|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 1783276
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 1972563
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3181646
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3360193
|      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6309176 Periyathamby 415/119 Oct,2001 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6290022 Wolf 181/292 Sep,2001 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6135238 Arcas 181/292 Oct,2000 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6082489 Iwao
Jul,2000 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5979593 Rice
Nov,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5923003 Arcas 181/292 Jul,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5919029 Van Nostrand 415/119 Jul,1999 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5644918 Gulati
Jul,1997 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5457291 Richardson
Oct,1995 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5249919 Sishtla 415/119 Oct,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5173021 Grainger 415/119 Dec,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5173020 Ebbing 415/119 Dec,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5099566 Barrett 29/451 Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5025888 Arcas 181/213 Jun,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5014815 Arcas 181/213 May,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5007499 Ebbing
Apr,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4947958 Snyder 181/296 Aug,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4944362 Motsinger 181/213 Jul,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4932835 Sorokes 415/150 Jun,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4926963 Snyder 181/290 May,1990 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4854416 Lalikos 181/207 Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4848514 Snyder 181/290 Jul,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4504188 Traver 415/1 Mar,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4433751 Bonneau 181/213 Feb,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4421455 Tomren 415/119 Dec,1983 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4303144 Wirt 181/288 Dec,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4287962 Ingard 181/224 Sep,1981 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4204586 Hani 181/229 May,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4190131 Robinson 181/296 Feb,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4189027 Dean, III 181/286 Feb,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4150850 Doerfling 296/211 Apr,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4137992 Herman 181/213 Feb,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4135603 Dean, III 181/286 Jan,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3948346 Schindler 181/286 Apr,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4241806 Metzger 181/284 Dec,1969 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
This invention relates to an acoustic liner and
a fluid pressurizing device and method utilizing same.
Fluid pressurizing devices, such as centrifugal compressors, are widely used in different industries for a variety of applications involving the compression, or pressurization, of a gas. However, a typical compressor produces a relatively high
noise level which is an obvious nuisance to the people in the vicinity of the device. This noise can also cause vibrations and structural failures.
For example, the dominant noise source in a centrifugal compressor is typically generated at the locations of the impeller exit and the diffuser inlet, due to the high velocity of the fluid passing through these regions. The noise level becomes
higher when discharge vanes are installed in the diffuser to improve pressure recovery, due to the aerodynamic interaction between the impeller and the diffuser vanes.
Various external noise control measures such as enclosures and wrappings have been used to reduce the relative high noise levels generated by compressors, and similar devices. These external noise reduction techniques can be relatively expensive
especially when they are often offered as an add-on product after the device is manufactured.
Also, internal devices, usually in the form of acoustic liners, have been developed which are placed in the compressors, or similar devices, for controlling noise inside the gas flow paths. These liners are often based on the well-known
Helmholtz resonator principle according to which the liners dissipate the acoustic energy when the sound waves oscillate through perforations in the liners, and reflect the acoustic energy upstream due to the local impedance mismatch caused by the liner. Examples of Helmholtz resonators are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,100,993; 4,135,603; 4,150,732;.4,189,027; 4,443,751; 4,944,362; and 5,624,518.
A typical Helmholtz array acoustic liner is in the form of a three-piece sandwich structure consisting of honeycomb cells sandwiched between a perforated facing sheet and a back plate. Although these three-piece designs have been successfully
applied to suppress noise in aircraft engines, it is questionable whether or not they would work in fluid pressurizing devices, such as centrifugal compressors. This is largely due to the possibility of the perforated facing sheet of the liner breaking
off its bond with the honeycomb under extreme operating conditions of the compressor, such as, for example, during rapid depressurization caused by an emergency shut down of the compressor. In the event that the perforated facing sheet becomes loose, it
not only makes the acoustic liners no longer functional but also causes excessive aerodynamic losses, and even the possibility of mechanical catastrophic failure, caused by the potential collision between the break-away perforated sheet metal and the
spinning impeller.
Therefore what is needed is a system and method for reducing the noise in a fluid pressurizing device utilizing a Hemholtz array acoustic liner while eliminating its disadvantages.
SUMMARY
Accordingly an acoustic liner is provided, as well as a fluid processing device and method incorporating same, according to which the liner attenuates noise and consists of a plurality of cells formed in a plate in a manner to form an array of
resonators.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a gas pressurizing device and an acoustic liner according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the acoustic liner of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is an enlarged elevational view of a portion of the liner of FIGS. 1 and 2.
FIG. 4 is a view similar to that of FIG. 1, but depicting additional acoustic liners disposed at other locations in the fluid pressurizing device.
FIG. 5 is a view similar to that of FIG. 1, but depicting another acoustic liner disposed around the inlet duct of the fluid pressurizing device.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 depicts a portion of a high pressure fluid pressurizing device, such as a centrifugal compressor, including a casing 10 defining an impeller cavity 10a for receiving an impeller 12 which is mounted for rotation in the cavity. The impeller
has openings, or flow passages, formed therethrough, one of which is shown by the reference numeral 12a. A diffuser channel 14 is provided in the casing 10 radially outwardly from the chamber 10a and the impeller 12, and receives the high pressure fluid
from the impeller before it is passed to a volute, or collector, 16 for discharge from the device. Since this structure is conventional, it will not be shown or described in any further detail.
A mounting bracket 20 is secured to an inner wall of the casing 10 defining the diffuser channel and includes a base 22 disposed adjacent the outer end portion of the impeller and a plate 24 extending from the base and along the latter wall of
the casing.
A one-piece, unitary, annular acoustic liner 30 is mounted to the bracket 20 with its upper section being shown in detail in FIGS. 2 and 3. The liner 30 is formed of an annular, relatively thick, unitary shell, or plate 32 which is secured to
the plate 24 of the bracket 20 in any known manner. The plate 32 is preferably made of steel, and is attached to the bracket plate 24 by a plurality of equally-spaced bolts, or the like. The liner 30 is annular in shape and extends around the impeller
12 for 360 degrees.
A series of relatively large cells, or openings, 34 are formed through one surface of the plate 32 and extend through a majority of the thickness of the plate but not through its entire thickness. A series of relatively small cells 36 extend
from the bottom of each cell 34 to the opposite surface of the plate 32. Each cell 34 is shown having a disc-like cross section and each cell 36 is in the shown in the form of a bore for the purpose of example, it being understood that the shapes of the
cells 34 and 36 can vary within the scope of the invention.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, each cell 34 is formed by drilling a relative large-diameter counterbore through one surface of the plate 32, which counterbore extends through a majority of the thickness of the plate but not
though the complete thickness of the plate. Each cell 36 is formed by drilling a bore, or passage, through the opposite surface of the plate 32 to the bottom of a corresponding cell 34 and thus connects the cell 34 to the diffuser channel 14.
As shown in FIG. 3, the cells 34 are formed in a plurality of annular extending rows along the entire annular area of the plate 32, with the cells 34 of a particular row being staggered, or offset, from the cells of its adjacent row(s). A
plurality of cells 36 are associated with each cell 34 and the cells 36 can be randomly disposed relative to their corresponding cell 34, or, alternately, can be formed in any pattern of uniform distribution.
The liner 30 is installed on the inner wall of the plate 24 of the bracket 20 so that the open ends of all the cells 34 are capped by the underlying wall of the plate. Due to the firm contact between the plate 32 of the liner and the bracket
plate 24, and due to the cells 36 connecting each cell 34 to the diffuser area, the cells work collectively as array of Helmholtz acoustic resonators. Thus, the sound waves generated in the casing 10 by the high-rotation of the impeller 12, and by its
associated components, are attenuated as they pass by the liner 30.
Moreover, the dominant noise component commonly occurring at the blade passing frequency, or other high frequency can be effectively lowered by tuning the liner 30 so that its maximum sound attenuation occurs around the latter frequency. This
can be achieved by varying the volume of the cells 34, and/or the cross-section area, the number, and/or the length of the cells 36 to tune the liner. Thus, a maximum amount of attenuation of the acoustic energy generated by the rotating impeller 12 and
its associated components can be achieved.
According to the embodiment of FIG. 4, an additional one-piece, unitary, annular liner 40 is provided on the internal wall of the casing 10 opposite the bracket plate 24 and defining, with the bracket plate, the diffuser channel 14. To this end,
the latter wall is cut out as shown to accommodate the liner 40, which is identical to the liner 30 and therefore will not be described in detail. The liner 40 functions in an identical manner as the liner 30 as discussed above, and thus also
contributes to a significant reduction of the noise generated by the impeller 12 and its associated components.
FIG. 4 also depicts two additional one-piece, unitary, annular liners 52 and 54 located at other preferred locations in the casing 10, i.e., to the front and the rear of the impeller 12. To this end, the corresponding portions of the internal
walls of the casing 10 that houses the impeller 12 are cut out as shown to accommodate the liners 52 and 54. The liners 52 and 54 have a smaller outer diameter than the liners 30 and 40 and otherwise are identical to the liners 30 and 40. The liners 52
and 54 thus function in an identical manner as the liner 30 as discussed above, and thus contribute to a significant reduction of the noise generated in the casing 10.
The above-described preferred locations of the liners 30, 40, 52, and 54 enjoy the advantage of optimum noise reduction, since the liners are relatively close to the source of the noise, and therefore reduce the possibility that the noise will
by-pass the liners and pass through a different path.
Still another preferred location for a liner is shown in FIG. 5 which depicts an inlet conduit 60 that introduces gas to the inlet of the impeller 12. The upper portion of the conduit 60 is shown extending above the centerline C/L of the conduit
and the casing 10, as viewed in FIG. 5.
A one-piece, unitary, liner 64 is flush-mounted on the inner wall of the conduit 60 with the radial outer portion being shown. The liner 64 is in the form of a curved shell, preferably cylindrical in shape, is disposed in a cut-out recess of the
inner surface of the conduit 60, and is attached in the recess in any known manner. Since the liner 64 is otherwise identical to the liners 30, 40, 52, and 54, it will not be described in further detail. The liner 64 also functions in an identical
manner as the liner 30 as discussed above, and contributes to a significant attenuation of the noise in the casing 10.
It is understood that the liners 40, 52, 54 and 64 can be tuned to the impeller blade passing frequency to increase the noise reduction as discussed above in connection with the liner 30.
There are several advantages associated with the foregoing. For example, the liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 are located to attenuate a maximum amount of noise near its source. Also, due to their one-piece, unitary construction, the liners 30,
40, 52, 54, and 64 have fewer parts and are mechanically stronger when compared to the composite designs discussed above. Also, given the fact that the frequency of the dominant noise component varies with the compressor speed, the number of the smaller
cells 36 per each larger cell 34 can be varied spatially across the liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 so that the entire liner is effective to attenuate noise in a broader frequency band. Consequently, the liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 can efficiently and
effectively attenuate noise, not just in constant speed machines, but also in variable speed compressors, or other fluid pressurizing devices. The liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 also provide a very rigid inner wall to the internal flow. Further,
relative to the three-piece sandwich structure used in the traditional configuration of conventional Helmholtz array acoustic liners, as discussed above, the liners according to the above embodiments of the present invention have less or no deformation
when subject to mechanical and thermal loading. Therefore, the liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 have no adverse effect on the aerodynamic performance of a centrifugal compressor, even when they are installed in the narrow passages such as the diffusor
channels, or the like, of a centrifugal compressor.
VARIATIONS
The specific arrangement and number of liners 30, 40, 52, 54, and 64 utilized are not limited to the number shown in FIGS. 1, 4 and 5. Thus, one or both of the liners 30 and 40 could be used in the diffuser channel 14, one or both of the liners
52 and 53 could be used around the impeller 12, and/or the liner 64 could be used around the inlet conduit 60, depending on the particular application.
The specific technique of forming the cells 34 and 36 can vary from that discussed above. For example, a one-piece liner can be formed in which the cells 34 and 36 are molded in the plate 32.
The relative dimensions and shapes of the cells 34 | | |