WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Computer-based methods and systems for sequencing of individual nucleic acid molecules    

Custom CD of patents similar to US6221592 : Computer-based methods and systems for sequencing of individual nucleic acid molecules - $19.95
United States Patent6221592   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6221592.html
Inventor(s)Schwartz; David C. (New York, NY); Mishra; Bhubaneswar (Great Neck, NY)
AbstractThe present invention also relates to single molecule optical sequencing methods and systems for determining the nucleotide sequence of individual double stranded nucleic acid molecules elongated and fixed to a solid-surface by nicking the nucleic acid molecule, enzymatically adding labeled nucleotides and imaging the labeled nucleotides. The present invention also relates to methods and systems of single molecule optical sequencing using primer extension comprising the steps of elongating and fixing the nucleic acid molecule annealed with or to be annealed with at least one primer on a surface so that the nucleic acid remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides; exposing the nucleic acid molecule annealed with at least one primer to a polymerase and dideoxy nucleotide; exposing the nucleic acid molecule to a polymerase and nucleotides including labeled nucleotides to produce a primer extension nucleic acid molecule; and imaging the labeled primer extension molecule to produce an image. The invention further relates to methods of imaging single or multiple labeled nucleotides enzymatically added to nicked individual double stranded nucleic acid molecules. The invention also provides a method of analysis of the images of labeled nucleotides or primer extension products using Bayesian estimation to determine the sequence of the nucleic acid molecules.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Schwartz; David C. (New York, NY); Mishra; Bhubaneswar (Great Neck, NY)
Owner/Assignee     Wisconsin Alumi Research Foundation (Madison, WI)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     April 24, 2001
Application Number     09/175,824
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     October 20, 1998
US Classification     435/6 435/91.1
Int'l Classification     C12Q 001/68 C12P 019/34
Examiner     Brusca; John S.
Assistant Examiner     Kim; Young
Attorney/Law Firm     Pennie & Edmonds, LLP
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     435/6 435/91 435/91.1 435/91.2 536/24.33 536/25.3
Patent Tags     computer-based methods sequencing individual nucleic acid molecules
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5720928
Schwartz
422/186
Feb,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5695940
Drmanac
435/6
Dec,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5674743
Ulmer
435/287.2
Oct,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5667972
Drmanac
435/6
Sep,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5418975
Babaian
712/24
May,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5405747
Jett
435/6
Apr,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5380833
Urdea
536/22.1
Jan,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5314829
Coles
436/165
May,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5202231
Drmanac
435/6
Apr,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5079169
Chu

Jan,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5059294
Lizardi
204/458
Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4962037
Jett
435/6
Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4870004
Conroy
204/461
Sep,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4863849
Melamede
435/6
Sep,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4767700
Wallace
435/6
Aug,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4695548
Cantor
435/179
Sep,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4473452
Cantor
204/458
Sep,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
5525464
Drmanac
435/6
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
5492806
Drmanac
435/5
Dec,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method for imaging a single labeled nucleotide on an individual double stranded nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) nicking a double stranded nucleic acid molecule elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the double stranded nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of a labeled nucleotide creating a nicked strand;

(b) enzymatically adding a single nucleotide comprising a label; and

(c) imaging the added label.

2. The method of claim 1, in which the step of nicking the double stranded nucleic acid molecule is performed by the enzyme DNase.

3. The method of claim 1, in which the surface is a planar surface.

4. The method of claim 1, in which the step of adding nucleotides comprising a label is performed by a polymerase.

5. The method of claim 4, in which the polymerase is DNA Polymerase I, the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I lacking the 5'-3' exonuclease activity, T7 Sequenase v. 2.0 or Taq polymerase.

6. The method of claim 1, in which the step of imaging the label is performed using a camera and a microscope.

7. The method of claim 6, in which the step of imaging the label further comprises using laser illumination.

8. The method of claim 1, in which the step of imaging further comprises using a computer.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising analyzing the image using a mathematical algorithm.

10. The method of claim 9, in which the mathematical algorithm is a Bayesian estimation method.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps:

(a) modifying the label after imaging the label in order to visualize the subsequently added labeled nucleotides; and

(b) repeating the steps of enzymatically adding a nucleotide comprising a label, imaging the label, and modifying the label to image multiple, consecutively added nucleotides.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising enzymatically displacing the nicked strand of the nucleic acid molecule.

13. The method of claim 12, in which enzymatically displacing the nicked strand is performed using the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I.

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising enzymatically opening the nicked sites on the double stranded nucleic acid molecule.

15. The method of claim 14, in which the step of opening the nicked sites is performed by an enzyme having 5'-3' exonuclease activity.

16. The method of claim 15, in which the enzyme having 5'-31 exonuclease activity is DNA Polymerase I or T7 exonuclease.

17. The method of claim 11, in which the label is photolabile.

18. The method of claim 11, in which the step of modifying the label after imaging is performed by photobleaching or photolysis.

19. A method for determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual double stranded nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) nicking a double stranded nucleic acid molecule elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the double stranded nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides forming a 3' terminus to create an extended strand;

(b) extending the strand by adding at least one nucleotide comprising a label to the 3' terminus of the nicked site; and

(c) imaging the added label.

20. The method of claim 19, in which the step of nicking the double stranded nucleic acid molecule is performed by the enzyme DNase.

21. The method of claim 19, further comprising enzymatically displacing the nicked strand of the nucleic acid molecule.

22. The method of claim 21, in which enzymatically displacing the nicked strand is performed using the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I.

23. The method of claim 19, further comprising opening the nicked sites on the double stranded nucleic acid molecule.

24. The method of claim 23, in which the step of opening the nicked sites on the double stranded nucleic acid molecule is performed by an enzyme having 5'-3' exonuclease activity.

25. The method of claim 24, in which the enzyme having 5'-3' exonuclease activity is DNA Polymerase I or T7 exonuclease.

26. The method of claim 19, in which the step of extending the strand by adding a nucleotide comprising a label is performed by a polymerase.

27. The method of claim 26, in which the polymerase is DNA Polymerase I, the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I lacking the 5'-3' exonuclease activity, T7 Sequenase v. 2.0, or a Taq polymerase.

28. The method of claim 23, in which the step of opening the nicked sites on the double stranded nucleic acid molecule and extending the strand by adding a nucleotide comprising a label is performed by T7 exonuclease gene 6 and T7 Sequenase v. 2.0, respectively.

29. The method of claim 19, in which the step of imaging the label is performed using a camera and a microscope.

30. The method of claim 29, in which the step of imaging the label further comprises using laser illumination.

31. The method of claim 19, in which the label is photolabile.

32. The method of claim 19, further comprising modifying the label after imaging in order to visualize subsequently added labels.

33. The method of claim 3, in which the step of modifying the label after imaging is performed by photobleaching or photolysis.

34. The method of claim 19, in which the nucleotides comprise a mix of labeled and unlabeled nucleotides.

35. A system for determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual double stranded nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) the double stranded nucleic acid molecule elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions and/or hybridization reactions;

(b) a polymerase fixed on the surface;

(c) nucleotides comprising a label fixed on the surface; and

(d) a device for imaging the label to produce an image.

36. The system of claim 35, in which the polymerase is DNA Polymerase I, the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I without the 5'-3' exonuclease activity T7 Sequenase v. 2.0, or Taq polymerase.

37. The system of claim 35, further comprising a nucleic acid nicking enzyme.

38. The system of claim 36, in which the nicking enzyme is a DNase.

39. The system of claim 35, in which the label is a fluorescent label.

40. The system of claim 35, further comprising a nick opening enzyme fixed on the surface.

41. The system of claim 40, in which the nick opening enzyme is T7 exonuclease gene 6, DNA Polymerase I, the Klenow fragment of DNA Polymerase I or a 5'-3' exonuclease.

42. The system of claim 35, in which the device for imaging comprises a fluorescence microscope, a camera and a source of illumination.

43. The system of claim 35, in which the source of illumination is a laser.

44. The system of claim 35, in which the device for imaging the label processes the image using Bayesian estimation, comprising:

(a) accumulating signals of an addition site of the image;

(b) filtering the signals according to fluorescence intensity;

(c) correlating the signals with the backbone of the nucleic acid molecule;

(d) tabulating addition sites of the image using Bayesian inference estimation of the signals; and

(e) aligning and assembling the addition sites to determine a nucleotide addition.

45. A method of determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) exposing a nucleic acid molecule annealed with at least one primer elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides to a polymerase and dideoxy nucleotides comprising a base and a label; and

(b) imaging the labeled nucleotides added onto the primer;

to determine the nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acid molecule by the addition of the labeled dideoxy nucleotide.

46. A method of determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) exposing a nucleic acid molecule annealed with at least one primer elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of a labeled nucleotide to a polymerase and nucleotides comprising a base and a label; and

(b) imaging the labeled nucleotide added onto the primers;

to determine the nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acid molecule by the addition of the labeled dideoxy nucleotide.

47. A method of determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual-nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) exposing a nucleic acid molecule annealed with at least one primer elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides to a polymerase and dideoxy nucleotides;

(b) exposing the nucleic acid molecule annealed with at least one primer to a polymerase and nucleotides including nucleotides comprising a label to produce a labeled primer extension nucleic acid molecule; and

(c) imaging the labeled primer extension nucleic acid molecule to produce an image;

to determine the nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acid molecule by the absence of a primer extension product corresponding to the dideoxy nucleotides used in step (a).

48. A method of determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) elongating and fixing the nucleic acid molecule onto a surface so that the nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides;

(b) annealing at least one primer to the elongated and fixed nucleic acid molecule;

(c) exposing the nucleic acid molecule annealed with a primer to a polymerase and dideoxy nucleotides;

(d) exposing the nucleic acid molecule to a polymerase and nucleotides including nucleotides comprising a label to produce at least one labeled primer extension nucleic acid molecule; and

(e) imaging the labeled primer extension nucleic acid molecule to produce an image;

to determine the nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acid molecule by the absence of a primer extension product corresponding to the dideoxy nucleotides used in step (c).

49. A system for determining the nucleotide sequence of an individual nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) an elongated and fixed nucleic acid molecule on a surface so that the nucleic acid molecules remain accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides;

(b) at least one primer annealed to the nucleic acid molecule;

(c) a polymerase enzyme fixed on the surface to produce a primer extension product;

(d) dideoxy nucleotides fixed on the surface;

(e) nucleotides comprising a label fixed on the surface; and

(f) a device for imaging the elongated and fixed nucleic acid molecule to detect the presence of labeled nucleotides in the primer extension product to produce an image;

whereby the absence of the image of the primer extension product for a particular dideoxy nucleotide corresponds to the nucleotide sequence at one position of the nucleic acid molecule.

50. A system for determining a single nucleotide polymorphism in a population of nucleic acid molecules, comprising the system of claim 47, in which the nucleic acid molecules are elongated and fixed onto at least four surfaces and the surfaces are individually exposed to dideoxynucleotides comprising different bases.

51. A method for imaging multiple labeled nucleotides on an individual double stranded nucleic acid molecule, comprising:

(a) nicking a nucleic acid molecule elongated and fixed onto a surface so that the double stranded nucleic acid molecule remains accessible for enzymatic reactions with enzymes for the addition of labeled nucleotides;

(b) enzymatically adding multiple nucleotides comprising at least four bases and at least four labels; and (c) simultaneously imaging the added labels.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


INTRODUCTION

The present invention relates to methods and systems for determining the nucleotide sequence of individual nucleic acid molecules using optical techniques, referred to herein as "single molecule optical sequencing." The present invention also relates to methods for imaging single or multiple labeled nucleotides added onto an individual double stranded nucleic acid molecule mounted on a solid surface. Bayesian inference estimation methods are utilized to analyze a population of images and to produce statistically accurate nucleotide sequences.

The present invention also relates to methods and systems for determining single nucleotide polymorphisms in a population of individual double stranded nucleic acid molecules.

BACKGROUND

The analysis of nucleic acid molecules at the genome level is an extremely complex endeavor which requires accurate, rapid characterization of large numbers of often very large nucleic acid molecules via high throughput DNA mapping and sequencing. The construction of physical maps, and ultimately of nucleotide sequences, for eukaryotic chromosomes currently remains laborious and difficult. This is due, in part, to the fact that current procedures for mapping and sequencing DNA were originally designed to analyze nucleic acids at the gene, rather than at the genome, level (Chumakov, et al., 1992, Nature 359:380; Maier, et al., 1992, Nat. Genet. 1:273).

DNA Sequencing

Approaches to DNA sequencing have varied widely, and have made it possible to sequence entire genomes, including portions of the human genome. The most commonly used method has been the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger (1977, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463). However, this method is time-consuming, labor-intensive and expensive, requiring the analysis of four sets of radioactively labeled DNA fragments resolved by gel electrophoresis to determine the DNA sequence.

To overcome some of these deficiencies, automated DNA sequencing systems were developed which used four fluorescently labeled dideoxy nucleotides to label DNA (Smith et al., 1985, Nucleic Acids Res. 13:2399-2412; Smith et al., 1986, Nature 321:674; Prober et al., 1987, Science 238:336-341, which are incorporated herein by reference). Automated slab gel electrophoresis systems enable large-scale sequence acquisition (Roach et al., 1995, Genomics 26:345-353; Venter et al., 1996, Nature 381:364-366; Profer et al., 1987, Science 238:336-341; Lake et al., 1996, Science 273:1058; Strathmann et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:1247-1250; and the complete genomic sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the Stanford database). Current large-scale sequencing is largely the domain of centers where costly and complex support systems are essential for the production efforts. Efforts to deal with sequence acquisition from a large population (usually less than 1,000) is limited to relatively small numbers of loci (Davies et al., 1995, Nature 371:130-136). However, these methods are still dependent on Sanger sequencing reactions and gel electrophoresis to generate ladders and robotic sample handling procedures to deal with the attending numbers of clones and polymerase chain reacting products.

Some recently developed methods and devices for automated sequencing of bulk DNA samples that utilize fluorescently labeled nucleotides are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,743; International Application Nos. PCT/GB93/00848 published Apr. 22, 1993 as WO 93/21340; PCT/US96/08633 published Jun. 4, 1996 as WO 96/39417; and PCT/US94/01156 published Jan. 31, 1994 as WO 94/18218. None of the recently developed methods is capable of sequencing individual nucleic acid molecules.

Techniques for sequencing large genomes of DNA have relied upon the construction of Yeast Artificial Chromosomes ("YAC") contiguous sequences. Preliminary physical maps of a large fraction of the human genome have been generated via YACs (Cohen et al., 1993, Nature 366:698-701). However, extensive high resolution maps of YACs have not been widely generated, due to the high frequency of rearrangement/chimerism among YACs, the low complexity of fingerprints generated by hybridization approaches, and the extensive labor required to overcome these problems. Ordered maps of YACs have been optically made by using a spermine condensation method (to avoid shearing the DNA) and fixing the clones in molten agarose onto derivatized glass surfaces (Cai et al., 1995, Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168).

There have been several proposals for the rapid attainment of sequence data from clones that minimize or obviate the need for shotgun sequencing approaches or subcloning of large insert clones (Smith et al., 1994, Nature Genet. 7:40-47; Kupfer et al., 1995, Genomics 27:90-100; Chen et al., 1993, Genomics 17:651-656 and Roach et al., 1995, Genomics 26:345-353). Several of these approaches advocate the generation of "sequence sampled maps" (Smith et al., 1994, Nature Genet. 7:40-47 and Venter et al., 1996, Nature 381:364-366) which require fingerprinting of clones, or large numbers of subclones, to achieve good target coverage while simultaneously generating a fine-scale map.

A recent development has been the proposal of DNA sequencing of aligned and oriented Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes ("BAC") contiguous sequences (Venter et al., 1996, Nature 381:364-366); (see also Smith et al., 1994, Nature Genetics 7:40-47; Kupfer et al., 1995, Genomics 27:90-100; and Chen et al., 1993, Genomics 17:651-656). BACs offer the advantage of considerably greater stability than YACs, are more easily physically managed due to their smaller size (.about.500 kb to 2 Mb versus .about.100 to 200 kb, respectively), and are more compatible with automated DNA purification procedures (Kim et al., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:6297-6301; Kim et al., 1994, Genomics 24:527-534; and Schmitt et al., 1996, Genomics 33:9-20). Further approaches for the optical analysis of BAC clones were also developed (Cai et al., 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3390-3395).

Limitations of these approaches described above include low throughput, DNA fragmentation (preventing subsequent or simultaneous multimethod analyses), and difficulties in automation. Despite the potential utilities of these and other approaches, it is increasingly clear that current molecular approaches were developed primarily for characterization of single genes, not entire genomes, and are, therefore, not optimally suited to the analysis of polygenic diseases and complex traits, especially on a population-wide basis (Risch et al., 1996, Science 273:1516-1517).

Visualization and Surface Mounting of Single DNA Molecules

Single molecule approaches represent a subset of current physical and genetic mapping approaches constitute the two major approaches to genomic analysis, and are critical to mapping and cloning of disease genes and to direct sequencing efforts. Such methods of visualization of single DNA molecules include fluorescence microscopy in solution (Yanagida et al., 1986, in Applications of fluorescence in the biomedical sciences Taylor et al. (eds), Alan Liss, New York, pp 321-345; Yanagida et al., 1983, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quantit. Biol. 47:177; Matsumoto et al., 1981, J. Mol. Biol. 132:501-516; Schwartz et al., 1989, Nature 338:520-522; and Houseal et al., 1989, Biophys. J. 56:507-516); FISH (Manuelidis et al., 1982, J. Cell. Biol. 95:619; Lawrence et al., 1988, Cell 52:51; Lichter et al., 1990, Science 247:64; Heng et al., 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:9509; van den Engh et al., 1992, Science 257:1410); visualization by scanning tunneling microscopy or atomic force microscopy techniques (Keller et al., 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5356-5360; see, e.g., Karrasch et al., 1993, Biophysical J. 65:2437-2446; Hansma et al., 1993, Nucleic Acids Research 21:505-512; Bustamante et al., 1992, Biochemistry 31:22-26; Lyubchenko et al., 1992, J. Biomol. Struct. and Dyn. 10:589-606; Allison et al., 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10129-10133; Zenhausern et al., 1992, J. Struct. Biol. 108:69-73); visualization of circular DNA molecules (Bustamante et al., 1992, Biochemistry 31:22-26); DNA bending in transcription complexes by scanning force microscopy (Rees et al., 1993, Science 260:1646-1649); direct mechanical measurement of the elasticity of single DNA molecules using magnetic beads (Smith et al., 1992, Science 258:1122-1126); alignment and detection of DNA molecules involving either elongation of end-tethered surface bound molecules by a receding air-water interface (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,079,169; 5,380,833; Perkins et al., 1994, Science 264:819; and Bensimon et al., 1994, Science 265:2096-2098), and elongation of non-tethered molecules by `fluid fixation` (Samad et al., 1995, Nature 378:516-517; Cai et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168; Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438; Wang et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:165-169; and Schwartz et al., 1993, and Science 262:110-114); (See also Reed et al., "A Quantitative Study Of Optical Mapping Surfaces By Atomic Force Microscopy And Restriction Endonuclease Digestion" in press, Analytical Biochemistry; Cai et al., "High Resolution Restriction Maps Of Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes Constructed By Optical Mapping", 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3390-3395; Samad and Schwartz, "Genomic Analysis by Optical Mapping" in Analytical Biotechnology--Genomic Analysis in press; Schwartz et al., 1997, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 8:70-74; Samad, 1995, Genomics Research 59:1-4; and Primrose, 1995, Principles of Genome Analysis: A guide to mapping and sequencing DNA from different organisms, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford England, pp. 76-77; and Bautsch et al., 1997 "Long-Range Restriction Mapping of Genomic DNA" in Genomic Mapping: A Practical Approach, Chapter 12, Paul H. Dear ed., Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 281-313).

New modes of molecular investigation have emerged from advances in molecular fixation techniques, labeling, and the development of scanning probe microscopies (Keller et al., 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5356-5360; Bensimon et al., 1994, Science 265:2096-2098; Guthold et al., 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91:12927-12931; Hansma et al., 1996, Nucleic Acids Res. 24:713-720; Cai et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168; Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438; Weier et al., 1995, Hum. Mol. Genet. 4:1903-1910; Wang et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:165-169; Schwartz et al., 1993, Science 262:110-114; Schena et al., 1995, Science 270:467-470; Heller et al., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2150-2155; Erie et al., 1994, Science 266:1562-1566; and Leuba et al., 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11621-11625). In particular, molecular fixation techniques have relied on the application of outside forces such as electrical fields, a travelling meniscus (Michalet et al., 1997, Science 277:1518) or end-tethering of molecules with beads (Strick et al., 1996, Science 271:1835-1837) to fix DNA to solid surfaces. Biochemistries have been performed on surface-mounted DNA molecules, but the procedures used bulk deposition and analysis (Schena et al., 1995, Science 270:467-470; Heller et al., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2150-2155; Craig et al., 1990, Nucleic Acids Res. 18:2653-2660; and Nizetic et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3233-3237).

Once the nucleic acid molecules are fixed, they must be imaged and analyzed. Although the spatial resolution of conventional light microscopy is limited, cooled, charged-coupled (CCD) imaging devices have stimulated the development of new optical approaches to the quantitation of nucleic acids, that may supplant electrophoresis-based techniques in many applications (Schena et al., 1995, Science 270:467-470; Lipshutz et al., 1995, Biotechniques 19:442-447; and Chee et al., 1996, Science 274:610-614). Yanagida and coworkers (Yanagida et al., 1996, in Applications of fluorescence in the biomedical sciences, Taylor et al. (eds), Alan Liss, New York, pp. 321-345) first investigated the molecular motions of fluorescently stained individual DNA molecules in solution by image-enhanced fluorescence microscopy. Optical mapping was subsequently developed for the rapid production of ordered restriction maps from individual, fluorescently stained DNA molecules (Cai et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168; Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438; Wang et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:165-169; Schwartz et al., 1993, Science 262:110-114; Schwartz et al., 1997, Curr. Opinions in Biotechnology 8:70-74; Samad et al., Nature 378:516-517; and Samad et al., 1995, Genomic Research 59:1-4).

In the original method, individual fluorescently labeled yeast chromosomes were elongated and fixed in a flow of molten agarose generated between a coverslip and a glass slide (Schwartz et al., 1993, Science 262:110-114). Restriction endonuclease cleavage events were recorded as time-lapse images, following addition of magnesium ions to activate the added endonuclease. Cleavage sites appeared as growing gaps due to relaxation of DNA coils at nascent ends, and maps were constructed by measuring fragment sizes using relative fluorescent intensity or apparent length measurements.

In another closed system, the DNA molecules (2-1,500 kb) were elongated and fixed using the flow and adhesion forces generated when a fluid sample is compressed between two glass surfaces, one derivatized with polylysine or APTES (Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438 and Cai et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168). Fixed molecules were digested with restriction endonucleases, fluorescently stained (Rye et al., 1992, Nucleic Acids Res. 20:2803-2812) and optically mapped (Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438 and Cai et al., 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5164-5168). However, closed systems have limited access to the samples and cannot readily accommodate arrayed samples (Bensimon et al., 1994, Science 265:2096-2098 and Meng et al., 1995, Nature Genet. 9:432-438).

To increase the throughput and versatility of optical mapping and sequencing, multiple samples need to be arrayed on a single mapping surface. Although robotic gridding techniques for DNA samples exist (Heller et al., 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2150-2155; Craig et al., 1990, Nucl. Acids Res. 18:2653-2660; and Nizetic et al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3233-3237), such approaches were not designed to work with single molecule substrates and could not be relied upon to deposit molecules retaining significant accessibility to enzymatic action.

While single molecule techniques offer the potential advantage of an ordering capability which gel electrophoresis lacks, none of the current single molecule techniques can be used, on a practical level, as high resolution genomic sequencing tools. The molecules described by Yanagida (Yanagida, M. et al., 1983, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quantit.

Biol. 47:177; Matsumoto, S. et al., 1981, J. Mol. Biol. 132:501-516) were visualized, primarily free in solution making any practical sequencing impossible. Further, while the FISH technique offers the advantage of using only a limited number of immobilized fragments, usually chromosomes, it is not possible to achieve the siz