|
|  Get related patents on CD |
| United States Patent | 6659159 |
| Link to this page | http://www.wikipatents.com/6659159.html |
| Inventor(s) | Fritsche; Mark (Eagan, MN), Berg; Dan (Minneapolis, MN), Johnson; Jason (Minneapolis, MN) |
| Abstract | A screen mounting apparatus for mounting a graphic display screen for use
with display stands or booths, such as those used in trade shows and other
exhibitions. The apparatus is designed to receive, generally by adhesive
affixation, a display graphics screen such that generally the entire
length of one of the screen edges is affixed to the apparatus, with the
length of the screen edge and the apparatus generally equaling that of the
corresponding display frame segment. Additionally, the screen mounting
apparatus includes an elastic portion which permits a limited degree of
resilient movement when force is placed upon the screen at assembly and
disassembly. The tension force required to mount the apparatus and the
affixed screen to a display frame is thus distributed along the entire
surface of the apparatus and screen, and not at isolated fastening points. |
| |
|
Title Information  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication Date |
December 9, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Filing Date |
September 13, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Information  |
|
|
References  |
|
|
| *references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references |
|
U.S. References |
|
|
| Add a new US reference: |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | 6505669 Lilie et al.
Jan,2003 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6276082 Richards et al.
Aug,2001 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6209245 Wittenberg
Apr,2001 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 6164364 Morris
Dec,2000 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5797223 Shoup et al.
Aug,1998 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5537766 Nickens et al.
Jul,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5517779 Coleman
May,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5507109 Rinzler
Apr,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5501051 Harlan
Mar,1996 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5245774 Huber
Sep,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5248044 Szilvasi
Sep,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5205337 Bozzo
Apr,1993 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5115623 Ahlberg
May,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5097761 Hamu
Mar,1992 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 5042551 Ein et al.
Aug,1991 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4860814 Vilmann et al.
Aug,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4800663 Zeigler
Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4799299 Campbell
Jan,1989 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4658560 Beaulieu
Apr,1987 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4549334 Miller
Oct,1985 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4471548 Goudie
Sep,1984 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4351411 Inoue
Sep,1982 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4194313 Downing
Mar,1980 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4173803 Kennedy
Nov,1979 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4107826 Tysdal
Aug,1978 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 4028230 Rosenblum
Jun,1977 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3975850 Giaume
Aug,1976 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3824753 Anderson
Jul,1974 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | 3373464 Ausnit
Mar,1968 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
U.S. References |
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign References |
|
|
Other References |
|
|
| Add a new Other reference: |
| Post related web sites and other references in this section |
| | Reference | Relevancy | Comments | Skyline Displays, Inc., ps2000 brochure, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Skyline Displays, Inc., imagine that. brochure, 2000.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Skyline Displays, Inc. design ideas brochure,2000.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Skyline Displays, Inc., How Do You Market Your e-Business Offline? brochure, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Skyline Displays, Inc., mirage plus brochure, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Syline Displays, Inc., skytruss brochure, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Trussworks, Truss Catalog web page printout, Truss Parts, Aug. 17, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Trussworks, Truss Catalog web page printout, Trussworks Photos, Graphics Frame, p. 1, Aug. 17, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Trussworks, Truss Catalog web page printout, Trussworks Photos, Graphics Frame, p. 2, Aug. 17, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Trussworks, Truss Catalog web page printout, Trussworks Photos, Exhibit Photos, p. 1, Aug. 17, 2001.
. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | Trussworks, Truss Catalog web page printout, Trussworks Photos, Graphics Frame, p. 12 Aug. 17, 2001.. Sep,2007 |      Your vote accepted [0 after 0 votes] | | |
|
|
|
|
Other References |
|
|
|
|
|
References  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Review  |
|
|
Technical Review  |
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
What is claimed is:
1. In a portable, disassemblable display structure for displaying graphic material, the display structure including a display frame having a pair of horizontal support members
vertically spaced from one another, and a screen constructed of sheet material, the screen having a width substantially equal to the horizontal span of the horizontal support members and a height substantially equal to the vertical spacing of the
horizontal support members, the improvement comprising a screen mounting apparatus for use in mounting the screen to the display frame, the apparatus including: a frame clasping attachment portion removably securable to the display frame; a screen
material attachment portion adapted to fixedly receive an end portion of the screen such that substantially the entire length of the end portion of the screen is fixedly received; and an elastic portion joining the frame clasping portion and the screen
attachment portion such that appropriate force upon the screen attachment portion results in an appropriate resilient displacement of the apparatus.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion extends substantially the width of the screen attachment portion.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is integral with the screen attachment portion.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the frame clasping portion and the screen attachment portion are formed from dual durometer plastic.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a clip is attached to the frame clasping portion for removably securing the screen mounting apparatus to the display frame.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is generally C-shaped.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is generally S-shaped.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion includes a hinge portion.
9. In a portable, disassemblable display structure for displaying graphic material, the display structure including a display frame and a screen, the improvement comprising a screen mounting apparatus for use in mounting the screen to the
display frame including: frame clasping means removably securable to the display frame; screen attachment means adapted to fixedly receive an end portion of the screen such that substantially the entire length of the end portion of the screen is fixedly
received; and means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means.
10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein said means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means includes a hinge.
11. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein said means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means comprises a spring member.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said spring member comprises folded plastic material.
13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said spring member is formed from elastic material.
14. A portable, manually disassemblable display structure comprising: a framework, including at least a pair of spaced apart columns and a pair of spaced apart horizontal members connecting the columns, the columns and the horizontal members
together forming at least one display frame; a screen having a pair of opposing margins, each margin having a length; and a pair of screen mounting devices for mounting the screen on the display frame, each of the screen mounting devices including: a
screen attachment portion secured to substantially all of the length of a separate one of the pair of opposing margins of the screen; a frame attachment portion removably securable to the display frame; and an elastic portion resiliently coupling the
frame clasping portion and the screen attachment portion.
15. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion comprises folded plastic material.
16. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion is integral with the screen attachment portion and the frame attachment portion.
17. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion comprises elastic material.
18. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion is adapted to hingably couple the screen attachment portion and the frame attachment portion. |
|
|
|
|
Claims  |
|
|
Description  |
|
|
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to displays, and in particular, to an apparatus for removably mounting a screen to the frame of a display unit.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the construction of exhibit and display stands at trade shows, it is a conventional practice to utilize various truss and frame structures to assist in erecting and configuring the walls that create the backdrop for a particular vendor's
defined booth space. Screens are traditionally used to substantially cover a large portion of these framing structures. These screens are made of many materials and often contain various designs and graphics for displaying advertisements and
presentation materials. To facilitate flexibility and portability, the screens are usually made of cloth or some other thin flexible material. The screens will generally be rectangular and cover a frame opening that is rectangular in the vertical and
linear or arcuate in the horizontal.
In displaying graphics on a display stand, it is desirable to make the graphic as attractive as possible, along the entire surface of the screen. Consequently, any crimping, binding, buckling, wrinkling, or other unattractive deviations is
surface flatness are ideally avoided. However, it must be kept in mind that these graphics screens must be easily attachable and removable from the framing. As a result, permanent and rigid screening materials are not feasible since a display stand,
like those used in trade shows, must be frequently assembled and disassembled.
Attempts have been made to implement screen mounting means that increase the appearance of the screen while at the same time provide a cost and time efficient design that will properly accommodate the innate portability feature of display stands. However, this pursuit has proved difficult. One of the goals is inevitably sacrificed for another.
The most common solutions typically center around the use of mounting means such as hook and loop fasteners ("Velcro.RTM."), magnetic strips, or some combination thereof. Generally, these mounting means are designed so that the flushness or
tightness of the screen can be controlled through the attachment to the display framing. Magnetic or Velcro.RTM. strips border the back of the screens (usually the edges) such that they match up with similar strips on the surface of the frame. Often,
the mounting means will extend around the entire perimeter of the screen. These strips are viewed as inexpensive. Most importantly, the ability to make fine adjustments along selective and multiple screen surface areas is likely perceived to be the
most advantageous characteristic of the magnetic and Velcro.RTM. strips. However, it is this adjustability characteristic that proves to be a problem. Fine adjustments are typically required, and are often quite time consuming. An adjustment to one
surface problem area will often require multiple adjustments to other areas in order to achieve the desired screen-wide smoothness. In addition, an adjustment in one area will often introduce a problem in another unanticipated area. While disassembly
is quick and easy, mounting visually acceptable screen displays can take an unreasonable amount of time, and take a toll on one's patience.
Other common screen mounting means center around various fasteners. Namely, snaps and clips are traditionally used to attach a screen to the frame at the top and bottom of the frame, and occasionally along the sides of the frame. The snaps,
clips, or other fasteners are distantly spaced for attaching the screen to the frame. Consequently, the use of such fasteners invariably results in wrinkling or buckling of the screen since the mounting pressure of the fasteners is directed to focal
areas along the screen and is not equally distributed along the entire surface of the screen.
There are some unconventional screen mounting means that are utilized as well. U.S. Pat. No. 5,537,766 is directed to an apparatus that utilizes "frictional engagement" to attach a screen covering to the display panels. This apparatus is a
gear system that receives an end of the screen. A rotational adjustment of the gear system draws the screen into the gears (tightening the screen surface) or releasably withdraws the screen (loosening the screen surface), depending upon the direction of
the rotational adjustment. While use of this type of system in relatively simple, it also has drawbacks. Specifically, the added complexity and mechanical vulnerability of these moving gear parts is problematic.
Another unconventional screen mounting approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,658,560 ('560). '560 utilizes a mounting groove within the screen itself, in addition to magnetic strips. The groove is essentially a hook on the attaching end of
the screen such that the screen will hang over a mounting rod on the display framing. With such a design, the weight of the screen is distributed equally along the entire length of the screen surface. The weight and elasticity of the screen itself is
relied upon to prevent unwanted surface buckling and wrinkling. However, since the groove or hook is incorporated within the screen material, the benefits are limited to elastic material of appreciable weight. For instance, if the screen is made of an
inelastic cloth or polymer, it will still be necessary to use other mounting means such as magnets or Velcro.RTM. to tightly secure the sides and opposite end of the screen to the frame in order to achieve the desired level of distributed tension across
the entire length of the screen. With such inelastic screens, it will also be difficult or impossible to mount a screen that relies upon these mounting grooves at each end of the screen. So while this groove mounting technique is beneficial with
respect to reducing screen wrinkling, the benefits are only realized with elastic screens, and therefore, greatly limiting its usefulness.
As | | |