|
|
|
| United States Patent | 6298782 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/6298782.html |
| Inventor(s) | Gregory; Michael (Winfield, IL), Pavliny; Mark (Romeoville, IL), Lewandowski; Edward (Rockton, IL), Lawrence; William (late of Villa Pk., IL), Ozers; Guntis (Woodridge, IL) |
| Abstract | A system and method for preventing a broken printing web from wrapping
about or otherwise fouling the blanket cylinders of printing press units.
The system and method includes a web tensioning device located downstream
of the printing press units for maintaining tension upon a broken web and
pulling the web from the printing press units. The device includes a
plurality of web disturbance detectors for detecting a wave, ripple or
other disturbance indicative of a web break. A pair of anti-wrap rollers
located above and below the web are engaged upon detection of a web break
to engage the web between them to exert tension onto the web and pull it
from the printing units. The anti-wrap rollers are rotated at a surface
speed nominally greater than the surface speed of the printing rolls. The
anti-wrap rollers include a plurality of opposed peak and valley portions
which enable them to interlock and grip the web along a line of contact.
The system and method also includes a flow bar system to reduce false
detections of a web break. A blow-down bar is also used to force air, or
some other fluid, downward on a broken web so as to harmlessly force the
broken web to the ground as it exits the web tensioning device. A series
of sensors which project two beams in the form of a crossing pattern are
utilized to more rapidly and accurately detect a web break. |
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
October 9, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
January 5, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parent Case |
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/821,404 filed Mar. 20,
1997, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/435,006, filed
May 4, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,484, which is a continuation-in-part
of Ser. No. 08/327,095, filed Oct. 21, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,008,
which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/036,928, filed Mar. 25, 1993, now
U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,610, each of which are herein incorporated by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 5372290 Marmin
Dec,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5357448 Stanford
Oct,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5285238 Quadracci et al.
Feb,1994 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5163371 Kotterer et al.
Nov,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5130557 Kettl
Jul,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5056431 Sainio
Oct,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4961378 Balow et al.
Oct,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4913049 Sainio
Apr,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4909426 Crowley et al.
Mar,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4846060 Proctor
Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4787547 Hella et al.
Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4787986 Dietl et al.
Nov,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4754702 Muller
Jul,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4748910 Richter
Jun,1988 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4698914 Shu et al.
Oct,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4549485 Nawrath
Oct,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4541337 Schaul
Sep,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4508033 Fischer
Apr,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4500043 Brown
Feb,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4472888 Spiller
Sep,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4453709 Reba
Jun,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4406388 Takashi et al.
Sep,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4366753 Glanz et al.
Jan,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4342413 Reba
Aug,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4321107 Page
Mar,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4240346 Landis et al.
Dec,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4142661 Nettles et al.
Mar,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4137644 Karlsson
Feb,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4096801 Martin
Jun,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4069595 Ahlbert et al.
Jan,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4038917 DeLigt
Aug,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3979038 Karlsson
Sep,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3622058 Vits
Nov,1971 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3549070 Frost et al.
Dec,1970 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3448907 Otepka et al.
Jun,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3152740 Kindseth
Oct,1964 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3147006 Fulk
Sep,1964 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2848820 Wallin et al.
Aug,1958 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 2838303 Morley
Jun,1958 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Market Size |
|
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market
sector:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Market Share |
|
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| Reasonable Royalty |
|
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
|
| | |
| |
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
|
| Market Size | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Market Share | N/A | [No votes] | | x | Reasonable Royalty | N/A | [No votes] |
| | N/A | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A system for preventing damage to printing cylinders of a web printing press by maintaining tension in a web in the event of web breakage, comprising:
(a) a first roller having a plurality of valley and peak portions;
(b) a second roller having a plurality of valley and peak portions;
(c) a motor device disposed in communication with said first and second rollers to rotate said first and second rollers to pull a broken web though said first and second rollers; and
(d) stripper fingers disposed in said valley portions of said first and second rollers to prevent a broken web from wrapping around said first and second rollers.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said first and second rollers are disposed to engage a broken web with line contact.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein said motor device is configured to rotate said first and second rollers at a surface speed greater than a surface speed of said printing cylinders.
4. The system of claim 1 further comprising means for engaging said first and second rollers with said broken web.
5. The system of claim 1 further comprising a web break detector.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein said first and second rollers are disposed downstream of said printing cylinders.
7. The system of claim 1 further comprising a frame in which said first and second rollers are mounted.
8. A method for preventing damage to the printing cylinders of a web printing press in the event of web breakage by maintaining tension in a broken web, comprising the steps of:
(a) detecting a web disturbance indicative of a web break;
(b) rotating at least two rollers;
(c) engaging said rollers with said broken web;
(d) pulling said broken web away from said printing cylinders with contact exerted by said rollers; and
(e) preventing said broken web from wrapping around said rollers.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said pulling step includes the step of pulling said broken web away from said printing cylinders with line contact exerted by said rollers.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein said engaging step includes the step of moving said rollers into engagement with said broken web.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said engaging step includes the step of engaging said broken web with rollers each having a plurality of peak and valley position.
12. The method of claim 8 wherein said preventing step includes the step of disposing stripper fingers within said valley portions of said rollers. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to a web control mechanism for preventing damage to a printing unit of a printing press in the event of a substantial loss of tension in a running web exiting from the printing unit such as would be caused by a
break in the web and, more particularly, to a flow bar system for enhancing such web control mechanisms. The invention is particularly useful in the commercial heat-set printing market where the printed product exits to dryer and chill units.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In a typical printing unit the printed product is discharged from the printing unit and typically is directed downstream through a dryer unit, followed by a chill unit. Problems occur when a web break occurs downstream of the press such as in
the dryer or chill unit.
Should there be a web break there is a possibility that the web will be directed back to the printing press where it will become entangled in the press rolls. More particularly, the end of the printing web may wrap around the blanket cylinder
damaging the blanket and resulting in substantial down time and blanket expense. This problem is particularly acute when the operator is not even aware of the web break.
The prior art has suggested several solutions to the problem. One proposed solution is to provide sensor means for detecting web breaks within the dryer and/or chill units. The detectors may be of the air, infra-red, photoelectric, contact,
ultrasonic or other type capable of detecting a web break and signalling such information to a circuit which would cause the press to stop its operation. However, the press may be running at speeds of 1,000 to 3,000 feet per minute. The press rolls do
not stop immediately but periodically decelerate over a period of time perhaps ten seconds. During this period of time, substantial printed product can be emitted from the press causing damage to the blankets by wrapping in the printing units.
In order to alleviate the problem some prior art devices utilize a web break detector which not only provides a signal which stops the press but also activates knife means or other severing device which severs the web. Preferably, the web
severing device is located before the dryer so as to reduce the amount of untensioned web. But since there is a period of time before the press stops, there remains the possibility that the untensioned web will go back to the press units and be wrapped
around the blanket cylinders.
In prior art web break detectors, the web break is detected mechanically, optically or electrically which activates a shearing mechanism downstream of the printing unit and shuts down the printing unit to prevent additional printed product from
issuing from the printing press. During the time period between the web breaks and the press shut down, the paper printed product will continue to issue. However, since there is no tension in the printed product due to the web break, the paper web will
become entangled with the blanket cylinder and impression cylinder and may wrap around the blanket in the blanket cylinder. Typically, the blanket on the blanket cylinder is fragile in nature and may easily be compressed or otherwise damaged. When this
occurs the blanket may have to be replaced, which can be expensive. The blanket cylinder is also somewhat inaccessible. Accordingly, it is a time consuming, complicated task to remove the wound printed web from the blanket and associated cylinders and
after this is done the blanket must be removed and then replaced by a new, fresh blanket. All of these steps are time consuming and will result in substantial press down time.
There have been numerous attempts to overcome the problems associated with the detection of a breakage of printed product during the printing process.
Another proposed solution eliminates the necessity for a web severing device. One such prior art attempt is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,060 to Proctor entitled "Printing Web Tensioning System." This prior art practice involves
the use of at least a pair of rollers sometimes called anti-wrap rollers which are positioned downstream of the printing unit and immediately before the drying units. These rollers are normally positioned one on the upper and one on the lower side of
the printing web. In normal operation, the rollers are spaced apart and not in contact with the web. Upon detection of a web disturbance indicating a likelihood of or actual web break, a mechanism is activated which causes the rollers on opposite sides
of the web to come together with the printed product between the rolls along the width of the web. The rollers are rotated at a synchronized speed with respect to the speed of the printing cylinders. In this way, tension is supposed to be maintained on
the web and the web will not be wrapped around and become entangled with the printing rollers. Although a certain amount of paper will be wasted as it is directed to the floor, such waste is minimal as compared to the problems, waste and expense
associated with wrap around the blanket cylinders.
Another prior art proposal is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,485 entitled Paper Web Seizing Apparatus For Use With Printing Machinery. In this prior art device, rollers are provided so as to cause the broken web to wrap around
rollers which are positioned downstream of the printing press.
Prior art devices made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,060 and modified versions thereof, have met with a certain amount of success in the commercial field when used at relatively low press speeds such as not in excess of 1200- | | |