|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5638443 Stefik et al.
Jun,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5596744 Dao et al.
Jan,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5491817 Gopal et al.
Feb,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5375206 Hunter et al.
Dec,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5357630 Oprescu et al.
Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5339403 Parker
Aug,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5321841 East et al.
Jun,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5260999 Wyman
Nov,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5241671 Reed et al.
Aug,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5239648 Nukui
Aug,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5230051 Quan
Jul,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5222134 Waite et al.
Jun,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5032979 Hecht et al.
Jul,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4953209 Ryder, Sr. et al.
Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4937863 Robert et al.
Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4914571 Baratz et al.
Apr,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
| Add a new Other reference: |
| Post related web sites and other references in this section |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | CNRI Brochure, Workshop on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights In A Digital Library System, "Knowbots In The Real World", May
18-19, 1989.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert E. et al., "The Digital Library Project--Volume I: The World of Knowbots (Draft)", An Open Architecture for a Digital Library System and a Plan for Its Development, Mar. 1988 (49 pp) and Dec. 1987 (75 pp).
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Garrett, John R. et al., Copyright Clearance Center, "Text to Screen: Copyright Issues in the Electronic Age", pp. 1-12, Copyright 1989.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Garrett, John R. et al., Copyright Clearance Center, "Toward a Copyright Management System for Digital Libraries", pp. 1-74, Copyright 1991.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert E., "Deposit, Registration and Recordation in an Electronic Copyright Management System", IMA Intellectual Property Project Proceedings, Jan. 1994, vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 111-120.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert and Robert Wilensky, "Locating Electronic Library Services and Objects: A Frame of Reference for the CS-TR Project", Feb. 1994 and later versions.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert et al., "A Framework for Distributed Digital Objects Services", May 13, 1995.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert, "National Information Infrastructure Components", Serials Review, vol. 18, No. 1-2, 1992.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Lyons, Patrice A., "Knowledge-Based Systems and Copyright", Serials Review, pp. 88-91, 1992.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert E, Deposit, Registration and Recordation in an Electronic Copyright Management Systems, 18 pp (published Oct. 1992).
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Dunstan, James E. et al., "Access to Digital Objects: A Communications Law Perspective", Annual Survey of American Law, NY University School of Law, 1994 Volume, Issue 3.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Lagoze, Carl et al., "Implementation Issues in an Open Architectural Framework for Digital Object Services", Jun. 6, 1995--Revision 1.3.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, Robert E., Deposit, Registration and Recordation in an Electronic Copyright Management System, Corporation for National Research Initiatives, Reston, VA, Aug., 1992.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Lyons, Patrice, Computer Programs: A Fair Use Analysis, Twenty-First Annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Solomons, MD, Oct. 2-4, 1993.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Copyright Clearance Center Online, Apr. 6, 1995, Danvers, MA, Press Release.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | EPR Electronic Commerce Technologies Press Release, "Breakthrough Digital Rights Protection Information Metering Architecture with a Universal Digital Content and Commerce Container", Apr. 10, 1995, Press Release, San
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Jose, CA, Internet World 95--EPR Inc.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Cerf et al., "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication,", IEEE Transactions On Communications, vol. Com-22, No. 5, May 1974, pp. 637-648.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Cerf et al. "Issues in Packet Network Intercommunication", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, No. 11, Nov, 1978, pp. 1386-1408.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Kahn, "Resource-Sharing Computer Communications Networks", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 60, No. 11, Nov. 1972, pp. 1397-1407.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Postel, "NCP/TCP Transition Plan", USC/Information Sciences Institute, Nov, 1981.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Mockapetris, "Domain Names--Concepts and Facilities", http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0882.txt., Nov. 1983. pp. 1-28.
. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Mockapetris, "Domain Names--Implementation and Specification", http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0883.text., Nov., 1983, pp. 1-67.. May,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A system for organizing digital information in a network that includes computational facilities comprising:
digital objects, each of the digital objects comprising one or more sequences of structured data or sets of such sequences, each of the sequences or sets of sequences incorporating a work or a portion of a work or other digital information in
which a party has rights or interests, or in which there is value, each of the sequences or sets of sequences being structured in a way that is interpretable by one or more of the computational facilities in the network,
each of the digital objects including an identifier that uniquely identifies the digital object within the network and persists, with respect to the digital object, over a period of time that is at least as long as the existence of the digital
object,
an administrative mechanism that (a) is distributed among the computational facilities, (b) assures the uniqueness and persistence of the identifiers over a time period that is at least as long as the existence of the digital objects, and (c)
distributes state information that includes the identifiers among computational facilities by an algorithmic process for managing the uniqueness and persistence of the identifiers, at least some of the digital objects including other structured data
which is useful in processing the digital objects, including managing access to them, and
a resolution mechanism that accepts unique identifiers as input and resolves each of the identifiers to state information that denotes a computational facility or other digital object that contains the digital object associated with the unique
identifier.
2. The system of claim 1 further comprising
repositories on the network in which digital objects are stored and from which they can be accessed.
3. The system of claim 1 further comprising
validation information for at least some of the digital objects, the validation information being sufficient to permit a determination whether a purported instance of a digital object is identical to an original instance of the digital object.
4. The system of claim 3 which the validation information is stored separately from the corresponding digital object.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the other structured data includes information about at least one of the following: registration of rights in the digital objects; accesses to and uses of digital objects; the terms and conditions for access
and use of digital objects; the ownership and licensing of rights to digital objects; links between different digital objects.
6. The system of claim 5 in which the other structured data is stored separately from the corresponding digital object.
7. The system of claim 1 in which
the resolution mechanism is scalable without requiring full replication of the state information and includes servers on the network, each of the servers storing information about states of the digital object including information that associates
the identifiers with the locations of corresponding digital object in the network.
8. The system of claim 1 in which the administrative mechanism distributes the state information relatively evenly among all or a subset of the computational facilities.
9. The system of claim 1 further comprising a registering authority that processes applications for registration of rights or interests associated with digital information structured as digital objects, based on the digital objects, their
identifiers, and validation information for each of the digital objects sufficient to determine whether a purported instance of a digital object is identical to an original instance.
10. The system of claim 1 further comprising
an access mechanism for applying terms and conditions for access to each of the digital objects,
the mechanism including information about the terms and conditions, and
the mechanism being arranged to make the information about terms and conditions available to a user in connection with a request for access to one of the digital objects, to enable the user to indicate assent to the terms and conditions, and to
permit access to the user only upon the user indicating assent to the terms and conditions.
11. The system of claim 1 further comprising
a recordation server on the network, the recordation server storing information on rights or interests or value pertaining to the digital objects on the network.
12. The system of claim 1 further comprising
a reference service on the network, separate from the digital objects, for recording information about accesses to and transactions associated with the digital objects, the information in the reference service being accessible to authorized
users.
13. The system of claim 1 further comprising an identifier service, accessible on the network, for generating the unique identifiers, the service including servers each serving a portion of an identifier space.
14. The system of claim 1 further comprising
an authorization server which provides information about terms and conditions for access to a digital object and authorizations for use of the digital object. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND
This invention relates to digital objects and associated rights and payments.
By a "digital object" we broadly mean any set of sequences of bits or digits and an associated unique identifier which we call a "handle". A digital object may incorporate information or material in which rights (e.g., copyright rights) or other
interests are or may be claimed. There may also be rights associated with the digital object itself. Thus digital objects may include conventional digital representations of works (books, papers, images, sounds, software), and more broadly any digital
material which is capable of producing desired manifestations for a computer user. Thus, a digital object could include programs and data which, though not directly a representation of the text of a work, enable the delivery over a network and the
subsequent reproduction on a computer screen of selected portions of the text of the work. By the notion of rights which are or may be claimed in a digital object, we mean rights which exist under statute (e.g., copyright, patent, trade secret,
trademark), or as a result of private action (e.g., via secrecy, cooperative ventures, or negotiation).
Rights are normally protected under the law by mechanisms that are paper-based. Patent and trademark applications are prosecuted by exchanges of paper with the Patent and Trademark Office. Trade secret rights are often protected by appropriate
legends on paper, and by physically guarding paper copies against disclosure. Registration of claims in copyright is largely based on a paper system. Registration systems generally involve providing physical copies (sometimes voluminous) to the
registering authority of the object to be registered.
Holders of rights may get value from those rights by allowing others to copy, use, or perform the object covered by the rights in exchange for consideration (e.g., a photographer may sell copies of his photographs). In some situations there may
no need for negotiation of the terms, which may be simple and well understood. The working out of compensation may be done automatically by private clearing house operations, such as the Copyright Clearance Center (as to photocopying) or ASCAP and BMI
(in the music field).
In other situations the rights holders may derive value by granting to others exclusive rights to disseminate the object in exchange for a royalty (e.g., a book author grants a publisher the North American paperback distribution rights).
Exclusive rights are typically subject to direct negotiation.
It is common to provide for central registration of ownership and other exclusive rights so that others may know the timing and terms of those rights.
Making digital objects available on networks (e.g., Internet), gives rise to at least four specific activities of concern. The first is the ease of movement of digital objects already contained in a computer network environment allowing the
creation of multiple copies in multiple machines in fractions of a second. The second is the importation of external information, such as print material or isolated CD-ROM based material, which must first be scanned or read into the system before it can
be used. The third is export of internal network based information to paper using digital printers or facsimile machines or copying to separable media such as tape or DAT for external transport to others. The fourth is that digital objects may be
easily manipulated on a computer to produce derivative works. The derivative works can also be easily moved about in a computer network environment and be subject to further manipulation by other parties. Parallel and concurrent manipulation can
generate an exponential proliferation of derivative works.
Several technologies are known for handling privacy and authentication in a digital network environment, including public key cryptography, digital signatures, privacy enhanced mail, and notarization.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In general, in one aspect, the invention features a method of managing digital objects in a network, the objects are stored at locations accessible in the network using a storage technique which renders the digital objects secure against
unauthorized access. Pointer information which associates each digital object identifier with a pointer indicating the location of the stored digital object is also stored in the network. For each digital object validation information is stored,
separately from the digital object, and is sufficient to permit a determination whether a purported instance of a digital object is identical to the original. In examples of the invention, an authorized user may have access to the validation
information, using the digital object identifier, to determine whether a purported instance of a digital object is identical to the original. The validation information comprises a digital signature over the digital object.
Another general aspect of the invention concerns managing reference information about digital objects in a network. The reference information is stored for each of the digital objects. Validation information is also stored and is substantially
smaller in size than the corresponding digital object. In examples of the invention, an authorized user may have access to the reference information using the unique identifier. The reference information includes information concerning at least one of
the following: registration of rights in the digital object including performance of the object; accesses to and uses of digital object; the terms and conditions for use of digital objects; the ownership and transfer of rights to disseminate digital
objects; links between different digital objects.
In another general aspect of the invention, which concerns the storing of the digital objects in a network, the verification information is stored separately from the digital object. In examples of this aspect of the invention, the pointer to
the object (versus identifier information for the object) is stored in multiple servers on the network. The identifiers are generated in a manner to distribute the pointer information with the unique identifier information) relatively evenly among the
servers, using a hashing algorithm.
Another general aspect of t | | |