WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Anti-wrap device for a web press    
United States Patent6298782   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6298782.html
Inventor(s)Gregory; Michael (Winfield, IL), Pavliny; Mark (Romeoville, IL), Lewandowski; Edward (Rockton, IL), Lawrence; William (late of Villa Pk., IL), Ozers; Guntis (Woodridge, IL)
AbstractA system and method for preventing a broken printing web from wrapping about or otherwise fouling the blanket cylinders of printing press units. The system and method includes a web tensioning device located downstream of the printing press units for maintaining tension upon a broken web and pulling the web from the printing press units. The device includes a plurality of web disturbance detectors for detecting a wave, ripple or other disturbance indicative of a web break. A pair of anti-wrap rollers located above and below the web are engaged upon detection of a web break to engage the web between them to exert tension onto the web and pull it from the printing units. The anti-wrap rollers are rotated at a surface speed nominally greater than the surface speed of the printing rolls. The anti-wrap rollers include a plurality of opposed peak and valley portions which enable them to interlock and grip the web along a line of contact. The system and method also includes a flow bar system to reduce false detections of a web break. A blow-down bar is also used to force air, or some other fluid, downward on a broken web so as to harmlessly force the broken web to the ground as it exits the web tensioning device. A series of sensors which project two beams in the form of a crossing pattern are utilized to more rapidly and accurately detect a web break.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Inventor     Gregory; Michael (Winfield, IL) , Pavliny; Mark (Romeoville, IL) , Lewandowski; Edward (Rockton, IL) , Lawrence; William (late of Villa Pk., IL) , Ozers; Guntis (Woodridge, IL)
Owner/Assignee     Baldwin WEb Controls (Countryside, IL)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     October 9, 2001
Application Number     09/002,755
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     January 5, 1998
US Classification     101/484 101/228 226/11
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Funk; Stephen R.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Morgan & Finnegan, LLP
Address
Parent Case     This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/821,404 filed Mar. 20, 1997, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/435,006, filed May 4, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,678,484, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/327,095, filed Oct. 21, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,008, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/036,928, filed Mar. 25, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,610, each of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     101/217 101/129 101/224 101/225 101/226 101/227 101/228 101/232 101/484 101/DIG.41 226/11 226/42 226/45 226/124
Patent Tags     anti-wrap web press
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
5372290
Marmin

Dec,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5357448
Stanford

Oct,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5285238
Quadracci et al.

Feb,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5163371
Kotterer et al.

Nov,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5130557
Kettl

Jul,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5056431
Sainio

Oct,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4961378
Balow et al.

Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4913049
Sainio

Apr,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4909426
Crowley et al.

Mar,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4846060
Proctor

Jul,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4787547
Hella et al.

Nov,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4787986
Dietl et al.

Nov,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4754702
Muller

Jul,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4748910
Richter

Jun,1988

[0 after 0 votes]
4698914
Shu et al.

Oct,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4549485
Nawrath

Oct,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4541337
Schaul

Sep,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4508033
Fischer

Apr,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4500043
Brown

Feb,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4472888
Spiller

Sep,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4453709
Reba

Jun,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4406388
Takashi et al.

Sep,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4366753
Glanz et al.

Jan,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
4342413
Reba

Aug,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4321107
Page

Mar,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4240346
Landis et al.

Dec,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4142661
Nettles et al.

Mar,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4137644
Karlsson

Feb,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4096801
Martin

Jun,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4069595
Ahlbert et al.

Jan,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4038917
DeLigt

Aug,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3979038
Karlsson

Sep,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3622058
Vits

Nov,1971

[0 after 0 votes]
3549070
Frost et al.

Dec,1970

[0 after 0 votes]
3448907
Otepka et al.

Jun,1969

[0 after 0 votes]
3152740
Kindseth

Oct,1964

[0 after 0 votes]
3147006
Fulk

Sep,1964

[0 after 0 votes]
2848820
Wallin et al.

Aug,1958

[0 after 0 votes]
2838303
Morley

Jun,1958

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A system for preventing damage to printing cylinders of a web printing press by maintaining tension in a web in the event of web breakage, comprising:

(a) a first roller having a plurality of valley and peak portions;

(b) a second roller having a plurality of valley and peak portions;

(c) a motor device disposed in communication with said first and second rollers to rotate said first and second rollers to pull a broken web though said first and second rollers; and

(d) stripper fingers disposed in said valley portions of said first and second rollers to prevent a broken web from wrapping around said first and second rollers.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said first and second rollers are disposed to engage a broken web with line contact.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein said motor device is configured to rotate said first and second rollers at a surface speed greater than a surface speed of said printing cylinders.

4. The system of claim 1 further comprising means for engaging said first and second rollers with said broken web.

5. The system of claim 1 further comprising a web break detector.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein said first and second rollers are disposed downstream of said printing cylinders.

7. The system of claim 1 further comprising a frame in which said first and second rollers are mounted.

8. A method for preventing damage to the printing cylinders of a web printing press in the event of web breakage by maintaining tension in a broken web, comprising the steps of:

(a) detecting a web disturbance indicative of a web break;

(b) rotating at least two rollers;

(c) engaging said rollers with said broken web;

(d) pulling said broken web away from said printing cylinders with contact exerted by said rollers; and

(e) preventing said broken web from wrapping around said rollers.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said pulling step includes the step of pulling said broken web away from said printing cylinders with line contact exerted by said rollers.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said engaging step includes the step of moving said rollers into engagement with said broken web.

11. The method of claim 8 wherein said engaging step includes the step of engaging said broken web with rollers each having a plurality of peak and valley position.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein said preventing step includes the step of disposing stripper fingers within said valley portions of said rollers.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to a web control mechanism for preventing damage to a printing unit of a printing press in the event of a substantial loss of tension in a running web exiting from the printing unit such as would be caused by a break in the web and, more particularly, to a flow bar system for enhancing such web control mechanisms. The invention is particularly useful in the commercial heat-set printing market where the printed product exits to dryer and chill units.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In a typical printing unit the printed product is discharged from the printing unit and typically is directed downstream through a dryer unit, followed by a chill unit. Problems occur when a web break occurs downstream of the press such as in the dryer or chill unit.

Should there be a web break there is a possibility that the web will be directed back to the printing press where it will become entangled in the press rolls. More particularly, the end of the printing web may wrap around the blanket cylinder damaging the blanket and resulting in substantial down time and blanket expense. This problem is particularly acute when the operator is not even aware of the web break.

The prior art has suggested several solutions to the problem. One proposed solution is to provide sensor means for detecting web breaks within the dryer and/or chill units. The detectors may be of the air, infra-red, photoelectric, contact, ultrasonic or other type capable of detecting a web break and signalling such information to a circuit which would cause the press to stop its operation. However, the press may be running at speeds of 1,000 to 3,000 feet per minute. The press rolls do not stop immediately but periodically decelerate over a period of time perhaps ten seconds. During this period of time, substantial printed product can be emitted from the press causing damage to the blankets by wrapping in the printing units.

In order to alleviate the problem some prior art devices utilize a web break detector which not only provides a signal which stops the press but also activates knife means or other severing device which severs the web. Preferably, the web severing device is located before the dryer so as to reduce the amount of untensioned web. But since there is a period of time before the press stops, there remains the possibility that the untensioned web will go back to the press units and be wrapped around the blanket cylinders.

In prior art web break detectors, the web break is detected mechanically, optically or electrically which activates a shearing mechanism downstream of the printing unit and shuts down the printing unit to prevent additional printed product from issuing from the printing press. During the time period between the web breaks and the press shut down, the paper printed product will continue to issue. However, since there is no tension in the printed product due to the web break, the paper web will become entangled with the blanket cylinder and impression cylinder and may wrap around the blanket in the blanket cylinder. Typically, the blanket on the blanket cylinder is fragile in nature and may easily be compressed or otherwise damaged. When this occurs the blanket may have to be replaced, which can be expensive. The blanket cylinder is also somewhat inaccessible. Accordingly, it is a time consuming, complicated task to remove the wound printed web from the blanket and associated cylinders and after this is done the blanket must be removed and then replaced by a new, fresh blanket. All of these steps are time consuming and will result in substantial press down time.

There have been numerous attempts to overcome the problems associated with the detection of a breakage of printed product during the printing process.

Another proposed solution eliminates the necessity for a web severing device. One such prior art attempt is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,060 to Proctor entitled "Printing Web Tensioning System." This prior art practice involves the use of at least a pair of rollers sometimes called anti-wrap rollers which are positioned downstream of the printing unit and immediately before the drying units. These rollers are normally positioned one on the upper and one on the lower side of the printing web. In normal operation, the rollers are spaced apart and not in contact with the web. Upon detection of a web disturbance indicating a likelihood of or actual web break, a mechanism is activated which causes the rollers on opposite sides of the web to come together with the printed product between the rolls along the width of the web. The rollers are rotated at a synchronized speed with respect to the speed of the printing cylinders. In this way, tension is supposed to be maintained on the web and the web will not be wrapped around and become entangled with the printing rollers. Although a certain amount of paper will be wasted as it is directed to the floor, such waste is minimal as compared to the problems, waste and expense associated with wrap around the blanket cylinders.

Another prior art proposal is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,485 entitled Paper Web Seizing Apparatus For Use With Printing Machinery. In this prior art device, rollers are provided so as to cause the broken web to wrap around rollers which are positioned downstream of the printing press.

Prior art devices made in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,846,060 and modified versions thereof, have met with a certain amount of success in the commercial field when used at relatively low press speeds such as not in excess of 1200-