WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Microfluidic matrix localization apparatus and methods    
United States Patent6306590   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6306590.html
Inventor(s)Mehta; Tammy Burd (San Jose, CA); Kopf-Sill; Anne R. (Portola Valley, CA)
AbstractMultiphasic microfluidic apparatus for performing product fluid manipulation and separation in a single continuous unit are provided. Related methods, kits, and compositions are also provided.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 6306590
Microfluidic matrix localization apparatus and methods - US Patent 6306590 Drawing
Microfluidic matrix localization apparatus and methods
Inventor     Mehta; Tammy Burd (San Jose, CA); Kopf-Sill; Anne R. (Portola Valley, CA)
Owner/Assignee     Caliper Technologies Corp. (Mountain View, CA)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     October 23, 2001
Application Number     09/093,832
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     June 8, 1998
US Classification     435/6 422/68.1 435/91.2 435/173.1 435/814
Int'l Classification     C12Q 001/68
Examiner     Le; Long V.
Assistant Examiner     Pham; Minh-Quan K.
Attorney/Law Firm     Shaver; Gulshan H. The Law Offices of Jonathan Alan Quine
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     422/50 422/54 422/55 422/56 422/57 422/58 422/68.1 422/69 422/82.02 422/82.05 422/6 422/7 422/8 422/9 422/10 422/11 422/12 422/13 422/14 422/15 422/16 422/17 422/18 422/19 422/20 422/21 422/22 422/23 422/24 422/25 422/26 422/27 422/28 422/29 422/30 422/31 422/32 422/33 422/34 422/35 422/36 422/37 422/38 422/39 422/40 422/41 422/42 422/43 422/44 422/45 422/46 422/47 422/48 422/49 422/50 422/51 422/52 422/53 422/54 422/55 422/56 422/57 422/58 422/59 422/60 422/61 422/62 422/63 422/64 422/65 422/66 422/67 422/68 422/69 422/70 422/71 422/72 422/73 422/74 422/75 422/76 422/77 422/78 422/79 422/80 422/81 422/82.09 422/129 422/131 ;287.05 422/6 422/7 422/8 422/9 422/10 422/11 422/12 422/13 422/14 422/15 422/16 422/17 422/18 422/19 422/20 422/21 422/22 422/23 422/24 422/25 422/26 422/27 422/28 422/29 422/30 422/31 422/32 422/33 422/34 422/35 422/36 422/37 422/38 422/39 422/40 422/41 422/42 422/43 422/44 422/45 422/46 422/47 422/48 422/49 422/50 422/51 422/52 422/53 422/54 422/55 422/56 422/57 422/58 422/59 422/60 422/61 422/62 422/63 422/64 422/65 422/66 422/67 422/68 422/69 422/70 422/71 422/72 422/73 422/74 422/75 422/76 422/77 422/78 422/79 422/80 422/81 422/82.3;287.05 422/6 422/7 422/8 422/9 422/10 422/11 422/12 422/13 422/14 422/15 422/16 422/17 422/18 422/19 422/20 422/21 422/22 422/23 422/24 422/25 422/26 422/27 422/28 422/29 422/30 422/31 422/32 422/33 422/34 422/35 422/36 422/37 422/38 422/39 422/40 422/41 422/42 422/43 422/44 422/45 422/46 422/47 422/48 422/49 422/50 422/51 422/52 422/53 422/54 422/55 422/56 422/57 422/58 422/59 422/60 422/61 422/62 422/63 422/64 422/65 422/66 422/67 422/68 422/69 422/70 422/71 422/72 422/73 422/74 422/75 422/76 422/77 422/78 422/79 422/80 422/81 422/82.9;808;814 435/91.2 435/91.1 435/6 435/5 435/291 435/810 435/90 435/91 435/91.51 435/91.5 435/173.1 435/174 435/90 435/91 435/283.1 435/285.90 435/91.2 436/22.1 436/23.1 436/25.1 436/518 436/524 436/525 436/528 436/531 436/532 436/63 436/531 436/532 436/169 436/172 436/175 436/805
Patent Tags     microfluidic matrix localization methods
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
6013166
Heller

Jan,2000

[0 after 0 votes]
6007690
Nelson

Dec,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5989402
Chow
204/601
Nov,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5965410
Chow
435/91.2
Oct,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5885470
Parce
216/33
Mar,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5882465
McReynolds
156/285
Mar,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5880071
Parce
204/453
Mar,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5876675
Kennedy
422/99
Mar,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5869004
Parce
422/100
Feb,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5852495
Parce
356/344
Dec,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5842787
Kopf-Sill

Dec,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5800690
Chow

Sep,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5779868
Parce

Jul,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5770029
Nelson

Jun,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5716825
Hancock

Feb,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5699157
Parce

Dec,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5587128
Wilding
422/50
Dec,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5585069
Zanzucchi

Dec,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A method of performing a polymerase chain reaction in a microfluidic apparatus, said method comprising:

providing a microfluidic device comprising at least two intersecting channels in fluid communication;

filling at least one of said two intersecting channels with an electrophoretic phase selected from the group consisting of a sieving matrix and a molecular partition matrix, wherein the electrophoretic phase comprise at least two PCR reactants and a thermostable polymerase dispersed therein;

performing the polymerase chain reaction in the presence of the electrophoretic phase to produce at least a first product.

2. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising a step of separating the at least first product from the reactants in the presence of the electrophoretic phase.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said intersecting channels comprise a reaction region.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the microfluidic device comprises a high-resistance channel region for heating the at least two PCR reactants.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the two PCR reactants are heterogeneously dispersed throughout at least a portion of the electrophoretic phase.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the two PCR reactants are homogeneously dispersed throughout at least a portion of the electrophoretic phase.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the two PCR reactants is heterogeneously dispersed in at least a portion of the electrophoretic phase and one of the two PCR reactants is homogeneously dispersed throughout the electrophoretic phase.

8. A method of performing a polymerase chain reaction in a microfluidic apparatus, said method comprising:

providing a microfluidic device comprising at least two intersecting channels in fluid communication;

filling at least one of said two intersecting channels with a mixture comprising a sieving matrix, a thermostable polymerase and a plurality of PCR reaction components;

performing the PCR in the presence of the sieving matrix to produce at least a first product.

9. The method of claim 8, said method further comprising a step of separating the at least first product from the PCR reaction components in the presence of the sieving matrix.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of separating is carried out in a channel region different from a channel region for performing the PCR.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the sieving matrix is selected from a group consisting of agarose, linear polyacrylamide, methylcellulose, polyethylene oxide and hydroxy ethyl cellulose.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting channels have an interior dimension of between about 0.1 .mu.m and 500 .mu.m.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein the two PCR reactants are heterogeneously dispersed throughout at least a portion of the sieving matrix.

14. The method of claim 8, wherein the two PCR reactants are homogeneously dispersed throughout at least a portion of the sieving matrix.

15. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the two PCR reactants is heterogeneously dispersed in at least a portion of the sieving matrix and one of the two PCR reactants is homogeneously dispersed throughout the sieving matrix.

16. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting channels comprise a reaction region.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the reaction region is substantially filled with the sieving matrix.

18. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting channels comprise a separation region.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the separation region is substantially filled with the sieving matrix.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Manipulating fluidic reagents and assessing the results of reagent interactions are central to chemical and biological science. Manipulations include mixing fluidic reagents, assaying products resulting from such mixtures, and separation or purification of products or reagents and the like. Assessing the results of reagent interactions can include autoradiography, spectroscopy, microscopy, photography, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance and many other techniques for observing and recording the results of mixing reagents. A single experiment may involve literally hundreds of fluidic manipulations, product separations, result recording processes and data compilation and integration steps. Fluidic manipulations are performed using a wide variety of laboratory equipment, including various fluid heating devices, fluidic mixing devices, centrifugation equipment, molecule purification apparatus, chromatographic machinery, gel electrophoretic equipment and the like. The effects of mixing fluidic reagents are typically assessed by additional equipment relating to detection, visualization or recording of an event to be assayed, such as spectrophotometers, autoradiographic equipment, microscopes, gel scanners, computers and the like.

Because analysis of even simple chemical, biochemical, or biological phenomena requires many different types of laboratory equipment, the modern laboratory is complex, large and expensive. In addition, because so many different types of equipment are used in even conceptually simple experiments such as DNA synthesis or sequencing, it has not generally been practical to integrate different types of equipment to improve automation. The need for a laboratory worker to physically perform many aspects of laboratory science imposes sharp limits on the number of experiments which a laboratory can perform, and increases the undesirable exposure of laboratory workers to toxic or radioactive reagents.

One particularly labor intensive biochemical series of laboratory fluidic manipulations is nucleic acid synthesis and analysis. A variety of in vitro amplification methods for biochemical synthesis of nucleic acids are available, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). See, Mullis et al., (1987) U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202 and PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis et al. eds, Academic Press Inc. San Diego, Calif. (1990) (Innis). PCR methods typically require the use of specialized machinery for performing thermocycling reactions to perform DNA synthesis, followed by the use of specialized machinery for electrophoretic analysis of synthesized DNA. For a description of nucleic acid manipulation methods and apparatus see Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning--A Laboratory Manual (2nd ed.) Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Press, NY, (Sambrook); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F. M. Ausubel et al., eds., Current Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1997, supplement 37) (Ausubel).

Another particularly important and labor intensive biochemical series of laboratory fluidic manipulations which are typically performed on nucleic acids which are made recombinantly or synthetically is nucleic acid sequencing. Efficient DNA sequencing technology is central to the development of the biotechnology industry and basic biological research. Improvements in the efficiency and speed of DNA sequencing are needed to keep pace with the demands for DNA sequence information. The Human Genome Project, for example, has set a goal of dramatically increasing the efficiency, cost-effectiveness and throughput of DNA sequencing techniques. See, e.g., Collins, and Galas (1993) Science 262:43-46.

Most DNA sequencing today is carried out by chain termination methods of DNA sequencing. The most popular chain termination methods of DNA sequencing are variants of the dideoxynucleotide mediated chain termination method of Sanger. See, Sanger et al. (1977) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 74:5463-5467. For a simple introduction to dideoxy sequencing, see, Ausubel or Sambrook, supra. Four color sequencing is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,534. Thousands of laboratories employ dideoxynucleotide chain termination techniques. Commercial kits containing the reagents most typically used for these methods of DNA sequencing are available and widely used.

In addition to the Sanger methods of chain termination, new PCR exonuclease digestion methods have also been proposed for DNA sequencing. Direct sequencing of PCR generated amplicons by selectively incorporating boronated nuclease resistant nucleotides into the amplicons during PCR and digestion of the amplicons with a nuclease to produce sized template fragments has been proposed (Porter et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Research 25(8):1611-1617). In the methods, 4 PCR reactions on a template are performed, in each of which one of the nucleotide triphosphates in the PCR reaction mixture is partially substituted with a 2'deoxynucleoside 5'-.alpha.[P-borano]-triphosphate. The boronated nucleotide is stocastically incorporated into PCR products at varying positions along the PCR amplicon in a nested set of PCR fragments of the template. An exonuclease which is blocked by incorporated boronated nucleotides is used to cleave the PCR amplicons. The cleaved amplicons are then separated by size using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, providing the sequence of the amplicon. An advantage of this method is that it requires fewer biochemical manipulations than performing standard Sanger-style sequencing of PCR amplicons.

Other sequencing methods which reduce the number of steps necessary for template preparation and primer selection have been developed. One proposed variation on sequencing technology involves the use of modular primers for use in PCR and DNA sequencing. For example, Ulanovsky and co-workers have described the mechanism of the modular primer effect (Beskin et al. (1995) Nucleic Acids Research 23(15):2881-2885) in which short primers of 5-6 nucleotides can specifically prime a template-dependent polymerase enzyme for template dependent nucleic acid synthesis. A modified version of the use of the modular primer strategy, in which small nucleotide primers are specifically elongated for use in PCR to amplify and sequence template nucleic acids has also been described. The procedure is referred to as DNA sequencing using differential extension with nucleotide subsets (DENS). See, Raja et al. (1997)