WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Wafer scale integration and remoted subsystems using opto-electronic transceivers    
United States Patent6567963   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6567963.html
Inventor(s)Trezza; John A. (Nashua, NH)
AbstractAn apparatus and method for optically interconnecting subsystems of a microprocessor system, whether co-located on a common wafer or divided among two or more wafers or substrates. Photo- transceiver arrays adjacent all or selected subsystems are optically interconnected to other subsystems for data transfer, enabled by protocol embedded in the CMOS circuitry in the respective substrates, enabling high speed and large bandwidth communications. Subsystems on a wafer can be located at some distance apart and communicate via the optical interconnect without adverse propagation delays. In a preferred embodiment a central processing unit (CPU) interfaces optically with a plurality of remote memory or co-processor subsystems.



 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History
Drawing from US Patent 6567963
Wafer scale integration and remoted subsystems using opto-electronic
     transceivers - US Patent 6567963 Drawing
Wafer scale integration and remoted subsystems using opto-electronic transceivers
Inventor     Trezza; John A. (Nashua, NH)
Owner/Assignee     Tera Connect, Inc. (Nashua, NH)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Publication Date     May 20, 2003
Application Number     09/693,664
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     October 20, 2000
US Classification     716/8 716/10 716/9
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Siek; Vuthe
Assistant Examiner     Tat; Binh
Attorney/Law Firm     Maine & Asmus
Address
Parent Case     CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/165,562 filed Nov. 15, 1999; Ser. No. 60/161,170, filed Oct. 22, 1999; and is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/653,727, filed Sep. 1, 2000, and which are all incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     716/8 716/9 716/10 257/82 257/83 257/185 359/163 359/622 710/14
Patent Tags     wafer scale integration remoted subsystems opto-electronic transceivers
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
6147366
Drottar

Nov,2000

[0 after 0 votes]
5987196
Noble

Nov,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5951627
Kiamilev et al.

Sep,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5923796
Feldman et al.

Jul,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5909303
Trazza et al.

Jun,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5896213
Nagahori et al.

Apr,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5866443
Pogge et al.

Feb,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5858814
Goossen et al.

Jan,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5857042
Robertson et al.

Jan,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5818984
Ahmad et al.

Oct,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5805548
Ishihara

Sep,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5761350
Koh

Jun,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5715274
Rostoker et al.

Feb,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5667132
Chirovsky et al.

Sep,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5579426
Li et al.

Nov,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5568574
Tanguay, Jr. et al.

Oct,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5535036
Grant

Jul,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5533158
Han et al.

Jul,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5506383
Chen

Apr,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5472914
Martin et al.

Dec,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5469526
Rawlings

Nov,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5428704
Lebby et al.

Jun,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5420954
Swirhun et al.

May,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5333225
Jacobowitz et al.

Jul,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5324932
Niewisch

Jun,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5313536
Rossi et al.

May,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5289303
Cloonan et al.

Feb,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5241610
Labiche et al.

Aug,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5200631
Austin et al.

Apr,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5009476
Reid et al.

Apr,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4989935
Stein

Feb,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4966430
Weidel

Oct,1990

[0 after 0 votes]
4422088
Gfeller

Dec,1983

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. A semiconductor microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate, comprising: said microprocessor system divided on said substrate into at least two subsystems, each said subsystems being overlaid with and electrically connected for data transfer to a respective semiconductor photo-transceiver array, said respective photo-transceiver arrays being optically interconnected for said data transfer, said substrate containing CMOS circuitry for each said subsystem and respective photo-transceiver array, said CMOS circuitry incorporating communications protocol for enabling said data transfer.

2. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 1, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a Memory unit.

3. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 1, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a Digital Signal Processing unit.

4. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 1, said being optically interconnected comprising a fiber optic bundle connecting said respective photo-transceiver arrays.

5. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 1, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a backup chip.

6. A semiconductor microprocessor system comprising; said microprocessor system divided into at least two subsystems, each said subsystem on a respective silicon substrate, each said subsystem being overlaid with and electrically connected for data transfer to respective semiconductor photo-transceiver arrays, said respective photo-transceiver arrays being optically interconnected for said data transfer, each said substrate containing CMOS circuitry for its respective said subsystem and respective said photo-transceiver array, said CMOS circuitry incorporating suitable communications protocol for enabling said data transfer.

7. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 6, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a Memory unit.

8. A semiconductor microprocessor system according to claim 6, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a co-processor device.

9. A method for interconnecting subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate comprising the steps: (a) dividing a single wafer layout for said microprocessor system into at least two said subsystems, (b) providing for data transfer channels between said subsystems in said layout with electrical contacts in each said subsystem for connecting said data transfer channels to respective semiconductor photo-transceiver arrays, (c) incorporating communications protocol in CMOS circuitry in each said subsystem layout for data transfer between said subsystems, (d) fabricating said single wafer substrate with said CMOS circuitry for each said subsystem, (e) aligning, attaching and electrically connecting said photo-transceiver array to each said subsection, (f) optically interconnecting respective said photo-transceiver arrays for said data transfer.

10. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate according to claim 9, said at least two subsystems being a CPU and a Memory Unit.

11. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate according to claim 9, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a coprocessor device.

12. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate according to claim 9, said optically interconnecting comprising installing a fiber optic bundle connecting said respective photo-transceiver arrays.

13. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate according to claim 12, said fiber optic bundle being rigid.

14. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system on a single wafer silicon substrate according to claim 12, said fiber optic bundle being flexible.

15. A method for interconnecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system where said subsystems are divided among at least two silicon substrates, comprising the steps: (a) dividing the subsystem layouts of a master layout for a said microprocessor system for fabrication on said at least two silicon substrates, (b) providing electrical contacts in said subsystem layouts for semiconductor phototransceiver arrays for data transfer channels between said substrates, (c) incorporating communications protocol in CMOS circuitry in each said subsystem layout for data transfer between said substrates, (d) fabricating said substrates with said CMOS circuitry for each said subsystem, (e) aligning, attaching and electrically connecting a said photo-transceiver array to each said substrate, and (f) optically interconnecting respective said photo-transceiver arrays for said data transfer.

16. A method for connecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system according to claim 15, said at least two subsystems being a CPU and a Memory Unit.

17. A method for connecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system according to claim 15, one said subsystem being a CPU, another said subsystem being a Digital Signal Processing unit or other arithmetic coprocessor device.

18. A method for connecting the subsystems of a microprocessor system according to claim 15, said optically interconnecting comprising installing a fiber optic bundle connecting said respective photo-transceiver arrays.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field of the Invention

This invention most generally relates to data transfer and broadband communication networks within a parallel computing system or a local area network. In particular, the present invention relates to wafer scale integration of optoelectronics.

2. Background of the Invention

Technological advancements have dramatically increased the capabilities and possibilities of computing electronics. The increased bandwidth and data transfer rates have resulted in commercial innovation and scientific advancements in many fields. However, data transfer continues to be a bottleneck. This is true for data transfer within an integrated circuit (IC), from one chip to another, from hybrid circuit to hybrid circuit, from integrated circuit board to another integrated circuit board, and from system to system.

Another driving factor leading to ever increasing demands for faster data transfer rates is the need to do tasks that are more complex, requiring multiple computing nodes to cooperate. Digital signal processing, image analysis, and communications technology all require a greater bandwidth. The demand for increased data transfer capability and greater bandwidth translates into increases in both the speed of the data transfer, and the amount of data that is transferred per unit time.

In general, the problems associated with data transfer within an IC and on a system network are similar. Increasing the data transfer rate can be done in any of several ways. Some increase in the data transfer rate can be obtained by increasing the speed at which signals are communicated from one part of a system or network to another. Presently, the fastest known transfer means is the use of optical signals that operate at the speed of light.

Another means to reduce system delays is to increase the bandwidth being used. In this approach, more information is sent at one time. Since the vast majority of systems and networks now are digital, the measure of the increase in bandwidth is in terms of the number of bits on a bus.

There are limitations to the available bandwidth, such as spacing and size requirements, noise problems, reliability of connectors, processing times, buffer size, and the power required to drive multiple lines off-chip. Increasing the transmission speed also has some limitations, as increasing the speed also increases power requirements, introduces timing skew problems across a channel, and usually requires more exotic processing than is standard practice. Combining higher transmission speeds and more bandwidth is exceedingly difficult and impractical.

Whether transferring data within a circuit or connecting system to system, the limited bandwidth of conventional hardware does not satisfy the marketplace. For high data rate transmissions, only fiber optics transmit data at Gigabit data rates. Fiber optic communication systems allow information to be transmitted by means of binary digital transmission. The data or information that is to be transmitted is converted into a stream of light pulses, wherein the presence of a pulse corresponds to the transmission of a binary "one," and the absence of light corresponds to the transmission of a binary "zero." An optical receiver is used to convert the stream of light pulses into an electrical signal that is processed to determine the transmitted information.

Typically the optical transmitters are light emitting devices such as vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELS) and light detecting devices such as photodiodes. The optical transmitters and receivers may be encompassed in a separate chip or fabricated on the same substrate and with accompanying electronics. The fabrication process is well known in the art and U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,401 provides background materials, and is incorporated by reference.

The transmitters have driver circuitry that drives the VCSELS, while the receivers also have receiver circuitry for processing the received signals. The transmitter driver circuitry and the receiver driver circuitry is usually in the form of ASIC devices. The combination of the VCSELS and photodiodes along with the ASIC driver circuitry is called an optical transceiver. One embodiment for hybridization of the transceiver elements is via flip-chip bonding, which is generally explained in U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,814, incorporated by reference herein.

Optical fibers are used to transmit the optical data off the transceiver device and the fibers mate with the transceiver for data transfer. A spacing problem exists when there are large arrays of transceivers and corresponding optic cables mating to each emitter and detector. The coupling and alignment of these multiple fiber optic cables is exceedingly difficult and there is a high defect rate in large bundles.

In particular, data transfer in and out of a processor is a major concern. If the memory resides off the chip and is connected by traditional electronic means, data access is particularly slow. Even if it is on the chip, the current capabilities of reticles limit the amount of memory that is possible to put on the chip.

In recent years, there has been increased interest in systems on a chip. The logical extension of this idea is the system on a wafer, so called wafer scale integration. There are advantages to integrating an entire system on a wafer. First, the entire mask set can be designed for a particular function, much like current microprocessors, but at a higher level. Second, the entire wafer experiences the same set of process conditions. Many circuits exhibit slight process dependencies such as shifts in threshold voltages in MOSFETs and it is advantageous for all of the MOSFETs in a system to exhibit the same sensitivities. A further benefit of wafer scale integration is that all of the elements of a circuit can be processed at the same time.

However, with existing wafer fabrication technology there are some severe constraints posed by the need to have circuit elements such as memory, and some supporting circuitry, physically close to the processor section of a chip. The reason for this requirement is that as the distance between circuit elements increases, so does the signal propagation delays. The signal propagation increases the delay associated with transferring data to and from memory, and the need to accommodate current interconnection schemes. To account for the additional signal delay it becomes necessary to slow the data rate into and out of memory.

A prior art example of the spatial relationship between the processor section and the memory is shown in FIG. 1. The central processing unit (CPU) 10 is located in some small portion of the chip 30, while the memory cells 20 are located as near as possible in order to minimize distance and therein minimize propagation delays. It is apparent that only a certain quantity of memory devices may be located in close proximity to the CPU. Additional memory devices may be located at a greater distance on the chip or be located off chip. In either scenario, the increased distance translates into propagation delays.

An additional problem involved in wafer integration deals with the internal connections. The imaging process involved in forming integrated circuits must be done in a `step and repeat` manner because of limitations in imaging extremely fine structures across a large area. In sum, there are challenges associated with reliably making connections from one portion of a wafer to another using conventional lithographic techniques if the distances are too great.

The factors that limit the transferal of data to and from processors on a wafer become even more acute as compared to system level impediments. Though transfer rates within a chip are quite high, the inter-chip data transfer rates are appreciably slower than the intra-chip data transfer rates. This problem is due, in part, to the limited area on the perimeter of integrated circuits, which traditionally contains the Input/Output (I/O) buffers needed to drive signals off-chip. Consequently, there is often a severe limitation on the number of bits available for any external bus. Thus, an external data bus can be a significant bottleneck to improving system performance. At present, the largest bus sizes are only 64 bits wide.

Some attempts have been made to address the aforementioned problems. Considerable work has been done to develop optical interconnect technology for mating transceivers with silicon die, but the current systems are still very limited in bandwidth.

In summary, conventional methods for communicating data between a CPU and memory cells on chips are slow and bandwidth limited. Furtherm