|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 5976156 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/5976156.html |
| Inventor(s) | Taylor; Russell Highsmith (Ossining, NY);
Kim; Yong-yil (Seoul, KR) |
| Abstract | The system and method includes a manipulator for manipulating a surgical
instrument relative to a patient's body and, a position sensor for sensing
the position of the surgical instrument relative to the patient's body.
The manipulator can be manually or computer actuated and can have brakes
to limit movement. In a preferred embodiment, orthogonal only motion
between members of the manipulator is provided. The position sensor
includes beacons connected to the patient and manipulator or surgical
instrument and, a three dimensional beacon sensor adapted to sense the
location and position of the beacons. Redundant joint sensors on the
manipulator may also be provided. The system and method uses a computer to
actively interact with the surgeon and can use various different input and
output devices and modes. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
November 2, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
November 2, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This is a continuation of copending application Ser. No. 07/714,816 filed
on Jun. 13, 1991, now abandoned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 3481494
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3338235
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3359583
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3480002
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3262452
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5119817 Allen 600/426 Jun,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5112340 Krenkel 606/130 May,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5100401 Patel 604/410 Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5093978 Binder 483/43 Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5090401 Schwieker 601/4 Feb,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5078140 Kwoh
Jan,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5050608 Watanabe 600/429 Sep,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5045054 Hood 604/22 Sep,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4979949 Matsen, III 606/53 Dec,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4945914 Allen 600/426 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4846173 Davidson 606/130 Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4791934 Brunnett 600/429 Dec,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4766465 Takahashi 355/53 Aug,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4764944 Finlayson 378/20 Aug,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4750487 Zanetti 606/130 Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4618978 Cosman 378/164 Oct,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4592352 Patil 606/130 Jun,1986 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4490022 Reynolds 351/211 Dec,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4485453 Taylor 700/186 Nov,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4150326 Engelberger 318/563 Apr,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4089293 Lyons 118/706 May,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4058001 Waxman 600/443 Nov,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4024959 Gruner 414/751.1 May,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4005782 Crockett 414/591 Feb,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3888362 Fletcher 414/620 Jun,1975 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4691694 Boyd 601/34 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for use in moving an end effector, the apparatus
comprising:
a first manipulator comprising a coarse motion manipulator with at least
three degrees-of-freedom and a fine motion manipulator with at least three
degrees-of-freedom; and
a second manipulator connected to a distal end of the first manipulator,
the second manipulator having means for providing at least three
orthogonally decoupled revolute degrees-of-freedom with a common remote
center of motion located at a distance from the second manipulator, and
means for selectively locking and releasing the separate
degrees-of-freedom small rotational realignments of an end effector
connected to the second manipulator can be provided without requiring
large motions of a manipulator joint.
2. An apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the coarse motion manipulator is
adapted to provide six degrees-of-freedom.
3. An apparatus as in claim 2 wherein the fine motion manipulator is
adapted to provide at least three linear degrees-of-freedom.
4. An apparatus as in claim 2 wherein the coarse motion manipulator has a
three degree-of-freedom rotational manipulator.
5. An apparatus as in claim 4 wherein the fine motion manipulator is
connected to the coarse motion manipulator's rotational manipulator
wherein a center of rotation of the second manipulator can be aligned over
a target area and, the fine motion manipulator can be used to move the end
effector with natural motions of a task.
6. An apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the coarse motion manipulator is
adapted to provide at least three orthogonally decoupled paths of linear
motion.
7. An apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the fine motion manipulator is
adapted to provide at least three orthogonally decoupled paths of linear
motion.
8. An apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the second manipulator includes two
crossed goniometer cradle sections having axes of rotation at a common
point.
9. An apparatus as in claim 1 wherein the second manipulator includes at
least two goniometer cradle sections and at least two rotary axis sections
having axes of rotation that intersect at a common point with axes of
rotation of the goniometer cradle sections.
10. An apparatus as in claim 1 further comprising means for selectively
applying a braking force to a joint of at least one of the manipulators to
restrict a degree-of-freedom.
11. An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the means for selectively applying
a braking force is adapted to provide a variable braking force.
12. An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the means for selectively applying
a braking force includes a computer and computer controlled brakes.
13. An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein the means for selectively applying
a braking force includes manually actuatable locks.
14. An apparatus as in claim 10 further comprising at least one micrometer
adjuster adapted to provide motion at the joint when the joint is locked
by the means for selectively applying a braking force.
15. An apparatus as in claim 1 further comprising a force sensor adapted to
sense force being applied to the patient by an end effector connected to
the second manipulator.
16. An apparatus as in claim 1 further comprising means for direct endpoint
sensing of the location of an end effector connected to the second
manipulator.
17. An apparatus for use in moving a surgical instrument relative to a
patient, the apparatus comprising;
a base;
a first link movably mounted to the base for movement along a first axis of
motion;
a second link movably mounted to the first link for movement along a second
axis of motion perpendicular to the first axis of motion;
a third link movably mounted to the second link for movement along a third
axis of motion perpendicular to the first and second axes of motion;
a fine adjustment manipulator comprising a first section movably mounted to
the third link along a forth axis of motion, a second section movably
mounted to the first section along a fifth axis of motion perpendicular to
the fourth axis of motion, and a third section movably mounted to the
second section along a sixth axis of motion perpendicular to the fourth
and fifth axes of motion;
means for selectively locking and unlocking movement of individual links
and sections to provide orthogonal only movement between connected links
and sections upon unlocking of the links and sections; and
a rotational manipulator connected to the fine adjustment manipulator
adapted to provide multiple orthogonally decoupled revolute
degrees-of-freedom.
18. An apparatus as in claim 17 wherein the means for selectively locking
an unlocking includes manually actuatable locks.
19. An apparatus as in claim 17 wherein the means for selectively locking
and unlocking includes computer controlled brakes.
20. An apparatus as in claim 19 further comprising means for manually
actuating the brakes.
21. An apparatus for assisting a surgeon in manipulating a surgical
instrument intended to be placed into a patient's body through an opening
in which there is a relatively small amount of available lateral motion at
the opening, the apparatus comprising:
a first manipulator;
a second manipulator connected to the first manipulator, the second
manipulator comprising at least three orthogonally decoupled revolute
degrees-of-freedom and being positionable relative to the opening to
provide a center of motion at the opening, means for connecting the
surgical instrument to the second manipulator, and means for controlling
movement of members of the second manipulator, the means for controlling
movement comprising a computer-controlled device including at least one
motion driver attached to at least one of the members adapted to drive the
two members relative to each other;
a computer controller connected to the computer-controlled motion driver to
control activation of the motion driver, the computer controller being
adapted to automatically actuate the motion driver to move the two
members; and
sensors connected to the computer controller for indicating position of the
members of the second manipulator wherein the surgical instrument
comprises a camera and the computer controller is adapted to move the
second manipulator to track a target with the camera.
22. An apparatus as in claim 21 wherein the second manipulator includes
means for longitudinally axially moving the surgical instrument relative
to the second manipulator along longitudinal axis of the surgical
instrument.
23. An apparatus as in claim 21 wherein the second manipulator includes a
distal end section adapted to provide a fourth revolute degree-of-freedom.
24. An apparatus as in claim 21 wherein the second manipulator includes at
least one micrometer adjustment mechanism.
25. An apparatus as in claim 21 wherein the computer-controlled device
includes at least one selectively actuatable motion brake.
26. An apparatus as in claim 21 further comprising means for inputting
information by the surgeon directly into the computer controller during
surgery. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to surgery and, more particularly, to a
system and method for positioning, moving and locating surgical
instruments for performing surgery on a patient.
2. Prior Art
Recent advances in medical imagining technology (CT, MRI, PET, etc.),
coupled with advances in computer-based image processing and modelling
capabilities have given physicians an unprecedented ability to visualize
anatomical structures in live patients, and to use this information in
diagnosis and treatment planning. The precision of image-based
pre-surgical planning often greatly exceeds the precision of actual
surgical execution. Precise surgical execution has been limited to
procedures, such as brain biopsies, in which a suitable sterotactic frame
is available. The inconvenience and restricted applicability of such a
frame or device has led many researchers to explore the use of robotic
devices to augment a surgeon's ability to perform geometrically precise
tasks planned from computed tomography (CT) or other image data. The
ultimate goal of this research is partnership between a man (the surgeon)
and machines (computers and robots), that seeks to exploit the
capabilities of both, to do a task better than either can do alone.
Machines are very precise and untiring and can be equipped with any number
of sensory feedback devices. Numerically controlled robots can move a
surgical instrument through an exactly defined trajectory with precisely
controlled forces. On the other hand, the surgeon is very dexterous. He is
also quite strong, fast, and is highly trained to exploit a variety of
tactile, visual, and other cues. "Judgementally" controlled, the surgeon
understands what is going on in the surgery and uses his dexterity,
senses, and experience to execute the procedure. However, the surgeon
usually wants to be in control of everything that goes on. If the surgeon
desires to increase precision within acceptable limits of time or with
sufficient speed, he must be willing to rely on machines to provide the
precision.
One potential problem with a robotic device is undesired motion. The most
obvious way to prevent a robotic device from making an undesired motion is
to make it incapable of moving of its own accord. Motor-less manipulators
have been implemented in the past which use joint encoders to provide
feedback to the surgeon on where his instruments are relative to his
image-based surgical plan. European Patent Application 326,768A2 describes
one such device. One important limitation of this approach is that it is
often very difficult for a person to align a tool accurately in six
degrees-of-freedom with only the use of positional feedback. Passive
manipulators, permitting free motion until locked, have also been
implemented in the past for limb positioning, tissue retraction,
instrument holding, and other applications in which accuracy is not
important. A three degree-of-freedom passive manipulation aid for prostate
surgery has also been used clinically in the past.
In cases where only a single motion axis is required during the "in
contact" phase of the surgery, a robot has been used in the past
essentially as a motorized sterotactic frame. A passive tool guide is
placed at the desired position and orientation relative to the patient.
Brakes are applied and robot power is turned off before any instrument
touches the patient. The surgeon provides whatever motive force is needed
for the surgical instruments themselves and relies on his own tactile
senses for further feedback in performing the operation. This approach
ameliorates, but does not entirely eliminate, the safety issue raised by
the presence of an actively powered robot in close proximity to to the
patient and operating room personnel. Furthermore, maintaining accurate
positioning is not always easy, since many robots tend to "sag" a bit when
they are turned off or to "jump" when brakes are applied. Leaving power
turned on and relying on the robot's servocontroller to maintain position
introduces further safety exposures. Finally, this type of approach is
limited to cases where a fixed passive guide suffices. The surgeon cannot
execute a complex pre-computed trajectory by use of this approach, nor can
he precisely relocate an instrument or body part from one place to
another.
Over the past several years, researchers at IBM and the University of
California at Davis developed an image-directed robotic system to augment
the performance of human surgeons in precise bone machining procedures in
orthopedic surgery, with cementless total hip replacement surgery as an
initial application. This application inherently requires computer
controlled motion of the robot's end-effector while it is in contact with
the patient. Thus, considerable attention had to be paid to safety
checking mechanisms. In-vitro experiments conducted with this system
demonstrated an order of-magnitude improvement in implant fit and
placement accuracy, compared to standard manual preparation techniques. A
clinical trial on dogs needing hip replacement operations is presently
underway.
It is the objective of the present invention to provide a new and improved
system and method for augmentation of surgery.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing problems are overcome and other advantages are provided by a
new and improved system and method for augmentation of surgery.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus
for use in moving an end effector is provided. The apparatus comprises a
first manipulator and a second manipulator. The first manipulator
comprises a coarse motion manipulator and a fine motion manipulator. The
second manipulator is connected to a distal end of the first manipulator.
The second manipulator has means for providing orthogonally decoupled
degrees of freedom with a common remote center-of-motion located at a work
point some distance from the manipulator mechanism, means for selectively
locking or releasing the separate degrees of freedom, and arranged so that
small rotational realignments of an end effector connected to the end of
the second manipulator can be provided without requiring large motions of
any manipulator joint. This mechanism provides at least three orthogonally
decoupled revolute degrees of freedom, together with additional linear
degrees of freedom.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a system
for manipulating movement of a surgical instrument is provided. The system
comprises a mechanical positioner, a computer controlled brake, a
computer, and means for signaling the computer. The mechanical positioner
is adapted to have the surgical instrument connected thereto and comprises
a plurality of members connected to each other in a series with at least
one motion joint between two of the members. The computer controlled brake
is located at the motion joint. The computer is connected to the brake for
selectively actuating the brake upon an occurrence of a predetermined
event. The means for signaling the computer can signal the computer of the
occurrence of the predetermined event.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a system
for assisting the surgeon in positioning a surgical instrument relative to
a target position is provided. The system comprises means for manipulating
the position of a surgical instrument, means for sensing the position of
the surgical instrument, means for determining a path from a sensed
position of the surgical instrument to the target position, and means for
audibly signaling deviation of the position of the surgical instrument
from the path.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a system
for assisting a surgeon in positioning an article relative to a target
position is provided. The system comprising means for determining a
surgical plan based upon input patient information, means for sensing
surgical execution of the surgical plan by the surgeon, means for advising
the surgeon and means for automatically selecting different types of
advice.
The means for advising the surgeon can advise the surgeon based upon
comparison of the surgical plan and the sensed surgical execution. The
means for automatically selecting different types of advice can select
different types of advice to give the surgeon based upon the surgical plan
and the sensed surgical execution.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a system
for assisting a surgeon during surgery is provided. The system comprises
means for determining a surgical plan based upon input patient
information, means for sensing surgical execution of the surgical plan by
the surgeon, means for advising the surgeon, and means for inputting a
change in the surgical plan. The means for advising the surgeon can advise
the surgeon of the surgical plan and the sensed surgical execution during
the surgery. The means for advising comprises a computer. The means for
inputting a change in the surgical plan can input a change in the surgical
plan into the computer during surgery and determine a new surgical plan
based, at least partially, upon previously sensed surgical execution of
the surgical plan.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, an
apparatus for moving a surgical instrument relative to a patient is
provided. The apparatus comprises a base, a first link, a second link, a
third link, a fine adjustment manipulator, and means for selectively
locking and unlocking movement. The first link is movably mounted to the
base for movement along a first axis of motion. The second link is movably
mounted to the first link for movement along a second axis of motion
perpendicular to the first axis of motion. The third link is movably
mounted to the second link for movement along a third axis of motion
perpendicular to the first and second axes of motion. The fine adjustment
manipulator comprises a first section movably mounted to the third link
along a fourth axis of motion. The fine adjustment manipulator also
comprises a second section movably mounted to the first section along a
fifth axis of motion perpendicular to the fourth axes of motion, and a
third section movably mounted to the second section along a sixth axis of
motion perpendicular to the | | |