or
Bookmark and Share
System and method for grating profile classification
   
Document Number
US Patent 6636843
Issued Date
October 21, 2003
Link
Inventors
Map
Abstract
Grating profile data is classified using a cluster generator to generate a plurality of clusters of grating profile data points from a data space containing grating profile data points. The cluster generator associates profile shape data to each cluster, and links the associated profile shape data to the grating profiles belonging to each cluster.
Tags:
Description:
Amusing 0%
Clever 0%
Complex 0%
Efficient 0%
Historic 0%
Important 0%
Innovative 0%
Interesting 0%
Practical 0%
Simple 0%
Number of Claims:
11
Comments:
no comments yet
Owner
Timbre Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)
Published
October 21, 2003
Application Number
09/737,705
Filed
December 14, 2000
US Classification
706/46   706/12 706/934
Int'l Classification
G02B   5/18   (20060101)  
Examiner
Assistant Examiner
Attorney/Law Firm
Parent Case
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application relates to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/727,531, entitled "Clustering For Data Compression" by Doddi, Srinivas filed on Nov. 28, 2000, owned by the assignee of this application and incorporated herein by reference.
USPTO Field of Search
706/46   706/12   706/934   707/100  
Related Patents
6792328 - Metrology diffraction signal adaptation for tool-to-tool matching - Owned by Timbre Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)

A method and system in integrated circuit metrology for adapting a metrology system to work with diverse metrology devices. One embodiment is a method and system for generating signal adjustment data to adapt measured diffraction signals to enable use of a library of diffraction signals and structure profiles created for a different metrology device. Another embodiment is the creation and use of a data store of diffraction adjustment vectors and metrology device specifications relative to a reference device specification.

6768983 - System and method for real-time library generation of grating profiles - Owned by Timbre Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)

The present invention provides a method and a system for a real-time configurable definition and generation of grating profile libraries. A parameter set is used to specify the ranges of grating dimensions and resolutions of the profile library to be generated. In one embodiment, a compiler creates subsets of a large profile library, the subset designed to enable rapid search and validation of real-time data. In another embodiment, an automatic process generates a new parameter set and a new subset of the library when trigger conditions are met. Subsets of the profile library may be used to check if grating spectrum data are within the ranges established for an application and if the dimensions are within the process averages established for a manufacturing run. The system for generation of grating profile libraries is scalable, operable in a distributed environment, and includes application specific items that can be selected or determined by the client.

7305322 - Using a virtual profile library - Owned by Tokyo Electron Limited (Tokyo,JP)

To determine the profile of an integrated circuit structure, a signal is measured off the structure with a metrology device. The measured signal is compared to signals in a virtual profile library. The comparison is stopped if matching criteria are met. A subset of a virtual profile data space is determined when the matching criteria are not met. The subset is determined using profile data space associated with the library. A virtual profile signal of the subset is selected. Virtual profile shape/parameters are determined based on the virtual profile signal. A difference is calculated between the measured and virtual profile signals. The difference is compared to virtual profile library creation criteria. If the criteria are met, then the structure is identified using virtual profile data, which includes the virtual profile shape/parameters, associated with the virtual profile signal. Or, if the criteria are not met, then a corrective action is applied.

7221989 - Optical metrology model optimization for process control - Owned by Tokyo Electron Limited (Tokyo,JP)

To evaluate the adequacy of a profile model, one or more types of process control to be used in controlling a fabrication process are selected. Profile model parameters and acceptable ranges for the profile model parameters are selected. A first and second metrology tools are selected. Statistical metric criteria that define an acceptable amount of variation in measurements obtained using the first and second tools are set. A profile model is selected. A measurement of the profile model parameters is obtained using the first tool and the selected profile model. A measurement of the one or more profile model parameters is obtained using the second tool. Statistical metric criteria are calculated based on the measurements of the one or more profile model parameters obtained using the first and second tools. The calculated and set statistical metric criteria are compared to evaluate the adequacy of the selected profile model.

7065423 - Optical metrology model optimization for process control - Owned by Timbre Technologies, Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)

To evaluate the adequacy of a profile model, one or more types of process control to be used in controlling a fabrication process are selected. Profile model parameters and acceptable ranges for the profile model parameters are selected. A first and second metrology tools are selected. Statistical metric criteria that define an acceptable amount of variation in measurements obtained using the first and second tools are set. A profile model is selected. A measurement of the profile model parameters is obtained using the first tool and the selected profile model. A measurement of the one or more profile model parameters is obtained using the second tool. Statistical metric criteria are calculated based on the measurements of the one or more profile model parameters obtained using the first and second tools. The calculated and set statistical metric criteria are compared to evaluate the adequacy of the selected profile model.

Claims
Description
About| FAQs| Terms & Disclaimer| Link to Us| Contact Us