local server SL1 and the users, the control facility CM of the central
server SM causes the movie B2 to be copied to the memory SPL1 of the local
server SL1. In this way, the movie request value represents a criterion
for a decision within the hierarchical server structure of the
communication system KS, as to which movie and when that movie is copied
from the central server SM to one of the local servers SL1 . . . SLN.
FIG. 6 depicts the third configuration example of a request for movies by
the users U1 . . . U6, U10 . . . U13, after the movie B2 has been copied
from the central server SM to the local servers SL1. The memory SPM of the
central server SM now also contains movies B1 . . . B100 and A1 . . . A10.
After the copying, the memory SPM of the local server SL1 contains movies
A1 . . . A9 and B2. This means that the movie A10 was deleted from the
memory SPL1 while the movie B2 was copied from the central server SM to
the local servers SL1. However, it is also possible to leave the movie A10
in the memory SPL1, if the capacity of the memory SPL1 is large enough. In
this third configuration example in FIG. 6, the local server SL1 now
transmits the movie A1 to the users U1 . . . U6, and the movie B2 to the
users U11 . . . U13. The movie A10 is now transmitted from the memory SPM
to user U10, via a connection between user U10 and the central server SM.
FIG. 7 depicts the second configuration example of the control tables of
the central server SM and the local server SL1, after the movie B2 has
been copied to the memory SPL1 in accordance with the third configuration
example in FIG. 6. The control table TABL1 produced by the control
facility CL1 now contains the movie request value FAW.sub.A1 for the movie
A1 and the server SL1, and the movie request value FAW.sub.B2 for the
movie B2 and the server SL1. The control table TABM produced by the
control facility CM now contains the movie request value FAW.sub.A10 for
the movie A10 and the server SL1.
In the described configuration examples, the control facility CL1 of the
local server SL1 causes the movie request values FAW to be transmitted to
the central server SM. According to the invention, it is also possible for
the control facility CL1 to determine the smallest movie request value FAW
in the control table TABL1, and cause the smallest movie request value to
be transmitted exclusively to the central server SM. In this way, fewer
data are transmitted between the two servers SL1 and SM and the control
facility CL1 needs to perform fewer comparison operations. Beyond that, it
is also possible for the control facility CL1 to cause the transmission of
the movie request values FAW from the local server SL1 to the central
server SM at predetermined points in time, or for the control facility CM
of the central server SM to request the transmission of the movie request
values FAW.
The determination of the movie request values FAW through the control
facility CM can be advantageously changed, so that the increase in the
movie request value FAW depends on the geographical distance of the
central server SM and the requesting user. In addition, the number of
requests for movies, which are complied with by the central server SM, can
be provided with an additional factor, an exponent, an e-function, etc.,
so that the corresponding movie request value FAW increases
disproportionately with respect to the number of requests from these
users, whose requests cannot be complied with by the local server SL1.
FIG. 8 depicts the configuration example of the process in time of the
requesting rate of one of the movies. In a coordinate system, the time is
plotted on the abscissa, and the number of requests for this movie is
plotted on the ordinate. In addition to the actual course of the
requesting rate, the enveloping curve is drawn by a broken line in FIG. 8.
Usually several copies of a movie are stored in the memories for storing
movies in the servers of the communication system KS, particularly in
local servers. The number of copies is determined by the requesting rate
of the movies. However, this number of copies should not be the actual
time-dependent requesting rate, since this would lead to too many
recopying procedures. Therefore, the enveloping curve of the actual
time-dependent requesting rate can advantageously serve to determine the
number of copies of the movie.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to a best
mode embodiment thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the
art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions and additions
in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without departing from
the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *
|
|
|
|
|
Description  |
|
|
|
|
|