WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
System and method for servo control of nonlinear electromagnetic actuators    

Get related patents on CD
United States Patent6208497   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6208497.html
Inventor(s)Seale; Joseph B. (Gorham, ME), Bergstrom; Gary E. (Moreland Hills, OH)
AbstractServo control using ferromagnetic core material and electrical windings is based on monitoring of winding currents and voltages and inference of: magnetic flux, a force indication; and magnetic gap, a position indication. Third order nonlinear servo control is split into nested control loops: a fast nonlinear first-order inner loop causing flux to track a target by varying a voltage output; and a slower almost linear second-order outer loop causing magnetic gap to track a target by controlling the flux target of the inner loop. The inner loop uses efficient switching regulation, preferably based on controlled feedback instabilities, to control voltage output. The outer loop achieves damping and accurate convergence using proportional, time-integral, and time-derivative gain terms. The time-integral feedback may be based on measured and target solenoid drive currents, adjusting the magnetic gap for force balance at the target current. Incorporation of permanent magnet material permits the target current to be zero, achieving levitation with low power, including for a monorail deriving propulsion from the levitation magnets. Linear magnetic approximations lead to the simplest controller, but nonlinear analog computation in the log domain yields a better controller with relatively few parts. When servo controlled solenoids provide actuation of a pump piston and valves, electronic LC resonance measurements determine liquid volume and gas bubble volume.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History Custom Search
Drawing from US Patent 6208497
System and method for servo control of nonlinear electromagnetic actuators - US Patent 6208497 Drawing
System and method for servo control of nonlinear electromagnetic actuators
Inventor     Seale; Joseph B. (Gorham, ME) , Bergstrom; Gary E. (Moreland Hills, OH)
Owner/Assignee     Venture Scientifics, LLC (Bedford, NH)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     March 27, 2001
Application Number     08/882,945
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     June 26, 1997
US Classification     361/160 361/154
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Fleming; Fritz
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     McDermott, Will & Emery
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     361/152 361/154 361/160
Patent Tags     servo control nonlinear electromagnetic actuators
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5724223
Feuser et al.

Mar,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5673165
Kuhn et al.

Sep,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5621603
Adamec et al.

Apr,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5602711
Curtis et al.

Feb,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5546268
Hurley et al.

Aug,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5539608
Hurley et al.

Jul,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5467244
Jayawant et al.

Nov,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5442515
Wallaert

Aug,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5442671
Wollschlager et al.

Aug,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5406440
Wieloch

Apr,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5381297
Weber

Jan,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5359490
Oguro

Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5267091
Chen

Nov,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5264982
Cox et al.

Nov,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5128825
Hurley et al.

Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5093754
Kawashima

Mar,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5053911
Kopec et al.

Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4978865
Hartmann et al.

Dec,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4910633
Quinn et al.

Mar,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4868708
Bohn

Sep,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4793263
Basic et al.

Dec,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4710740
Dennisin

Dec,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4700165
Brisson et al.

Oct,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4665348
Stupak

May,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4659969
Stupak

Apr,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4656400
Pailthorp et al.

Apr,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4638279
Brisson et al.

Jan,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4608620
Hines

Aug,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4578604
Eilertsen

Mar,1986

[0 after 0 votes]
4479162
Offutt et al.

Oct,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4450427
Gareis

May,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4434450
Gareis

Feb,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4368501
Gingrich

Jan,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4150653
Grancoin

Apr,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
3932792
Massie

Jan,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3846682
Massie

Nov,1974

[0 after 0 votes]
3754154
Massie

Aug,1973

[0 after 0 votes]
3671814
Dick

Jun,1972

[0 after 0 votes]
3324356
Kussy

Jun,1967

[0 after 0 votes]
3153229
Roberts

Oct,1964

[0 after 0 votes]
2399065
Schleicher

Apr,1946

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


We claim:

1. A system for controlling an electromagnetic solenoid including an armature and one or more windings, the system comprising:

a. measurement means couplable to said solenoid for obtaining a position measurement of said armature;

b. means for setting a target flux associated with said solenoid as a function of said measurement; and

c. means for maintaining a solenoid magnetic flux associated with operation of said solenoid near said target, said means including a circuit arrangement which detects an oscillatory slope of a current supplied to the one or more windings, which develops a ratio based on the amount of current being supplied to the one or more windings and the oscillatory slope, and which controls the amount of current with respect to the ratio.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein said means for maintaining said solenoid magnetic flux includes amplifier means for controlling an electric current in at least one of said one or more windings.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein said means for obtaining said position measurement includes means for inferring an approximate ratio of said electric current to said solenoid magnetic flux.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein said approximate ratio is based on a sum of a constant plus a first linear term relating to said electric current plus a second linear term relating to said solenoid magnetic flux.

5. The system of claim 3, wherein said approximate ratio is based on a sum of a constant plus a first linear term relating to said electric current.

6. The system of claim 2 wherein said amplifier means includes a switching amplifier coupled to at least one of said one or more windings.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein said switching amplifier includes a voltage-switching output stage and a comparator input stage, said comparator input stage responding to an error difference between said solenoid magnetic flux and said target to produce an oscillation of variable duty cycle, said variable duty cycle causing said error difference to cross frequently through zero.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein said means for setting said target includes means for determining a magnetic force acting on said armature.

9. The system of claim 3, wherein said means for determining said magnetic force is part of servo means for controlling a position of said armature.

10. The system of claim 8, further comprising derivative control means, responsive to a rate of change in said position measurement, to generate a damping variation in said magnetic force.

11. The system of claim 8, further comprising integral control means, responsive to a persistent error in said position measurement, to generate an accumulating corrective variation in said magnetic force.

12. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

a. means for measuring from at least one of said one or more windings an induced voltage indicative of a time derivative of said solenoid magnetic flux;

b. means for measuring net variations in said solenoid magnetic flux by way of time integration of said induced voltage; and,

c. means for ensuring that said net variations in said solenoid magnetic flux substantially match said target.

13. The system of claim 12, further comprising:

a. means for determining time-integral measures of said current through said one or more windings;

b. means for determining sums of said time integral measures and said net variations; and

c. means for ensuring that said sums substantially match said target.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein said means for determining said measurement of said position includes a sensor separable from said solenoid.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein said sensor includes a hall-effect sensor.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein said means for maintaining said solenoid magnetic flux includes a hall-effect sensor.

17. A system for controlling an electromagnetic solenoid including an armature and one or more windings, the system comprising:

a. means for detecting an oscillatory slope of an electric current in at least one of said one or more windings; and

b. control means, responsive to said oscillatory slope and to a ratio of the current divided by the oscillatory slope, for controlling the electric current and for said ratio to vary as a function of the oscillatory slope.

18. The system of claim 17 wherein said control means comprises amplifier means for controlling the electric current in at least one of said one or more windings.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein said control means includes means responsive to a transfer function of said oscillatory slope, wherein the transfer function includes at least one of: a proportional term, a time-integral term, and a band-limited derivative term.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein said control means includes means for causing the square of said ratio to vary in proportion to a transfer function of said oscillatory slope.

21. The system of claim 17 further comprising:

a. means for generating a difference of weighted sums of logarithms of the current, the magnetic flux, the oscillatory slope, and a bias signal of said control means; and

b. means for controlling the current in response to the signal difference varying as a function of the weighted sums of the logarithms.

22. A solenoid having a core of a material which minimizes core loss at a predetermined frequency comprising:

a. a drive coil;

b. an armature capable of movement within said drive coil;

c. a yoke coupled to said drive coil, wherein said yoke is positioned in relation to said armature such that there is at least one air gap between said yoke and said armature; and

d. control means including a drive coil controller coupled to said drive coil, wherein said control means regulates movement of said armature within said drive coil based upon measurements of current and an oscillatory characteristic of the current from said drive coil.

23. The solenoid as claimed in claim 22, wherein said control means includes means for measuring a position of said armature and delivering to said drive coil controller said armature position measurement.

24. The solenoid as claimed in claim 22, wherein said control means includes means for measuring a magnetic flux of said drive coil and deriving from said magnetic flux a position measurement of said armature for delivery to said drive coil controller.

25. The solenoid as claimed in claim 22, further comprising a sense coil proximate to said drive coil, wherein said sense coil is used to independently determine said position measurement of said armature.

26. The solenoid as claimed in claim 25, wherein said control means includes a voltage-switching amplifier coupled to said drive coil for controlling movement of said armature.

27. The solenoid as claimed in claim 25, wherein said control means includes a first servo control loop means for determination of position of said armature, and a second servo control loop means related to a determination of force for regulating a drive pulse transmitted by said drive coil controller.

28. The solenoid as claimed in claim 25, wherein said first servo control loop means is coupled to said second servo control loop means.

29. A solenoid comprising:

a drive coil;

an armature capable of movement within said drive coil;

a yoke coupled to said drive coil, wherein said yoke is positioned in relation to said armature such that there is at least one air gap between said yoke and said armature;

control means including a drive coil controller coupled to said drive coil, wherein said control means regulates movement of said armature within said drive coil based upon electrical measurements from said drive coil; and

launch control means for computing and initiating drive coil signals for movement of said armature with minimal electrical power consumption.

30. The solenoid as claimed in claim 29, wherein said launch control means further includes a comparator designed to compare a position of said armature with a set of pre-defined armature positions so as to define a termination operation of said drive coil.

31. The solenoid as claimed in claim 30, including means for identifying a starting position of said armature and internal calibration means.

32. The solenoid as claimed in claim 31, wherein said solenoid is a pump actuator and wherein the solenoid is controlled by a circuit which identifies, based on the position of the armature, the content of the fluid being pumped by the pump.

33. The solenoid as claimed in claim 31 further comprising means for delivering a drive pulse to said drive coil sufficient to force near closure of said gap between said armature and said yoke.

34. The solenoid as claimed in claim 33, further comprising means for delivering a secondary drive pulse to said drive coil to force movement of said armature from near closure to complete closure.

35. The solenoid as claimed in claim 34, further comprising means for delivering a holding signal to said drive coil to maintain complete closure of said armature until delivery of a stop-holding signal.

36. The solenoid as claimed in claim 22, wherein said armature and said yoke have a design based on a pot core.

37. A method for controlling the duration of a drive pulse transmitted to a drive coil of a solenoid having an armature and a yoke so as to move said armature to a prescribed position, said method comprising the steps of:

a. supplying a drive pulse to said drive coil for movement of said armature in relation to said yoke;

b. determining a signal sensitive to movement of said armature;

c. defining as a function of time a threshold for said signal sensitive to said movement;

d. comparing said signal with said threshold; and

e. terminating said drive pulse either when said signal substantially corresponds with said threshold, or when a predefined time limit is reached.

38. The method as claimed in