|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 6013166 Heller
Jan,2000 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6007690 Nelson
Dec,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5989402 Chow 204/601 Nov,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5965410 Chow 435/91.2 Oct,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5885470 Parce 216/33 Mar,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5882465 McReynolds 156/285 Mar,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5880071 Parce 204/453 Mar,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5876675 Kennedy 422/99 Mar,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5869004 Parce 422/100 Feb,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5852495 Parce 356/344 Dec,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5842787 Kopf-Sill
Dec,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5800690 Chow
Sep,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5779868 Parce
Jul,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5770029 Nelson
Jun,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5716825 Hancock
Feb,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5699157 Parce
Dec,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5587128 Wilding 422/50 Dec,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5585069 Zanzucchi
Dec,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. A method of performing a polymerase chain reaction in a microfluidic
apparatus, said method comprising:
providing a microfluidic device comprising at least two intersecting
channels in fluid communication;
filling at least one of said two intersecting channels with an
electrophoretic phase selected from the group consisting of a sieving
matrix and a molecular partition matrix, wherein the electrophoretic phase
comprise at least two PCR reactants and a thermostable polymerase
dispersed therein;
performing the polymerase chain reaction in the presence of the
electrophoretic phase to produce at least a first product.
2. The method of claim 1, said method further comprising a step of
separating the at least first product from the reactants in the presence
of the electrophoretic phase.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said intersecting
channels comprise a reaction region.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the microfluidic device comprises a
high-resistance channel region for heating the at least two PCR reactants.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the two PCR reactants are heterogeneously
dispersed throughout at least a portion of the electrophoretic phase.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the two PCR reactants are homogeneously
dispersed throughout at least a portion of the electrophoretic phase.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the two PCR reactants is
heterogeneously dispersed in at least a portion of the electrophoretic
phase and one of the two PCR reactants is homogeneously dispersed
throughout the electrophoretic phase.
8. A method of performing a polymerase chain reaction in a microfluidic
apparatus, said method comprising:
providing a microfluidic device comprising at least two intersecting
channels in fluid communication;
filling at least one of said two intersecting channels with a mixture
comprising a sieving matrix, a thermostable polymerase and a plurality of
PCR reaction components;
performing the PCR in the presence of the sieving matrix to produce at
least a first product.
9. The method of claim 8, said method further comprising a step of
separating the at least first product from the PCR reaction components in
the presence of the sieving matrix.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of separating is carried out in
a channel region different from a channel region for performing the PCR.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the sieving matrix is selected from a
group consisting of agarose, linear polyacrylamide, methylcellulose,
polyethylene oxide and hydroxy ethyl cellulose.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting
channels have an interior dimension of between about 0.1 .mu.m and 500
.mu.m.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the two PCR reactants are
heterogeneously dispersed throughout at least a portion of the sieving
matrix.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein the two PCR reactants are homogeneously
dispersed throughout at least a portion of the sieving matrix.
15. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one of the two PCR reactants is
heterogeneously dispersed in at least a portion of the sieving matrix and
one of the two PCR reactants is homogeneously dispersed throughout the
sieving matrix.
16. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting
channels comprise a reaction region.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the reaction region is substantially
filled with the sieving matrix.
18. The method of claim 8, wherein one of said at least two intersecting
channels comprise a separation region.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the separation region is substantially
filled with the sieving matrix. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Manipulating fluidic reagents and assessing the results of reagent
interactions are central to chemical and biological science. Manipulations
include mixing fluidic reagents, assaying products resulting from such
mixtures, and separation or purification of products or reagents and the
like. Assessing the results of reagent interactions can include
autoradiography, spectroscopy, microscopy, photography, mass spectrometry,
nuclear magnetic resonance and many other techniques for observing and
recording the results of mixing reagents. A single experiment may involve
literally hundreds of fluidic manipulations, product separations, result
recording processes and data compilation and integration steps. Fluidic
manipulations are performed using a wide variety of laboratory equipment,
including various fluid heating devices, fluidic mixing devices,
centrifugation equipment, molecule purification apparatus, chromatographic
machinery, gel electrophoretic equipment and the like. The effects of
mixing fluidic reagents are typically assessed by additional equipment
relating to detection, visualization or recording of an event to be
assayed, such as spectrophotometers, autoradiographic equipment,
microscopes, gel scanners, computers and the like.
Because analysis of even simple chemical, biochemical, or biological
phenomena requires many different types of laboratory equipment, the
modern laboratory is complex, large and expensive. In addition, because so
many different types of equipment are used in even conceptually simple
experiments such as DNA synthesis or sequencing, it has not generally been
practical to integrate different types of equipment to improve automation.
The need for a laboratory worker to physically perform many aspects of
laboratory science imposes sharp limits on the number of experiments which
a laboratory can perform, and increases the undesirable exposure of
laboratory workers to toxic or radioactive reagents.
One particularly labor intensive biochemical series of laboratory fluidic
manipulations is nucleic acid synthesis and analysis. A variety of in
vitro amplification methods for biochemical synthesis of nucleic acids are
available, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). See, Mullis et
al., (1987) U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,202 and PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods
and Applications (Innis et al. eds, Academic Press Inc. San Diego, Calif.
(1990) (Innis). PCR methods typically require the use of specialized
machinery for performing thermocycling reactions to perform DNA synthesis,
followed by the use of specialized machinery for electrophoretic analysis
of synthesized DNA. For a description of nucleic acid manipulation methods
and apparatus see Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning--A Laboratory
Manual (2nd ed.) Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring
Harbor Press, NY, (Sambrook); and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,
F. M. Ausubel et al., eds., Current Protocols, a joint venture between
Greene Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1997,
supplement 37) (Ausubel).
Another particularly important and labor intensive biochemical series of
laboratory fluidic manipulations which are typically performed on nucleic
acids which are made recombinantly or synthetically is nucleic acid
sequencing. Efficient DNA sequencing technology is central to the
development of the biotechnology industry and basic biological research.
Improvements in the efficiency and speed of DNA sequencing are needed to
keep pace with the demands for DNA sequence information. The Human Genome
Project, for example, has set a goal of dramatically increasing the
efficiency, cost-effectiveness and throughput of DNA sequencing
techniques. See, e.g., Collins, and Galas (1993) Science 262:43-46.
Most DNA sequencing today is carried out by chain termination methods of
DNA sequencing. The most popular chain termination methods of DNA
sequencing are variants of the dideoxynucleotide mediated chain
termination method of Sanger. See, Sanger et al. (1977) Proc. Nat. Acad.
Sci., USA 74:5463-5467. For a simple introduction to dideoxy sequencing,
see, Ausubel or Sambrook, supra. Four color sequencing is described in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,534. Thousands of laboratories employ
dideoxynucleotide chain termination techniques. Commercial kits containing
the reagents most typically used for these methods of DNA sequencing are
available and widely used.
In addition to the Sanger methods of chain termination, new PCR exonuclease
digestion methods have also been proposed for DNA sequencing. Direct
sequencing of PCR generated amplicons by selectively incorporating
boronated nuclease resistant nucleotides into the amplicons during PCR and
digestion of the amplicons with a nuclease to produce sized template
fragments has been proposed (Porter et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Research
25(8):1611-1617). In the methods, 4 PCR reactions on a template are
performed, in each of which one of the nucleotide triphosphates in the PCR
reaction mixture is partially substituted with a 2'deoxynucleoside
5'-.alpha.[P-borano]-triphosphate. The boronated nucleotide is
stocastically incorporated into PCR products at varying positions along
the PCR amplicon in a nested set of PCR fragments of the template. An
exonuclease which is blocked by incorporated boronated nucleotides is used
to cleave the PCR amplicons. The cleaved amplicons are then separated by
size using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, providing the sequence of
the amplicon. An advantage of this method is that it requires fewer
biochemical manipulations than performing standard Sanger-style sequencing
of PCR amplicons.
Other sequencing methods which reduce the number of steps necessary for
template preparation and primer selection have been developed. One
proposed variation on sequencing technology involves the use of modular
primers for use in PCR and DNA sequencing. For example, Ulanovsky and
co-workers have described the mechanism of the modular primer effect
(Beskin et al. (1995) Nucleic Acids Research 23(15):2881-2885) in which
short primers of 5-6 nucleotides can specifically prime a
template-dependent polymerase enzyme for template dependent nucleic acid
synthesis. A modified version of the use of the modular primer strategy,
in which small nucleotide primers are specifically elongated for use in
PCR to amplify and sequence template nucleic acids has also been
described. The procedure is referred to as DNA sequencing using
differential extension with nucleotide subsets (DENS). See, Raja et al.
(1997) | | |