|
|
|
| United States Patent | 5970475 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5970475.html |
| Inventor(s) | Barnes; Robert L. (Summit, NJ);
Berti; Andrew J. (Jersey City, NJ);
Doyle; Kevin (Tring Hertforshire, GB);
Rawlinson; Peter J. (Jersey City, NJ) |
| Abstract | An Electronic Commerce system enables corporate purchasers and suppliers to
electronically transact for the purchase and supply of goods/services. The
system includes three major hardware and software components: buyer,
supplier and bank/administration. To enable suppliers to supply goods and
services online and process electronic orders, several software components
are used for operating a supplier processor server and a supplier catalog
server. To enable corporate purchasers to purchase products and services
online, preferably over the Internet, from suppliers, software is used for
operating a customer server to which multiple users may log-on and access
the supplier server. An Automated Clearing House (ACH) server may be used
to interface with a bank's (ACH) systems. A service bureau that supplies
the hardware and/or software components and assists to administer the
system includes a transaction counter, which records transactions and
charges the buyers and/or suppliers based on the number of purchase orders
and/or invoices issued.
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular
embodiments thereof, many other variations, modifications and other uses
will become apparent in those skilled in the art. It is preferred that the
present intention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but by
the scope of the appended claims. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
October 19, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
October 10, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5808894 Wiens 700/231 Sep,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5799289 Fukushima
Aug,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5758329 Wojcik
May,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5721832 Westrope 705/27 Feb,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5694551 Doyle 705/26 Dec,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5666493 Wojcik 705/26 Sep,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5623660 Josephson 707/9 Apr,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5592375 Salmon 705/7 Jan,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5592378 Cameron 705/27 Jan,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5557518 Rosen
Sep,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5544040 Gerbaulet 705/26 Aug,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5528490 Hill 717/168 Jun,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5515268 Yoda 705/26 May,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5504893 Kawashima 707/9 Apr,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5475585 Bush
Dec,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5465206 Hilt 705/40 Nov,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5455406 Terashima 235/379 Oct,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5361199 Shoquist 705/26 Nov,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5355474 Thuraisngham 707/9 Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5319542 King, Jr. 705/27 Jun,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5270922 Higgins 705/37 Dec,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5224034 Katz 705/7 Jun,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5063506 Brockwell
Nov,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4984155 Geier 705/26 Jan,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4951196 Jackson 705/37 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4897867 Foster 379/93.12 Jan,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4812994 Taylor 705/410 Mar,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4799156 Shavit 705/26 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4796292 Thomas 379/91.01 Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4774663 Musmanno 705/36R Sep,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
We claim:
1. Electronic Commerce System for procuring goods/services by a plurality
of users within a custom organization, comprising
(a) a plurality of terminals;
(b) a customer server connectable to each of said terminals and including
log-on means for providing access to said customer server to a user by
means of one of said terminals only if the user can be properly
authenticated for a predetermined level of purchasing authorization;
(c) a supplier system including a supplier catalog server for storing data
representing a supplier catalog of goods/services that are available for
purchase by authorized users in the customer organization, and a supplier
processor server for processing orders received by the authorized user
within the customer organization, said supplier system being directly
accessible to said customer server through an internet connection; and
(d) security means provided within said servers which limit transactions to
customers and suppliers who have pre-arranged relationship for displaying
selected supplier catalog information to a user within said organization,
consistent with said predetermined level of authorization, for issuing a
purchase order by the user to said supplier system, and issuing an invoice
by said supplier system to the customer organization after goods/services
have been delivered to the user.
2. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said terminals are connectable to
said customer server by means of a LAN network.
3. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said terminals are connectable to
said customer server by means of an Intranet connection.
4. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said customer server includes
means for defining the level of authorization for the approval of
acquisition of goods/services by a user logged on to said customer server,
said level of authorization also defining pre-selected goods/services that
the user has available for viewing from said supplier catalog.
5. Suppler System as defined in claim 1, wherein said customer server is
provided with means for linking said customer server with a purchaser
legacy system.
6. Supplier System as defined in claim 1, wherein said customer server
output data format and bank server input data format are compatible and
said customer and bank servers are directly coupled to each other over an
Internet connection.
7. Supplier System as defined in claim 1, wherein said customer server
output data format and bank server input data format are incompatible, and
further comprising a clearing house gateway between said customer and bank
servers for translating said output data format to be compatible with said
input data format.
8. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said supplier system includes a
supplier legacy catalog, said merchant catalog server including means for
accessing said supplier legacy catalog to make same accessible for viewing
by said users in said customer organization.
9. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said supplier system includes a
supply legacy system, said supplier processor server including means for
accessing said supply legacy system.
10. System as defined in claim 1, further comprising counting means at a
service bureau for counting the number of purchase orders issued by said
customer server to said suppler system, whereby said service bureau may be
compensated for hardware, software and/or services in the use of the
system.
11. System as defined in claim 1, wherein said customer server, supplier
system and bank server, supplier system and bank server Internet
connections use at least one of the following electronic exchange
protocols: EDI (ANSI and EDIFACT), OBI (open buying on the Internet),
S/MIME, MIME, SMTP, HTTP, and TCP/IP.
12. Electronic Commerce System as defined in claim 1, wherein further
comprising a bank server accessible by said customer server through an
Internet connection for payment to said supplier for the procure
goods/services upon receiving instructions to make payment by said
customer server.
13. Systems as defined in claim 1, further comprising a certificate
authority for uniquely authenticating customer and suppliers to each
other, whereby secure connections to exchange information and documents.
14. System as defined in claim 13, wherein said certificate authority
comprises means for generating public/private keys unique to each buyer
and supplier to enable encryption/decryption, authentication and integrity
of all communications and/or messages transmitted between said customer
server and said supplier system.
15. Electronic Commerce System for procuring goods/services by a plurality
of users within an organization, comprising user hierarchy-based
communication system for
(a) a supplier computer system including a supplier catalog and an order
processor, said supplier catalog containing information regarding all of
said supplier's goods/services and a specific profile for the purchasing
organization;
(b) a procurement computer system including a plurality of terminals for
use by a plurality of users within a purchasing organization each assigned
an organization user profile which specifies a level of authorization for
approval of the acquisition of goods and/or services from at least one
predetermined supplier of goods, said procurement computer including means
for displaying pre-selected goods/services on a terminal available for
acquisition from said at least one supplier consistent with the user's
level of authorization for the acquisition of goods/services from said
supplier;
(c) a communication link for selectively accessing, for downloading by a
user, selected information from said supplier catalog to the user's
terminal to said procurement computer and the supplier system being
programmed to establish a cryptographically secure session for ordering
and filling an order of goods/services, by means of said order processor,
from said supplier, only when an authorized user seeks to acquire one or
more products/services which the user is authorized to purchase.
16. Method of procuring goods/services by any one of a plurality of users
within a customer organization from a supplier, comprising the steps of:
(a) logging on by a user on a terminal to a customer server at the customer
organization;
(b) authenticating the user as a valid user;
(c) connecting the user to a supplier catalog over the Internet and
displaying selected goods/services on the user terminal consistent with
the user's authorization profile established by the customer
authorization;
(d) completing a requisition request by the user selecting the
products/services the user wants to purchase;
(e) sending the requisition requests to the customer server and checking
the request against the user's purchasing authorization limits; and
(f) creating a purchase order for the supplies only if the user's
purchasing authorization limits are not exceeded.
17. Method as defined in claim 16, wherein the user is connected to the
customer server by means of an Intranet connection.
18. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of sending a
message to the user's designated supervisor to approve, alter or cancel
the requisition request where the user's purchasing authorization limits
have been exceeded.
19. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of
translating purchase orders into ANSI EDI formats prior to sending them to
a supplier.
20. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of creating
an electronic invoice by the supplier for the user.
21. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of
establishing requisition templates that can be used by one or more users
to speed up and simplify the requisition process.
22. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of paying
the supplier directly from a bank by using the bank's automated clearing
house (ACH) payment service when the bank is instructed to make such
payment by the customer organization.
23. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of counting
the number of purchase orders sent by the customer organization to the
supplier to establish a service fee payable to the customer organization
for the use of the system.
24. Method as defined in claim 16, further comprising the step of
encrypting purchase orders prior to sending them to a supplier.
25. Method as defined in claim 24, further comprising the step of
initiating a secure synchronous connection to each supplier's transaction
gateway. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to electronic commerce systems and,
more specifically, to a procurement system and method for trading partners
which enables a plurality of users within a purchasing organization to
procure goods/services from pre-arranged suppliers, consistent with the
level of authorization given to each user and enables automated payments
to the supplier by a bank after the goods/services have been delivered.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In any business, and particularly within large organizations having
hundreds or even thousands of employees, the procurement of
"non-production" or "non-custom" products and services in high volume is
generally a time consuming process and a costly one. In various industry
surveys, companies cite the costs of processing a requisition and a
purchase order as anywhere between $25 and $300; a cost that often exceeds
the value of the goods being ordered.
Ordering of non-production goods in high volumes, such as office supplies
and desktop hardware, can be a time-consuming and expensive process for
suppliers as well. For example, suppliers have to be increasingly
competitive in today's market as their customers are constantly seeking
immediate turn-around on orders and better overall customer service.
However, suppliers find that the process of phone or paper purchase orders
is costly because of the administration associated with order processing,
can cause delays in order fulfillment, and is prone to errors.
Additionally, paper-based marketing in the form of catalogs and price
lists is expensive and makes it difficult to keep customers up-to-date
with the latest product availability and pricing.
Ultimately, all these factors impact buyers through higher prices or poor
service. Buyers have to implement time-consuming processes to prevent
purchases that exceed employee limits. As a result, the cost of processing
requisitions and purchase orders often exceeds the value of the goods
being purchased. Buying organizations also find it difficult to prevent
employees from purchasing from non-preferred suppliers and thus do not get
the advantage of negotiated prices. This adds to buyers' costs and reduces
business for their preferred suppliers.
There is, therefore, an extremely large overhead factor associated with the
procurement of products and services which, in a large organization, can
cost the company thousands or even millions of dollars a year.
There is a need, therefore, for a simple automated procurement system that
will reduce the amount of paper needed to be handled and enable the
employees within an organization to acquire the goods and services that
they require, consistent with their needs to perform their tasks. An
automated system must be secure so that it is not abused by employees
within the organization or parties outside of the organization.
There have been a number of obstacles in establishing an effective commerce
system. Systems disclosed in previously issued patents have sought to
address some of these obstacles. One problem is the "user-friendliness" of
the systems, or the ease of use of the systems so that each person that
needs to requisition a product or service can do so in an easy and
efficient way. Another problem has been to develop a system that can be
used with existing computer systems. This is an important consideration
since many businesses have already made substantial investments in
"legacy" systems, including main frames, mini computers, and micro
computers. These systems frequently use different operating systems and
different data formats. Another problem has been to develop user interface
that is secure from abuse from within and from outside the buyer
organization.
One example of an on-line system for processing business transactions is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,156 for an Interactive Market Management
System. The system discloses a plurality of buyers and a plurality of
sellers which can be linked to each other by means of an interactive
market management system (IMMS) for interactive communications. Each of
the participating entities which is a subscriber to the system must always
operate through the IMMS, which serves as a focal point or hub through
which all transactions must be funneled. The patent does not address the
need or ability of individuals within an organization to be provided with
different levels of authorization so that different users within the same
organization or "buyer" can access different types and/or spend different
amounts on goods and/or services.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,518, a system is described for trusted agents for
open electronic commerce. However, this patent involves the use of "money
modules" to create a secure transaction environment for both the buyer and
the seller of electronic merchandise and services. The primary objective
of the patent is to provide a system which allows customers to buy
electronic merchandise or services on demand without enrolling in an
electronic community. According to this patent, a customer and supplier,
trusted agent, establish a secure session. The customer trusted agent
communicates with a first money-module and the supplier trusted agent
communicates with the second money-module. The supplier trusted agent
delivers the electronic merchandise. The first money module transmits
electronic money to the second money module. Upon successful completion of
the money payment, the first money module informs the customer trusted
agent, and the second money module informs the supplier trusted agent. The
supplier then logs the sale and the customer may use the purchased
electronic merchandise. The patent appears to be restricted to the sale of
electronic merchandise.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,542, a system for ordering items using an electronic
catalog is disclosed. However, the disclosure is primarily concerned with
establishing a private catalog resident on a customer's computer system.
The customer can electronically requisition a product based on the
information provided in the catalog and route or requisition through the
appropriate approval process within the enterprise. However, requisitions
must then be processed through the customer's procurement system and
transmitted electronically as purchased orders to the supplier. Therefore,
aside from establishing private catalogs which may be used by the
customer, the system disclosed in the patent does not eliminate many of
the inefficiencies and expenses involved with requisitioning products
and/or services by many employees in a large organization.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,378, a computerized order entry system and method is
disclosed which includes a plurality of servers, data entry devices,
back-end systems and data bases. The computer order entry system is
intended to permit placement of orders by capturing order information and
storing the order information through the data capture mechanism. This is
accomplished by a sequence of steps of multiple search categories. The
patent does not address the ready accessibility and ease of use by many
employees within an organization to requisition goods/services from a
pre-arranged trading partner or multiple partners.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an electronic
procurement system for and method of initiating and consummating sales
transactions of goods and/or services by buyers and suppliers (as
pre-established trading partners).
It is another object of the present invention to provide an electronic
procurement system as aforementioned which is easy to implement and to
use.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an
electronic procurement system and method, as suggested in the previous
objects, which is particularly suitable with buying organizations having a
large number of employees each of which has well-defined authorizations
for the purchase of goods/services in order to control such purchases and
prevent abuses from within the organization.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an electronic
procurement system, as suggested in the previous objects, which enables
each user within a purchasing organization to use an Intranet connection
to access the organization's Intranet Server as a means for accessing the
supplier's server via an Internet connection by using an Internet browser.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a secure
electronic real-time purchasing transactions between a buyer and supplier
without third-party intervention.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide an
electronic procurement system, of the type under discussion, which permits
any buyer and supplier organizations to establish an electronic commerce
relationship with each other without regard to other establishments or
enterprises, that may likewise establish electronic commerce relationships
with the same or other buyer and supplier organizations.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide an
electronic commerce procurement system which permits manual or optional
automated payments by the buyer organization's bank to the supplier or
supplier's bank after goods/services have been ordered and delivered to
the buyer.
In order to achieve the above objects, as well as others which will become
apparent hereinafter, an electronic commerce system for procuring
goods/services by a plurality of users within an organization, according
to the invention, comprises a plurality of terminals. A customer server is
connectable to each of said terminals and includes log-on means for
providing access to a user by means of one of said terminals only if the
user can be properly authenticated by the customer server. A supplier
system is used which includes a supplier catalog server for storing data
representing a supplier catalog of goods/services that are available for
purchase by an authorized user in the customer organization and a supplier
processor server for processing orders received from the authorized user
within the customer organization. The supplier catalog server and the
supplier processor server may be combined into one server. Said supplier
system is directly accessible by said customer server through an Internet
connection. Security means is provided within said servers which limit
transactions to entities that have pre-arranged relationships for
displaying supplier catalog information to an authorized user within the
customer organization for issuing a purchase order by the user | | |