WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Screen mounting apparatus    

Get related patents on CD
United States Patent6659159   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/6659159.html
Inventor(s)Fritsche; Mark (Eagan, MN), Berg; Dan (Minneapolis, MN), Johnson; Jason (Minneapolis, MN)
AbstractA screen mounting apparatus for mounting a graphic display screen for use with display stands or booths, such as those used in trade shows and other exhibitions. The apparatus is designed to receive, generally by adhesive affixation, a display graphics screen such that generally the entire length of one of the screen edges is affixed to the apparatus, with the length of the screen edge and the apparatus generally equaling that of the corresponding display frame segment. Additionally, the screen mounting apparatus includes an elastic portion which permits a limited degree of resilient movement when force is placed upon the screen at assembly and disassembly. The tension force required to mount the apparatus and the affixed screen to a display frame is thus distributed along the entire surface of the apparatus and screen, and not at isolated fastening points.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History Custom Search
Inventor     Fritsche; Mark (Eagan, MN) , Berg; Dan (Minneapolis, MN) , Johnson; Jason (Minneapolis, MN)
Owner/Assignee     Skyline Displays, Inc. (Eagan, MN)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     December 9, 2003
Application Number     09/953,099
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     September 13, 2001
US Classification     160/371 160/135 160/351 40/610
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Lev; Bruce A.
Assistant Examiner    
Attorney/Law Firm     Patterson,Thuente, Skaar, & Christensen, P.A.
Address
Parent Case    
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     160/135 160/351 160/371 160/377 160/378 160/380 160/382 160/392 160/395 160/398 160/399 160/402 40/605 40/610 52/646
Patent Tags     screen mounting
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
6505669
Lilie et al.

Jan,2003

[0 after 0 votes]
6276082
Richards et al.

Aug,2001

[0 after 0 votes]
6209245
Wittenberg

Apr,2001

[0 after 0 votes]
6164364
Morris

Dec,2000

[0 after 0 votes]
5797223
Shoup et al.

Aug,1998

[0 after 0 votes]
5537766
Nickens et al.

Jul,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5517779
Coleman

May,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5507109
Rinzler

Apr,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5501051
Harlan

Mar,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5245774
Huber

Sep,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5248044
Szilvasi

Sep,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5205337
Bozzo

Apr,1993

[0 after 0 votes]
5115623
Ahlberg

May,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5097761
Hamu

Mar,1992

[0 after 0 votes]
5042551
Ein et al.

Aug,1991

[0 after 0 votes]
4860814
Vilmann et al.

Aug,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4800663
Zeigler

Jan,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4799299
Campbell

Jan,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
4658560
Beaulieu

Apr,1987

[0 after 0 votes]
4549334
Miller

Oct,1985

[0 after 0 votes]
4471548
Goudie

Sep,1984

[0 after 0 votes]
4351411
Inoue

Sep,1982

[0 after 0 votes]
4194313
Downing

Mar,1980

[0 after 0 votes]
4173803
Kennedy

Nov,1979

[0 after 0 votes]
4107826
Tysdal

Aug,1978

[0 after 0 votes]
4028230
Rosenblum

Jun,1977

[0 after 0 votes]
3975850
Giaume

Aug,1976

[0 after 0 votes]
3824753
Anderson

Jul,1974

[0 after 0 votes]
3373464
Ausnit

Mar,1968

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 reasonable royalty comments]
Public's "Guesstimation" of Royalty Value
Market SizeN/A[No votes]
xMarket ShareN/A[No votes]
xReasonable RoyaltyN/A[No votes]

N/A

[0 Guesstimation of Royalty Value Comments]
License Availablity
If you are NOT the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 license availability comments]
License Availablity
If you ARE the owner or assignee, answer here:
Yes, license is available for purchase

No, license is not currently available



[No votes]
[0 owner/assignee comments]
Competitive Advantage
Does this invention have a significant competitive advantage over similar technologies?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful competitive advantage comment
[No comments]

[0 competitive advantage comments]
Commercial Alternatives
Are there viable commercial alternatives for this invention?
Yes

No



[No votes]
Most helpful commercial alternative comment
[No comments]

[0 commercial alternatives comments]
 Technical Review Submit all comments and votes
 Claims Submit all comments and votes
 


What is claimed is:

1. In a portable, disassemblable display structure for displaying graphic material, the display structure including a display frame having a pair of horizontal support members vertically spaced from one another, and a screen constructed of sheet material, the screen having a width substantially equal to the horizontal span of the horizontal support members and a height substantially equal to the vertical spacing of the horizontal support members, the improvement comprising a screen mounting apparatus for use in mounting the screen to the display frame, the apparatus including: a frame clasping attachment portion removably securable to the display frame; a screen material attachment portion adapted to fixedly receive an end portion of the screen such that substantially the entire length of the end portion of the screen is fixedly received; and an elastic portion joining the frame clasping portion and the screen attachment portion such that appropriate force upon the screen attachment portion results in an appropriate resilient displacement of the apparatus.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion extends substantially the width of the screen attachment portion.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is integral with the screen attachment portion.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the frame clasping portion and the screen attachment portion are formed from dual durometer plastic.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a clip is attached to the frame clasping portion for removably securing the screen mounting apparatus to the display frame.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is generally C-shaped.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion is generally S-shaped.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the elastic portion includes a hinge portion.

9. In a portable, disassemblable display structure for displaying graphic material, the display structure including a display frame and a screen, the improvement comprising a screen mounting apparatus for use in mounting the screen to the display frame including: frame clasping means removably securable to the display frame; screen attachment means adapted to fixedly receive an end portion of the screen such that substantially the entire length of the end portion of the screen is fixedly received; and means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means.

10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein said means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means includes a hinge.

11. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein said means for resiliently joining the frame clasping means and the screen attachment means comprises a spring member.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said spring member comprises folded plastic material.

13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said spring member is formed from elastic material.

14. A portable, manually disassemblable display structure comprising: a framework, including at least a pair of spaced apart columns and a pair of spaced apart horizontal members connecting the columns, the columns and the horizontal members together forming at least one display frame; a screen having a pair of opposing margins, each margin having a length; and a pair of screen mounting devices for mounting the screen on the display frame, each of the screen mounting devices including: a screen attachment portion secured to substantially all of the length of a separate one of the pair of opposing margins of the screen; a frame attachment portion removably securable to the display frame; and an elastic portion resiliently coupling the frame clasping portion and the screen attachment portion.

15. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion comprises folded plastic material.

16. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion is integral with the screen attachment portion and the frame attachment portion.

17. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion comprises elastic material.

18. The display structure of claim 14, wherein the elastic portion is adapted to hingably couple the screen attachment portion and the frame attachment portion.
 Description Submit all comments and votes
 


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to displays, and in particular, to an apparatus for removably mounting a screen to the frame of a display unit.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the construction of exhibit and display stands at trade shows, it is a conventional practice to utilize various truss and frame structures to assist in erecting and configuring the walls that create the backdrop for a particular vendor's defined booth space. Screens are traditionally used to substantially cover a large portion of these framing structures. These screens are made of many materials and often contain various designs and graphics for displaying advertisements and presentation materials. To facilitate flexibility and portability, the screens are usually made of cloth or some other thin flexible material. The screens will generally be rectangular and cover a frame opening that is rectangular in the vertical and linear or arcuate in the horizontal.

In displaying graphics on a display stand, it is desirable to make the graphic as attractive as possible, along the entire surface of the screen. Consequently, any crimping, binding, buckling, wrinkling, or other unattractive deviations is surface flatness are ideally avoided. However, it must be kept in mind that these graphics screens must be easily attachable and removable from the framing. As a result, permanent and rigid screening materials are not feasible since a display stand, like those used in trade shows, must be frequently assembled and disassembled.

Attempts have been made to implement screen mounting means that increase the appearance of the screen while at the same time provide a cost and time efficient design that will properly accommodate the innate portability feature of display stands. However, this pursuit has proved difficult. One of the goals is inevitably sacrificed for another.

The most common solutions typically center around the use of mounting means such as hook and loop fasteners ("Velcro.RTM."), magnetic strips, or some combination thereof. Generally, these mounting means are designed so that the flushness or tightness of the screen can be controlled through the attachment to the display framing. Magnetic or Velcro.RTM. strips border the back of the screens (usually the edges) such that they match up with similar strips on the surface of the frame. Often, the mounting means will extend around the entire perimeter of the screen. These strips are viewed as inexpensive. Most importantly, the ability to make fine adjustments along selective and multiple screen surface areas is likely perceived to be the most advantageous characteristic of the magnetic and Velcro.RTM. strips. However, it is this adjustability characteristic that proves to be a problem. Fine adjustments are typically required, and are often quite time consuming. An adjustment to one surface problem area will often require multiple adjustments to other areas in order to achieve the desired screen-wide smoothness. In addition, an adjustment in one area will often introduce a problem in another unanticipated area. While disassembly is quick and easy, mounting visually acceptable screen displays can take an unreasonable amount of time, and take a toll on one's patience.

Other common screen mounting means center around various fasteners. Namely, snaps and clips are traditionally used to attach a screen to the frame at the top and bottom of the frame, and occasionally along the sides of the frame. The snaps, clips, or other fasteners are distantly spaced for attaching the screen to the frame. Consequently, the use of such fasteners invariably results in wrinkling or buckling of the screen since the mounting pressure of the fasteners is directed to focal areas along the screen and is not equally distributed along the entire surface of the screen.

There are some unconventional screen mounting means that are utilized as well. U.S. Pat. No. 5,537,766 is directed to an apparatus that utilizes "frictional engagement" to attach a screen covering to the display panels. This apparatus is a gear system that receives an end of the screen. A rotational adjustment of the gear system draws the screen into the gears (tightening the screen surface) or releasably withdraws the screen (loosening the screen surface), depending upon the direction of the rotational adjustment. While use of this type of system in relatively simple, it also has drawbacks. Specifically, the added complexity and mechanical vulnerability of these moving gear parts is problematic.

Another unconventional screen mounting approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,658,560 ('560). '560 utilizes a mounting groove within the screen itself, in addition to magnetic strips. The groove is essentially a hook on the attaching end of the screen such that the screen will hang over a mounting rod on the display framing. With such a design, the weight of the screen is distributed equally along the entire length of the screen surface. The weight and elasticity of the screen itself is relied upon to prevent unwanted surface buckling and wrinkling. However, since the groove or hook is incorporated within the screen material, the benefits are limited to elastic material of appreciable weight. For instance, if the screen is made of an inelastic cloth or polymer, it will still be necessary to use other mounting means such as magnets or Velcro.RTM. to tightly secure the sides and opposite end of the screen to the frame in order to achieve the desired level of distributed tension across the entire length of the screen. With such inelastic screens, it will also be difficult or impossible to mount a screen that relies upon these mounting grooves at each end of the screen. So while this groove mounting technique is beneficial with respect to reducing screen wrinkling, the benefits are only realized with elastic screens, and therefore, greatly limiting its usefulness.

As