WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Device and method for isolating a surgical site    
United States Patent6017304   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6017304.html
Inventor(s)Vierra; Mark A. (Woodside, CA), Roth; Alex T. (Redwood City, CA)
AbstractThe invention provides a system and method for performing less-invasive surgical procedures within a body cavity. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a system and method for isolating a surgical site such as an anastomosis between an internal mammary artery and a coronary artery in a thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting procedure. The system comprises a foot (11) pivotally coupled to the distal end of a shaft (3) by a linkage (13). The foot has first and second engaging portions (15, 17) with contact surfaces for engaging a tissue surface. The engaging portions are movable between an open position, where the contact surfaces are separated by a gap, and a collapsed position, where the foot is configured for delivery through the percutaneous penetration. An actuator, at the proximal end of the shaft, can be rotated to pivot the foot about a transverse axis so that the contact surfaces are oriented generally parallel to the surgical site to apply pressure to the tissue structure on both sides of the surgical site.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Vierra; Mark A. (Woodside, CA) , Roth; Alex T. (Redwood City, CA)
Owner/Assignee    
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     January 25, 2000
Application Number     09/062,911
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     April 20, 1998
US Classification     600/204 128/898 600/201
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Smith; Jeffrey A.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Grainger; Jeffry J. Hoekendijk; Jens E.
Address
Parent Case     CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/603,175 filed Feb. 20, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,807,243, which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/298,646 filed Aug. 31, 1994, now abandoned.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     600/201 600/204 600/205 600/210 600/214 600/215 600/227 600/228 600/233 600/235 600/1 128/898
Patent Tags     isolating surgical site
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5807243
Vierra et al.

Sep,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5799661
Boyd et al.

Sep,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5749892
Vierra et al.

May,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5613937
Garrison et al.

Mar,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5476479
Green et al.

Dec,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5447515
Robicsek

Sep,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5452733
Sterman et al.

Sep,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5391156
Hildwein et al.

Feb,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5374277
Hassler

Dec,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5318579
Chow

Jun,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5300087
Knoepfler

Apr,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5231974
Giglio et al.

Aug,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5197948
Ghodsian

Mar,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5195506
Hulfish

Mar,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
Re34150
Santilli et al.

Dec,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5167223
Koros et al.

Dec,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5052373
Michelson

Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5037428
Picha et al.

Aug,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
5000163
Ray et al.

Mar,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4993862
Pelta

Feb,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4971037
Pelta

Nov,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4946463
Wright

Aug,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4865019
Phillips

Sep,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4854318
Solem et al.

Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4852552
Chaux

Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4829985
Couetil

May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4834090
Moore

May,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4813401
Grieshaber

Mar,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4747395
Brief

May,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4726356
Santilli et al.

Feb,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4718151
LeVahn et al.

Jan,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4702230
Pelta

Oct,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4637377
Loop

Jan,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4635636
Goldstein

Jan,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4627421
Symbas et al.

Dec,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4617916
LeVahn et al.

Oct,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4492229
Grunwald

Jan,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4457300
Budde

Jul,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4434791
Darnell

Mar,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4355631
LeVahn

Oct,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4254763
McCready et al.

Mar,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4245638
LeBeck et al.

Jan,1981

[0 after 0 votes]
4143652
Meier et al.

Mar,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4122844
Rabban

Oct,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4049000
Williams

Sep,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3724449
Gauthier

Apr,1973

[0 after 0 votes]
3572326
Jensen

Mar,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
3542015
Steinman

Nov,1970

[0 after 0 votes]
3515129
Truhan

Jun,1970

[0 after 0 votes]
3503398
Fogarty et al.

Mar,1970

[0 after 0 votes]
2608192
Heitmeyer et al.

Aug,1952

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A