WikiPatents - Community Patent Review
Create Free Account  |  License or Sell Your Patent  |  WikiPatents Marketplace  |  WikiPatents Blog
Username:  Password:  
    
Advanced Search
Faster processing of multiple spatially-heterodyned direct to digital holograms    

Get related patents on CD
United States Patent7116425   
Link to this pagehttp://www.wikipatents.com/7116425.html
Inventor(s)Hanson; Gregory R. (Clinton, TN), Bingham; Philip R. (Knoxville, TN)
AbstractSystems and methods are described for faster processing of multiple spatially-heterodyned direct to digital holograms. A method includes of obtaining multiple spatially-heterodyned holograms, includes: digitally recording a first spatially-heterodyned hologram including spatial heterodyne fringes for Fourier analysis; digitally recording a second spatially-heterodyned hologram including spatial heterodyne fringes for Fourier analysis; Fourier analyzing the recorded first spatially-heterodyned hologram by shifting a first original origin of the recorded first spatially-heterodyned hologram including spatial heterodyne fringes in Fourier space to sit on top of a spatial-heterodyne carrier frequency defined as a first angle between a first reference beam and a first, object beam; applying a first digital filter to cut off signals around the first original origin and performing an inverse Fourier transform on the result; Fourier analyzing the recorded second spatially-heterodyned hologram by shifting a second original origin of the recorded second spatially-heterodyned hologram including spatial heterodyne fringes in Fourier space to sit on top of a spatial-heterodyne carrier frequency defined as a second angle between a second reference beam and a second object beam; and applying a second digital filter to cut off signals around the second original origin and performing an inverse Fourier transform on the result, wherein digitally recording the first spatially-heterodyned hologram is completed before digitally recording the second spatially-heterodyned hologram and a single digital image includes both the first spatially-heterodyned hologram and the second spatially-heterodyned hologram.
   














 Title Information Submit all comments and votes
 
Patent Text Patent PDF Print Page Summary File History
Plain text PDF images Print Summary File History Custom Search
Inventor     Hanson; Gregory R. (Clinton, TN) , Bingham; Philip R. (Knoxville, TN)
Owner/Assignee     UT-Battelle LLC (Oak Ridge, TN)
Patent assignment
All assignments
Company News
Publication Date     October 3, 2006
Application Number     10/607,840
PAIR File History     Application Data   Transaction History
Image File Wrapper   Patent Term   Fees
Litigation
Filing Date     June 27, 2003
US Classification     356/457 356/484
Int'l Classification    
Examiner     Toatley Jr.; Gregory J.
Assistant Examiner     Connolly; Patrick J.
Attorney/Law Firm     John Bruckner PC
Address
Parent Case     CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 from copending utility patent application U.S. Ser. No. 10/421,444, filed Apr. 23, 2003, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Priority Data    
USPTO Field of Search     356/457 356/458 356/484 356/489
Patent Tags     faster processing multiple spatially-heterodyned direct digital holograms
   
Enter a comma (,) or semicolon (;) between multiple tag words/phrases.
Describe this patent:
 Amusing   
 Clever   
 Complex   
 Efficient   
 Historic   
 Important   
 Innovative   
 Interesting   
 Practical   
 Simple   
[no votes]
Patent WIKI

Share information and news about this patent, including information and news about the technology, inventors, company, ligation and licensing.

 References Submit all comments and votes
 
*references marked with an asterisk below are user-added references
 U.S. References
 
Add a new US reference:  
ReferenceRelevancyCommentsReferenceRelevancyComments
2005/0046858
Hanson et al.

Mar,2005

[0 after 0 votes]
2005/0046857
Bingham et al.

Mar,2005

[0 after 0 votes]
6809845
Kim et al.

Oct,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0213464
Hanson et al.

Oct,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0213462
Hanson et al.

Oct,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0145745
Voelkl

Jul,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0130762
Thomas et al.

Jul,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
6747771
Thomas et al.

Jun,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0066518
Kreuzer

Apr,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0042056
Price et al.

Mar,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0057089
Voelkl

Mar,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0042015
Price

Mar,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2004/0021871
Psaltis et a.

Feb,2004

[0 after 0 votes]
2003/0227658
Thomas et al.

Dec,2003

[0 after 0 votes]
6525821
Thomas et al.

Feb,2003

[0 after 0 votes]
2003/0016364
Thomas et al.

Jan,2003

[0 after 0 votes]
6597446
Klooster et al.

Oct,2002

[0 after 0 votes]
6262818
Cuche et al.

Jul,2001

[0 after 0 votes]
6078392
Thomas et al.

Jun,2000

[0 after 0 votes]
5995251
Hesselink et a.

Nov,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5877873
Bashaw et a.

Mar,1999

[0 after 0 votes]
5671042
Sciammarella

Sep,1997

[0 after 0 votes]
5515183
Hashimoto

May,1996

[0 after 0 votes]
5410397
Toeppen

Apr,1995

[0 after 0 votes]
5339152
Horn

Aug,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
5299035
Leith et al.

Mar,1994

[0 after 0 votes]
4812042
Yokokura et al.

Mar,1989

[0 after 0 votes]
 Foreign References
 Other References
 Market Review Submit all comments and votes
   
Market Size
Estimate the gross annual revenues of the relevant market sector:
> $10B
$5B - $10B
$2B - $5B
$500M - $2B
$100M - $500M
$10M - $100M
$1M - $10M
$500K - $1M
$100K - $500K
< $100K
[No votes]
$0
 
$0   $2.5B   $5B   $7.5B   $10B

[0 market size comments]
Market Share
Estimate the percentage of the relevant market sector this invention will capture:
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%
10 - 24.99%
5 - 9.99%
2 - 4.99%
1 - 1.99%
< 1%
[No votes]
0.0%
 
0%   25%   50%   75%   100%

[0 market share comments]
Reasonable Royalty
What percentage of gross sales should the inventor or assignee be paid?
75% - 100%
50% - 74.99%
25% - 49.99%